Free Trial

Serica Energy (SQZ) Competitors

Serica Energy logo
GBX 274.32 -6.28 (-2.24%)
As of 07:40 AM Eastern

SQZ vs. ENOG, KOS, DEC, RKH, and ENQ

Should you buy Serica Energy stock or one of its competitors? Serica Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Energean (ENOG), Kosmos Energy (KOS), Diversified Energy (DEC), Rockhopper Exploration (RKH), and EnQuest (ENQ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Serica Energy compare to Energean?

Energean (LON:ENOG) and Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

Energean currently has a consensus target price of GBX 843.33, suggesting a potential upside of 13.20%. Serica Energy has a consensus target price of GBX 283.71, suggesting a potential upside of 1.11%. Given Energean's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Energean is more favorable than Serica Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energean
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Serica Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Serica Energy has a net margin of -0.27% compared to Energean's net margin of -12.80%. Serica Energy's return on equity of -0.62% beat Energean's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energean-12.80% -114.52% 7.67%
Serica Energy -0.27%-0.62%12.14%

Energean has higher revenue and earnings than Serica Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energean£1.67B0.83£160.37M-£114.00N/A
Serica Energy£973.63M1.13-£9.03MN/AN/A

Energean pays an annual dividend of GBX 100 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.4%. Serica Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Energean pays out -87.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

26.3% of Energean shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.4% of Serica Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.6% of Energean shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of Serica Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Energean has a beta of 0.232, indicating that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Energean. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Serica Energy and 0 mentions for Energean. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Energean's score of 0.00 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Energean Neutral
Serica Energy Positive

Summary

Serica Energy beats Energean on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Serica Energy compare to Kosmos Energy?

Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) and Kosmos Energy (LON:KOS) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

26.4% of Serica Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.4% of Kosmos Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 14.3% of Serica Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Kosmos Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, suggesting that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kosmos Energy has a beta of 0.732, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Serica Energy currently has a consensus price target of GBX 283.71, suggesting a potential upside of 1.11%. Kosmos Energy has a consensus price target of GBX 210, suggesting a potential upside of 0.96%. Given Serica Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Serica Energy is more favorable than Kosmos Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Serica Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Kosmos Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Kosmos Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Serica Energy and 0 mentions for Kosmos Energy. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Kosmos Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Serica Energy Positive
Kosmos Energy Neutral

Serica Energy has a net margin of -0.27% compared to Kosmos Energy's net margin of -32.73%. Serica Energy's return on equity of -0.62% beat Kosmos Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Serica Energy-0.27% -0.62% 12.14%
Kosmos Energy -32.73%-81.46%6.82%

Kosmos Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Serica Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Serica Energy£973.63M1.13-£9.03MN/AN/A
Kosmos Energy£1.58B0.78£283.21M-£112.00N/A

Summary

Serica Energy beats Kosmos Energy on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Serica Energy compare to Diversified Energy?

Diversified Energy (LON:DEC) and Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Diversified Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Serica Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diversified Energy£1.94B0.39£193.32M£609.001.80
Serica Energy£973.63M1.13-£9.03MN/AN/A

Diversified Energy presently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,000, indicating a potential upside of 173.22%. Serica Energy has a consensus target price of GBX 283.71, indicating a potential upside of 1.11%. Given Diversified Energy's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Diversified Energy is more favorable than Serica Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diversified Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Serica Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Diversified Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Serica Energy and 1 mentions for Diversified Energy. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Diversified Energy's score of 1.13 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diversified Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Serica Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Diversified Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 115.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.5%. Serica Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Diversified Energy pays out 18.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Diversified Energy has a beta of 0.305, suggesting that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, suggesting that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

41.4% of Diversified Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.4% of Serica Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Diversified Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of Serica Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Diversified Energy has a net margin of 44.69% compared to Serica Energy's net margin of -0.27%. Diversified Energy's return on equity of 64.35% beat Serica Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diversified Energy44.69% 64.35% 3.52%
Serica Energy -0.27%-0.62%12.14%

Summary

Diversified Energy beats Serica Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Serica Energy compare to Rockhopper Exploration?

Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) and Rockhopper Exploration (LON:RKH) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Rockhopper Exploration has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Serica Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Serica Energy£973.63M1.13-£9.03MN/AN/A
Rockhopper ExplorationN/AN/A£19.71K£1.3736.72

In the previous week, Rockhopper Exploration had 1 more articles in the media than Serica Energy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Rockhopper Exploration and 3 mentions for Serica Energy. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Rockhopper Exploration's score of 0.18 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Serica Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Rockhopper Exploration
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, meaning that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rockhopper Exploration has a beta of 1.1822942, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Rockhopper Exploration has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Serica Energy's net margin of -0.27%. Rockhopper Exploration's return on equity of 2.28% beat Serica Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Serica Energy-0.27% -0.62% 12.14%
Rockhopper Exploration N/A 2.28%-1.19%

26.4% of Serica Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Rockhopper Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. 14.3% of Serica Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Rockhopper Exploration shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Serica Energy currently has a consensus price target of GBX 283.71, indicating a potential upside of 1.11%. Rockhopper Exploration has a consensus price target of GBX 135, indicating a potential upside of 168.39%. Given Rockhopper Exploration's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Rockhopper Exploration is more favorable than Serica Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Serica Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Rockhopper Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Rockhopper Exploration beats Serica Energy on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Serica Energy compare to EnQuest?

EnQuest (LON:ENQ) and Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

38.5% of EnQuest shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.4% of Serica Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of EnQuest shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of Serica Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 3 more articles in the media than EnQuest. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Serica Energy and 0 mentions for EnQuest. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat EnQuest's score of 0.14 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
EnQuest Neutral
Serica Energy Positive

EnQuest has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Serica Energy's net margin of -0.27%. EnQuest's return on equity of 27.37% beat Serica Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EnQuest11.62% 27.37% 7.54%
Serica Energy -0.27%-0.62%12.14%

EnQuest has higher revenue and earnings than Serica Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EnQuest£1.10B0.54£25.24M£7.304.38
Serica Energy£973.63M1.13-£9.03MN/AN/A

EnQuest has a beta of 0.022, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

EnQuest pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Serica Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. EnQuest pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

EnQuest presently has a consensus target price of GBX 34.60, suggesting a potential upside of 8.13%. Serica Energy has a consensus target price of GBX 283.71, suggesting a potential upside of 1.11%. Given EnQuest's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe EnQuest is more favorable than Serica Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EnQuest
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Serica Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Serica Energy beats EnQuest on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Serica Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SQZ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SQZ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SQZ vs. The Competition

MetricSerica EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.08B£11.98B£10.42B£2.82B
Dividend Yield6.02%10.14%10.63%6.26%
P/E Ratio-19.9821.2620.75366.73
Price / Sales1.10655.39534.9688,670.32
Price / Cash3.1341.2637.3227.83
Price / Book1.644.554.106.77
Net Income-£9.03M£5.27B£4.34B£5.88B
7 Day Performance4.07%-0.41%-0.48%0.49%
1 Month Performance-2.93%-4.13%-3.98%-0.22%
1 Year Performance50.05%33.34%33.65%22.07%

Serica Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SQZ
Serica Energy
1.5328 of 5 stars
GBX 274.32
-2.2%
GBX 283.71
+3.4%
+51.3%£1.08B£973.63MN/A1,620
ENOG
Energean
N/AGBX 687
-1.4%
GBX 843.33
+22.8%
-15.5%£1.27B£1.67BN/A590
KOS
Kosmos Energy
1.0719 of 5 stars
GBX 202
+11.0%
GBX 210
+4.0%
+67.1%£1.20B£1.58BN/A240
DEC
Diversified Energy
4.0572 of 5 stars
GBX 1,064
+1.9%
GBX 3,000
+182.0%
+15.1%£734.55M£1.94B1.751,603
RKH
Rockhopper Exploration
2.969 of 5 stars
GBX 49
-2.6%
GBX 135
+175.5%
-33.5%£524.00MN/A35.7711

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SQZ) was last updated on 10/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners