Free Trial

CloudCoCo Group (CLCO) Competitors

GBX 0.22 +0.02 (+10.26%)
As of 05:13 AM Eastern

CLCO vs. SHIP, TORO, ICON, PAA, and GEL

Should you buy CloudCoCo Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CloudCoCo Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CloudCoCo Group include Tufton Oceanic Assets (SHIP), Chenavari Toro Income Fund (TORO), Iconic Labs (ICON), 22532 (PAA.L) (PAA), and Greka Engineering & Technology (GEL). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does CloudCoCo Group compare to Tufton Oceanic Assets?

Tufton Oceanic Assets (LON:SHIP) and CloudCoCo Group (LON:CLCO) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

28.6% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tufton Oceanic Assets shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 51.3% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tufton Oceanic Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CloudCoCo Group. Tufton Oceanic Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CloudCoCo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tufton Oceanic Assets-£27.15M-0.12£6.96B-£10.09N/A
CloudCoCo Group£7.99M0.25-£2.15M£0.370.58

Tufton Oceanic Assets has a beta of 0.44728526, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CloudCoCo Group has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CloudCoCo Group had 1 more articles in the media than Tufton Oceanic Assets. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CloudCoCo Group and 0 mentions for Tufton Oceanic Assets. CloudCoCo Group's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' score of 0.00 indicating that CloudCoCo Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tufton Oceanic Assets Neutral
CloudCoCo Group Positive

CloudCoCo Group has a net margin of 39.86% compared to Tufton Oceanic Assets' net margin of -88.41%. CloudCoCo Group's return on equity of 538.46% beat Tufton Oceanic Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tufton Oceanic Assets-88.41% -7.25% 5.03%
CloudCoCo Group 39.86%538.46%-5.41%

Summary

CloudCoCo Group beats Tufton Oceanic Assets on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CloudCoCo Group compare to Chenavari Toro Income Fund?

Chenavari Toro Income Fund (LON:TORO) and CloudCoCo Group (LON:CLCO) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

0.4% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chenavari Toro Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 51.3% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has higher revenue and earnings than CloudCoCo Group. Chenavari Toro Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CloudCoCo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chenavari Toro Income Fund£26.58M0.06N/A£8.050.07
CloudCoCo Group£7.99M0.25-£2.15M£0.370.58

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a beta of 0.22568311, suggesting that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CloudCoCo Group has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CloudCoCo Group had 1 more articles in the media than Chenavari Toro Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CloudCoCo Group and 0 mentions for Chenavari Toro Income Fund. CloudCoCo Group's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Chenavari Toro Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that CloudCoCo Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chenavari Toro Income Fund Neutral
CloudCoCo Group Positive

Chenavari Toro Income Fund has a net margin of 94.29% compared to CloudCoCo Group's net margin of 39.86%. CloudCoCo Group's return on equity of 538.46% beat Chenavari Toro Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chenavari Toro Income Fund94.29% 12.06% N/A
CloudCoCo Group 39.86%538.46%-5.41%

Summary

CloudCoCo Group beats Chenavari Toro Income Fund on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CloudCoCo Group compare to Iconic Labs?

Iconic Labs (LON:ICON) and CloudCoCo Group (LON:CLCO) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

CloudCoCo Group has a net margin of 39.86% compared to Iconic Labs' net margin of 0.00%. CloudCoCo Group's return on equity of 538.46% beat Iconic Labs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Iconic LabsN/A N/A 11,862.25%
CloudCoCo Group 39.86%538.46%-5.41%

Iconic Labs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CloudCoCo Group. Iconic Labs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CloudCoCo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Iconic LabsN/AN/A£4.77M-£5.31N/A
CloudCoCo Group£7.99M0.25-£2.15M£0.370.58

Iconic Labs has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CloudCoCo Group has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

0.8% of Iconic Labs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.5% of Iconic Labs shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 51.3% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CloudCoCo Group had 1 more articles in the media than Iconic Labs. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CloudCoCo Group and 0 mentions for Iconic Labs. CloudCoCo Group's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Iconic Labs' score of 0.00 indicating that CloudCoCo Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Iconic Labs Neutral
CloudCoCo Group Positive

Summary

CloudCoCo Group beats Iconic Labs on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CloudCoCo Group compare to 22532 (PAA.L)?

22532 (PAA.L) (LON:PAA) and CloudCoCo Group (LON:CLCO) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

CloudCoCo Group has a net margin of 39.86% compared to 22532 (PAA.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. CloudCoCo Group's return on equity of 538.46% beat 22532 (PAA.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
22532 (PAA.L)N/A N/A N/A
CloudCoCo Group 39.86%538.46%-5.41%

22532 (PAA.L) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CloudCoCo Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
22532 (PAA.L)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
CloudCoCo Group£7.99M0.25-£2.15M£0.370.58

1.2% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by institutional investors. 51.3% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CloudCoCo Group had 1 more articles in the media than 22532 (PAA.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CloudCoCo Group and 0 mentions for 22532 (PAA.L). CloudCoCo Group's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat 22532 (PAA.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that CloudCoCo Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
22532 (PAA.L) Neutral
CloudCoCo Group Positive

Summary

CloudCoCo Group beats 22532 (PAA.L) on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CloudCoCo Group compare to Greka Engineering & Technology?

Greka Engineering & Technology (LON:GEL) and CloudCoCo Group (LON:CLCO) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

CloudCoCo Group has a net margin of 39.86% compared to Greka Engineering & Technology's net margin of 0.00%. CloudCoCo Group's return on equity of 538.46% beat Greka Engineering & Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greka Engineering & TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
CloudCoCo Group 39.86%538.46%-5.41%

Greka Engineering & Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CloudCoCo Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greka Engineering & TechnologyN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
CloudCoCo Group£7.99M0.25-£2.15M£0.370.58

1.2% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by institutional investors. 51.3% of CloudCoCo Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CloudCoCo Group had 1 more articles in the media than Greka Engineering & Technology. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CloudCoCo Group and 0 mentions for Greka Engineering & Technology. CloudCoCo Group's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Greka Engineering & Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that CloudCoCo Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Greka Engineering & Technology Neutral
CloudCoCo Group Positive

Summary

CloudCoCo Group beats Greka Engineering & Technology on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CloudCoCo Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLCO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CLCO vs. The Competition

MetricCloudCoCo GroupSoftware IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.01M£723.76M£38.55B£2.78B
Dividend Yield2.63%4.01%3.19%6.09%
P/E Ratio0.58666.21164.47365.94
Price / Sales0.2516,757.01625.9488,399.10
Price / Cash5.7515.4647.8227.89
Price / Book50.646.969.477.72
Net Income-£2.15M-£18.69M£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance10.26%0.61%-0.03%0.49%
1 Month Performance3.86%3.33%9.13%2.48%
1 Year Performance13.16%-5.65%163.84%87.19%

CloudCoCo Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CLCO
CloudCoCo Group
N/AGBX 0.22
+10.3%
N/A-1.6%£2.01M£7.99M0.58125
SHIP
Tufton Oceanic Assets
N/AGBX 1.20
-2.0%
N/A+10.4%£3.20M-£27.15MN/A50
TORO
Chenavari Toro Income Fund
N/AGBX 0.55
-0.2%
N/A-10.2%£1.73M£26.58M0.07N/A
ICON
Iconic Labs
N/AGBX 1.25
-24.2%
N/AN/A£233KN/AN/A3
PAA
22532 (PAA.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£0.00N/AN/A4,100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CLCO) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners