Go Pro

CyanConnode (CYAN) Competitors

CyanConnode logo
GBX 9.89 +0.04 (+0.43%)
As of 08/21/2026 12:30 PM Eastern

CYAN vs. AMO, MWE, CLX, PEB, and GINV

Should you buy CyanConnode stock or one of its competitors? CyanConnode's main competitors and comparable companies include Amino Technologies (AMO), M.T.I Wireless Edge (MWE), Calnex Solutions (CLX), Pebble Beach Systems Group (PEB), and Global Invacom Group (GINV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "communications equipment" industry.

How does CyanConnode compare to Amino Technologies?

Amino Technologies (LON:AMO) and CyanConnode (LON:CYAN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Amino Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CyanConnode'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Amino Technologies Neutral
CyanConnode Neutral

Amino Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CyanConnode's net margin of -29.88%. Amino Technologies' return on equity of 0.00% beat CyanConnode's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Amino TechnologiesN/A N/A N/A
CyanConnode -29.88%-35.93%-9.06%

Amino Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than CyanConnode. CyanConnode is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amino Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Amino Technologies£82.70M0.00N/A£2.90N/A
CyanConnode£15.99M2.18-£4.72M-£1.32N/A

5.6% of CyanConnode shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.5% of CyanConnode shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Amino Technologies beats CyanConnode on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CyanConnode compare to M.T.I Wireless Edge?

M.T.I Wireless Edge (LON:MWE) and CyanConnode (LON:CYAN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, M.T.I Wireless Edge had 4 more articles in the media than CyanConnode. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for M.T.I Wireless Edge and 0 mentions for CyanConnode. M.T.I Wireless Edge's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat CyanConnode's score of 0.00 indicating that M.T.I Wireless Edge is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
M.T.I Wireless Edge Positive
CyanConnode Neutral

M.T.I Wireless Edge has a net margin of 10.02% compared to CyanConnode's net margin of -29.88%. M.T.I Wireless Edge's return on equity of 17.43% beat CyanConnode's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M.T.I Wireless Edge10.02% 17.43% 7.21%
CyanConnode -29.88%-35.93%-9.06%

5.5% of M.T.I Wireless Edge shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.6% of CyanConnode shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of M.T.I Wireless Edge shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 52.5% of CyanConnode shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

M.T.I Wireless Edge has higher revenue and earnings than CyanConnode. CyanConnode is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M.T.I Wireless Edge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M.T.I Wireless Edge£52.22M1.11£5.30M£6.0411.13
CyanConnode£15.99M2.18-£4.72M-£1.32N/A

M.T.I Wireless Edge has a beta of 0.814, meaning that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CyanConnode has a beta of 1.063, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

M.T.I Wireless Edge beats CyanConnode on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CyanConnode compare to Calnex Solutions?

CyanConnode (LON:CYAN) and Calnex Solutions (LON:CLX) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Calnex Solutions has a net margin of 3.33% compared to CyanConnode's net margin of -29.88%. Calnex Solutions' return on equity of 2.71% beat CyanConnode's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CyanConnode-29.88% -35.93% -9.06%
Calnex Solutions 3.33%2.71%-1.02%

Calnex Solutions has a consensus target price of GBX 125, suggesting a potential upside of 106.78%. Given Calnex Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Calnex Solutions is more favorable than CyanConnode.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CyanConnode
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Calnex Solutions
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

CyanConnode has a beta of 1.063, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Calnex Solutions has a beta of 1.046, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CyanConnode's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Calnex Solutions'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CyanConnode Neutral
Calnex Solutions Neutral

Calnex Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than CyanConnode. CyanConnode is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calnex Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CyanConnode£15.99M2.18-£4.72M-£1.32N/A
Calnex Solutions£21.88M2.43£40.61K£0.8075.56

5.6% of CyanConnode shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.0% of Calnex Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 52.5% of CyanConnode shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.6% of Calnex Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Calnex Solutions beats CyanConnode on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CyanConnode compare to Pebble Beach Systems Group?

Pebble Beach Systems Group (LON:PEB) and CyanConnode (LON:CYAN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

Pebble Beach Systems Group has a net margin of 22.12% compared to CyanConnode's net margin of -29.88%. Pebble Beach Systems Group's return on equity of 248.37% beat CyanConnode's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pebble Beach Systems Group22.12% 248.37% 10.84%
CyanConnode -29.88%-35.93%-9.06%

Pebble Beach Systems Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CyanConnode. CyanConnode is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pebble Beach Systems Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pebble Beach Systems Group£12.23M2.43£1.58M£2.0011.75
CyanConnode£15.99M2.18-£4.72M-£1.32N/A

In the previous week, Pebble Beach Systems Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CyanConnode'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pebble Beach Systems Group Neutral
CyanConnode Neutral

Pebble Beach Systems Group has a beta of 0.851, suggesting that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CyanConnode has a beta of 1.063, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

10.2% of Pebble Beach Systems Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.6% of CyanConnode shares are held by institutional investors. 38.6% of Pebble Beach Systems Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.5% of CyanConnode shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pebble Beach Systems Group beats CyanConnode on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CyanConnode compare to Global Invacom Group?

Global Invacom Group (LON:GINV) and CyanConnode (LON:CYAN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

5.6% of CyanConnode shares are held by institutional investors. 35.8% of Global Invacom Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.5% of CyanConnode shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Global Invacom Group has a net margin of -21.55% compared to CyanConnode's net margin of -29.88%. CyanConnode's return on equity of -35.93% beat Global Invacom Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Invacom Group-21.55% -37.60% -5.46%
CyanConnode -29.88%-35.93%-9.06%

CyanConnode has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Global Invacom Group. CyanConnode is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Invacom Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Invacom Group£66.69M0.00-£14.37M-£0.04N/A
CyanConnode£15.99M2.18-£4.72M-£1.32N/A

In the previous week, Global Invacom Group had 1 more articles in the media than CyanConnode. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Global Invacom Group and 0 mentions for CyanConnode. Global Invacom Group's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat CyanConnode's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Invacom Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Global Invacom Group Positive
CyanConnode Neutral

Global Invacom Group has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CyanConnode has a beta of 1.063, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Global Invacom Group and CyanConnode tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CyanConnode News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CYAN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CYAN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CYAN vs. The Competition

MetricCyanConnodeCommunications Equipment IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£34.68M£16.34B£29.55B£2.54B
Dividend Yield1.81%4.18%2.75%6.17%
P/E Ratio-7.4930.5973.35367.57
Price / Sales2.1836.52598.8483,481.74
Price / Cash12.70119.6650.3527.89
Price / Book2.096.759.447.19
Net Income-£4.72M£306.24M£679.74M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.08%-3.91%-1.29%0.30%
1 Month Performance9.91%-0.83%4.03%3.31%
1 Year Performance40.31%65.58%189.70%22.13%

CyanConnode Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CYAN
CyanConnode
N/AGBX 9.89
+0.4%
N/A+40.3%£34.68M£15.99MN/A100
AMO
Amino Technologies
N/AN/AN/AN/A£137.90M£82.70M57.07307
MWE
M.T.I Wireless Edge
N/AGBX 65.22
-1.2%
GBX 100
+53.3%
+40.8%£56.24M£52.22M10.80235
CLX
Calnex Solutions
2.3641 of 5 stars
GBX 59
+1.7%
GBX 125
+111.9%
+11.9%£51.96M£21.88M73.759,000
PEB
Pebble Beach Systems Group
N/AGBX 21.55
-1.2%
N/A+36.2%£27.26M£12.23M10.7860

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CYAN) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners