Go Pro

Serica Energy (SQZ) Competitors

Serica Energy logo
GBX 247.80 +8.60 (+3.60%)
As of 08/14/2026 12:36 PM Eastern

SQZ vs. SEPL, ENOG, KOS, DEC, and RKH

Should you buy Serica Energy stock or one of its competitors? Serica Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Seplat Energy (SEPL), Energean (ENOG), Kosmos Energy (KOS), Diversified Energy (DEC), and Rockhopper Exploration (RKH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Serica Energy compare to Seplat Energy?

Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) and Seplat Energy (LON:SEPL) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Seplat Energy has a net margin of 9.40% compared to Serica Energy's net margin of -3.63%. Seplat Energy's return on equity of 16.13% beat Serica Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Serica Energy-3.63% -7.80% 12.14%
Seplat Energy 9.40%16.13%5.52%

24.9% of Serica Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.4% of Seplat Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.3% of Serica Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of Seplat Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Seplat Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Serica Energy. Serica Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seplat Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Serica Energy£973.63M0.99-£9.03M-£13.00N/A
Seplat Energy£3.15B1.17£99.56M£30.0020.40

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Seplat Energy. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Serica Energy and 4 mentions for Seplat Energy. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Seplat Energy's score of 0.40 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Serica Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Seplat Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Serica Energy presently has a consensus price target of GBX 282.29, indicating a potential upside of 13.92%. Seplat Energy has a consensus price target of GBX 3,670, indicating a potential upside of 499.67%. Given Seplat Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Seplat Energy is more favorable than Serica Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Serica Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seplat Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Serica Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Seplat Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Serica Energy pays out -166.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Seplat Energy pays out 47.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Serica Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, meaning that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seplat Energy has a beta of 0.106, meaning that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Seplat Energy beats Serica Energy on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Serica Energy compare to Energean?

Energean (LON:ENOG) and Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Energean has a beta of 0.237, meaning that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, meaning that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Energean. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Serica Energy and 0 mentions for Energean. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Energean's score of 0.00 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Energean Neutral
Serica Energy Positive

26.4% of Energean shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.9% of Serica Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 19.7% of Energean shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of Serica Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Energean pays an annual dividend of GBX 120 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.8%. Serica Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Energean pays out -74.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Serica Energy pays out -166.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Serica Energy has a net margin of -3.63% compared to Energean's net margin of -14.97%. Serica Energy's return on equity of -7.80% beat Energean's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energean-14.97% -65.81% 7.67%
Serica Energy -3.63%-7.80%12.14%

Energean currently has a consensus target price of GBX 798.33, suggesting a potential upside of 4.91%. Serica Energy has a consensus target price of GBX 282.29, suggesting a potential upside of 13.92%. Given Serica Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Serica Energy is more favorable than Energean.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energean
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Serica Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Energean has higher revenue and earnings than Serica Energy. Serica Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energean, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energean£1.66B0.85£160.37M-£160.77N/A
Serica Energy£973.63M0.99-£9.03M-£13.00N/A

Summary

Serica Energy beats Energean on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Serica Energy compare to Kosmos Energy?

Kosmos Energy (LON:KOS) and Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

65.4% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.9% of Serica Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of Serica Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kosmos Energy has a beta of 0.728, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, suggesting that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Kosmos Energy. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Serica Energy and 3 mentions for Kosmos Energy. Kosmos Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Serica Energy's score of 0.60 indicating that Kosmos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kosmos Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Serica Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Kosmos Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Serica Energy. Serica Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kosmos Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kosmos Energy£1.58B0.65£283.21M-£169.00N/A
Serica Energy£973.63M0.99-£9.03M-£13.00N/A

Serica Energy has a net margin of -3.63% compared to Kosmos Energy's net margin of -32.73%. Serica Energy's return on equity of -7.80% beat Kosmos Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kosmos Energy-32.73% -81.46% 6.82%
Serica Energy -3.63%-7.80%12.14%

Kosmos Energy currently has a consensus target price of GBX 210, suggesting a potential upside of 22.09%. Serica Energy has a consensus target price of GBX 282.29, suggesting a potential upside of 13.92%. Given Kosmos Energy's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Kosmos Energy is more favorable than Serica Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kosmos Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Serica Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Serica Energy beats Kosmos Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Serica Energy compare to Diversified Energy?

Diversified Energy (LON:DEC) and Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 5 more articles in the media than Diversified Energy. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Serica Energy and 1 mentions for Diversified Energy. Diversified Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Serica Energy's score of 0.60 indicating that Diversified Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diversified Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Serica Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Diversified Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Serica Energy. Serica Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diversified Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diversified Energy£1.94B0.37£193.32M£797.001.32
Serica Energy£973.63M0.99-£9.03M-£13.00N/A

Diversified Energy has a beta of 0.305, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, meaning that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

44.0% of Diversified Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.9% of Serica Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Diversified Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of Serica Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Diversified Energy has a net margin of 44.69% compared to Serica Energy's net margin of -3.63%. Diversified Energy's return on equity of 64.35% beat Serica Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diversified Energy44.69% 64.35% 3.52%
Serica Energy -3.63%-7.80%12.14%

Diversified Energy presently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,000, suggesting a potential upside of 184.63%. Serica Energy has a consensus target price of GBX 282.29, suggesting a potential upside of 13.92%. Given Diversified Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Diversified Energy is more favorable than Serica Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diversified Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Serica Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Diversified Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 115.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.9%. Serica Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Diversified Energy pays out 14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Serica Energy pays out -166.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Diversified Energy beats Serica Energy on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Serica Energy compare to Rockhopper Exploration?

Rockhopper Exploration (LON:RKH) and Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

0.6% of Rockhopper Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.9% of Serica Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Rockhopper Exploration shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of Serica Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Rockhopper Exploration has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Serica Energy's net margin of -3.63%. Serica Energy's return on equity of -7.80% beat Rockhopper Exploration's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rockhopper ExplorationN/A -17.25% -1.19%
Serica Energy -3.63%-7.80%12.14%

Rockhopper Exploration presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, indicating a potential upside of 75.68%. Serica Energy has a consensus price target of GBX 282.29, indicating a potential upside of 13.92%. Given Rockhopper Exploration's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Rockhopper Exploration is more favorable than Serica Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rockhopper Exploration
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Serica Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Rockhopper Exploration has a beta of 1.1822942, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Rockhopper Exploration has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Serica Energy. Serica Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rockhopper Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rockhopper ExplorationN/AN/A£19.71K-£6.15N/A
Serica Energy£973.63M0.99-£9.03M-£13.00N/A

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 5 more articles in the media than Rockhopper Exploration. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Serica Energy and 1 mentions for Rockhopper Exploration. Rockhopper Exploration's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Serica Energy's score of 0.60 indicating that Rockhopper Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rockhopper Exploration
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Serica Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Rockhopper Exploration and Serica Energy tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Serica Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SQZ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SQZ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SQZ vs. The Competition

MetricSerica EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£967.80M£11.10B£9.70B£2.88B
Dividend Yield6.50%11.32%11.57%6.11%
P/E Ratio-19.0616.4520.21368.68
Price / Sales0.99480.37393.4983,339.32
Price / Cash3.1339.7336.0727.89
Price / Book1.483.112.957.18
Net Income-£9.03M£5.27B£4.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance7.93%3.21%3.56%0.91%
1 Month Performance7.83%4.82%4.83%2.94%
1 Year Performance45.59%35.69%39.23%64.32%

Serica Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SQZ
Serica Energy
2.1586 of 5 stars
GBX 247.80
+3.6%
GBX 282.29
+13.9%
+48.7%£967.80M£973.63MN/A1,620
SEPL
Seplat Energy
4.4659 of 5 stars
GBX 585
+1.0%
GBX 3,670
+527.4%
+136.3%£3.51B£2.76B19.50588
ENOG
Energean
1.6057 of 5 stars
GBX 723.70
-3.2%
GBX 798.33
+10.3%
-15.9%£1.34B£1.66BN/A590
KOS
Kosmos Energy
3.7258 of 5 stars
GBX 172
-9.9%
GBX 210
+22.1%
+26.5%£1.02B£1.37BN/A240
DEC
Diversified Energy
4.0161 of 5 stars
GBX 981
+0.6%
GBX 3,000
+205.8%
-5.9%£687.05M£1.58B1.231,603

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SQZ) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners