Go Pro

Pacific Assets (PAC) Competitors

Pacific Assets logo
GBX 418 -2.00 (-0.48%)
As of 12:03 PM Eastern

PAC vs. TRIG, HGT, MRC, BHMU, and RAT

Should you buy Pacific Assets stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pacific Assets with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pacific Assets include The Renewables Infrastructure Group (TRIG), HgCapital Trust (HGT), The Mercantile Investment Trust (MRC), BH Macro USD (BHMU), and Rathbones Group (RAT). These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Pacific Assets compare to The Renewables Infrastructure Group?

The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 1 more articles in the media than Pacific Assets. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 1 mentions for Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Assets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pacific Assets
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.391, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.648272, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.3% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 29.87%. Given The Renewables Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe The Renewables Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Pacific Assets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Pacific Assets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Pacific Assets has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Renewables Infrastructure Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-14.54-£37.22M-£5.40N/A
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-107.48£42.65M-£3.70N/A

The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.8%. Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Pacific Assets' return on equity of -0.93% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Renewables Infrastructure Group328.03% -5.09% -1.63%
Pacific Assets -29.27%-0.93%0.07%

Summary

The Renewables Infrastructure Group beats Pacific Assets on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to HgCapital Trust?

Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) and HgCapital Trust (LON:HGT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pacific Assets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
HgCapital Trust
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.648272, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HgCapital Trust has a beta of 0.41128778, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pacific Assets had 1 more articles in the media than HgCapital Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pacific Assets and 0 mentions for HgCapital Trust. Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat HgCapital Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Assets is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pacific Assets Positive
HgCapital Trust Neutral

Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. HgCapital Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HgCapital Trust pays out 25.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

11.3% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.1% of HgCapital Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of HgCapital Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

HgCapital Trust has a net margin of 88.67% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. HgCapital Trust's return on equity of 3.90% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pacific Assets-29.27% -0.93% 0.07%
HgCapital Trust 88.67%3.90%6.88%

HgCapital Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HgCapital Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-107.48£42.65M-£3.70N/A
HgCapital Trust£109.29M16.21£284.58M£21.4918.19

Summary

HgCapital Trust beats Pacific Assets on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to The Mercantile Investment Trust?

The Mercantile Investment Trust (LON:MRC) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, earnings and dividends.

13.0% of The Mercantile Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.3% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of The Mercantile Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

The Mercantile Investment Trust has a beta of 1.5278819, meaning that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.648272, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

The Mercantile Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. The Mercantile Investment Trust pays out 27.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

The Mercantile Investment Trust has a net margin of 89.90% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. The Mercantile Investment Trust's return on equity of 10.56% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Mercantile Investment Trust89.90% 10.56% 2.53%
Pacific Assets -29.27%-0.93%0.07%

In the previous week, The Mercantile Investment Trust and The Mercantile Investment Trust both had 1 articles in the media. Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat The Mercantile Investment Trust's score of 1.13 indicating that Pacific Assets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
The Mercantile Investment Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Pacific Assets
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

The Mercantile Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Mercantile Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Mercantile Investment Trust£209.68M8.67£393.55M£29.039.82
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-107.48£42.65M-£3.70N/A

Summary

The Mercantile Investment Trust beats Pacific Assets on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to BH Macro USD?

BH Macro USD (LON:BHMU) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

0.0% of BH Macro USD shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.3% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of BH Macro USD shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BH Macro USD has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BH Macro USD, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BH Macro USD£277.60M0.05£4.33B£45.680.09
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-107.48£42.65M-£3.70N/A

BH Macro USD has a beta of 0.18969847, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.648272, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

BH Macro USD has a net margin of 54.44% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. BH Macro USD's return on equity of 7.42% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BH Macro USD54.44% 7.42% -0.31%
Pacific Assets -29.27%-0.93%0.07%

In the previous week, Pacific Assets had 1 more articles in the media than BH Macro USD. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pacific Assets and 0 mentions for BH Macro USD. Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat BH Macro USD's score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Assets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BH Macro USD Neutral
Pacific Assets Positive

Summary

BH Macro USD beats Pacific Assets on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to Rathbones Group?

Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) and Rathbones Group (LON:RAT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

11.3% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.6% of Rathbones Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Rathbones Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Rathbones Group has a consensus target price of GBX 1,836.67, suggesting a potential upside of 7.79%. Given Rathbones Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Rathbones Group is more favorable than Pacific Assets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pacific Assets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Rathbones Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Rathbones Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 99 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rathbones Group pays out 88.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.648272, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rathbones Group has a beta of 0.722, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Rathbones Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rathbones Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-107.48£42.65M-£3.70N/A
Rathbones Group£961.70M1.82£63.46M£112.3015.17

In the previous week, Pacific Assets and Pacific Assets both had 1 articles in the media. Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Rathbones Group's score of 0.57 indicating that Pacific Assets is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pacific Assets
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Rathbones Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Rathbones Group has a net margin of 11.20% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Rathbones Group's return on equity of 8.95% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pacific Assets-29.27% -0.93% 0.07%
Rathbones Group 11.20%8.95%3.57%

Summary

Rathbones Group beats Pacific Assets on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pacific Assets News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PAC vs. The Competition

MetricPacific AssetsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£477.62M£5.55B£14.03B£2.87B
Dividend Yield1.40%7.46%5.91%6.13%
P/E Ratio-112.9738.2429.34369.49
Price / Sales-107.481,242.89511.8683,955.53
Price / Cash12.6948.2339.3227.89
Price / Book0.993.743.747.07
Net Income£42.65M£417.17M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.47%1.27%1.11%1.18%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-0.46%0.46%0.90%
1 Year Performance17.42%6.59%13.14%75.31%

Pacific Assets Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PAC
Pacific Assets
N/AGBX 418
-0.5%
N/A+18.3%£477.62M-£4.44MN/A1,740
TRIG
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
1.9863 of 5 stars
GBX 76.10
-1.3%
GBX 100
+31.4%
-6.0%£1.79B-£123.70MN/AN/A
HGT
HgCapital Trust
N/AGBX 390
+0.4%
N/A-23.4%£1.77B£109.29M18.15N/A
MRC
The Mercantile Investment Trust
N/AGBX 276.50
-0.9%
N/A+12.2%£1.77B£209.68M9.522,800
BHMU
BH Macro USD
N/AGBX 4.24
-0.2%
N/A+5.5%£1.76B£277.60M0.09N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PAC) was last updated on 8/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners