Go Pro

Octopus AIM VCT (OOA) Competitors

Octopus AIM VCT logo
GBX 37.10 -0.50 (-1.33%)
As of 08/20/2026 11:13 AM Eastern

OOA vs. CCJI, MNL, CHRY, DIG, and AEI

Should you buy Octopus AIM VCT stock or one of its competitors? Octopus AIM VCT's main competitors and comparable companies include CC Japan Income & Growth (CCJI), Manchester & London (MNL), Chrysalis Investments (CHRY), Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust (DIG), and abrdn Equity Income Trust (AEI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Octopus AIM VCT compare to CC Japan Income & Growth?

Octopus AIM VCT (LON:OOA) and CC Japan Income & Growth (LON:CCJI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

CC Japan Income & Growth has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT. CC Japan Income & Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT£3.41M27.06£855.81K£1.2030.92
CC Japan Income & Growth£107.73M3.36£60.67M£77.933.45

Octopus AIM VCT has a beta of 0.56630313, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CC Japan Income & Growth has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT had 2 more articles in the media than CC Japan Income & Growth. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT and 0 mentions for CC Japan Income & Growth. Octopus AIM VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat CC Japan Income & Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that Octopus AIM VCT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT Positive
CC Japan Income & Growth Neutral

Octopus AIM VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. CC Japan Income & Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Octopus AIM VCT pays out 399.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CC Japan Income & Growth pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

8.6% of CC Japan Income & Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Octopus AIM VCT shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of CC Japan Income & Growth shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CC Japan Income & Growth has a net margin of 95.52% compared to Octopus AIM VCT's net margin of 74.14%. CC Japan Income & Growth's return on equity of 30.46% beat Octopus AIM VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT74.14% 2.54% -11.95%
CC Japan Income & Growth 95.52%30.46%N/A

Summary

CC Japan Income & Growth beats Octopus AIM VCT on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT compare to Manchester & London?

Octopus AIM VCT (LON:OOA) and Manchester & London (LON:MNL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Manchester & London has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT. Manchester & London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT£3.41M27.06£855.81K£1.2030.92
Manchester & London£74.60M5.10£120.05M£186.275.37

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT had 2 more articles in the media than Manchester & London. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT and 0 mentions for Manchester & London. Octopus AIM VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Manchester & London's score of 0.00 indicating that Octopus AIM VCT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT Positive
Manchester & London Neutral

Octopus AIM VCT has a beta of 0.56630313, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manchester & London has a beta of 0.8005124, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Octopus AIM VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. Manchester & London pays an annual dividend of GBX 14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Octopus AIM VCT pays out 399.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Manchester & London pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Manchester & London has a net margin of 91.75% compared to Octopus AIM VCT's net margin of 74.14%. Manchester & London's return on equity of 18.18% beat Octopus AIM VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT74.14% 2.54% -11.95%
Manchester & London 91.75%18.18%27.70%

1.7% of Manchester & London shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Octopus AIM VCT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.6% of Manchester & London shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Manchester & London beats Octopus AIM VCT on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT compare to Chrysalis Investments?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and Octopus AIM VCT (LON:OOA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Octopus AIM VCT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT had 1 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT and 1 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Octopus AIM VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Octopus AIM VCT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Octopus AIM VCT
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Octopus AIM VCT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.296, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Octopus AIM VCT has a beta of 0.56630313, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Chrysalis Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Octopus AIM VCT. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments-£112.98M-3.15£97.18M-£24.85N/A
Octopus AIM VCT£3.41M27.06£855.81K£1.2030.92

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Octopus AIM VCT's net margin of 74.14%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 15.84% beat Octopus AIM VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments184.47% 15.84% N/A
Octopus AIM VCT 74.14%2.54%-11.95%

Summary

Chrysalis Investments beats Octopus AIM VCT on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT compare to Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust?

Octopus AIM VCT (LON:OOA) and Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust (LON:DIG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT. Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT£3.41M27.06£855.81K£1.2030.92
Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust£29.19M12.65£36.34M£22.0014.27

Octopus AIM VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Octopus AIM VCT pays out 399.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust pays out 74.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust has a net margin of 83.32% compared to Octopus AIM VCT's net margin of 74.14%. Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust's return on equity of 6.95% beat Octopus AIM VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT74.14% 2.54% -11.95%
Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust 83.32%6.95%3.15%

6.6% of Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Octopus AIM VCT shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Octopus AIM VCT has a beta of 0.56630313, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust has a beta of 1.035, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT had 1 more articles in the media than Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT and 1 mentions for Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust. Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat Octopus AIM VCT's score of 0.80 indicating that Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust beats Octopus AIM VCT on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT compare to abrdn Equity Income Trust?

Octopus AIM VCT (LON:OOA) and abrdn Equity Income Trust (LON:AEI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

abrdn Equity Income Trust has a net margin of 157.91% compared to Octopus AIM VCT's net margin of 74.14%. abrdn Equity Income Trust's return on equity of 18.96% beat Octopus AIM VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT74.14% 2.54% -11.95%
abrdn Equity Income Trust 157.91%18.96%0.71%

Octopus AIM VCT has higher earnings, but lower revenue than abrdn Equity Income Trust. abrdn Equity Income Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT£3.41M27.06£855.81K£1.2030.92
abrdn Equity Income Trust£47.57M7.69-£220.80K£96.934.76

3.2% of abrdn Equity Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Octopus AIM VCT shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of abrdn Equity Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT had 2 more articles in the media than abrdn Equity Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT and 0 mentions for abrdn Equity Income Trust. Octopus AIM VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat abrdn Equity Income Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Octopus AIM VCT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT Positive
abrdn Equity Income Trust Neutral

Octopus AIM VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. abrdn Equity Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 23 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Octopus AIM VCT pays out 399.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. abrdn Equity Income Trust pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Octopus AIM VCT has a beta of 0.56630313, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Equity Income Trust has a beta of 0.901, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

abrdn Equity Income Trust beats Octopus AIM VCT on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Octopus AIM VCT News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OOA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OOA vs. The Competition

MetricOctopus AIM VCTCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£93.31M£5.66B£13.63B£2.54B
Dividend Yield13.30%7.38%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio30.9239.0929.61367.57
Price / Sales27.061,262.20520.7583,481.74
Price / Cash3.9848.3130.7127.89
Price / Book0.643.752.847.19
Net Income£855.81K£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance5.25%-0.25%-0.30%0.30%
1 Month Performance-6.08%2.06%2.37%3.31%
1 Year Performance-18.46%5.71%9.68%22.13%

Octopus AIM VCT Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OOA
Octopus AIM VCT
N/AGBX 37.10
-1.3%
N/A-18.5%£93.31M£3.41M30.92N/A
CCJI
CC Japan Income & Growth
N/AGBX 275.95
-2.1%
N/A+31.2%£371.79M£107.73M3.54N/A
MNL
Manchester & London
N/AGBX 974
-5.4%
N/A+10.9%£370.36M£74.60M5.23N/A
CHRY
Chrysalis Investments
0.3685 of 5 stars
GBX 76.57
-2.5%
N/A-39.2%£368.26M-£112.98MN/AN/A
DIG
Dunedin Income Growth Investment Trust
N/AGBX 313
-0.6%
N/A+4.6%£368.17M£29.19M14.23N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:OOA) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners