Go Pro
→ MILLIONAIRE MASTERCLASS INVITE: Altucher (From Paradigm Press) (Ad)tc pixel Free SHIP Stock Alerts

Tufton Oceanic Assets (SHIP) Competitors

Tufton Oceanic Assets logo
GBX 1.40 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 09/29/2026 12:33 PM Eastern
Compare

SHIP vs. GEL, MMP, GNK, NTBR, and CSC

Should you buy Tufton Oceanic Assets stock or one of its competitors? Tufton Oceanic Assets's main competitors and comparable companies include Greka Engineering & Technology (GEL), Marwyn Management Partners (MMP), Greene King (GNK), Northern Bear (NTBR), and Chesterfield Special Cylinders (CSC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Tufton Oceanic Assets compare to Greka Engineering & Technology?

Tufton Oceanic Assets (LON:SHIP) and Greka Engineering & Technology (LON:GEL) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

Tufton Oceanic Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greka Engineering & Technology.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tufton Oceanic Assets-£27.15M-0.14£6.96B-£10.09N/A
Greka Engineering & TechnologyN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

38.0% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Greka Engineering & Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tufton Oceanic Assets' net margin of -88.41%. Greka Engineering & Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tufton Oceanic Assets-88.41% -7.82% 5.03%
Greka Engineering & Technology N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Tufton Oceanic Assets had 3 more articles in the media than Greka Engineering & Technology. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tufton Oceanic Assets and 0 mentions for Greka Engineering & Technology. Greka Engineering & Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' score of -0.10 indicating that Greka Engineering & Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tufton Oceanic Assets Neutral
Greka Engineering & Technology Neutral

Summary

Tufton Oceanic Assets and Greka Engineering & Technology tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tufton Oceanic Assets compare to Marwyn Management Partners?

Tufton Oceanic Assets (LON:SHIP) and Marwyn Management Partners (LON:MMP) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

38.0% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tufton Oceanic Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marwyn Management Partners.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tufton Oceanic Assets-£27.15M-0.14£6.96B-£10.09N/A
Marwyn Management PartnersN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Marwyn Management Partners has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tufton Oceanic Assets' net margin of -88.41%. Marwyn Management Partners' return on equity of 0.00% beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tufton Oceanic Assets-88.41% -7.82% 5.03%
Marwyn Management Partners N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Tufton Oceanic Assets had 3 more articles in the media than Marwyn Management Partners. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tufton Oceanic Assets and 0 mentions for Marwyn Management Partners. Marwyn Management Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' score of -0.10 indicating that Marwyn Management Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tufton Oceanic Assets Neutral
Marwyn Management Partners Neutral

Summary

Tufton Oceanic Assets and Marwyn Management Partners tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tufton Oceanic Assets compare to Greene King?

Tufton Oceanic Assets (LON:SHIP) and Greene King (LON:GNK) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Tufton Oceanic Assets had 3 more articles in the media than Greene King. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tufton Oceanic Assets and 0 mentions for Greene King. Greene King's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' score of -0.10 indicating that Greene King is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tufton Oceanic Assets Neutral
Greene King Neutral

Tufton Oceanic Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greene King. Tufton Oceanic Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greene King, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tufton Oceanic Assets-£27.15M-0.14£6.96B-£10.09N/A
Greene King£2.22B0.00N/A£38.70N/A

38.0% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Greene King has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tufton Oceanic Assets' net margin of -88.41%. Greene King's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tufton Oceanic Assets-88.41% -7.82% 5.03%
Greene King N/A N/A N/A

Tufton Oceanic Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 714.2%. Greene King pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.33 per share. Tufton Oceanic Assets pays out -98.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Greene King pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tufton Oceanic Assets is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Tufton Oceanic Assets and Greene King tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tufton Oceanic Assets compare to Northern Bear?

Tufton Oceanic Assets (LON:SHIP) and Northern Bear (LON:NTBR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Northern Bear has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Tufton Oceanic Assets' net margin of -88.41%. Northern Bear's return on equity of 16.33% beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tufton Oceanic Assets-88.41% -7.82% 5.03%
Northern Bear 4.82%16.33%3.83%

38.0% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Northern Bear shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 98.8% of Northern Bear shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tufton Oceanic Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 714.2%. Northern Bear pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Tufton Oceanic Assets pays out -98.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Northern Bear pays out 8.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tufton Oceanic Assets is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Tufton Oceanic Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Northern Bear. Tufton Oceanic Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northern Bear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tufton Oceanic Assets-£27.15M-0.14£6.96B-£10.09N/A
Northern Bear£86.10M0.18£1.30M£29.303.92

In the previous week, Tufton Oceanic Assets had 3 more articles in the media than Northern Bear. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tufton Oceanic Assets and 0 mentions for Northern Bear. Northern Bear's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' score of -0.10 indicating that Northern Bear is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tufton Oceanic Assets Neutral
Northern Bear Neutral

Tufton Oceanic Assets has a beta of 0.3580951, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northern Bear has a beta of 0.261, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Northern Bear beats Tufton Oceanic Assets on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tufton Oceanic Assets compare to Chesterfield Special Cylinders?

Chesterfield Special Cylinders (LON:CSC) and Tufton Oceanic Assets (LON:SHIP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Chesterfield Special Cylinders has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tufton Oceanic Assets' net margin of -88.41%. Chesterfield Special Cylinders' return on equity of 0.00% beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chesterfield Special CylindersN/A N/A N/A
Tufton Oceanic Assets -88.41%-7.82%5.03%

Tufton Oceanic Assets has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chesterfield Special Cylinders. Tufton Oceanic Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chesterfield Special Cylinders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chesterfield Special Cylinders£17.56M0.78N/A£2.0017.69
Tufton Oceanic Assets-£27.15M-0.14£6.96B-£10.09N/A

21.0% of Chesterfield Special Cylinders shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.0% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.7% of Chesterfield Special Cylinders shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Tufton Oceanic Assets had 3 more articles in the media than Chesterfield Special Cylinders. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tufton Oceanic Assets and 0 mentions for Chesterfield Special Cylinders. Chesterfield Special Cylinders' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' score of -0.10 indicating that Chesterfield Special Cylinders is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chesterfield Special Cylinders Neutral
Tufton Oceanic Assets Neutral

Summary

Chesterfield Special Cylinders beats Tufton Oceanic Assets on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tufton Oceanic Assets News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SHIP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SHIP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SHIP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTufton Oceanic AssetsDeep Sea Freight Transportation IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.73M£3.73M£10.17B£2.88B
Dividend Yield7.41%7.41%96.95%6.22%
P/E Ratio-0.14N/A25.15365.96
Price / Sales-0.14N/A273.8789,730.91
Price / Cash11.1011.1023.8427.89
Price / Book0.010.014.816.33
Net Income£6.96B£6.96B£616.01M£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.10%3.10%-1.02%0.04%
1 Month Performance1.82%1.82%-2.92%10.99%
1 Year Performance23.45%23.45%3.34%17.89%

Tufton Oceanic Assets Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SHIP
Tufton Oceanic Assets
N/AGBX 1.40
flat		N/A+25.2%£3.73M-£27.15MN/A50
GEL
Greka Engineering & Technology
N/AN/AN/AN/A£0.00N/AN/A2,110
MMP
Marwyn Management Partners
N/AN/AN/AN/A£0.00N/AN/A1,660
GNK
Greene King
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.63B£2.22B21.941,010
NTBR
Northern Bear
N/AGBX 105
-4.5%		N/A+23.7%£14.45M£86.10M3.58421

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SHIP) was last updated on 9/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Dr. Ron Paul Issues New Warning: “The Next Financial Crisis Is Here”
Dr. Ron Paul warns a dangerous experiment is already underway in Washington, involving at least 27 billion dol...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
I've seen this movie before (last time: 17,556%)
My track record speaks for itself... KDA: 17,556%. PRE: 3,900%. OCEAN: 2,650%. Every single one was called ...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
A “bloodbath” Is Coming
Reports suggest some Silicon Valley billionaires are stockpiling gold, guns, and gas masks - or leaving the co...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why I went to Mount Rushmore
A small miner just hit on gold in the hills surrounding Mount Rushmore, thanks to a breakthrough new technolog...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Should You Convert a Traditional IRA to a Roth After 60?
Considering a Roth conversion after 60? The upside includes no income limits on conversions, potential tax-fre...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel