Falcon Oil & Gas (FOG) Competitors

Falcon Oil & Gas logo
GBX 16.05 -0.45 (-2.73%)
As of 05/28/2026

FOG vs. RKH, EGY, GKP, ENQ, and PTAL

Should you buy Falcon Oil & Gas stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Falcon Oil & Gas with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Falcon Oil & Gas include Rockhopper Exploration (RKH), VAALCO Energy (EGY), Gulf Keystone Petroleum (GKP), EnQuest (ENQ), and PetroTal (PTAL). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Falcon Oil & Gas compare to Rockhopper Exploration?

Rockhopper Exploration (LON:RKH) and Falcon Oil & Gas (LON:FOG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Falcon Oil & Gas' return on equity of -8.00% beat Rockhopper Exploration's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rockhopper ExplorationN/A -17.25% -1.19%
Falcon Oil & Gas N/A -8.00%-3.61%

Falcon Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rockhopper Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rockhopper ExplorationN/AN/A£19.71K-£6.15N/A
Falcon Oil & GasN/AN/A-£3.52M-£0.20N/A

Rockhopper Exploration has a beta of 1.1822942, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Falcon Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.34988192, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

0.6% of Rockhopper Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of Rockhopper Exploration shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Rockhopper Exploration presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, indicating a potential upside of 87.54%. Given Rockhopper Exploration's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Rockhopper Exploration is more favorable than Falcon Oil & Gas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rockhopper Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Falcon Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Rockhopper Exploration's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Falcon Oil & Gas'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Rockhopper Exploration Neutral
Falcon Oil & Gas Neutral

Summary

Rockhopper Exploration beats Falcon Oil & Gas on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Falcon Oil & Gas compare to VAALCO Energy?

VAALCO Energy (LON:EGY) and Falcon Oil & Gas (LON:FOG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

VAALCO Energy has a net margin of 17.82% compared to Falcon Oil & Gas' net margin of 0.00%. VAALCO Energy's return on equity of 18.19% beat Falcon Oil & Gas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
VAALCO Energy17.82% 18.19% 12.17%
Falcon Oil & Gas N/A -8.00%-3.61%

VAALCO Energy has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Falcon Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.34988192, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

45.7% of VAALCO Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.4% of VAALCO Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

VAALCO Energy currently has a consensus target price of GBX 615, suggesting a potential upside of 46.43%. Given VAALCO Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe VAALCO Energy is more favorable than Falcon Oil & Gas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
VAALCO Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Falcon Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

VAALCO Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Falcon Oil & Gas. Falcon Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VAALCO Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
VAALCO Energy£311.54M1.44£85.04M-£137.00N/A
Falcon Oil & GasN/AN/A-£3.52M-£0.20N/A

In the previous week, VAALCO Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Falcon Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for VAALCO Energy and 0 mentions for Falcon Oil & Gas. VAALCO Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Falcon Oil & Gas' score of 0.00 indicating that VAALCO Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
VAALCO Energy Positive
Falcon Oil & Gas Neutral

Summary

VAALCO Energy beats Falcon Oil & Gas on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Falcon Oil & Gas compare to Gulf Keystone Petroleum?

Falcon Oil & Gas (LON:FOG) and Gulf Keystone Petroleum (LON:GKP) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

Falcon Oil & Gas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gulf Keystone Petroleum. Falcon Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Keystone Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Falcon Oil & GasN/AN/A-£3.52M-£0.20N/A
Gulf Keystone Petroleum£164.81M2.35-£9.57M£6.6826.65

Gulf Keystone Petroleum has a consensus price target of GBX 272, suggesting a potential upside of 52.81%. Given Gulf Keystone Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gulf Keystone Petroleum is more favorable than Falcon Oil & Gas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Falcon Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gulf Keystone Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Falcon Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.34988192, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gulf Keystone Petroleum has a beta of 0.103, suggesting that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gulf Keystone Petroleum had 1 more articles in the media than Falcon Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gulf Keystone Petroleum and 0 mentions for Falcon Oil & Gas. Falcon Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gulf Keystone Petroleum'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Falcon Oil & Gas Neutral
Gulf Keystone Petroleum Neutral

0.5% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.6% of Gulf Keystone Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.0% of Gulf Keystone Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gulf Keystone Petroleum has a net margin of 9.23% compared to Falcon Oil & Gas' net margin of 0.00%. Gulf Keystone Petroleum's return on equity of 3.18% beat Falcon Oil & Gas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Falcon Oil & GasN/A -8.00% -3.61%
Gulf Keystone Petroleum 9.23%3.18%-0.98%

Summary

Gulf Keystone Petroleum beats Falcon Oil & Gas on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Falcon Oil & Gas compare to EnQuest?

Falcon Oil & Gas (LON:FOG) and EnQuest (LON:ENQ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

0.5% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of EnQuest shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of EnQuest shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, EnQuest's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Falcon Oil & Gas' score of 0.00 indicating that EnQuest is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Falcon Oil & Gas Neutral
EnQuest Positive

EnQuest has higher revenue and earnings than Falcon Oil & Gas. Falcon Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EnQuest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Falcon Oil & GasN/AN/A-£3.52M-£0.20N/A
EnQuest£1.12B0.38£25.24M£0.10230.00

EnQuest has a consensus price target of GBX 25.20, indicating a potential upside of 9.57%. Given EnQuest's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe EnQuest is more favorable than Falcon Oil & Gas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Falcon Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
EnQuest
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

EnQuest has a net margin of 0.22% compared to Falcon Oil & Gas' net margin of 0.00%. EnQuest's return on equity of 0.54% beat Falcon Oil & Gas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Falcon Oil & GasN/A -8.00% -3.61%
EnQuest 0.22%0.54%7.54%

Falcon Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.34988192, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EnQuest has a beta of 0.001, meaning that its share price is 100% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

EnQuest beats Falcon Oil & Gas on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Falcon Oil & Gas compare to PetroTal?

Falcon Oil & Gas (LON:FOG) and PetroTal (LON:PTAL) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Falcon Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.34988192, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PetroTal has a beta of 0.175, suggesting that its share price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Falcon Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PetroTal'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Falcon Oil & Gas Neutral
PetroTal Neutral

PetroTal has a consensus target price of GBX 74, suggesting a potential upside of 183.52%. Given PetroTal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PetroTal is more favorable than Falcon Oil & Gas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Falcon Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
PetroTal
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

PetroTal has a net margin of 11.17% compared to Falcon Oil & Gas' net margin of 0.00%. PetroTal's return on equity of 5.39% beat Falcon Oil & Gas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Falcon Oil & GasN/A -8.00% -3.61%
PetroTal 11.17%5.39%17.91%

PetroTal has higher revenue and earnings than Falcon Oil & Gas. Falcon Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PetroTal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Falcon Oil & GasN/AN/A-£3.52M-£0.20N/A
PetroTal£264.64M0.91£132.43M£4.006.53

0.5% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of PetroTal shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of PetroTal shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PetroTal beats Falcon Oil & Gas on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Falcon Oil & Gas News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FOG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FOG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FOG vs. The Competition

MetricFalcon Oil & GasOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£178.02M£1.86B£9.72B£2.80B
Dividend YieldN/A7.61%10.50%6.16%
P/E Ratio-80.2528.4018.40367.11
Price / SalesN/A2,408.19727.6486,377.90
Price / Cash4.2485.5337.4727.85
Price / Book3.712.274.147.95
Net Income-£3.52M£82.07M£4.24B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-4.83%-3.43%1.38%
1 Month Performance-8.29%-8.60%-6.77%1.63%
1 Year Performance107.10%32.43%30.97%73.73%

Falcon Oil & Gas Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FOG
Falcon Oil & Gas
N/AGBX 16.05
-2.7%
N/A+114.0%£178.02MN/AN/A5
RKH
Rockhopper Exploration
2.1596 of 5 stars
GBX 72.18
-2.7%
GBX 130
+80.1%
+42.2%£620.18MN/AN/A11
EGY
VAALCO Energy
3.5662 of 5 stars
GBX 410
flat
GBX 607.50
+48.2%
N/A£438.75M£311.54MN/A189
GKP
Gulf Keystone Petroleum
3.6281 of 5 stars
GBX 181.60
-3.6%
GBX 272
+49.8%
+7.0%£394.88M£164.81M27.19471
ENQ
EnQuest
2.7513 of 5 stars
GBX 19.36
-0.5%
GBX 23.20
+19.8%
+73.1%£360.31M£1.12B193.60681

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FOG) was last updated on 6/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners