Go Pro

Crimson Tide (TIDE) Competitors

Crimson Tide logo
GBX 92.65 +2.65 (+2.94%)
As of 11:08 AM Eastern

TIDE vs. CRTA, APPS, ALT, ZOO, and PEN

Should you buy Crimson Tide stock or one of its competitors? Crimson Tide's main competitors and comparable companies include Cirata (CRTA), Appscatter Group (APPS), Altitude Group (ALT), ZOO Digital Group (ZOO), and Pennant International Group (PEN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does Crimson Tide compare to Cirata?

Cirata (LON:CRTA) and Crimson Tide (LON:TIDE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Cirata has a beta of 1.606, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crimson Tide has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Cirata currently has a consensus target price of GBX 44, suggesting a potential upside of 272.88%. Given Cirata's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cirata is more favorable than Crimson Tide.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Crimson Tide
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Crimson Tide has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cirata. Cirata is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crimson Tide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cirata£11.87M1.60-£44.87M-£6.00N/A
Crimson Tide£5.97M1.02-£85.00K£4.2122.01

0.9% of Cirata shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of Crimson Tide shares are held by institutional investors. 11.6% of Cirata shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.7% of Crimson Tide shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Crimson Tide has a net margin of 4.72% compared to Cirata's net margin of -58.41%. Crimson Tide's return on equity of 4.92% beat Cirata's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cirata-58.41% -90.39% -126.55%
Crimson Tide 4.72%4.92%-2.62%

In the previous week, Crimson Tide had 1 more articles in the media than Cirata. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Crimson Tide and 0 mentions for Cirata. Crimson Tide's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Cirata's score of 0.00 indicating that Crimson Tide is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cirata Neutral
Crimson Tide Positive

Summary

Crimson Tide beats Cirata on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crimson Tide compare to Appscatter Group?

Appscatter Group (LON:APPS) and Crimson Tide (LON:TIDE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Crimson Tide had 1 more articles in the media than Appscatter Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Crimson Tide and 0 mentions for Appscatter Group. Crimson Tide's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Appscatter Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Crimson Tide is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Appscatter Group Neutral
Crimson Tide Positive

Crimson Tide has a net margin of 4.72% compared to Appscatter Group's net margin of 0.00%. Crimson Tide's return on equity of 4.92% beat Appscatter Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Appscatter GroupN/A N/A N/A
Crimson Tide 4.72%4.92%-2.62%

Appscatter Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Crimson Tide. Appscatter Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crimson Tide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Appscatter Group£758.10K0.00N/A-£13.80N/A
Crimson Tide£5.97M1.02-£85.00K£4.2122.01

1.8% of Crimson Tide shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.7% of Crimson Tide shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Crimson Tide beats Appscatter Group on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crimson Tide compare to Altitude Group?

Crimson Tide (LON:TIDE) and Altitude Group (LON:ALT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Altitude Group has higher revenue and earnings than Crimson Tide. Altitude Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crimson Tide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crimson Tide£5.97M1.02-£85.00K£4.2122.01
Altitude Group£44.43M0.37£682.34K-£0.33N/A

Crimson Tide has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Altitude Group has a beta of 0.591, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

1.8% of Crimson Tide shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Altitude Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.7% of Crimson Tide shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.1% of Altitude Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Altitude Group had 1 more articles in the media than Crimson Tide. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Altitude Group and 1 mentions for Crimson Tide. Crimson Tide's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Altitude Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Crimson Tide is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Crimson Tide
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Altitude Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Crimson Tide has a net margin of 4.72% compared to Altitude Group's net margin of -1.59%. Crimson Tide's return on equity of 4.92% beat Altitude Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crimson Tide4.72% 4.92% -2.62%
Altitude Group -1.59%-4.69%1.65%

Summary

Altitude Group beats Crimson Tide on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crimson Tide compare to ZOO Digital Group?

Crimson Tide (LON:TIDE) and ZOO Digital Group (LON:ZOO) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

ZOO Digital Group has a consensus price target of GBX 22, suggesting a potential upside of 37.50%. Given ZOO Digital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ZOO Digital Group is more favorable than Crimson Tide.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crimson Tide
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
ZOO Digital Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Crimson Tide and Crimson Tide both had 1 articles in the media. Crimson Tide's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat ZOO Digital Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Crimson Tide is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Crimson Tide
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ZOO Digital Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Crimson Tide has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZOO Digital Group has a beta of 0.966, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Crimson Tide has a net margin of 4.72% compared to ZOO Digital Group's net margin of -8.68%. Crimson Tide's return on equity of 4.92% beat ZOO Digital Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crimson Tide4.72% 4.92% -2.62%
ZOO Digital Group -8.68%-21.37%-21.28%

Crimson Tide has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ZOO Digital Group. ZOO Digital Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crimson Tide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crimson Tide£5.97M1.02-£85.00K£4.2122.01
ZOO Digital Group£42.34M0.37-£27.37M-£3.80N/A

1.8% of Crimson Tide shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.4% of ZOO Digital Group shares are held by institutional investors. 25.7% of Crimson Tide shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.1% of ZOO Digital Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Crimson Tide beats ZOO Digital Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crimson Tide compare to Pennant International Group?

Pennant International Group (LON:PEN) and Crimson Tide (LON:TIDE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Crimson Tide has a net margin of 4.72% compared to Pennant International Group's net margin of -8.06%. Crimson Tide's return on equity of 4.92% beat Pennant International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pennant International Group-8.06% -13.64% -0.28%
Crimson Tide 4.72%4.92%-2.62%

9.6% of Pennant International Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of Crimson Tide shares are held by institutional investors. 37.0% of Pennant International Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.7% of Crimson Tide shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Pennant International Group had 1 more articles in the media than Crimson Tide. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pennant International Group and 1 mentions for Crimson Tide. Crimson Tide's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Pennant International Group's score of -0.50 indicating that Crimson Tide is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pennant International Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Crimson Tide
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pennant International Group has a beta of 0.176, meaning that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crimson Tide has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Crimson Tide has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pennant International Group. Pennant International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crimson Tide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pennant International Group£9.66M1.47-£1.09M-£5.04N/A
Crimson Tide£5.97M1.02-£85.00K£4.2122.01

Summary

Crimson Tide beats Pennant International Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Crimson Tide News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TIDE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TIDE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TIDE vs. The Competition

MetricCrimson TideSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£6.09M£15.72B£29.51B£2.91B
Dividend Yield6.50%3.40%2.73%6.18%
P/E Ratio22.01139.9275.80364.48
Price / Sales1.021,293.98591.9883,785.80
Price / Cash4.4245.8947.3227.89
Price / Book0.837.459.296.81
Net Income-£85.00K£437.25M£678.51M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.47%-1.84%-2.37%-0.58%
1 Month Performance7.98%3.26%1.09%2.34%
1 Year Performance53.78%4.92%186.43%21.91%

Crimson Tide Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TIDE
Crimson Tide
N/AGBX 92.65
+2.9%
N/A+42.9%£6.09M£5.97M22.0152
CRTA
Cirata
N/AGBX 12.95
+1.6%
GBX 44
+239.8%
-30.4%£20.80M£11.87MN/A112
APPS
Appscatter Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£16.74M£758.10KN/A840
ALT
Altitude Group
N/AGBX 22.62
-1.7%
N/A+8.1%£16.54M£44.43MN/A50
ZOO
ZOO Digital Group
2.0738 of 5 stars
GBX 16.34
-6.7%
GBX 22
+34.7%
+29.2%£16.06M£42.34MN/A624

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TIDE) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners