Go Pro

CloudCoCo Group (CLCO) Competitors

GBX 0.18 +0.02 (+9.38%)
As of 11:09 AM Eastern

CLCO vs. 4GBL, ARB, TNT, NARF, and RCGH

Should you buy CloudCoCo Group stock or one of its competitors? CloudCoCo Group's main competitors and comparable companies include 4GLOBAL (4GBL), Argo Blockchain (ARB), Tintra (TNT), Narf Industries (NARF), and RC365 (RCGH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "software" industry.

How does CloudCoCo Group compare to 4GLOBAL?

CloudCoCo Group (LON:CLCO) and 4GLOBAL (LON:4GBL) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, CloudCoCo Group had 1 more articles in the media than 4GLOBAL. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CloudCoCo Group and 0 mentions for 4GLOBAL. CloudCoCo Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat 4GLOBAL's score of 0.00 indicating that CloudCoCo Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CloudCoCo Group Positive
4GLOBAL Neutral

CloudCoCo Group has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 4GLOBAL has a beta of -0.4, suggesting that its stock price is 140% less volatile than the broader market.

CloudCoCo Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to 4GLOBAL's net margin of -3.60%. CloudCoCo Group's return on equity of 58.02% beat 4GLOBAL's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CloudCoCo Group2.63% 58.02% -5.41%
4GLOBAL -3.60%-5.10%8.62%

CloudCoCo Group has higher revenue and earnings than 4GLOBAL. 4GLOBAL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CloudCoCo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CloudCoCo Group£9.01M0.18-£2.15M-£0.05N/A
4GLOBAL£6.37M0.93-£2.90M-£0.01N/A

1.2% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of 4GLOBAL shares are held by institutional investors. 59.0% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.1% of 4GLOBAL shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CloudCoCo Group beats 4GLOBAL on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CloudCoCo Group compare to Argo Blockchain?

CloudCoCo Group (LON:CLCO) and Argo Blockchain (LON:ARB) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

CloudCoCo Group has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Argo Blockchain has a beta of 3.39, meaning that its stock price is 239% more volatile than the broader market.

CloudCoCo Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Argo Blockchain. CloudCoCo Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Argo Blockchain, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CloudCoCo Group£9.01M0.18-£2.15M-£0.05N/A
Argo Blockchain£24.12M0.24-£88.80M-£3.00N/A

1.2% of CloudCoCo Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.5% of Argo Blockchain shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.0% of CloudCoCo Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.5% of Argo Blockchain shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CloudCoCo Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Argo Blockchain's net margin of -129.41%. CloudCoCo Group's return on equity of 58.02% beat Argo Blockchain's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CloudCoCo Group2.63% 58.02% -5.41%
Argo Blockchain -129.41%21.74%-16.05%

In the previous week, CloudCoCo Group and CloudCoCo Group both had 1 articles in the media. CloudCoCo Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Argo Blockchain's score of 0.54 indicating that CloudCoCo Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CloudCoCo Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Argo Blockchain
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

CloudCoCo Group beats Argo Blockchain on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CloudCoCo Group compare to Tintra?

CloudCoCo Group (LON:CLCO) and Tintra (LON:TNT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, CloudCoCo Group had 1 more articles in the media than Tintra. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CloudCoCo Group and 0 mentions for Tintra. CloudCoCo Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Tintra's score of 0.00 indicating that CloudCoCo Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CloudCoCo Group Positive
Tintra Neutral

CloudCoCo Group has higher revenue and earnings than Tintra. CloudCoCo Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tintra, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CloudCoCo Group£9.01M0.18-£2.15M-£0.05N/A
Tintra-£245K0.00-£3.85M-£0.19N/A

CloudCoCo Group has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tintra has a beta of -0.04, suggesting that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market.

1.2% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by institutional investors. 59.0% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 73.4% of Tintra shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CloudCoCo Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Tintra's net margin of 0.00%. CloudCoCo Group's return on equity of 58.02% beat Tintra's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CloudCoCo Group2.63% 58.02% -5.41%
Tintra N/A -89.79%-32.80%

Summary

CloudCoCo Group beats Tintra on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CloudCoCo Group compare to Narf Industries?

CloudCoCo Group (LON:CLCO) and Narf Industries (LON:NARF) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

CloudCoCo Group has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Narf Industries has a beta of 0.416, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CloudCoCo Group had 1 more articles in the media than Narf Industries. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CloudCoCo Group and 0 mentions for Narf Industries. CloudCoCo Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Narf Industries' score of 0.00 indicating that CloudCoCo Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CloudCoCo Group Positive
Narf Industries Neutral

1.2% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.9% of Narf Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 59.0% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 32.4% of Narf Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Narf Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CloudCoCo Group. Narf Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CloudCoCo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CloudCoCo Group£9.01M0.18-£2.15M-£0.05N/A
Narf Industries£4.52M1.35-£1.43M-£0.06N/A

CloudCoCo Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Narf Industries' net margin of -21.32%. CloudCoCo Group's return on equity of 58.02% beat Narf Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CloudCoCo Group2.63% 58.02% -5.41%
Narf Industries -21.32%29.56%-23.65%

Summary

CloudCoCo Group beats Narf Industries on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CloudCoCo Group compare to RC365?

RC365 (LON:RCGH) and CloudCoCo Group (LON:CLCO) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

RC365 has a beta of 0.773, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CloudCoCo Group has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

CloudCoCo Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RC365. CloudCoCo Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RC365, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RC365£22.14M0.27-£382.65M-£8.56N/A
CloudCoCo Group£9.01M0.18-£2.15M-£0.05N/A

1.2% of CloudCoCo Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.3% of RC365 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.0% of CloudCoCo Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CloudCoCo Group has a net margin of 2.63% compared to RC365's net margin of -58.19%. RC365's return on equity of 481.17% beat CloudCoCo Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RC365-58.19% 481.17% -4.91%
CloudCoCo Group 2.63%58.02%-5.41%

In the previous week, CloudCoCo Group had 1 more articles in the media than RC365. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CloudCoCo Group and 0 mentions for RC365. CloudCoCo Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat RC365's score of 0.00 indicating that CloudCoCo Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
RC365 Neutral
CloudCoCo Group Positive

Summary

CloudCoCo Group beats RC365 on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CloudCoCo Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLCO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CLCO vs. The Competition

MetricCloudCoCo GroupSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.64M£15.55B£29.95B£2.92B
Dividend Yield2.63%3.42%2.73%6.22%
P/E Ratio-3.50138.3576.08366.70
Price / Sales0.181,288.80587.9083,694.76
Price / Cash5.7543.1246.8427.89
Price / Book41.218.397.796.58
Net Income-£2.15M£434.48M£703.05M£5.89B
7 Day Performance14.38%-0.60%0.75%12.36%
1 Month Performance9.37%-0.50%-2.06%1.01%
1 Year Performance-22.57%3.41%185.76%21.13%

CloudCoCo Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CLCO
CloudCoCo Group
N/AGBX 0.18
+9.4%
N/A-34.8%£1.64M£9.01MN/A125
4GBL
4GLOBAL
N/AGBX 22.50
flat
N/A+0.0%£5.93M£6.37MN/A30
ARB
Argo Blockchain
N/AGBX 0.80
-23.8%
N/A-55.8%£5.77M£24.12MN/A30
TNT
Tintra
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.76M-£245KN/A12
NARF
Narf Industries
N/AGBX 0.33
+10.0%
N/A-30.2%£5.60M£4.52MN/A18

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CLCO) was last updated on 9/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners