Temple Bar (TMPL) Competitors

Temple Bar logo
GBX 390.50 -3.00 (-0.76%)
As of 12:27 PM Eastern

TMPL vs. ABDN, ATST, 3IN, PHLL, and JGGI

Should you buy Temple Bar stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Temple Bar with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Temple Bar include abrdn (ABDN), Alliance Trust (ATST), 3i Infrastructure (3IN), Petershill Partners (PHLL), and JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Temple Bar compare to abrdn?

Temple Bar (LON:TMPL) and abrdn (LON:ABDN) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

abrdn has higher revenue and earnings than Temple Bar. Temple Bar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Temple Bar£281.60M4.20£154.90M£97.004.03
abrdn£1.75B2.41£316.36M£21.2011.08

abrdn has a consensus price target of GBX 226.50, suggesting a potential downside of 3.57%. Given abrdn's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe abrdn is more favorable than Temple Bar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Temple Bar
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
abrdn
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Temple Bar pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. abrdn pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Temple Bar pays out 14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn pays out 68.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Temple Bar has a net margin of 82.15% compared to abrdn's net margin of 22.56%. Temple Bar's return on equity of 27.93% beat abrdn's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Temple Bar82.15% 27.93% 7.08%
abrdn 22.56%8.13%0.68%

In the previous week, Temple Bar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Temple Bar Neutral
abrdn Neutral

10.7% of Temple Bar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of abrdn shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Temple Bar shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of abrdn shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Temple Bar has a beta of 1.1508299, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn has a beta of 1.87, suggesting that its share price is 87% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

abrdn beats Temple Bar on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Temple Bar compare to Alliance Trust?

Alliance Trust (LON:ATST) and Temple Bar (LON:TMPL) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and valuation.

Alliance Trust has a net margin of 92.17% compared to Temple Bar's net margin of 82.15%. Temple Bar's return on equity of 27.93% beat Alliance Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alliance Trust92.17% 17.93% 10.95%
Temple Bar 82.15%27.93%7.08%

In the previous week, Alliance Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Temple Bar'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alliance Trust Neutral
Temple Bar Neutral

Alliance Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Temple Bar. Alliance Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Temple Bar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alliance Trust£652.76M0.00£601.66M£2.12N/A
Temple Bar£281.60M4.20£154.90M£97.004.03

Alliance Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 26 per share. Temple Bar pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Alliance Trust pays out 1,226.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Temple Bar pays out 14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Temple Bar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

6.9% of Alliance Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Temple Bar shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Alliance Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Temple Bar shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alliance Trust has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Temple Bar has a beta of 1.1508299, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Alliance Trust and Temple Bar tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Temple Bar compare to 3i Infrastructure?

Temple Bar (LON:TMPL) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and risk.

3i Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than Temple Bar. Temple Bar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Temple Bar£281.60M4.20£154.90M£97.004.03
3i Infrastructure£301M11.32£347M£32.0011.55

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to Temple Bar's net margin of 82.15%. Temple Bar's return on equity of 27.93% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Temple Bar82.15% 27.93% 7.08%
3i Infrastructure 92.78%10.77%4.83%

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Temple Bar. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Temple Bar. Temple Bar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled 3i Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Temple Bar Neutral
3i Infrastructure Neutral

Temple Bar has a beta of 1.1508299, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Temple Bar pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Temple Bar pays out 14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Temple Bar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

3i Infrastructure has a consensus price target of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 21.79%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Temple Bar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Temple Bar
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

10.7% of Temple Bar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.4% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Temple Bar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats Temple Bar on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Temple Bar compare to Petershill Partners?

Temple Bar (LON:TMPL) and Petershill Partners (LON:PHLL) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Temple Bar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Petershill Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Temple Bar Neutral
Petershill Partners Neutral

Temple Bar has a net margin of 82.15% compared to Petershill Partners' net margin of 67.93%. Temple Bar's return on equity of 27.93% beat Petershill Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Temple Bar82.15% 27.93% 7.08%
Petershill Partners 67.93%18.13%5.95%

10.7% of Temple Bar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Temple Bar shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Petershill Partners has a consensus price target of GBX 311.33, suggesting a potential upside of 0.27%. Given Petershill Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Petershill Partners is more favorable than Temple Bar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Temple Bar
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Petershill Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Petershill Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Temple Bar. Petershill Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Temple Bar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Temple Bar£281.60M4.20£154.90M£97.004.03
Petershill Partners£1.15B2.93£420.55M£86.433.59

Temple Bar has a beta of 1.1508299, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petershill Partners has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Temple Bar pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Petershill Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Temple Bar pays out 14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Petershill Partners pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Temple Bar beats Petershill Partners on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Temple Bar compare to JPMorgan Global Growth & Income?

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JGGI) and Temple Bar (LON:TMPL) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and institutional ownership.

7.1% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Temple Bar shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Temple Bar shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, JPMorgan Global Growth & Income had 1 more articles in the media than Temple Bar. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for JPMorgan Global Growth & Income and 0 mentions for Temple Bar. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Temple Bar's score of 0.00 indicating that JPMorgan Global Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income Positive
Temple Bar Neutral

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Temple Bar pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Temple Bar pays out 14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a net margin of 91.40% compared to Temple Bar's net margin of 82.15%. Temple Bar's return on equity of 27.93% beat JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income91.40% 7.63% 10.62%
Temple Bar 82.15%27.93%7.08%

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Temple Bar. Temple Bar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income£255.23M12.80£625.87M£41.8114.31
Temple Bar£281.60M4.20£154.90M£97.004.03

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a beta of 0.7929957, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Temple Bar has a beta of 1.1508299, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income beats Temple Bar on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Temple Bar News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TMPL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TMPL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TMPL vs. The Competition

MetricTemple BarAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.18B£2.45B£6.05B£2.78B
Dividend Yield3.87%6.03%5.27%6.16%
P/E Ratio4.0325.8716.31365.72
Price / Sales4.202,081.991,434.8486,253.69
Price / Cash19.7760.1648.6327.85
Price / Book1.421.376.637.92
Net Income£154.90M£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.74%-0.64%-0.41%-0.87%
1 Month Performance-2.38%-0.17%1.00%-0.76%
1 Year Performance24.76%10.15%20.45%70.67%

Temple Bar Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TMPL
Temple Bar
N/AGBX 390.50
-0.8%
N/A+25.1%£1.18B£281.60M4.03N/A
ABDN
abrdn
2.1518 of 5 stars
GBX 234
+0.7%
GBX 226.50
-3.2%
+26.7%£4.19B£1.75B11.044,719
ATST
Alliance Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.58B£652.76M600.003
3IN
3i Infrastructure
2.9703 of 5 stars
GBX 372
+0.1%
GBX 450
+21.0%
+6.6%£3.43B£301M11.63N/A
PHLL
Petershill Partners
N/AGBX 310.50
flat
GBX 311.33
+0.3%
N/A£3.36B£1.15B3.59N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TMPL) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners