Go Pro

JPMorgan Japanese (JFJ) Competitors

JPMorgan Japanese logo
GBX 785.82 -9.18 (-1.15%)
As of 10:08 AM Eastern

JFJ vs. ABDN, ATST, 3IN, PHLL, and RCP

Should you buy JPMorgan Japanese stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares JPMorgan Japanese with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with JPMorgan Japanese include abrdn (ABDN), Alliance Trust (ATST), 3i Infrastructure (3IN), Petershill Partners (PHLL), and RIT Capital Partners (RCP). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does JPMorgan Japanese compare to abrdn?

abrdn (LON:ABDN) and JPMorgan Japanese (LON:JFJ) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

42.1% of abrdn shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of abrdn shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

abrdn presently has a consensus price target of GBX 225.67, suggesting a potential downside of 9.01%. Given abrdn's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe abrdn is more favorable than JPMorgan Japanese.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
abrdn
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
JPMorgan Japanese
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

abrdn pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. JPMorgan Japanese pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. abrdn pays out 68.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Japanese pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

JPMorgan Japanese has a net margin of 96.52% compared to abrdn's net margin of 22.56%. JPMorgan Japanese's return on equity of 20.00% beat abrdn's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn22.56% 7.96% 0.68%
JPMorgan Japanese 96.52%20.00%8.06%

abrdn has a beta of 1.393, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Japanese has a beta of 1.0779777, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, abrdn had 1 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Japanese. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for abrdn and 0 mentions for JPMorgan Japanese. abrdn's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat JPMorgan Japanese's score of 0.00 indicating that abrdn is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn Positive
JPMorgan Japanese Neutral

abrdn has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan Japanese. JPMorgan Japanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn£1.75B2.54£316.36M£21.2011.70
JPMorgan Japanese£245.55M4.86£194.81M£149.065.27

Summary

abrdn beats JPMorgan Japanese on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan Japanese compare to Alliance Trust?

Alliance Trust (LON:ATST) and JPMorgan Japanese (LON:JFJ) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Alliance Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Japanese'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alliance Trust Neutral
JPMorgan Japanese Neutral

Alliance Trust has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Japanese has a beta of 1.0779777, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Alliance Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 26 per share. JPMorgan Japanese pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Alliance Trust pays out 1,226.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. JPMorgan Japanese pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Japanese is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

JPMorgan Japanese has a net margin of 96.52% compared to Alliance Trust's net margin of 92.17%. JPMorgan Japanese's return on equity of 20.00% beat Alliance Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alliance Trust92.17% 17.93% 10.95%
JPMorgan Japanese 96.52%20.00%8.06%

Alliance Trust has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan Japanese. Alliance Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Japanese, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alliance Trust£652.76M0.00£601.66M£2.12N/A
JPMorgan Japanese£245.55M4.86£194.81M£149.065.27

6.9% of Alliance Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Alliance Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

JPMorgan Japanese beats Alliance Trust on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan Japanese compare to 3i Infrastructure?

JPMorgan Japanese (LON:JFJ) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

JPMorgan Japanese has a beta of 1.0779777, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

JPMorgan Japanese pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. JPMorgan Japanese pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

JPMorgan Japanese has a net margin of 96.52% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. JPMorgan Japanese's return on equity of 20.00% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan Japanese96.52% 20.00% 8.06%
3i Infrastructure 92.78%10.77%4.83%

3i Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan Japanese. JPMorgan Japanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan Japanese£245.55M4.86£194.81M£149.065.27
3i Infrastructure£301M11.97£347M£32.0012.20

3i Infrastructure has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 15.24%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than JPMorgan Japanese.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JPMorgan Japanese
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

18.9% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, JPMorgan Japanese's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled 3i Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan Japanese Neutral
3i Infrastructure Neutral

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats JPMorgan Japanese on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan Japanese compare to Petershill Partners?

Petershill Partners (LON:PHLL) and JPMorgan Japanese (LON:JFJ) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Petershill Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. JPMorgan Japanese pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Petershill Partners pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Japanese pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Petershill Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Japanese'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petershill Partners Neutral
JPMorgan Japanese Neutral

Petershill Partners has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Japanese has a beta of 1.0779777, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Petershill Partners has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan Japanese. Petershill Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Japanese, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petershill Partners£1.15B2.93£420.55M£86.433.59
JPMorgan Japanese£245.55M4.86£194.81M£149.065.27

JPMorgan Japanese has a net margin of 96.52% compared to Petershill Partners' net margin of 67.97%. JPMorgan Japanese's return on equity of 20.00% beat Petershill Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petershill Partners67.97% 16.42% 5.95%
JPMorgan Japanese 96.52%20.00%8.06%

Petershill Partners currently has a consensus target price of GBX 307, suggesting a potential downside of 1.13%. Given Petershill Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Petershill Partners is more favorable than JPMorgan Japanese.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Petershill Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
JPMorgan Japanese
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

3.7% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

JPMorgan Japanese beats Petershill Partners on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan Japanese compare to RIT Capital Partners?

RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) and JPMorgan Japanese (LON:JFJ) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 277.36% compared to JPMorgan Japanese's net margin of 96.52%. JPMorgan Japanese's return on equity of 20.00% beat RIT Capital Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RIT Capital Partners277.36% 11.79% 4.22%
JPMorgan Japanese 96.52%20.00%8.06%

8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.0% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.312, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Japanese has a beta of 1.0779777, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

JPMorgan Japanese has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RIT Capital Partners. JPMorgan Japanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RIT Capital Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RIT Capital Partners£500.60M6.88£167.81M£327.007.80
JPMorgan Japanese£245.55M4.86£194.81M£149.065.27

In the previous week, RIT Capital Partners had 1 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Japanese. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for RIT Capital Partners and 0 mentions for JPMorgan Japanese. RIT Capital Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Japanese'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
RIT Capital Partners Neutral
JPMorgan Japanese Neutral

RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. JPMorgan Japanese pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. RIT Capital Partners pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Japanese pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

RIT Capital Partners beats JPMorgan Japanese on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get JPMorgan Japanese News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for JFJ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding JFJ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

JFJ vs. The Competition

MetricJPMorgan JapaneseAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.19B£2.46B£6.17B£2.83B
Dividend Yield1.11%6.02%5.24%6.16%
P/E Ratio5.2761.7429.57368.32
Price / Sales4.861,785.181,731.8084,394.26
Price / Cash80.0060.49111.1727.89
Price / Book1.301.316.607.49
Net Income£194.81M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.72%-0.55%-0.25%0.39%
1 Month Performance-5.76%-0.39%0.01%-0.62%
1 Year Performance25.96%6.99%14.02%62.74%

JPMorgan Japanese Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
JFJ
JPMorgan Japanese
N/AGBX 785.82
-1.2%
N/A+27.0%£1.19B£245.55M5.27N/A
ABDN
abrdn
2.6738 of 5 stars
GBX 247.20
-0.2%
GBX 225.67
-8.7%
+23.8%£4.42B£1.75B11.664,719
ATST
Alliance Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.58B£652.76M600.003
3IN
3i Infrastructure
N/AGBX 385
+0.9%
GBX 450
+16.9%
+11.4%£3.55B£301M12.03N/A
PHLL
Petershill Partners
N/AGBX 310.50
flat
GBX 311.33
+0.3%
N/A£3.36B£1.15B3.59N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:JFJ) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners