Serica Energy (SQZ) Competitors

GBX 260.65 -4.75 (-1.79%)

As of 07:55 AM Eastern

SQZ vs. GNK, DAL, PAC, ASC, and RYA

Should you buy Serica Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Serica Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Serica Energy include Greene King (GNK), Dalata Hotel Group (DAL), Pacific Assets (PAC), ASOS (ASC), and Ryanair (RYA). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does Serica Energy compare to Greene King?

Greene King (LON:GNK) and Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) are both transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

Greene King has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Serica Energy's net margin of -6.73%. Greene King's return on equity of 0.00% beat Serica Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Greene King	N/A	N/A	N/A
Serica Energy	-6.73%	-7.42%	12.14%

24.1% of Serica Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.8% of Serica Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Greene King pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.33 per share. Serica Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Greene King pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Serica Energy pays out -166.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Serica Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Greene King has higher revenue and earnings than Serica Energy. Serica Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greene King, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Greene King	£2.22B	0.00	N/A	£38.70	N/A
Serica Energy	£601.43M	1.69	-£9.03M	-£13.00	N/A

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Greene King. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Serica Energy and 0 mentions for Greene King. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Greene King's score of 0.00 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Greene King	Neutral
Serica Energy	Positive

Serica Energy has a consensus price target of GBX 254.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.36%. Given Greene King's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Greene King is more favorable than Serica Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Greene King	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Serica Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Serica Energy beats Greene King on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Serica Energy compare to Dalata Hotel Group?

Dalata Hotel Group (LON:DAL) and Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Dalata Hotel Group has higher revenue and earnings than Serica Energy. Serica Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dalata Hotel Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dalata Hotel Group	£607.70M	1.89	£94.71M	£39.90	13.60
Serica Energy	£601.43M	1.69	-£9.03M	-£13.00	N/A

Serica Energy has a consensus target price of GBX 254.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.36%. Given Serica Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Serica Energy is more favorable than Dalata Hotel Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dalata Hotel Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Serica Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Dalata Hotel Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Serica Energy and 0 mentions for Dalata Hotel Group. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Dalata Hotel Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Dalata Hotel Group	Neutral
Serica Energy	Positive

Dalata Hotel Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Serica Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Dalata Hotel Group pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Serica Energy pays out -166.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Serica Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

74.4% of Dalata Hotel Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of Serica Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Dalata Hotel Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 63.8% of Serica Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dalata Hotel Group has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, meaning that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Dalata Hotel Group has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Serica Energy's net margin of -6.73%. Dalata Hotel Group's return on equity of 4.44% beat Serica Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dalata Hotel Group	9.53%	4.44%	3.89%
Serica Energy	-6.73%	-7.42%	12.14%

Summary

Dalata Hotel Group and Serica Energy tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Serica Energy compare to Pacific Assets?

Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) and Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Pacific Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Serica Energy. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Serica Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pacific Assets	-£4.44M	-105.79	£42.65M	-£3.70	N/A
Serica Energy	£601.43M	1.69	-£9.03M	-£13.00	N/A

Serica Energy has a net margin of -6.73% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Pacific Assets' return on equity of -0.93% beat Serica Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pacific Assets	-29.27%	-0.93%	0.07%
Serica Energy	-6.73%	-7.42%	12.14%

8.2% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of Serica Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 63.8% of Serica Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Serica Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Serica Energy pays out -166.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Serica Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Serica Energy has a consensus price target of GBX 254.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.36%. Given Serica Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Serica Energy is more favorable than Pacific Assets.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pacific Assets	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Serica Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Pacific Assets had 1 more articles in the media than Serica Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pacific Assets and 1 mentions for Serica Energy. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Pacific Assets' score of 0.12 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pacific Assets	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Serica Energy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6627685, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, suggesting that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Serica Energy beats Pacific Assets on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Serica Energy compare to ASOS?

ASOS (LON:ASC) and Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

ASOS has a beta of 2.222, suggesting that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, suggesting that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

4.8% of ASOS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of Serica Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.4% of ASOS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 63.8% of Serica Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ASOS presently has a consensus price target of GBX 364.33, indicating a potential upside of 44.58%. Serica Energy has a consensus price target of GBX 254.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.36%. Given ASOS's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ASOS is more favorable than Serica Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ASOS	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Serica Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Serica Energy has a net margin of -6.73% compared to ASOS's net margin of -10.10%. Serica Energy's return on equity of -7.42% beat ASOS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ASOS	-10.10%	-155.17%	-5.44%
Serica Energy	-6.73%	-7.42%	12.14%

Serica Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ASOS. Serica Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASOS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ASOS	£2.29B	0.13	-£340.23M	-£193.20	N/A
Serica Energy	£601.43M	1.69	-£9.03M	-£13.00	N/A

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 1 more articles in the media than ASOS. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Serica Energy and 0 mentions for ASOS. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat ASOS's score of 0.00 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
ASOS	Neutral
Serica Energy	Positive

Summary

Serica Energy beats ASOS on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Serica Energy compare to Ryanair?

Ryanair (LON:RYA) and Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

24.1% of Serica Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 63.8% of Serica Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ryanair had 17 more articles in the media than Serica Energy. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Ryanair and 1 mentions for Serica Energy. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Ryanair's score of -0.03 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ryanair	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Serica Energy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Serica Energy has a consensus target price of GBX 254.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.36%. Given Ryanair's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Ryanair is more favorable than Serica Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ryanair	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Serica Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Ryanair has higher revenue and earnings than Serica Energy. Serica Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ryanair, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ryanair	£2.61B	0.00	N/A	-£0.58	N/A
Serica Energy	£601.43M	1.69	-£9.03M	-£13.00	N/A

Ryanair has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Serica Energy's net margin of -6.73%. Ryanair's return on equity of 0.00% beat Serica Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ryanair	N/A	N/A	N/A
Serica Energy	-6.73%	-7.42%	12.14%

Summary

Serica Energy beats Ryanair on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Serica Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SQZ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SQZ vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Serica Energy	Oil & Gas E&P Industry	Energy Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£1.02B	£2.09B	£10.58B	£2.82B
Dividend Yield	6.03%	7.53%	10.24%	6.08%
P/E Ratio	-20.05	31.85	21.10	365.80
Price / Sales	1.69	3,253.41	964.26	88,173.13
Price / Cash	3.13	85.54	38.74	27.89
Price / Book	1.56	3.67	4.66	7.80
Net Income	-£9.03M	£82.07M	£4.24B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-9.12%	-2.19%	-0.54%	2.43%
1 Month Performance	-5.01%	1.22%	2.17%	3.67%
1 Year Performance	82.55%	56.40%	53.92%	79.77%

Serica Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SQZ Serica Energy	1.9544 of 5 stars	GBX 260.65 -1.8%	GBX 254.50 -2.4%	+85.9%	£1.02B	£601.43M	N/A	1,620	Positive News
GNK Greene King	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£2.63B	£2.22B	21.94	1,010	High Trading Volume
DAL Dalata Hotel Group	N/A	GBX 542.50 flat	N/A	+15.8%	£1.15B	£607.70M	13.60	95,000	Gap Up
PAC Pacific Assets	N/A	GBX 403 +1.3%	N/A	+19.7%	£460.48M	-£4.44M	N/A	1,740
ASC ASOS	3.4624 of 5 stars	GBX 234 +1.3%	GBX 364.33 +55.7%	-22.0%	£279.98M	£2.29B	N/A	990	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SQZ) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Serica Energy (SQZ) Competitors

SQZ vs. GNK, DAL, PAC, ASC, and RYA

How does Serica Energy compare to Greene King?

Summary

How does Serica Energy compare to Dalata Hotel Group?

Summary

How does Serica Energy compare to Pacific Assets?

Summary

How does Serica Energy compare to ASOS?

Summary

How does Serica Energy compare to Ryanair?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SQZ vs. The Competition

Serica Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Serica Energy (SQZ) Competitors

SQZ vs. GNK, DAL, PAC, ASC, and RYA

How does Serica Energy compare to Greene King?

Is GNK or SQZ more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GNK or SQZ?

Is GNK or SQZ a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, GNK or SQZ?

Does the media prefer GNK or SQZ?

Do analysts recommend GNK or SQZ?

Summary

How does Serica Energy compare to Dalata Hotel Group?

Which has better earnings and valuation, DAL or SQZ?

Do analysts recommend DAL or SQZ?

Does the media refer more to DAL or SQZ?

Is DAL or SQZ a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in DAL or SQZ?

Which has more risk and volatility, DAL or SQZ?

Is DAL or SQZ more profitable?

Summary

How does Serica Energy compare to Pacific Assets?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, PAC or SQZ?

Is PAC or SQZ more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PAC or SQZ?

Is PAC or SQZ a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer PAC or SQZ?

Does the media favor PAC or SQZ?

Which has more volatility and risk, PAC or SQZ?

Summary

How does Serica Energy compare to ASOS?

Which has more volatility and risk, ASC or SQZ?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in ASC or SQZ?

Do analysts rate ASC or SQZ?

Is ASC or SQZ more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, ASC or SQZ?

Does the media refer more to ASC or SQZ?

Summary

How does Serica Energy compare to Ryanair?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in RYA or SQZ?

Does the media refer more to RYA or SQZ?

Do analysts rate RYA or SQZ?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, RYA or SQZ?

Is RYA or SQZ more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SQZ vs. The Competition

Serica Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools