Go Pro

Tullow Oil (TLW) Competitors

Tullow Oil logo
GBX 24.10 +1.35 (+5.93%)
As of 11:28 AM Eastern

TLW vs. KOS, SQZ, RKH, DEC, and ENQ

Should you buy Tullow Oil stock or one of its competitors? Tullow Oil's main competitors and comparable companies include Kosmos Energy (KOS), Serica Energy (SQZ), Rockhopper Exploration (RKH), Diversified Energy (DEC), and EnQuest (ENQ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Tullow Oil compare to Kosmos Energy?

Kosmos Energy (LON:KOS) and Tullow Oil (LON:TLW) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Kosmos Energy has a beta of 0.732, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tullow Oil has a beta of 0.546, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Kosmos Energy currently has a consensus target price of GBX 210, suggesting a potential downside of 7.89%. Tullow Oil has a consensus target price of GBX 12.60, suggesting a potential downside of 47.72%. Given Kosmos Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Kosmos Energy is more favorable than Tullow Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kosmos Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Tullow Oil
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Tullow Oil has a net margin of 0.76% compared to Kosmos Energy's net margin of -32.73%. Tullow Oil's return on equity of -2.23% beat Kosmos Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kosmos Energy-32.73% -81.46% 6.82%
Tullow Oil 0.76%-2.23%5.94%

65.4% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.7% of Tullow Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Tullow Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Kosmos Energy and Kosmos Energy both had 1 articles in the media. Kosmos Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Tullow Oil's score of 0.75 indicating that Kosmos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kosmos Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Tullow Oil
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Kosmos Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Tullow Oil. Kosmos Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tullow Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kosmos Energy£1.58B0.86£283.21M-£112.00N/A
Tullow Oil£851.20M0.43£19.84M£0.4060.25

Summary

Kosmos Energy beats Tullow Oil on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tullow Oil compare to Serica Energy?

Tullow Oil (LON:TLW) and Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Tullow Oil presently has a consensus price target of GBX 12.60, indicating a potential downside of 47.72%. Serica Energy has a consensus price target of GBX 283.71, indicating a potential upside of 3.47%. Given Serica Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Serica Energy is more favorable than Tullow Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tullow Oil
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
Serica Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Tullow Oil has a net margin of 0.76% compared to Serica Energy's net margin of -0.27%. Serica Energy's return on equity of -0.62% beat Tullow Oil's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tullow Oil0.76% -2.23% 5.94%
Serica Energy -0.27%-0.62%12.14%

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Tullow Oil. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Serica Energy and 1 mentions for Tullow Oil. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Tullow Oil's score of 0.75 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tullow Oil
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Serica Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Tullow Oil has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Serica Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tullow Oil£851.20M0.43£19.84M£0.4060.25
Serica Energy£973.63M1.10-£9.03MN/AN/A

21.7% of Tullow Oil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.2% of Serica Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Tullow Oil shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of Serica Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tullow Oil has a beta of 0.546, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, meaning that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Serica Energy beats Tullow Oil on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tullow Oil compare to Rockhopper Exploration?

Tullow Oil (LON:TLW) and Rockhopper Exploration (LON:RKH) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

21.7% of Tullow Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Rockhopper Exploration shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Tullow Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Rockhopper Exploration shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tullow Oil has a net margin of 0.76% compared to Rockhopper Exploration's net margin of 0.00%. Tullow Oil's return on equity of -2.23% beat Rockhopper Exploration's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tullow Oil0.76% -2.23% 5.94%
Rockhopper Exploration N/A -17.25%-1.19%

In the previous week, Tullow Oil had 1 more articles in the media than Rockhopper Exploration. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tullow Oil and 0 mentions for Rockhopper Exploration. Tullow Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Rockhopper Exploration's score of 0.00 indicating that Tullow Oil is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tullow Oil Positive
Rockhopper Exploration Neutral

Tullow Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Rockhopper Exploration. Rockhopper Exploration is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tullow Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tullow Oil£851.20M0.43£19.84M£0.4060.25
Rockhopper ExplorationN/AN/A£19.71K-£6.14N/A

Tullow Oil has a beta of 0.546, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rockhopper Exploration has a beta of 1.1822942, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Tullow Oil presently has a consensus price target of GBX 12.60, indicating a potential downside of 47.72%. Rockhopper Exploration has a consensus price target of GBX 130, indicating a potential upside of 88.41%. Given Rockhopper Exploration's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Rockhopper Exploration is more favorable than Tullow Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tullow Oil
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
Rockhopper Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Tullow Oil beats Rockhopper Exploration on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tullow Oil compare to Diversified Energy?

Diversified Energy (LON:DEC) and Tullow Oil (LON:TLW) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

41.4% of Diversified Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.7% of Tullow Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Diversified Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Tullow Oil shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Diversified Energy has a beta of 0.305, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tullow Oil has a beta of 0.546, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Diversified Energy currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,000, indicating a potential upside of 170.76%. Tullow Oil has a consensus price target of GBX 12.60, indicating a potential downside of 47.72%. Given Diversified Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Diversified Energy is more favorable than Tullow Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diversified Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Tullow Oil
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Diversified Energy has a net margin of 44.69% compared to Tullow Oil's net margin of 0.76%. Diversified Energy's return on equity of 64.35% beat Tullow Oil's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diversified Energy44.69% 64.35% 3.52%
Tullow Oil 0.76%-2.23%5.94%

In the previous week, Diversified Energy and Diversified Energy both had 1 articles in the media. Tullow Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Diversified Energy's score of 0.49 indicating that Tullow Oil is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diversified Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Tullow Oil
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Diversified Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Tullow Oil. Diversified Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tullow Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diversified Energy£1.94B0.40£193.32M£609.001.82
Tullow Oil£851.20M0.43£19.84M£0.4060.25

Summary

Diversified Energy beats Tullow Oil on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tullow Oil compare to EnQuest?

Tullow Oil (LON:TLW) and EnQuest (LON:ENQ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

EnQuest has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Tullow Oil's net margin of 0.76%. EnQuest's return on equity of 27.37% beat Tullow Oil's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tullow Oil0.76% -2.23% 5.94%
EnQuest 11.62%27.37%7.54%

Tullow Oil currently has a consensus price target of GBX 12.60, indicating a potential downside of 47.72%. EnQuest has a consensus price target of GBX 34.60, indicating a potential upside of 26.97%. Given EnQuest's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe EnQuest is more favorable than Tullow Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tullow Oil
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
EnQuest
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

EnQuest has higher revenue and earnings than Tullow Oil. Tullow Oil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EnQuest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tullow Oil£851.20M0.43£19.84M£0.4060.25
EnQuest£1.10B0.46£25.24M£0.10272.50

21.7% of Tullow Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.5% of EnQuest shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Tullow Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of EnQuest shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tullow Oil has a beta of 0.546, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EnQuest has a beta of 0.022, suggesting that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tullow Oil and Tullow Oil both had 1 articles in the media. Tullow Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat EnQuest's score of 0.00 indicating that Tullow Oil is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tullow Oil
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
EnQuest
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

EnQuest beats Tullow Oil on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tullow Oil News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TLW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TLW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TLW vs. The Competition

MetricTullow OilOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£365.12M£11.73B£10.22B£2.87B
Dividend Yield23.09%10.10%10.57%6.25%
P/E Ratio60.2518.6321.66366.99
Price / Sales0.43593.80485.5289,778.71
Price / Cash3.2139.8436.1827.89
Price / Book-2.344.594.156.24
Net Income£19.84M£5.28B£4.34B£5.89B
7 Day Performance14.22%1.35%0.99%-1.07%
1 Month Performance63.28%5.09%3.61%-0.66%
1 Year Performance129.09%39.11%39.63%19.51%

Tullow Oil Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TLW
Tullow Oil
0.7952 of 5 stars
GBX 24.10
+5.9%
GBX 12.60
-47.7%
+116.3%£365.12M£851.20M60.25399
KOS
Kosmos Energy
1.6528 of 5 stars
GBX 206
+1.5%
GBX 210
+1.9%
+76.2%£1.23B£1.58BN/A240
SQZ
Serica Energy
1.3106 of 5 stars
GBX 264.60
+0.5%
GBX 282.29
+6.7%
+72.2%£1.04B£973.63MN/A1,620
RKH
Rockhopper Exploration
2.0128 of 5 stars
GBX 68.30
-4.5%
GBX 130
+90.3%
-8.5%£845.65MN/AN/A11
DEC
Diversified Energy
3.8442 of 5 stars
GBX 1,146
+3.2%
GBX 3,000
+161.8%
-6.8%£811.02M£1.94B1.881,603

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TLW) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners