Go Pro

Chrysalis Investments (CHRY) Competitors

Chrysalis Investments logo
GBX 72.15 +0.15 (+0.21%)
As of 12:42 PM Eastern

CHRY vs. WWH, BNKR, ASL, BHMG, and JMG

Should you buy Chrysalis Investments stock or one of its competitors? Chrysalis Investments's main competitors and comparable companies include Worldwide Healthcare (WWH), The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust (ASL), BH Macro GBP (BHMG), and JPMorgan Emerging Markets (JMG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Worldwide Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M11.73£227.88M£26.7014.48
Chrysalis Investments-£112.98M-3.07£97.18M-£24.85N/A

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 4 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare Very Positive
Chrysalis Investments Neutral

7.9% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Worldwide Healthcare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.269, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Worldwide Healthcare's net margin of 85.46%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 15.84% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
Chrysalis Investments 184.47%15.84%N/A

Summary

Worldwide Healthcare beats Chrysalis Investments on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Bankers Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, The Bankers Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chrysalis Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Bankers Investment Trust Neutral
Chrysalis Investments Neutral

0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.613, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.269, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of 184.47%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Bankers Investment Trust1,132.30% 22.55% 6.13%
Chrysalis Investments 184.47%15.84%N/A

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Bankers Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Bankers Investment Trust£322.40M4.32£218.53M£30.135.02
Chrysalis Investments-£112.98M-3.07£97.18M-£24.85N/A

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats Chrysalis Investments on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust (LON:ASL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments-£112.98M-3.07£97.18M-£24.85N/A
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust£94.68M14.34£255.01M£115.7815.20

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.269, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust has a beta of 1.433, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's net margin of 63.47%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 15.84% beat Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments184.47% 15.84% N/A
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust 63.47%6.52%11.67%

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments Neutral
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust Neutral

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust beats Chrysalis Investments on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to BH Macro GBP?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to BH Macro GBP's net margin of 54.44%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 15.84% beat BH Macro GBP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments184.47% 15.84% N/A
BH Macro GBP 54.44%7.42%-0.31%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
BH Macro GBP
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BH Macro GBP'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments Neutral
BH Macro GBP Neutral

Chrysalis Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BH Macro GBP. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BH Macro GBP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments-£112.98M-3.07£97.18M-£24.85N/A
BH Macro GBP£277.60M4.92£53.77M£45.689.25

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.269, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.1291358, meaning that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chrysalis Investments beats BH Macro GBP on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to JPMorgan Emerging Markets?

JPMorgan Emerging Markets (LON:JMG) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and valuation.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JPMorgan Emerging Markets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

14.8% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to JPMorgan Emerging Markets' net margin of 95.26%. JPMorgan Emerging Markets' return on equity of 19.61% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan Emerging Markets95.26% 19.61% 1.55%
Chrysalis Investments 184.47%15.84%N/A

In the previous week, JPMorgan Emerging Markets had 1 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for JPMorgan Emerging Markets and 0 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. JPMorgan Emerging Markets' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that JPMorgan Emerging Markets is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Positive
Chrysalis Investments Neutral

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.269, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Chrysalis Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JPMorgan Emerging Markets. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Emerging Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan Emerging Markets£56.31M23.64£80.10M£4.6329.33
Chrysalis Investments-£112.98M-3.07£97.18M-£24.85N/A

Summary

JPMorgan Emerging Markets beats Chrysalis Investments on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chrysalis Investments News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHRY and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHRY vs. The Competition

MetricChrysalis InvestmentsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£347.04M£5.72B£14.28B£2.91B
Dividend YieldN/A7.39%5.88%6.18%
P/E Ratio-2.9031.6526.17367.42
Price / Sales-3.071,290.27526.9383,891.79
Price / CashN/A48.2139.5927.89
Price / Book0.511.982.136.75
Net Income£97.18M£419.47M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.02%-0.53%0.24%5.57%
1 Month Performance-3.35%0.61%1.56%2.30%
1 Year Performance-38.01%7.62%12.05%21.81%

Chrysalis Investments Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHRY
Chrysalis Investments
N/AGBX 72.15
+0.2%
N/A-38.1%£347.04M-£112.98MN/AN/A
WWH
Worldwide Healthcare
N/AGBX 391.50
flat
N/A+15.6%£1.40B£118.16M14.66N/A
BNKR
The Bankers Investment Trust
N/AGBX 151.60
flat
N/A+22.6%£1.39B£322.40M5.03N/A
ASL
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust
N/AGBX 1,780
flat
N/A+18.1%£1.37B£94.68M15.37N/A
BHMG
BH Macro GBP
N/AGBX 424
flat
N/A+8.8%£1.37B£277.60M9.28N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CHRY) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners