Go Pro

Seneca Growth Capital VCT (SVCT) Competitors

GBX 34 +1.40 (+4.29%)
As of 09/16/2026

SVCT vs. SWEF, CRS, OFG, SBO, and CBA

Should you buy Seneca Growth Capital VCT stock or one of its competitors? Seneca Growth Capital VCT's main competitors and comparable companies include Starwood European Real Estate Finance (SWEF), Crystal Amber (CRS), Octopus Future Generations VCT (OFG), Schroder British Opportunities (SBO), and Ceiba Investments (CBA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Seneca Growth Capital VCT compare to Starwood European Real Estate Finance?

Starwood European Real Estate Finance (LON:SWEF) and Seneca Growth Capital VCT (LON:SVCT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Starwood European Real Estate Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seneca Growth Capital VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Starwood European Real Estate Finance Neutral
Seneca Growth Capital VCT Neutral

Seneca Growth Capital VCT has a net margin of 112.97% compared to Starwood European Real Estate Finance's net margin of 38.35%. Starwood European Real Estate Finance's return on equity of 2.92% beat Seneca Growth Capital VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Starwood European Real Estate Finance38.35% 2.92% N/A
Seneca Growth Capital VCT 112.97%-16.36%-10.71%

Starwood European Real Estate Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Seneca Growth Capital VCT. Seneca Growth Capital VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Starwood European Real Estate Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Starwood European Real Estate Finance£15.24M3.26£18.07M-£0.64N/A
Seneca Growth Capital VCT-£1.80M-6.26-£2.19M-£0.08N/A

Starwood European Real Estate Finance pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Seneca Growth Capital VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. Starwood European Real Estate Finance pays out -859.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Seneca Growth Capital VCT pays out -3,750.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Seneca Growth Capital VCT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

43.9% of Starwood European Real Estate Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Starwood European Real Estate Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Seneca Growth Capital VCT shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Starwood European Real Estate Finance beats Seneca Growth Capital VCT on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seneca Growth Capital VCT compare to Crystal Amber?

Crystal Amber (LON:CRS) and Seneca Growth Capital VCT (LON:SVCT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Crystal Amber's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seneca Growth Capital VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crystal Amber Neutral
Seneca Growth Capital VCT Neutral

5.5% of Crystal Amber shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Crystal Amber shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Seneca Growth Capital VCT shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Seneca Growth Capital VCT has a net margin of 112.97% compared to Crystal Amber's net margin of -75.64%. Crystal Amber's return on equity of -5.11% beat Seneca Growth Capital VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crystal Amber-75.64% -5.11% 5.45%
Seneca Growth Capital VCT 112.97%-16.36%-10.71%

Crystal Amber has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Seneca Growth Capital VCT. Seneca Growth Capital VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crystal Amber, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crystal Amber-£4.61M-9.98£9.56M-£8.44N/A
Seneca Growth Capital VCT-£1.80M-6.26-£2.19M-£0.08N/A

Crystal Amber has a beta of 0.628, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seneca Growth Capital VCT has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Crystal Amber beats Seneca Growth Capital VCT on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seneca Growth Capital VCT compare to Octopus Future Generations VCT?

Octopus Future Generations VCT (LON:OFG) and Seneca Growth Capital VCT (LON:SVCT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Seneca Growth Capital VCT has a net margin of 112.97% compared to Octopus Future Generations VCT's net margin of 0.00%. Octopus Future Generations VCT's return on equity of 0.00% beat Seneca Growth Capital VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus Future Generations VCTN/A N/A N/A
Seneca Growth Capital VCT 112.97%-16.36%-10.71%

Octopus Future Generations VCT has higher revenue and earnings than Seneca Growth Capital VCT. Seneca Growth Capital VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus Future Generations VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus Future Generations VCT-£767K-66.42N/A-£2.30N/A
Seneca Growth Capital VCT-£1.80M-6.26-£2.19M-£0.08N/A

In the previous week, Octopus Future Generations VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seneca Growth Capital VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus Future Generations VCT Neutral
Seneca Growth Capital VCT Neutral

Summary

Octopus Future Generations VCT beats Seneca Growth Capital VCT on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seneca Growth Capital VCT compare to Schroder British Opportunities?

Schroder British Opportunities (LON:SBO) and Seneca Growth Capital VCT (LON:SVCT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

Schroder British Opportunities has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Seneca Growth Capital VCT. Seneca Growth Capital VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder British Opportunities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder British Opportunities-£1.93M-25.65£2.00M-£3.30N/A
Seneca Growth Capital VCT-£1.80M-6.26-£2.19M-£0.08N/A

5.5% of Schroder British Opportunities shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Schroder British Opportunities shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Seneca Growth Capital VCT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Schroder British Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seneca Growth Capital VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder British Opportunities Neutral
Seneca Growth Capital VCT Neutral

Schroder British Opportunities has a net margin of 165.49% compared to Seneca Growth Capital VCT's net margin of 112.97%. Schroder British Opportunities' return on equity of -3.04% beat Seneca Growth Capital VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder British Opportunities165.49% -3.04% N/A
Seneca Growth Capital VCT 112.97%-16.36%-10.71%

Schroder British Opportunities has a beta of 0.124, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seneca Growth Capital VCT has a beta of 0.33, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Schroder British Opportunities beats Seneca Growth Capital VCT on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seneca Growth Capital VCT compare to Ceiba Investments?

Ceiba Investments (LON:CBA) and Seneca Growth Capital VCT (LON:SVCT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Ceiba Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seneca Growth Capital VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ceiba Investments Neutral
Seneca Growth Capital VCT Neutral

Seneca Growth Capital VCT has a net margin of 112.97% compared to Ceiba Investments' net margin of -602.11%. Ceiba Investments' return on equity of -14.58% beat Seneca Growth Capital VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ceiba Investments-602.11% -14.58% 2.31%
Seneca Growth Capital VCT 112.97%-16.36%-10.71%

1.4% of Ceiba Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.5% of Ceiba Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Seneca Growth Capital VCT shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ceiba Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Seneca Growth Capital VCT. Seneca Growth Capital VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ceiba Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ceiba Investments-£10.05M-4.77£8.64M-£10.00N/A
Seneca Growth Capital VCT-£1.80M-6.26-£2.19M-£0.08N/A

Ceiba Investments has a beta of 0.2, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seneca Growth Capital VCT has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ceiba Investments beats Seneca Growth Capital VCT on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seneca Growth Capital VCT News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SVCT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SVCT vs. The Competition

MetricSeneca Growth Capital VCTCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£11.25M£5.34B£13.75B£2.87B
Dividend Yield8.82%7.51%5.94%6.26%
P/E Ratio-425.0029.8025.22366.69
Price / Sales-6.261,228.40508.9089,823.47
Price / Cash2.5247.7139.4027.89
Price / Book0.703.522.736.34
Net Income-£2.19M£417.39M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.65%-0.75%0.11%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-1.55%-0.18%0.10%
1 Year PerformanceN/A3.84%7.72%19.43%

Seneca Growth Capital VCT Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SVCT
Seneca Growth Capital VCT
N/AGBX 34
+4.3%
N/AN/A£11.25M-£1.80MN/AN/A
SWEF
Starwood European Real Estate Finance
N/AGBX 91.50
flat
N/AN/A£49.61M£15.24MN/AN/A
CRS
Crystal Amber
N/AGBX 82
-0.6%
N/A-48.6%£48.82M-£4.61MN/A4,100
OFG
Octopus Future Generations VCT
N/AGBX 77
flat
N/AN/A£48.73M-£767KN/A2,250
SBO
Schroder British Opportunities
N/AGBX 65.50
-0.4%
N/A-12.4%£48.40M-£1.93MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SVCT) was last updated on 9/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners