Do analysts prefer SQZ or PAC?

Serica Energy presently has a consensus target price of GBX 268.25, suggesting a potential upside of 15.43%. Given Serica Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Serica Energy is more favorable than Pacific Assets. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Serica Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 8 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Pacific Assets 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer PAC or ASC?

ASOS has a consensus price target of GBX 371.83, suggesting a potential upside of 4.15%. Given ASOS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ASOS is more favorable than Pacific Assets. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pacific Assets 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 ASOS 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PAC or ASC?

Pacific Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ASOS. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASOS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Pacific Assets -£4.44M -103.84 £42.65M -£3.70 N/A ASOS £2.29B 0.19 -£340.23M -£193.20 N/A

Is PAC or ASC more profitable?

ASOS has a net margin of -10.10% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Pacific Assets' return on equity of -0.93% beat ASOS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Pacific Assets -29.27% -0.93% 0.07% ASOS -10.10% -155.17% -5.44%

Pacific Assets (PAC) Competitors

GBX 403.86 -8.14 (-1.98%)

As of 04:08 AM Eastern

Compare

PAC vs. DAL, SQZ, ASC, SHIP, and TORO

Should you buy Pacific Assets stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pacific Assets with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pacific Assets include Dalata Hotel Group (DAL), Serica Energy (SQZ), ASOS (ASC), Tufton Oceanic Assets (SHIP), and Chenavari Toro Income Fund (TORO). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does Pacific Assets compare to Dalata Hotel Group?

Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) and Dalata Hotel Group (LON:DAL) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Dalata Hotel Group has a net margin of 12.07% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Dalata Hotel Group's return on equity of 5.60% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pacific Assets	-29.27%	-0.93%	0.07%
Dalata Hotel Group	12.07%	5.60%	3.89%

11.3% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.4% of Dalata Hotel Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Dalata Hotel Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dalata Hotel Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dalata Hotel Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pacific Assets	-£4.44M	-103.84	£42.65M	-£3.70	N/A
Dalata Hotel Group	£607.70M	1.89	£94.71M	£39.90	13.60

Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6684717, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dalata Hotel Group has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Dalata Hotel Group's average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Pacific Assets' score of 0.00 indicating that Dalata Hotel Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pacific Assets	Neutral
Dalata Hotel Group	Very Positive

Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Dalata Hotel Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dalata Hotel Group pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pacific Assets is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Dalata Hotel Group beats Pacific Assets on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to Serica Energy?

Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

Serica Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Serica Energy pays out -166.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Serica Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Pacific Assets has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Serica Energy. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Serica Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Serica Energy	£601.43M	1.51	-£9.03M	-£13.00	N/A
Pacific Assets	-£4.44M	-103.84	£42.65M	-£3.70	N/A

Serica Energy has a net margin of -8.68% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Pacific Assets' return on equity of -0.93% beat Serica Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Serica Energy	-8.68%	-11.49%	12.14%
Pacific Assets	-29.27%	-0.93%	0.07%

23.7% of Serica Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.3% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.3% of Serica Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, suggesting that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6684717, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Pacific Assets' score of 0.00 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Serica Energy	Positive
Pacific Assets	Neutral

Serica Energy presently has a consensus target price of GBX 268.25, suggesting a potential upside of 15.43%. Given Serica Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Serica Energy is more favorable than Pacific Assets.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Serica Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pacific Assets	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Serica Energy beats Pacific Assets on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to ASOS?

Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) and ASOS (LON:ASC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, ASOS had 1 more articles in the media than Pacific Assets. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ASOS and 0 mentions for Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled ASOS'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pacific Assets	Neutral
ASOS	Neutral

11.3% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of ASOS shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of ASOS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pacific Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ASOS. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASOS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pacific Assets	-£4.44M	-103.84	£42.65M	-£3.70	N/A
ASOS	£2.29B	0.19	-£340.23M	-£193.20	N/A

Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6684717, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASOS has a beta of 2.282, indicating that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the broader market.

ASOS has a net margin of -10.10% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Pacific Assets' return on equity of -0.93% beat ASOS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pacific Assets	-29.27%	-0.93%	0.07%
ASOS	-10.10%	-155.17%	-5.44%

ASOS has a consensus price target of GBX 371.83, suggesting a potential upside of 4.15%. Given ASOS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ASOS is more favorable than Pacific Assets.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pacific Assets	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
ASOS	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

ASOS beats Pacific Assets on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to Tufton Oceanic Assets?

Tufton Oceanic Assets (LON:SHIP) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Pacific Assets has a net margin of -29.27% compared to Tufton Oceanic Assets' net margin of -88.41%. Pacific Assets' return on equity of -0.93% beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tufton Oceanic Assets	-88.41%	-7.82%	5.03%
Pacific Assets	-29.27%	-0.93%	0.07%

Tufton Oceanic Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 736.4%. Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Tufton Oceanic Assets pays out -98.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Tufton Oceanic Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tufton Oceanic Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tufton Oceanic Assets	-£27.15M	-0.13	£6.96B	-£10.09	N/A
Pacific Assets	-£4.44M	-103.84	£42.65M	-£3.70	N/A

In the previous week, Tufton Oceanic Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pacific Assets'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Tufton Oceanic Assets	Neutral
Pacific Assets	Neutral

Tufton Oceanic Assets has a beta of 0.3580951, suggesting that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6684717, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

38.0% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.3% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Pacific Assets beats Tufton Oceanic Assets on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to Chenavari Toro Income Fund?

Chenavari Toro Income Fund (LON:TORO) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

0.4% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.3% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a net margin of 112.00% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Pacific Assets' return on equity of -0.93% beat Chenavari Toro Income Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chenavari Toro Income Fund	112.00%	-15.03%	N/A
Pacific Assets	-29.27%	-0.93%	0.07%

Chenavari Toro Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,214.4%. Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Chenavari Toro Income Fund pays out -73.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a beta of 0.25338104, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6684717, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chenavari Toro Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pacific Assets'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Chenavari Toro Income Fund	Neutral
Pacific Assets	Neutral

Pacific Assets has higher revenue and earnings than Chenavari Toro Income Fund. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chenavari Toro Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chenavari Toro Income Fund	-£27.26M	-0.06	N/A	-£9.20	N/A
Pacific Assets	-£4.44M	-103.84	£42.65M	-£3.70	N/A

Summary

Pacific Assets beats Chenavari Toro Income Fund on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pacific Assets News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PAC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pacific Assets	Asset Management Industry	Financial Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£461.46M	£2.49B	£6.21B	£2.78B
Dividend Yield	1.36%	6.00%	5.24%	6.12%
P/E Ratio	-109.15	62.73	29.67	368.15
Price / Sales	-103.84	1,838.81	1,175.13	84,703.07
Price / Cash	12.69	60.50	117.40	27.89
Price / Book	0.96	1.32	6.56	7.50
Net Income	£42.65M	£265.96M	£1.13B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-3.61%	-0.40%	-0.19%	0.05%
1 Month Performance	-4.52%	-0.09%	0.14%	-1.30%
1 Year Performance	13.13%	7.26%	15.07%	62.22%

Pacific Assets Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PAC Pacific Assets	N/A	GBX 403.86 -2.0%	N/A	+16.1%	£461.46M	-£4.44M	N/A	1,740
DAL Dalata Hotel Group	N/A	GBX 542.50 flat	N/A	-2.3%	£1.15B	£607.70M	13.60	95,000	Positive News Gap Up
SQZ Serica Energy	2.309 of 5 stars	GBX 216.40 -0.6%	GBX 268.25 +24.0%	+40.4%	£845.16M	£601.43M	N/A	1,620
ASC ASOS	1.5919 of 5 stars	GBX 326.88 -3.0%	GBX 371.83 +13.8%	+14.7%	£380.48M	£2.29B	N/A	990
SHIP Tufton Oceanic Assets	N/A	GBX 1.30 +0.9%	N/A	+17.3%	£344.95M	-£27.15M	N/A	50

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PAC) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pacific Assets (PAC) Competitors

PAC vs. DAL, SQZ, ASC, SHIP, and TORO

How does Pacific Assets compare to Dalata Hotel Group?

Summary

How does Pacific Assets compare to Serica Energy?

Summary

How does Pacific Assets compare to ASOS?

Summary

How does Pacific Assets compare to Tufton Oceanic Assets?

Summary

How does Pacific Assets compare to Chenavari Toro Income Fund?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PAC vs. The Competition

Pacific Assets Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pacific Assets (PAC) Competitors

PAC vs. DAL, SQZ, ASC, SHIP, and TORO

How does Pacific Assets compare to Dalata Hotel Group?

Is PAC or DAL more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PAC or DAL?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PAC or DAL?

Which has more volatility & risk, PAC or DAL?

Does the media prefer PAC or DAL?

Is PAC or DAL a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Pacific Assets compare to Serica Energy?

Is SQZ or PAC a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, SQZ or PAC?

Is SQZ or PAC more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in SQZ or PAC?

Which has more volatility & risk, SQZ or PAC?

Does the media favor SQZ or PAC?

Do analysts prefer SQZ or PAC?

Summary

How does Pacific Assets compare to ASOS?

Does the media refer more to PAC or ASC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PAC or ASC?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PAC or ASC?

Which has more risk and volatility, PAC or ASC?

Is PAC or ASC more profitable?

Do analysts prefer PAC or ASC?

Summary

How does Pacific Assets compare to Tufton Oceanic Assets?

Is SHIP or PAC more profitable?

Is SHIP or PAC a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, SHIP or PAC?

Does the media refer more to SHIP or PAC?

Which has more volatility and risk, SHIP or PAC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in SHIP or PAC?

Summary

How does Pacific Assets compare to Chenavari Toro Income Fund?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of TORO or PAC?

Is TORO or PAC more profitable?

Is TORO or PAC a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, TORO or PAC?

Does the media prefer TORO or PAC?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, TORO or PAC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PAC vs. The Competition

Pacific Assets Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools