Free Trial
→ I’m sounding the alarm (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free PHE Stock Alerts

PowerHouse Energy Group (PHE) Competitors

PowerHouse Energy Group logo
GBX 0.27 +0.01 (+3.49%)
As of 06:39 AM Eastern
Compare

PHE vs. REVB, CYAN, OKYO, IGAS, and JAN

Should you buy PowerHouse Energy Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PowerHouse Energy Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PowerHouse Energy Group include Revolution Beauty Group (REVB), CyanConnode (CYAN), OKYO Pharma (OKYO), IGas Energy (IGAS), and Jangada Mines (JAN). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to Revolution Beauty Group?

Revolution Beauty Group (LON:REVB) and PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Revolution Beauty Group has a net margin of -20.71% compared to PowerHouse Energy Group's net margin of -913.32%. Revolution Beauty Group's return on equity of 97.34% beat PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Revolution Beauty Group-20.71% 97.34% 1.14%
PowerHouse Energy Group -913.32%-115.89%-17.45%

In the previous week, Revolution Beauty Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PowerHouse Energy Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Revolution Beauty Group Neutral
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral

Revolution Beauty Group has higher revenue and earnings than PowerHouse Energy Group. PowerHouse Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Revolution Beauty Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Revolution Beauty Group£119.55M0.26-£549.75K-£7.70N/A
PowerHouse Energy Group£588.58K20.28-£2.22M-£0.12N/A

0.8% of Revolution Beauty Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors. 20.5% of Revolution Beauty Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Revolution Beauty Group has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.783, meaning that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Revolution Beauty Group beats PowerHouse Energy Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to CyanConnode?

PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) and CyanConnode (LON:CYAN) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk and analyst recommendations.

PowerHouse Energy Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CyanConnode. CyanConnode is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PowerHouse Energy Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerHouse Energy Group£588.58K20.28-£2.22M-£0.12N/A
CyanConnode£15.99M1.70-£4.72M-£1.32N/A

In the previous week, PowerHouse Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CyanConnode'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral
CyanConnode Neutral

CyanConnode has a net margin of -29.88% compared to PowerHouse Energy Group's net margin of -913.32%. CyanConnode's return on equity of -35.93% beat PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerHouse Energy Group-913.32% -115.89% -17.45%
CyanConnode -29.88%-35.93%-9.06%

0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.4% of CyanConnode shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.6% of CyanConnode shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.783, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CyanConnode has a beta of 1.074, indicating that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CyanConnode beats PowerHouse Energy Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to OKYO Pharma?

PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) and OKYO Pharma (LON:OKYO) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.783, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OKYO Pharma has a beta of -0.06, indicating that its stock price is 106% less volatile than the broader market.

PowerHouse Energy Group has higher revenue and earnings than OKYO Pharma. PowerHouse Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OKYO Pharma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerHouse Energy Group£588.58K20.28-£2.22M-£0.12N/A
OKYO PharmaN/AN/A-£6.70M-£0.01N/A

0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 31.9% of OKYO Pharma shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, OKYO Pharma had 1 more articles in the media than PowerHouse Energy Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for OKYO Pharma and 0 mentions for PowerHouse Energy Group. OKYO Pharma's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat PowerHouse Energy Group's score of 0.00 indicating that OKYO Pharma is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral
OKYO Pharma Positive

OKYO Pharma has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PowerHouse Energy Group's net margin of -913.32%. PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity of -115.89% beat OKYO Pharma's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerHouse Energy Group-913.32% -115.89% -17.45%
OKYO Pharma N/A -397.13%-154.72%

Summary

PowerHouse Energy Group beats OKYO Pharma on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to IGas Energy?

PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) and IGas Energy (LON:IGAS) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

PowerHouse Energy Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than IGas Energy. PowerHouse Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IGas Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerHouse Energy Group£588.58K20.28-£2.22M-£0.12N/A
IGas Energy£59.17M0.00-£11.78M-£0.10N/A

0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.7% of IGas Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of IGas Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.783, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IGas Energy has a beta of -0.04, suggesting that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PowerHouse Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled IGas Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral
IGas Energy Neutral

IGas Energy has a net margin of -19.91% compared to PowerHouse Energy Group's net margin of -913.32%. IGas Energy's return on equity of -18.56% beat PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerHouse Energy Group-913.32% -115.89% -17.45%
IGas Energy -19.91%-18.56%-5.66%

Summary

IGas Energy beats PowerHouse Energy Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PowerHouse Energy Group compare to Jangada Mines?

Jangada Mines (LON:JAN) and PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Jangada Mines has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PowerHouse Energy Group's net margin of -913.32%. Jangada Mines' return on equity of -37.79% beat PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jangada MinesN/A -37.79% -14.48%
PowerHouse Energy Group -913.32%-115.89%-17.45%

Jangada Mines has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PowerHouse Energy Group. Jangada Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PowerHouse Energy Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jangada MinesN/AN/A-£835.63-£0.51N/A
PowerHouse Energy Group£588.58K20.28-£2.22M-£0.12N/A

Jangada Mines has a beta of 1.774, suggesting that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.783, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Jangada Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.5% of Jangada Mines shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Jangada Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PowerHouse Energy Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jangada Mines Neutral
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral

Summary

Jangada Mines and PowerHouse Energy Group tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PowerHouse Energy Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PHE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PHE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PHE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPowerHouse Energy GroupSpecialty Industrial Machinery IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£11.94M£7.31B£9.30B£2.74B
Dividend YieldN/A2.69%3.59%6.15%
P/E Ratio-2.2316.6225.11365.72
Price / Sales20.2833,180.844,622.4488,197.72
Price / Cash6.259.3327.4027.89
Price / Book1.492.574.807.63
Net Income-£2.22M£299.51M£795.70M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-4.64%-1.42%-0.92%6.37%
1 Month Performance-23.71%1.77%1.23%0.57%
1 Year Performance-47.65%42.47%36.17%77.05%

PowerHouse Energy Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PHE
PowerHouse Energy Group
N/AGBX 0.27
+3.5%		N/A-49.4%£11.94M£588.58KN/A4
REVB
Revolution Beauty Group
N/AGBX 3.60
+2.9%		N/A-31.4%£31.31M£119.55MN/A10
CYAN
CyanConnode
N/AGBX 8
+3.5%		N/A-5.7%£28.16M£15.99MN/A100
OKYO
OKYO Pharma
N/AN/AN/AN/A£23.24MN/AN/A7
IGAS
IGas Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/A£18.97M£59.17MN/A100

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PHE) was last updated on 5/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Hey, it's Jon Najarian. The SpaceX IPO is right around the corner. But I discovered Elon may have something BIGGER planned. Check this out before June 9th...
After being invited to the SpaceX launch headquarters in Cape Canaveral from one of Elon's top lobbyists… Hall...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Distracted Americans set to miss out on quadrillions
Technology expert and Washington D.C. insider Jeff Brown - who identified Bitcoin, Tesla, and Nvidia early - s...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX will mint billionaires. You won't be one of them.
By the time a company goes public, 95% of profits have already been made. Insiders bought SpaceX at $20 billio...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
The cat is out the bag
Almost 80,000 tech jobs vanished in the first three months of 2026. Meta cut 14,000 roles, Microsoft offered s...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
The filing was one thing. June 1 is another.
The SpaceX filing got attention - but according to macroeconomic strategist Dr. Mark Skousen of The Oxford Clu...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel