Go Pro
→ Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free TORO Stock Alerts

Chenavari Toro Income Fund (TORO) Competitors

GBX 0.52 -0.01 (-2.62%)
As of 08/26/2026 11:06 AM Eastern
Compare

TORO vs. BRSC, BUT, SYNC, GCP, and HAN

Should you buy Chenavari Toro Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? Chenavari Toro Income Fund's main competitors and comparable companies include BlackRock Smaller Companies (BRSC), Brunner (BUT), Syncona (SYNC), GCP Infrastructure Investments (GCP), and Hansa Investment (HAN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Chenavari Toro Income Fund compare to BlackRock Smaller Companies?

BlackRock Smaller Companies (LON:BRSC) and Chenavari Toro Income Fund (LON:TORO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, BlackRock Smaller Companies had 13 more articles in the media than Chenavari Toro Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for BlackRock Smaller Companies and 0 mentions for Chenavari Toro Income Fund. BlackRock Smaller Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat Chenavari Toro Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that BlackRock Smaller Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Smaller Companies Very Positive
Chenavari Toro Income Fund Neutral

BlackRock Smaller Companies has a beta of 1.348, meaning that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a beta of 0.253, meaning that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

BlackRock Smaller Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Chenavari Toro Income Fund. Chenavari Toro Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock Smaller Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Smaller Companies£61.45M11.07£120.17M£29.009.60
Chenavari Toro Income Fund-£27.26M-0.06N/A-£9.20N/A

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a net margin of 112.00% compared to BlackRock Smaller Companies' net margin of 89.65%. BlackRock Smaller Companies' return on equity of 10.11% beat Chenavari Toro Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Smaller Companies89.65% 10.11% -2.39%
Chenavari Toro Income Fund 112.00%-15.03%N/A

BlackRock Smaller Companies pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Chenavari Toro Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,293.7%. BlackRock Smaller Companies pays out 30.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chenavari Toro Income Fund pays out -73.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chenavari Toro Income Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

6.6% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

BlackRock Smaller Companies beats Chenavari Toro Income Fund on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chenavari Toro Income Fund compare to Brunner?

Chenavari Toro Income Fund (LON:TORO) and Brunner (LON:BUT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Chenavari Toro Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,293.7%. Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Chenavari Toro Income Fund pays out -73.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunner pays out 10.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chenavari Toro Income Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Brunner had 2 more articles in the media than Chenavari Toro Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Brunner and 0 mentions for Chenavari Toro Income Fund. Chenavari Toro Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Brunner'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chenavari Toro Income Fund Neutral
Brunner Neutral

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a net margin of 112.00% compared to Brunner's net margin of 96.94%. Brunner's return on equity of 15.14% beat Chenavari Toro Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chenavari Toro Income Fund112.00% -15.03% N/A
Brunner 96.94%15.14%11.63%

Brunner has higher revenue and earnings than Chenavari Toro Income Fund. Chenavari Toro Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brunner, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chenavari Toro Income Fund-£27.26M-0.06N/A-£9.20N/A
Brunner£105.27M6.42£105.32M£238.786.59

0.4% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Brunner shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Brunner shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a beta of 0.253, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunner has a beta of 0.831, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Brunner beats Chenavari Toro Income Fund on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chenavari Toro Income Fund compare to Syncona?

Chenavari Toro Income Fund (LON:TORO) and Syncona (LON:SYNC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

Syncona has a consensus price target of GBX 189, indicating a potential upside of 67.26%. Given Syncona's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Syncona is more favorable than Chenavari Toro Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chenavari Toro Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Syncona
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a net margin of 112.00% compared to Syncona's net margin of -15.36%. Syncona's return on equity of -0.86% beat Chenavari Toro Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chenavari Toro Income Fund112.00% -15.03% N/A
Syncona -15.36%-0.86%0.40%

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Syncona. Syncona is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chenavari Toro Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chenavari Toro Income Fund-£27.26M-0.06N/A-£9.20N/A
Syncona£55.89M12.30-£16.90M-£1.45N/A

0.4% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.2% of Syncona shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Syncona shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Syncona had 1 more articles in the media than Chenavari Toro Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Syncona and 0 mentions for Chenavari Toro Income Fund. Chenavari Toro Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Syncona'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chenavari Toro Income Fund Neutral
Syncona Neutral

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a beta of 0.253, indicating that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Syncona has a beta of 0.357, indicating that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Syncona beats Chenavari Toro Income Fund on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chenavari Toro Income Fund compare to GCP Infrastructure Investments?

GCP Infrastructure Investments (LON:GCP) and Chenavari Toro Income Fund (LON:TORO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, GCP Infrastructure Investments had 4 more articles in the media than Chenavari Toro Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for GCP Infrastructure Investments and 0 mentions for Chenavari Toro Income Fund. GCP Infrastructure Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Chenavari Toro Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that GCP Infrastructure Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GCP Infrastructure Investments Positive
Chenavari Toro Income Fund Neutral

GCP Infrastructure Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.5%. Chenavari Toro Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,293.7%. GCP Infrastructure Investments pays out 168.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chenavari Toro Income Fund pays out -73.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chenavari Toro Income Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

GCP Infrastructure Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Chenavari Toro Income Fund. Chenavari Toro Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GCP Infrastructure Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GCP Infrastructure Investments£38.32M16.95£15.58M£4.1519.90
Chenavari Toro Income Fund-£27.26M-0.06N/A-£9.20N/A

GCP Infrastructure Investments has a beta of 0.848, indicating that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a beta of 0.253, indicating that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

35.4% of GCP Infrastructure Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of GCP Infrastructure Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a net margin of 112.00% compared to GCP Infrastructure Investments' net margin of 47.75%. GCP Infrastructure Investments' return on equity of 4.17% beat Chenavari Toro Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GCP Infrastructure Investments47.75% 4.17% 0.89%
Chenavari Toro Income Fund 112.00%-15.03%N/A

Summary

GCP Infrastructure Investments beats Chenavari Toro Income Fund on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chenavari Toro Income Fund compare to Hansa Investment?

Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) and Chenavari Toro Income Fund (LON:TORO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 422.56% compared to Chenavari Toro Income Fund's net margin of 112.00%. Hansa Investment's return on equity of 17.81% beat Chenavari Toro Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hansa Investment422.56% 17.81% 13.97%
Chenavari Toro Income Fund 112.00%-15.03%N/A

Hansa Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Chenavari Toro Income Fund. Chenavari Toro Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hansa Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hansa Investment£136.53M4.83£77.36M£89.903.76
Chenavari Toro Income Fund-£27.26M-0.06N/A-£9.20N/A

Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Chenavari Toro Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,293.7%. Hansa Investment pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chenavari Toro Income Fund pays out -73.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chenavari Toro Income Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Hansa Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chenavari Toro Income Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hansa Investment Neutral
Chenavari Toro Income Fund Neutral

0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.6% of Hansa Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.209, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a beta of 0.253, indicating that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hansa Investment beats Chenavari Toro Income Fund on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chenavari Toro Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TORO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TORO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TORO vs. The Competition

Export
MetricChenavari Toro Income FundCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.64M£5.73B£14.10B£2.92B
Dividend Yield11.18%7.39%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio-0.0632.5526.71367.32
Price / Sales-0.061,235.69518.2683,741.36
Price / CashN/A48.4539.1427.89
Price / BookN/A2.132.187.02
Net IncomeN/A£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.84%1.51%0.69%
1 Month Performance-6.13%2.08%2.57%2.87%
1 Year Performance-18.85%8.05%11.60%22.47%

Chenavari Toro Income Fund Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TORO
Chenavari Toro Income Fund
N/AGBX 0.52
-2.6%		N/A-21.7%£1.64M-£27.26MN/AN/A
BRSC
BlackRock Smaller Companies
N/AGBX 274.50
flat		N/A-78.8%£670.41M£61.45M9.46N/A
BUT
Brunner
N/AGBX 1,560
+0.8%		N/A+10.1%£670.30M£105.27M6.53N/A
SYNC
Syncona
2.3339 of 5 stars		GBX 109.40
+0.9%		GBX 189
+72.8%		+17.7%£659.29M£55.89MN/A1,208
GCP
GCP Infrastructure Investments
N/AGBX 82.50
flat		N/A+11.0%£645.59M£38.32M19.881,950

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TORO) was last updated on 8/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel