Free Trial

Pacific Assets (PAC) Competitors

Pacific Assets logo
GBX 407 -4.00 (-0.97%)
As of 04:18 AM Eastern

PAC vs. DAL, SQZ, ASC, RYA, and SAVE

Should you buy Pacific Assets stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pacific Assets with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pacific Assets include Dalata Hotel Group (DAL), Serica Energy (SQZ), ASOS (ASC), Ryanair (RYA), and Savannah Energy (SAVE). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does Pacific Assets compare to Dalata Hotel Group?

Dalata Hotel Group (LON:DAL) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

Dalata Hotel Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dalata Hotel Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dalata Hotel Group£607.70M1.89£94.71M£39.9013.60
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-104.65£42.65M-£3.70N/A

Dalata Hotel Group has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6627685, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

74.4% of Dalata Hotel Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Dalata Hotel Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dalata Hotel Group has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Dalata Hotel Group's return on equity of 4.44% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dalata Hotel Group9.53% 4.44% 3.89%
Pacific Assets -29.27%-0.93%0.07%

Dalata Hotel Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Dalata Hotel Group pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pacific Assets is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Pacific Assets had 2 more articles in the media than Dalata Hotel Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pacific Assets and 0 mentions for Dalata Hotel Group. Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Dalata Hotel Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Assets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dalata Hotel Group Neutral
Pacific Assets Positive

Summary

Dalata Hotel Group beats Pacific Assets on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to Serica Energy?

Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

Pacific Assets has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Serica Energy. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Serica Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Serica Energy£601.43M1.80-£9.03M-£13.00N/A
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-104.65£42.65M-£3.70N/A

Serica Energy presently has a consensus target price of GBX 254.50, indicating a potential downside of 8.28%. Given Serica Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Serica Energy is more favorable than Pacific Assets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Serica Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pacific Assets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6627685, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

24.1% of Serica Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.8% of Serica Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Serica Energy has a net margin of -6.73% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Pacific Assets' return on equity of -0.93% beat Serica Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Serica Energy-6.73% -7.42% 12.14%
Pacific Assets -29.27%-0.93%0.07%

Serica Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Serica Energy pays out -166.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Serica Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Pacific Assets had 2 more articles in the media than Serica Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pacific Assets and 0 mentions for Serica Energy. Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Serica Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Assets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Serica Energy Neutral
Pacific Assets Positive

Summary

Serica Energy beats Pacific Assets on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to ASOS?

ASOS (LON:ASC) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Pacific Assets has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ASOS. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASOS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ASOS£2.29B0.12-£340.23M-£193.20N/A
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-104.65£42.65M-£3.70N/A

ASOS has a beta of 2.222, meaning that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6627685, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

ASOS presently has a consensus target price of GBX 364.33, suggesting a potential upside of 52.76%. Given ASOS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe ASOS is more favorable than Pacific Assets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ASOS
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Pacific Assets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

4.8% of ASOS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.4% of ASOS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ASOS has a net margin of -10.10% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Pacific Assets' return on equity of -0.93% beat ASOS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ASOS-10.10% -155.17% -5.44%
Pacific Assets -29.27%-0.93%0.07%

In the previous week, ASOS had 6 more articles in the media than Pacific Assets. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for ASOS and 2 mentions for Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat ASOS's score of 0.46 indicating that Pacific Assets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ASOS
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pacific Assets
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

ASOS beats Pacific Assets on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to Ryanair?

Ryanair (LON:RYA) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Pacific Assets has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ryanair. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ryanair, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ryanair£2.61B0.00N/A-£0.58N/A
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-104.65£42.65M-£3.70N/A

8.2% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ryanair has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Ryanair's return on equity of 0.00% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RyanairN/A N/A N/A
Pacific Assets -29.27%-0.93%0.07%

In the previous week, Ryanair had 15 more articles in the media than Pacific Assets. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Ryanair and 2 mentions for Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Ryanair's score of 0.04 indicating that Pacific Assets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ryanair
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
4 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pacific Assets
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Ryanair beats Pacific Assets on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to Savannah Energy?

Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) and Savannah Energy (LON:SAVE) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Pacific Assets had 1 more articles in the media than Savannah Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pacific Assets and 1 mentions for Savannah Energy. Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Savannah Energy's score of -1.00 indicating that Pacific Assets is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pacific Assets
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Savannah Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Savannah Energy has a net margin of 44.77% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Savannah Energy's return on equity of 31.64% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pacific Assets-29.27% -0.93% 0.07%
Savannah Energy 44.77%31.64%9.85%

8.2% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Savannah Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.1% of Savannah Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6627685, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Savannah Energy has a beta of 0.295, indicating that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Pacific Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Savannah Energy. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Savannah Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-104.65£42.65M-£3.70N/A
Savannah Energy£238.27M0.62-£2.02B£8.010.89

Summary

Savannah Energy beats Pacific Assets on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pacific Assets News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PAC vs. The Competition

MetricPacific AssetsAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£465.05M£2.37B£5.71B£2.77B
Dividend Yield1.40%5.99%5.27%6.09%
P/E Ratio-110.0025.2016.02366.03
Price / Sales-104.651,955.361,219.9588,361.75
Price / Cash12.6960.1790.6127.89
Price / Book0.971.354.387.71
Net Income£42.65M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.45%0.16%0.45%
1 Month Performance6.82%2.23%1.95%2.14%
1 Year Performance16.29%13.07%21.48%86.95%

Pacific Assets Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PAC
Pacific Assets
N/AGBX 407
-1.0%
N/A+18.1%£465.05M-£4.44MN/A1,740
DAL
Dalata Hotel Group
N/AGBX 542.50
flat
N/A+19.8%£1.15B£607.70M13.6095,000
SQZ
Serica Energy
1.005 of 5 stars
GBX 291
+1.0%
GBX 254.50
-12.5%
+92.0%£1.14B£601.43MN/A1,620
ASC
ASOS
4.0059 of 5 stars
GBX 231.61
+3.2%
GBX 352.67
+52.3%
-21.0%£276.64M£2.29BN/A990
RYA
Ryanair
N/AN/AN/AN/A£163.33M£2.61BN/A19,100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PAC) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners