Go Pro
→ WATCH THIS BEFORE SEPTEMBER 25TH!! (From Paradigm Press) (Ad)tc pixel Free PHE Stock Alerts

PowerHouse Energy Group (PHE) Competitors

PowerHouse Energy Group logo
GBX 0.21 +0.01 (+5.00%)
As of 11:46 AM Eastern
Compare

PHE vs. XSG, CPH2, GPL, SIXH, and CMH

Should you buy PowerHouse Energy Group stock or one of its competitors? PowerHouse Energy Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Xeros Technology Group (XSG), Clean Power Hydrogen (CPH2), Graft Polymer (GPL), The 600 Group (SIXH), and Chamberlin (CMH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to Xeros Technology Group?

PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) and Xeros Technology Group (LON:XSG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

PowerHouse Energy Group has higher revenue and earnings than Xeros Technology Group. PowerHouse Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xeros Technology Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerHouse Energy Group£1.23M8.72-£2.22M-£0.07N/A
Xeros Technology Group£242K42.06-£6.18M-£0.62N/A

In the previous week, PowerHouse Energy Group had 6 more articles in the media than Xeros Technology Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for PowerHouse Energy Group and 1 mentions for Xeros Technology Group. Xeros Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat PowerHouse Energy Group's score of 0.40 indicating that Xeros Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PowerHouse Energy Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Xeros Technology Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.712, meaning that its share price is 71% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Xeros Technology Group has a beta of 2.357, meaning that its share price is 136% more volatile than the broader market.

0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Xeros Technology Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Xeros Technology Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PowerHouse Energy Group has a net margin of -237.87% compared to Xeros Technology Group's net margin of -1,161.54%. PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity of -63.74% beat Xeros Technology Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerHouse Energy Group-237.87% -63.74% -17.45%
Xeros Technology Group -1,161.54%-74.46%-50.82%

Summary

PowerHouse Energy Group beats Xeros Technology Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to Clean Power Hydrogen?

PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) and Clean Power Hydrogen (LON:CPH2) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, PowerHouse Energy Group had 7 more articles in the media than Clean Power Hydrogen. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for PowerHouse Energy Group and 0 mentions for Clean Power Hydrogen. PowerHouse Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Clean Power Hydrogen's score of 0.00 indicating that PowerHouse Energy Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral
Clean Power Hydrogen Neutral

0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Clean Power Hydrogen shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PowerHouse Energy Group has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Power Hydrogen. PowerHouse Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Power Hydrogen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerHouse Energy Group£1.23M8.72-£2.22M-£0.07N/A
Clean Power HydrogenN/AN/A-£4.83M-£1.80N/A

PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.712, indicating that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clean Power Hydrogen has a beta of 0.329, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

PowerHouse Energy Group has a net margin of -237.87% compared to Clean Power Hydrogen's net margin of -387,225.00%. PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity of -63.74% beat Clean Power Hydrogen's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerHouse Energy Group-237.87% -63.74% -17.45%
Clean Power Hydrogen -387,225.00%-77.92%-14.63%

Summary

PowerHouse Energy Group beats Clean Power Hydrogen on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to Graft Polymer?

Graft Polymer (LON:GPL) and PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, PowerHouse Energy Group had 7 more articles in the media than Graft Polymer. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for PowerHouse Energy Group and 0 mentions for Graft Polymer. PowerHouse Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Graft Polymer's score of 0.00 indicating that PowerHouse Energy Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Graft Polymer Neutral
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral

PowerHouse Energy Group has a net margin of -237.87% compared to Graft Polymer's net margin of -531.52%. PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity of -63.74% beat Graft Polymer's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Graft Polymer-531.52% -94.83% -38.87%
PowerHouse Energy Group -237.87%-63.74%-17.45%

PowerHouse Energy Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Graft Polymer. PowerHouse Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Graft Polymer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Graft Polymer£7.75M0.00-£58.52M-£2.49N/A
PowerHouse Energy Group£1.23M8.72-£2.22M-£0.07N/A

Graft Polymer has a beta of 1.92, suggesting that its stock price is 92% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.712, suggesting that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

8.2% of Graft Polymer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.7% of Graft Polymer shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PowerHouse Energy Group beats Graft Polymer on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to The 600 Group?

PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) and The 600 Group (LON:SIXH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

The 600 Group has a net margin of -2.89% compared to PowerHouse Energy Group's net margin of -237.87%. The 600 Group's return on equity of -3.66% beat PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerHouse Energy Group-237.87% -63.74% -17.45%
The 600 Group -2.89%-3.66%0.70%

The 600 Group has higher revenue and earnings than PowerHouse Energy Group. PowerHouse Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The 600 Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerHouse Energy Group£1.23M8.72-£2.22M-£0.07N/A
The 600 Group£33.80M0.00-£1.03M-£0.01N/A

0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of The 600 Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 37.4% of The 600 Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.712, suggesting that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The 600 Group has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PowerHouse Energy Group had 7 more articles in the media than The 600 Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for PowerHouse Energy Group and 0 mentions for The 600 Group. PowerHouse Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat The 600 Group's score of 0.00 indicating that PowerHouse Energy Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral
The 600 Group Neutral

Summary

The 600 Group beats PowerHouse Energy Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to Chamberlin?

PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) and Chamberlin (LON:CMH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.712, suggesting that its share price is 71% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chamberlin has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Chamberlin has higher revenue and earnings than PowerHouse Energy Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerHouse Energy Group£1.23M8.72-£2.22M-£0.07N/A
Chamberlin£20.79M0.00N/AN/AN/A

0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.7% of Chamberlin shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 38.4% of Chamberlin shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, PowerHouse Energy Group had 7 more articles in the media than Chamberlin. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for PowerHouse Energy Group and 0 mentions for Chamberlin. PowerHouse Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Chamberlin's score of 0.00 indicating that PowerHouse Energy Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral
Chamberlin Neutral

Chamberlin has a net margin of 0.98% compared to PowerHouse Energy Group's net margin of -237.87%. Chamberlin's return on equity of -62.66% beat PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerHouse Energy Group-237.87% -63.74% -17.45%
Chamberlin 0.98%-62.66%-2.67%

Summary

Chamberlin beats PowerHouse Energy Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PowerHouse Energy Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PHE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PHE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PHE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPowerHouse Energy GroupMachinery IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£10.76M£11.28B£10.34B£2.90B
Dividend YieldN/A2.28%96.84%6.22%
P/E Ratio-3.0021.6125.70366.53
Price / Sales8.7262.86283.8790,276.50
Price / Cash6.2522.8223.7827.89
Price / Book1.174.304.966.40
Net Income-£2.22M£370.56M£615.14M£5.89B
7 Day Performance5.00%0.87%1.70%1.06%
1 Month Performance3.96%-2.31%-2.45%0.12%
1 Year Performance-66.61%7.03%4.49%19.58%

PowerHouse Energy Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PHE
PowerHouse Energy Group
N/AGBX 0.21
+5.0%		N/A-67.4%£10.76M£1.23MN/A14
XSG
Xeros Technology Group
N/AGBX 1.23
+4.9%		N/A+1.7%£10.63M£242KN/A23
CPH2
Clean Power Hydrogen
N/AGBX 1.40
+9.8%		N/A-73.9%£9.40MN/AN/A55
GPL
Graft Polymer
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.79M£7.75MN/A7
SIXH
The 600 Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.39M£33.80MN/A123

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PHE) was last updated on 9/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The drone firm the Pentagon chose for next-gen defense
One Nasdaq-listed drone company already supplies the US Army, Air Force, and Navy with mission-ready drone sys...
Tomorrow Investor | Sponsoredtc pixel
Pass by August 7… or wait until 2027?
Last month I told investors that a Trump-backed crypto bank could be approved any day. On August 14, it was...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
$40,000,000,000,000
The national debt just hit 40 trillion dollars, and the U.S. now spends more on interest payments than on its ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
This free guide explains options the way they should be taught
Most options educators jump straight into Greeks, spreads, and implied volatility - losing beginners before th...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
China's dominance in rare earth processing sparks new defense rules
On January 1, 2027, new Pentagon rules tighten sourcing restrictions on critical minerals tied to foreign adve...
The Tomorrow Investor | Sponsoredtc pixel
A councilman backed AI — then 13 bullets hit his front door
Thirteen bullets hit an Indianapolis councilman's front door days after he backed a data center rezoning. Acro...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Shiller CAPE ratio now sits above 41. Before the 1929 crash, it was 32.6.
The Shiller CAPE ratio now sits above 41 a level seen only once before, near the peak of the dot-com bubble. B...
USA Capital Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon Musk’s One Stock Retirement Plan
Jeff Brown picked Nvidia in 2016, before it surged 37,000 percent. Now he's tracking a small AI company he say...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel