Free Trial

Altitude Group (ALT) Competitors

Altitude Group logo
GBX 18 -0.50 (-2.70%)
As of 12:04 PM Eastern

ALT vs. MRK, REVB, CYAN, CRDL, and OKYO

Should you buy Altitude Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Altitude Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Altitude Group include Marks Electrical Group (MRK), Revolution Beauty Group (REVB), CyanConnode (CYAN), Cordel Group (CRDL), and OKYO Pharma (OKYO). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does Altitude Group compare to Marks Electrical Group?

Marks Electrical Group (LON:MRK) and Altitude Group (LON:ALT) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Altitude Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Marks Electrical Group. Marks Electrical Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Altitude Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marks Electrical Group£111.35M0.45£426.93K-£1.03N/A
Altitude Group£40.47M0.33£682.34K£0.7623.68

In the previous week, Marks Electrical Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Altitude Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Marks Electrical Group Neutral
Altitude Group Neutral

Marks Electrical Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 52.50, suggesting a potential upside of 9.38%. Given Marks Electrical Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Marks Electrical Group is more favorable than Altitude Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marks Electrical Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Altitude Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Altitude Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Marks Electrical Group's net margin of -0.97%. Altitude Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Marks Electrical Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marks Electrical Group-0.97% -10.09% 0.91%
Altitude Group 0.00%0.00%1.65%

Marks Electrical Group has a beta of 0.673, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Altitude Group has a beta of 0.574, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

0.2% of Marks Electrical Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Altitude Group shares are held by institutional investors. 75.2% of Marks Electrical Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.2% of Altitude Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Marks Electrical Group and Altitude Group tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Altitude Group compare to Revolution Beauty Group?

Revolution Beauty Group (LON:REVB) and Altitude Group (LON:ALT) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

0.8% of Revolution Beauty Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Altitude Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.5% of Revolution Beauty Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 38.2% of Altitude Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Altitude Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Revolution Beauty Group. Revolution Beauty Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Altitude Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Revolution Beauty Group£119.55M0.31-£549.75K-£7.70N/A
Altitude Group£40.47M0.33£682.34K£0.7623.68

Revolution Beauty Group has a beta of 1.327, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Altitude Group has a beta of 0.574, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Revolution Beauty Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Altitude Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Revolution Beauty Group Neutral
Altitude Group Neutral

Altitude Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Revolution Beauty Group's net margin of -20.71%. Revolution Beauty Group's return on equity of 97.34% beat Altitude Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Revolution Beauty Group-20.71% 97.34% 1.14%
Altitude Group 0.00%0.00%1.65%

Summary

Altitude Group beats Revolution Beauty Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Altitude Group compare to CyanConnode?

CyanConnode (LON:CYAN) and Altitude Group (LON:ALT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Altitude Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CyanConnode's net margin of -29.88%. Altitude Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat CyanConnode's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CyanConnode-29.88% -35.93% -9.06%
Altitude Group 0.00%0.00%1.65%

Altitude Group has higher revenue and earnings than CyanConnode. CyanConnode is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Altitude Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CyanConnode£15.99M1.96-£4.72M-£1.32N/A
Altitude Group£40.47M0.33£682.34K£0.7623.68

9.4% of CyanConnode shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Altitude Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 51.6% of CyanConnode shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.2% of Altitude Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CyanConnode has a beta of 1.074, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Altitude Group has a beta of 0.574, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CyanConnode's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Altitude Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CyanConnode Neutral
Altitude Group Neutral

Summary

Altitude Group beats CyanConnode on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Altitude Group compare to Cordel Group?

Cordel Group (LON:CRDL) and Altitude Group (LON:ALT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

Altitude Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cordel Group's net margin of -27.15%. Altitude Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Cordel Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cordel Group-27.15% -44.78% -7.25%
Altitude Group 0.00%0.00%1.65%

3.4% of Cordel Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Altitude Group shares are held by institutional investors. 33.2% of Cordel Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.2% of Altitude Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cordel Group has a beta of 0.442, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Altitude Group has a beta of 0.574, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Altitude Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cordel Group. Cordel Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Altitude Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cordel Group£4.24M6.14-£1.41M-£0.53N/A
Altitude Group£40.47M0.33£682.34K£0.7623.68

In the previous week, Cordel Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Altitude Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cordel Group Neutral
Altitude Group Neutral

Summary

Altitude Group beats Cordel Group on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Altitude Group compare to OKYO Pharma?

OKYO Pharma (LON:OKYO) and Altitude Group (LON:ALT) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, OKYO Pharma's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Altitude Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
OKYO Pharma Neutral
Altitude Group Neutral

Altitude Group has higher revenue and earnings than OKYO Pharma. OKYO Pharma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Altitude Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OKYO PharmaN/AN/A-£6.70M-£0.01N/A
Altitude Group£40.47M0.33£682.34K£0.7623.68

6.4% of Altitude Group shares are held by institutional investors. 31.9% of OKYO Pharma shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 38.2% of Altitude Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

OKYO Pharma has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Altitude Group's net margin of 0.00%. Altitude Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat OKYO Pharma's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OKYO PharmaN/A -397.13% -154.72%
Altitude Group 0.00%0.00%1.65%

OKYO Pharma has a beta of -0.06, suggesting that its share price is 106% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Altitude Group has a beta of 0.574, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Altitude Group beats OKYO Pharma on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Altitude Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ALT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ALT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ALT vs. The Competition

MetricAltitude GroupSoftware IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£13.17M£5.20B£40.57B£2.78B
Dividend Yield2.18%3.93%3.06%6.12%
P/E Ratio23.6826.9082.40363.21
Price / Sales0.33247.17636.8887,415.85
Price / Cash26.2917.5053.0327.85
Price / Book1.254.4210.187.70
Net Income£682.34K£22.26M£1.06B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-5.26%1.54%2.25%0.20%
1 Year Performance-10.00%-2.14%169.91%74.70%

Altitude Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ALT
Altitude Group
N/AGBX 18
-2.7%
N/A-6.5%£13.17M£40.47M23.6850
MRK
Marks Electrical Group
0.6632 of 5 stars
GBX 50
+3.0%
GBX 52.50
+5.0%
-14.4%£52.13M£111.35MN/A200
REVB
Revolution Beauty Group
N/AGBX 3.76
+1.3%
N/A-38.2%£32.70M£119.55MN/A10
CYAN
CyanConnode
N/AGBX 8.48
+1.0%
N/A+9.3%£29.85M£15.99MN/A100
CRDL
Cordel Group
N/AGBX 11.92
-0.7%
N/A+60.0%£25.86M£4.24MN/A35

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ALT) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners