Go Pro

Foresight Solar (FSFL) Competitors

Foresight Solar logo
GBX 74 -0.10 (-0.13%)
As of 05:32 AM Eastern

FSFL vs. SSON, SNN, HRI, ASHM, and WWH

Should you buy Foresight Solar stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Foresight Solar with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Foresight Solar include Smithson Investment Trust (SSON), Sanne Group (SNN), Herald (HRI), Ashmore Group (ASHM), and Worldwide Healthcare (WWH). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Foresight Solar compare to Smithson Investment Trust?

Smithson Investment Trust (LON:SSON) and Foresight Solar (LON:FSFL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Foresight Solar has higher revenue and earnings than Smithson Investment Trust. Smithson Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Foresight Solar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smithson Investment Trust-£58.23M-26.53-£42.74M-£53.80N/A
Foresight Solar-£30.59M-13.20£6.34M-£5.83N/A

In the previous week, Foresight Solar had 1 more articles in the media than Smithson Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Foresight Solar and 0 mentions for Smithson Investment Trust. Smithson Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Foresight Solar'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Smithson Investment Trust Neutral
Foresight Solar Neutral

Smithson Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Foresight Solar pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.9%. Smithson Investment Trust pays out -1.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Foresight Solar pays out -138.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Foresight Solar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Smithson Investment Trust has a net margin of -34.17% compared to Foresight Solar's net margin of -112.38%. Smithson Investment Trust's return on equity of -3.46% beat Foresight Solar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smithson Investment Trust-34.17% -3.46% N/A
Foresight Solar -112.38%-5.64%-0.79%

5.0% of Smithson Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Foresight Solar shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Smithson Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Foresight Solar shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Foresight Solar beats Smithson Investment Trust on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Foresight Solar compare to Sanne Group?

Sanne Group (LON:SNN) and Foresight Solar (LON:FSFL) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

50.8% of Foresight Solar shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Foresight Solar shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Foresight Solar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sanne Group. Foresight Solar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanne Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanne Group£194.16M0.00N/A-£4.50N/A
Foresight Solar-£30.59M-13.20£6.34M-£5.83N/A

Sanne Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Foresight Solar's net margin of -112.38%. Sanne Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Foresight Solar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanne GroupN/A N/A N/A
Foresight Solar -112.38%-5.64%-0.79%

Sanne Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.10 per share. Foresight Solar pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.9%. Sanne Group pays out -2.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Foresight Solar pays out -138.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Foresight Solar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Foresight Solar had 1 more articles in the media than Sanne Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Foresight Solar and 0 mentions for Sanne Group. Sanne Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Foresight Solar'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanne Group Neutral
Foresight Solar Neutral

Summary

Foresight Solar beats Sanne Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Foresight Solar compare to Herald?

Foresight Solar (LON:FSFL) and Herald (LON:HRI) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Herald has a net margin of 86.00% compared to Foresight Solar's net margin of -112.38%. Herald's return on equity of 7.67% beat Foresight Solar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Foresight Solar-112.38% -5.64% -0.79%
Herald 86.00%7.67%9.22%

50.8% of Foresight Solar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Herald shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Foresight Solar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Herald shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Foresight Solar had 1 more articles in the media than Herald. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Foresight Solar and 0 mentions for Herald. Foresight Solar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Herald's score of -1.75 indicating that Foresight Solar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Foresight Solar Neutral
Herald Very Negative

Foresight Solar has a beta of 0.318, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Herald has a beta of 0.977886, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Herald has higher revenue and earnings than Foresight Solar. Foresight Solar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Herald, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Foresight Solar-£30.59M-13.20£6.34M-£5.83N/A
Herald£101.21M13.76£175.20M£199.0114.62

Summary

Herald beats Foresight Solar on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Foresight Solar compare to Ashmore Group?

Foresight Solar (LON:FSFL) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Foresight Solar has a beta of 0.318, suggesting that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.962, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Foresight Solar pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.9%. Ashmore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Foresight Solar pays out -138.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ashmore Group pays out 102.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Foresight Solar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Ashmore Group had 1 more articles in the media than Foresight Solar. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ashmore Group and 1 mentions for Foresight Solar. Ashmore Group's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Foresight Solar's score of 0.00 indicating that Ashmore Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Foresight Solar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ashmore Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

50.8% of Foresight Solar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of Ashmore Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Foresight Solar shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ashmore Group has a consensus price target of GBX 155, indicating a potential downside of 27.02%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Foresight Solar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Foresight Solar
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ashmore Group
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Ashmore Group has higher revenue and earnings than Foresight Solar. Foresight Solar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashmore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Foresight Solar-£30.59M-13.20£6.34M-£5.83N/A
Ashmore Group£135.90M10.16£94.67M£16.5412.84

Ashmore Group has a net margin of 78.55% compared to Foresight Solar's net margin of -112.38%. Ashmore Group's return on equity of 14.60% beat Foresight Solar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Foresight Solar-112.38% -5.64% -0.79%
Ashmore Group 78.55%14.60%4.52%

Summary

Ashmore Group beats Foresight Solar on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Foresight Solar compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Foresight Solar (LON:FSFL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

8.0% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Foresight Solar shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Foresight Solar shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.5198687, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Foresight Solar has a beta of 0.318, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Worldwide Healthcare has a net margin of 85.46% compared to Foresight Solar's net margin of -112.38%. Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity of 8.01% beat Foresight Solar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
Foresight Solar -112.38%-5.64%-0.79%

Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Foresight Solar pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.9%. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Foresight Solar pays out -138.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Foresight Solar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 7 more articles in the media than Foresight Solar. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 1 mentions for Foresight Solar. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat Foresight Solar's score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Foresight Solar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Worldwide Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than Foresight Solar. Foresight Solar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M11.61£227.88M£26.7014.30
Foresight Solar-£30.59M-13.20£6.34M-£5.83N/A

Summary

Worldwide Healthcare beats Foresight Solar on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Foresight Solar News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FSFL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FSFL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FSFL vs. The Competition

MetricForesight SolarAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£403.66M£2.49B£6.21B£2.78B
Dividend Yield11.41%6.00%5.24%6.12%
P/E Ratio-12.6962.7329.67368.15
Price / Sales-13.201,838.811,175.1384,703.07
Price / Cash232.6960.50117.4027.89
Price / Book0.641.326.567.50
Net Income£6.34M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.21%-0.40%-0.19%0.05%
1 Month Performance1.51%-0.09%0.14%-1.30%
1 Year Performance-19.04%7.26%15.07%62.22%

Foresight Solar Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FSFL
Foresight Solar
N/AGBX 74
-0.1%
N/A-19.7%£403.66M-£30.59MN/AN/A
SSON
Smithson Investment Trust
N/AGBX 1,438
flat
N/AN/A£1.54B-£58.23MN/AN/A
SNN
Sanne Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.50B£194.16MN/A20,100
HRI
Herald
N/AGBX 3,102.36
+0.4%
N/A+25.8%£1.48B£101.21M15.596,600
ASHM
Ashmore Group
1.2479 of 5 stars
GBX 218.40
+2.8%
GBX 150
-31.3%
+26.7%£1.42B£135.90M13.20283

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FSFL) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners