Free Trial
→ Skip the Line Opportunity: The SpaceX IPO (From Brownstone Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free PAC Stock Alerts

Pacific Assets (PAC) Competitors

Pacific Assets logo
GBX 421 -2.00 (-0.47%)
As of 07:38 AM Eastern
Compare

PAC vs. DAL, SQZ, SHIP, ASC, and TORO

Should you buy Pacific Assets stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pacific Assets with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pacific Assets include Dalata Hotel Group (DAL), Serica Energy (SQZ), Tufton Oceanic Assets (SHIP), ASOS (ASC), and Chenavari Toro Income Fund (TORO). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does Pacific Assets compare to Dalata Hotel Group?

Dalata Hotel Group (LON:DAL) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Dalata Hotel Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dalata Hotel Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dalata Hotel Group£607.70M1.89£94.71M£39.9013.60
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-108.25£42.65M-£3.70N/A

74.4% of Dalata Hotel Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Dalata Hotel Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dalata Hotel Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Dalata Hotel Group pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pacific Assets is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Dalata Hotel Group has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Dalata Hotel Group's return on equity of 4.44% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dalata Hotel Group9.53% 4.44% 3.89%
Pacific Assets -29.27%-0.93%0.07%

In the previous week, Pacific Assets had 1 more articles in the media than Dalata Hotel Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pacific Assets and 0 mentions for Dalata Hotel Group. Dalata Hotel Group's average media sentiment score of 0.28 beat Pacific Assets' score of 0.00 indicating that Dalata Hotel Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dalata Hotel Group Neutral
Pacific Assets Neutral

Dalata Hotel Group has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6627685, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Dalata Hotel Group beats Pacific Assets on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to Serica Energy?

Serica Energy (LON:SQZ) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, profitability and dividends.

Serica Energy currently has a consensus price target of GBX 268.25, indicating a potential upside of 2.70%. Given Serica Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Serica Energy is more favorable than Pacific Assets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Serica Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pacific Assets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Serica Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Pacific Assets. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Serica Energy and 1 mentions for Pacific Assets. Serica Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Pacific Assets' score of 0.00 indicating that Serica Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Serica Energy Positive
Pacific Assets Neutral

Serica Energy has a net margin of -7.30% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Pacific Assets' return on equity of -0.93% beat Serica Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Serica Energy-7.30% -9.06% 12.14%
Pacific Assets -29.27%-0.93%0.07%

Serica Energy pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Serica Energy pays out -166.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Serica Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Serica Energy has a beta of 0.047, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6627685, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

24.1% of Serica Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.8% of Serica Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pacific Assets has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Serica Energy. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Serica Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Serica Energy£601.43M1.70-£9.03M-£13.00N/A
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-108.25£42.65M-£3.70N/A

Summary

Serica Energy beats Pacific Assets on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to Tufton Oceanic Assets?

Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) and Tufton Oceanic Assets (LON:SHIP) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6627685, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tufton Oceanic Assets has a beta of 0.3580951, indicating that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pacific Assets had 1 more articles in the media than Tufton Oceanic Assets. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pacific Assets and 0 mentions for Tufton Oceanic Assets. Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tufton Oceanic Assets'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pacific Assets Neutral
Tufton Oceanic Assets Neutral

Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Tufton Oceanic Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 784.5%. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tufton Oceanic Assets pays out -98.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pacific Assets has a net margin of -29.27% compared to Tufton Oceanic Assets' net margin of -88.41%. Pacific Assets' return on equity of -0.93% beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pacific Assets-29.27% -0.93% 0.07%
Tufton Oceanic Assets -88.41%-7.25%5.03%

8.2% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.6% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tufton Oceanic Assets has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tufton Oceanic Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-108.25£42.65M-£3.70N/A
Tufton Oceanic Assets-£27.15M-0.13£6.96B-£10.09N/A

Summary

Pacific Assets beats Tufton Oceanic Assets on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to ASOS?

Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) and ASOS (LON:ASC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

ASOS has a net margin of -10.10% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Pacific Assets' return on equity of -0.93% beat ASOS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pacific Assets-29.27% -0.93% 0.07%
ASOS -10.10%-155.17%-5.44%

Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6627685, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASOS has a beta of 2.222, indicating that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market.

8.2% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.8% of ASOS shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of ASOS shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ASOS has a consensus target price of GBX 364.33, indicating a potential upside of 42.32%. Given ASOS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ASOS is more favorable than Pacific Assets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pacific Assets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
ASOS
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Pacific Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ASOS. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASOS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-108.25£42.65M-£3.70N/A
ASOS£2.29B0.13-£340.23M-£193.20N/A

In the previous week, ASOS had 2 more articles in the media than Pacific Assets. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for ASOS and 1 mentions for Pacific Assets. ASOS's average media sentiment score of 1.92 beat Pacific Assets' score of 0.00 indicating that ASOS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pacific Assets
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ASOS
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

ASOS beats Pacific Assets on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Assets compare to Chenavari Toro Income Fund?

Chenavari Toro Income Fund (LON:TORO) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Pacific Assets had 1 more articles in the media than Chenavari Toro Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pacific Assets and 0 mentions for Chenavari Toro Income Fund. Chenavari Toro Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pacific Assets'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chenavari Toro Income Fund Neutral
Pacific Assets Neutral

0.4% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pacific Assets has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chenavari Toro Income Fund. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chenavari Toro Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chenavari Toro Income Fund£26.58M0.07N/A£8.050.07
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-108.25£42.65M-£3.70N/A

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a net margin of 94.29% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Chenavari Toro Income Fund's return on equity of 12.06% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chenavari Toro Income Fund94.29% 12.06% N/A
Pacific Assets -29.27%-0.93%0.07%

Chenavari Toro Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,248.6%. Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Chenavari Toro Income Fund pays out 85.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a beta of 0.22568311, indicating that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6627685, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chenavari Toro Income Fund beats Pacific Assets on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pacific Assets News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PAC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPacific AssetsAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£481.05M£2.40B£5.70B£2.77B
Dividend Yield1.31%6.02%5.28%6.12%
P/E Ratio-113.7825.7216.28362.98
Price / Sales-108.252,095.501,112.2687,661.67
Price / Cash12.6960.1591.3227.85
Price / Book1.001.376.517.79
Net Income£42.65M£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.94%-0.38%0.10%0.17%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-32.65%-7.70%N/A
1 Year Performance22.38%11.18%19.43%74.52%

Pacific Assets Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PAC
Pacific Assets
N/AGBX 421
-0.5%		N/A+24.4%£481.05M-£4.44MN/A1,740
DAL
Dalata Hotel Group
N/AGBX 542.50
flat		N/A+10.7%£1.15B£607.70M13.6095,000
SQZ
Serica Energy
2.0503 of 5 stars		GBX 265.40
-2.8%		GBX 254.50
-4.1%		+63.3%£1.07B£601.43MN/A1,620
SHIP
Tufton Oceanic Assets
N/AGBX 1.22
+0.4%		N/A+8.9%£323.56M-£27.15MN/A50
ASC
ASOS
4.3572 of 5 stars		GBX 243.50
+3.0%		GBX 364.33
+49.6%		-21.3%£282.97M£2.29BN/A990

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PAC) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Nevada gold explorer near Kinross district draws attention
Gold has surged past $5,300 per ounce, with Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan forecasting $6,000+ by end of 2026. Cen...
Wall Street Logic | Sponsoredtc pixel
A gold storm is coming – are you ready?
The U.S. Treasury Secretary is betting big on gold - and the world's most successful investors are following s...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
The SpaceX S-1 changes everything
SpaceX just filed its IPO paperwork. And buried inside that filing was something that should change how every ...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s New Dollar revealed
The last time something like this happened was 1974 - a secret deal that quietly determined the financial fate...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
How to claim a stake in SpaceX before the June 12 IPO
SpaceX is expected to go public on June 12 - and for the first time, everyday investors may have a way in befo...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Oil is settling in yuan now - here's what that means for gold
Saudi Arabia has terminated its 1974 petrodollar agreement with the United States - the deal that forced every...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
The chokepoint supplier behind SpaceX's $1.75 trillion empire
When Musk laughed and said 'you need transformers to run transformers,' it wasn't a joke - it was a confession...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel