Go Pro
→ Join the rebirth of American prosperity (From Goldco Direct, LLC) (Ad)tc pixel Free PHE Stock Alerts

PowerHouse Energy Group (PHE) Competitors

PowerHouse Energy Group logo
GBX 0.22 0.00 (-0.45%)
As of 07:32 AM Eastern
Compare

PHE vs. XSG, CPH2, GPL, SIXH, and CMH

Should you buy PowerHouse Energy Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PowerHouse Energy Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PowerHouse Energy Group include Xeros Technology Group (XSG), Clean Power Hydrogen (CPH2), Graft Polymer (GPL), The 600 Group (SIXH), and Chamberlin (CMH). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to Xeros Technology Group?

PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) and Xeros Technology Group (LON:XSG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

PowerHouse Energy Group has a net margin of -237.87% compared to Xeros Technology Group's net margin of -1,411.16%. PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity of -63.74% beat Xeros Technology Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerHouse Energy Group-237.87% -63.74% -17.45%
Xeros Technology Group -1,411.16%-101.58%-50.82%

PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.724, suggesting that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Xeros Technology Group has a beta of 2.362, suggesting that its share price is 136% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PowerHouse Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Xeros Technology Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral
Xeros Technology Group Neutral

0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Xeros Technology Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Xeros Technology Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PowerHouse Energy Group has higher revenue and earnings than Xeros Technology Group. PowerHouse Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xeros Technology Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerHouse Energy Group£1.23M8.77-£2.22M-£0.07N/A
Xeros Technology Group£242K44.52-£6.18M-£0.62N/A

Summary

PowerHouse Energy Group beats Xeros Technology Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to Clean Power Hydrogen?

PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) and Clean Power Hydrogen (LON:CPH2) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, PowerHouse Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Clean Power Hydrogen'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral
Clean Power Hydrogen Neutral

PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.724, suggesting that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clean Power Hydrogen has a beta of 0.329, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

PowerHouse Energy Group has a net margin of -237.87% compared to Clean Power Hydrogen's net margin of -387,225.00%. PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity of -63.74% beat Clean Power Hydrogen's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerHouse Energy Group-237.87% -63.74% -17.45%
Clean Power Hydrogen -387,225.00%-77.92%-14.63%

PowerHouse Energy Group has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Power Hydrogen. PowerHouse Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Power Hydrogen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerHouse Energy Group£1.23M8.77-£2.22M-£0.07N/A
Clean Power HydrogenN/AN/A-£4.83M-£1.80N/A

0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PowerHouse Energy Group beats Clean Power Hydrogen on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to Graft Polymer?

PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) and Graft Polymer (LON:GPL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Graft Polymer shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 44.7% of Graft Polymer shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PowerHouse Energy Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Graft Polymer. PowerHouse Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Graft Polymer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerHouse Energy Group£1.23M8.77-£2.22M-£0.07N/A
Graft Polymer£7.75M0.00-£58.52M-£2.49N/A

PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.724, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Graft Polymer has a beta of 1.92, indicating that its share price is 92% more volatile than the broader market.

PowerHouse Energy Group has a net margin of -237.87% compared to Graft Polymer's net margin of -531.52%. PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity of -63.74% beat Graft Polymer's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerHouse Energy Group-237.87% -63.74% -17.45%
Graft Polymer -531.52%-94.83%-38.87%

In the previous week, PowerHouse Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Graft Polymer'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral
Graft Polymer Neutral

Summary

PowerHouse Energy Group and Graft Polymer tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to The 600 Group?

The 600 Group (LON:SIXH) and PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, The 600 Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PowerHouse Energy Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
The 600 Group Neutral
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral

The 600 Group has higher revenue and earnings than PowerHouse Energy Group. PowerHouse Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The 600 Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The 600 Group£33.80M0.00-£1.03M-£0.01N/A
PowerHouse Energy Group£1.23M8.77-£2.22M-£0.07N/A

17.0% of The 600 Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors. 37.4% of The 600 Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

The 600 Group has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.724, suggesting that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

The 600 Group has a net margin of -2.89% compared to PowerHouse Energy Group's net margin of -237.87%. The 600 Group's return on equity of -3.66% beat PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The 600 Group-2.89% -3.66% 0.70%
PowerHouse Energy Group -237.87%-63.74%-17.45%

Summary

The 600 Group beats PowerHouse Energy Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to Chamberlin?

Chamberlin (LON:CMH) and PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Chamberlin has higher revenue and earnings than PowerHouse Energy Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chamberlin£20.79M0.00N/AN/AN/A
PowerHouse Energy Group£1.23M8.77-£2.22M-£0.07N/A

Chamberlin has a net margin of 0.98% compared to PowerHouse Energy Group's net margin of -237.87%. Chamberlin's return on equity of -62.66% beat PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chamberlin0.98% -62.66% -2.67%
PowerHouse Energy Group -237.87%-63.74%-17.45%

Chamberlin has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.724, indicating that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chamberlin's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PowerHouse Energy Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chamberlin Neutral
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral

43.7% of Chamberlin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.4% of Chamberlin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Chamberlin beats PowerHouse Energy Group on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PowerHouse Energy Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PHE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PHE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PHE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPowerHouse Energy GroupMachinery IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£10.81M£11.83B£10.89B£2.89B
Dividend YieldN/A2.15%97.10%6.11%
P/E Ratio-3.0122.0628.60368.59
Price / Sales8.7763.71346.2383,687.67
Price / Cash6.2523.5624.7027.89
Price / Book1.184.504.957.26
Net Income-£2.22M£358.52M£608.56M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A1.45%2.45%1.65%
1 Month Performance3.94%1.58%1.93%2.43%
1 Year Performance-68.03%14.06%15.23%74.99%

PowerHouse Energy Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PHE
PowerHouse Energy Group
N/AGBX 0.22
-0.5%		N/A-66.7%£11.22M£1.23MN/A4
XSG
Xeros Technology Group
N/AGBX 1.40
+1.8%		N/A+0.7%£12.07M£242KN/A32
CPH2
Clean Power Hydrogen
N/AGBX 1.38
-3.2%		N/A-73.0%£6.93MN/AN/A55
GPL
Graft Polymer
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.79M£7.75MN/A7
SIXH
The 600 Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.39M£33.80MN/A123

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PHE) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
China is not hedging. It's escaping.
China's US Treasury holdings have fallen from a peak of $1.32 trillion to roughly $659 billion, an 18-year low...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Free Stock Pick: The Company First in Line for America’s New Super Fuel
The U.S. Army and Department of Energy are launching Project Janus - a high-priority initiative ordered by Pre...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's Terrifying Warning: America Is "1,000% Going Bankrupt"
The national debt just crossed $39 trillion, and Elon Musk - former head of the Department of Government Effic...
American Hartford Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Beginner’s Guide to Gold
The Ultimate Beginner's Guide to Gold IRAs Protect Your Retirement Savings Before It's Too Late With This I...
Goldco Direct, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
AI Bubble Could Finally Be Done - Wall St's Warning
Wall Street analysts are warning that the AI-driven market rally may be nearing its limits, with some cautioni...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel