Go Pro

Fidelity China Special (FCSS) Competitors

Fidelity China Special logo
GBX 248.55 -3.95 (-1.56%)
As of 05:24 AM Eastern

FCSS vs. ABDN, ATST, 3IN, PHLL, and JGGI

Should you buy Fidelity China Special stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fidelity China Special with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fidelity China Special include abrdn (ABDN), Alliance Trust (ATST), 3i Infrastructure (3IN), Petershill Partners (PHLL), and JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Fidelity China Special compare to abrdn?

Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) and abrdn (LON:ABDN) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.88140285, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. abrdn pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Fidelity China Special pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn pays out 68.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, abrdn had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelity China Special. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for abrdn and 0 mentions for Fidelity China Special. Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity China Special Neutral
abrdn Neutral

7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of abrdn shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of abrdn shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

abrdn has a consensus target price of GBX 225.67, suggesting a potential downside of 8.71%. Given abrdn's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe abrdn is more favorable than Fidelity China Special.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fidelity China Special
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
abrdn
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Fidelity China Special has higher earnings, but lower revenue than abrdn. Fidelity China Special is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity China Special£559.02M2.04£997.06M£112.602.21
abrdn£1.75B2.53£316.36M£21.2011.66

Fidelity China Special has a net margin of 81.41% compared to abrdn's net margin of 22.56%. Fidelity China Special's return on equity of 9.12% beat abrdn's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity China Special81.41% 9.12% N/A
abrdn 22.56%7.96%0.68%

Summary

abrdn beats Fidelity China Special on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity China Special compare to Alliance Trust?

Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) and Alliance Trust (LON:ATST) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alliance Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity China Special Neutral
Alliance Trust Neutral

Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Alliance Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 26 per share. Fidelity China Special pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alliance Trust pays out 1,226.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fidelity China Special is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of Alliance Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Alliance Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.88140285, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alliance Trust has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Alliance Trust has a net margin of 92.17% compared to Fidelity China Special's net margin of 81.41%. Alliance Trust's return on equity of 17.93% beat Fidelity China Special's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity China Special81.41% 9.12% N/A
Alliance Trust 92.17%17.93%10.95%

Fidelity China Special has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alliance Trust. Alliance Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity China Special, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity China Special£559.02M2.04£997.06M£112.602.21
Alliance Trust£652.76M0.00£601.66M£2.12N/A

Summary

Fidelity China Special and Alliance Trust tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity China Special compare to 3i Infrastructure?

3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) and Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation and risk.

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. Fidelity China Special is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3i Infrastructure£301M11.49£347M£32.0011.71
Fidelity China Special£559.02M2.04£997.06M£112.602.21

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to Fidelity China Special's net margin of 81.41%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat Fidelity China Special's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3i Infrastructure92.78% 10.77% 4.83%
Fidelity China Special 81.41%9.12%N/A

3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity China Special pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 3 more articles in the media than Fidelity China Special. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Fidelity China Special. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Fidelity China Special's score of 0.00 indicating that 3i Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
3i Infrastructure Neutral
Fidelity China Special Neutral

3i Infrastructure currently has a consensus price target of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 20.05%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Fidelity China Special.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Fidelity China Special
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.88140285, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

24.4% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats Fidelity China Special on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity China Special compare to Petershill Partners?

Petershill Partners (LON:PHLL) and Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

3.7% of Petershill Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Petershill Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Petershill Partners presently has a consensus target price of GBX 311.33, indicating a potential upside of 0.27%. Given Petershill Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Petershill Partners is more favorable than Fidelity China Special.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Petershill Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Fidelity China Special
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Fidelity China Special has a net margin of 81.41% compared to Petershill Partners' net margin of 67.93%. Petershill Partners' return on equity of 18.13% beat Fidelity China Special's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petershill Partners67.93% 18.13% 5.95%
Fidelity China Special 81.41%9.12%N/A

In the previous week, Petershill Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelity China Special'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petershill Partners Neutral
Fidelity China Special Neutral

Fidelity China Special has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petershill Partners. Fidelity China Special is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petershill Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petershill Partners£1.15B2.93£420.55M£86.433.59
Fidelity China Special£559.02M2.04£997.06M£112.602.21

Petershill Partners has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.88140285, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Petershill Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Petershill Partners pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity China Special pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Petershill Partners beats Fidelity China Special on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity China Special compare to JPMorgan Global Growth & Income?

Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) and JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JGGI) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income. Fidelity China Special is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity China Special£559.02M2.04£997.06M£112.602.21
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income£255.23M12.89£625.87M£41.8114.42

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a net margin of 91.40% compared to Fidelity China Special's net margin of 81.41%. Fidelity China Special's return on equity of 9.12% beat JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity China Special81.41% 9.12% N/A
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income 91.40%7.63%10.62%

In the previous week, Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Global Growth & Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity China Special Neutral
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income Neutral

7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.1% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.88140285, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a beta of 0.7929957, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Fidelity China Special pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Fidelity China Special beats JPMorgan Global Growth & Income on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fidelity China Special News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FCSS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FCSS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FCSS vs. The Competition

MetricFidelity China SpecialAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.14B£2.38B£6.11B£2.79B
Dividend Yield3.63%6.00%5.24%6.15%
P/E Ratio2.2162.0429.89366.63
Price / Sales2.042,051.221,108.6886,459.67
Price / CashN/A60.3394.2727.87
Price / Book1.011.406.627.76
Net Income£997.06M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.53%0.63%0.76%0.49%
1 Month Performance-14.08%-0.56%0.44%-1.37%
1 Year Performance-2.75%8.68%17.23%65.09%

Fidelity China Special Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FCSS
Fidelity China Special
N/AGBX 248.55
-1.6%
N/A-0.8%£1.14B£559.02M2.21N/A
ABDN
abrdn
2.2666 of 5 stars
GBX 233.80
-2.7%
GBX 225.67
-3.5%
+33.0%£4.22B£1.75B11.034,719
ATST
Alliance Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.58B£652.76M600.003
3IN
3i Infrastructure
3.3436 of 5 stars
GBX 377.50
-0.3%
GBX 450
+19.2%
+10.9%£3.48B£301M11.80N/A
PHLL
Petershill Partners
N/AGBX 310.50
flat
GBX 311.33
+0.3%
N/A£3.36B£1.15B3.59N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FCSS) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners