Octopus AIM VCT (OOA) Competitors

Octopus AIM VCT logo
GBX 38.40 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/22/2026 11:54 AM Eastern

OOA vs. BHIU, FSFL, CHRY, CHIU, and CCJI

Should you buy Octopus AIM VCT stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Octopus AIM VCT with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Octopus AIM VCT include BMO UK High Income Trust (BHIU), Foresight Solar (FSFL), Chrysalis Investments (CHRY), CT UK High Income Trust (CHIU), and CC Japan Income & Growth (CCJI). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Octopus AIM VCT compare to BMO UK High Income Trust?

Octopus AIM VCT (LON:OOA) and BMO UK High Income Trust (LON:BHIU) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT had 4 more articles in the media than BMO UK High Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT and 0 mentions for BMO UK High Income Trust. Octopus AIM VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat BMO UK High Income Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Octopus AIM VCT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT Neutral
BMO UK High Income Trust Neutral

Octopus AIM VCT has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BMO UK High Income Trust. Octopus AIM VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BMO UK High Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT-£8.46M-11.34£855.81K-£4.30N/A
BMO UK High Income Trust£3.93M0.00N/A£0.02N/A

Octopus AIM VCT has a net margin of 74.14% compared to BMO UK High Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Octopus AIM VCT's return on equity of 2.54% beat BMO UK High Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT74.14% 2.54% -11.95%
BMO UK High Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Octopus AIM VCT and BMO UK High Income Trust tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT compare to Foresight Solar?

Foresight Solar (LON:FSFL) and Octopus AIM VCT (LON:OOA) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

50.8% of Foresight Solar shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Foresight Solar shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Octopus AIM VCT shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Foresight Solar pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.5%. Octopus AIM VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Foresight Solar pays out -138.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Octopus AIM VCT pays out -116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Octopus AIM VCT has a net margin of 74.14% compared to Foresight Solar's net margin of -112.38%. Octopus AIM VCT's return on equity of 2.54% beat Foresight Solar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Foresight Solar-112.38% -5.64% -0.79%
Octopus AIM VCT 74.14%2.54%-11.95%

Foresight Solar has a beta of 0.318, meaning that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Octopus AIM VCT has a beta of 0.56630313, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT had 4 more articles in the media than Foresight Solar. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT and 0 mentions for Foresight Solar. Octopus AIM VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Foresight Solar's score of 0.00 indicating that Octopus AIM VCT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Foresight Solar Neutral
Octopus AIM VCT Neutral

Foresight Solar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Octopus AIM VCT. Foresight Solar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Foresight Solar-£30.59M-12.45£6.34M-£5.83N/A
Octopus AIM VCT-£8.46M-11.34£855.81K-£4.30N/A

Summary

Octopus AIM VCT beats Foresight Solar on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT compare to Chrysalis Investments?

Octopus AIM VCT (LON:OOA) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT had 3 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT and 1 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Octopus AIM VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Octopus AIM VCT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Chrysalis Investments
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Octopus AIM VCT shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chrysalis Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT. Octopus AIM VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chrysalis Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT-£8.46M-11.34£855.81K-£4.30N/A
Chrysalis Investments£123.58M2.89£97.18M£22.093.36

Octopus AIM VCT has a beta of 0.56630313, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3067211, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Octopus AIM VCT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Octopus AIM VCT's net margin of 74.14%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 14.16% beat Octopus AIM VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT74.14% 2.54% -11.95%
Chrysalis Investments 184.47%14.16%N/A

Summary

Chrysalis Investments beats Octopus AIM VCT on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT compare to CT UK High Income Trust?

Octopus AIM VCT (LON:OOA) and CT UK High Income Trust (LON:CHIU) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

CT UK High Income Trust has a net margin of 86.27% compared to Octopus AIM VCT's net margin of 74.14%. CT UK High Income Trust's return on equity of 10.97% beat Octopus AIM VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT74.14% 2.54% -11.95%
CT UK High Income Trust 86.27%10.97%6.44%

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT had 4 more articles in the media than CT UK High Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT and 0 mentions for CT UK High Income Trust. Octopus AIM VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat CT UK High Income Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Octopus AIM VCT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT Neutral
CT UK High Income Trust Neutral

CT UK High Income Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT. Octopus AIM VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT UK High Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT-£8.46M-11.34£855.81K-£4.30N/A
CT UK High Income Trust£12.28M0.00£10.59M£0.09N/A

Octopus AIM VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. CT UK High Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 15 per share. Octopus AIM VCT pays out -116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT UK High Income Trust pays out 16,666.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Octopus AIM VCT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Octopus AIM VCT has a beta of 0.56630313, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT UK High Income Trust has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CT UK High Income Trust beats Octopus AIM VCT on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Octopus AIM VCT compare to CC Japan Income & Growth?

Octopus AIM VCT (LON:OOA) and CC Japan Income & Growth (LON:CCJI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Octopus AIM VCT had 3 more articles in the media than CC Japan Income & Growth. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Octopus AIM VCT and 1 mentions for CC Japan Income & Growth. CC Japan Income & Growth's average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat Octopus AIM VCT's score of 0.38 indicating that CC Japan Income & Growth is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus AIM VCT Neutral
CC Japan Income & Growth Very Positive

CC Japan Income & Growth has a net margin of 95.52% compared to Octopus AIM VCT's net margin of 74.14%. CC Japan Income & Growth's return on equity of 30.46% beat Octopus AIM VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus AIM VCT74.14% 2.54% -11.95%
CC Japan Income & Growth 95.52%30.46%N/A

CC Japan Income & Growth has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT. Octopus AIM VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CC Japan Income & Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus AIM VCT-£8.46M-11.34£855.81K-£4.30N/A
CC Japan Income & Growth£68.01M5.75£60.67M£48.705.95

Octopus AIM VCT has a beta of 0.56630313, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CC Japan Income & Growth has a beta of 0.9675043, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Octopus AIM VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. CC Japan Income & Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Octopus AIM VCT pays out -116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CC Japan Income & Growth pays out 11.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Octopus AIM VCT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

8.5% of CC Japan Income & Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Octopus AIM VCT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of CC Japan Income & Growth shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CC Japan Income & Growth beats Octopus AIM VCT on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Octopus AIM VCT News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OOA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OOA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OOA vs. The Competition

MetricOctopus AIM VCTAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£95.88M£2.45B£6.07B£2.78B
Dividend Yield12.56%6.03%5.27%6.16%
P/E Ratio-8.9325.8716.31365.72
Price / Sales-11.342,081.971,100.8786,253.69
Price / Cash3.9860.1684.9827.85
Price / Book0.661.376.637.92
Net Income£855.81K£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.51%-0.23%-0.93%
1 Month Performance-2.78%-0.17%1.00%-0.76%
1 Year PerformanceN/A9.71%19.70%69.29%

Octopus AIM VCT Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OOA
Octopus AIM VCT
N/AGBX 38.40
flat
N/A-21.8%£95.88M-£8.46MN/AN/A
BHIU
BMO UK High Income Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£391.68M£3.93M16,900.00N/A
FSFL
Foresight Solar
N/AGBX 71.60
-1.5%
N/A-18.4%£390.74M-£30.59MN/AN/A
CHRY
Chrysalis Investments
1.8581 of 5 stars
GBX 80.38
+0.1%
N/A-28.8%£386.61M£123.58M3.64N/A
CHIU
CT UK High Income Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£383.24M£12.28M3,677.78N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:OOA) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners