Do analysts recommend WWH or CHRY?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Worldwide Healthcare 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts prefer TMPL or CHRY?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Temple Bar 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts recommend IHP or CHRY?

IntegraFin presently has a consensus price target of GBX 435, indicating a potential upside of 19.02%. Given IntegraFin's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe IntegraFin is more favorable than Chrysalis Investments. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score IntegraFin 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60 Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts recommend CHRY or JFJ?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 JPMorgan Japanese 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts rate CHRY or GROW?

Molten Ventures has a consensus target price of GBX 638.67, indicating a potential downside of 4.75%. Given Molten Ventures' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than Chrysalis Investments. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Molten Ventures 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Chrysalis Investments (CHRY) Competitors

GBX 68.90 +1.10 (+1.62%)

As of 12:05 PM Eastern

Compare

CHRY vs. WWH, TMPL, IHP, JFJ, and GROW

Should you buy Chrysalis Investments stock or one of its competitors? Chrysalis Investments's main competitors and comparable companies include Worldwide Healthcare (WWH), Temple Bar (TMPL), IntegraFin (IHP), JPMorgan Japanese (JFJ), and Molten Ventures (GROW). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Worldwide Healthcare has a net margin of 85.46% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of -3,829.61%. Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity of 8.01% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare	85.46%	8.01%	-2.02%
Chrysalis Investments	-3,829.61%	-15.34%	N/A

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.269, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 3 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare	Positive
Chrysalis Investments	Neutral

7.7% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.6% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Worldwide Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare	£118.16M	11.33	£227.88M	£26.70	14.31
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-2.93	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Worldwide Healthcare	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Worldwide Healthcare beats Chrysalis Investments on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Temple Bar?

Temple Bar (LON:TMPL) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Temple Bar	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Temple Bar has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Temple Bar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Temple Bar	£222.42M	5.73	£154.90M	£75.20	5.52
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-2.93	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A

10.7% of Temple Bar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.6% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Temple Bar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Temple Bar has a net margin of 74.06% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of -3,829.61%. Temple Bar's return on equity of 19.52% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Temple Bar	74.06%	19.52%	7.08%
Chrysalis Investments	-3,829.61%	-15.34%	N/A

Temple Bar has a beta of 1.151, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.269, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Temple Bar had 1 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Temple Bar and 0 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Temple Bar's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Temple Bar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Temple Bar	Positive
Chrysalis Investments	Neutral

Summary

Temple Bar beats Chrysalis Investments on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to IntegraFin?

IntegraFin (LON:IHP) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

IntegraFin presently has a consensus price target of GBX 435, indicating a potential upside of 19.02%. Given IntegraFin's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe IntegraFin is more favorable than Chrysalis Investments.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
IntegraFin	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Chrysalis Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than IntegraFin. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IntegraFin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
IntegraFin	£165.40M	7.30	£52.54M	£19.10	19.14
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-2.93	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A

IntegraFin has a beta of 1.276, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.269, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

IntegraFin has a net margin of 28.60% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of -3,829.61%. IntegraFin's return on equity of 27.60% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
IntegraFin	28.60%	27.60%	20.29%
Chrysalis Investments	-3,829.61%	-15.34%	N/A

44.0% of IntegraFin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.6% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.5% of IntegraFin shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, IntegraFin had 8 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for IntegraFin and 0 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. IntegraFin's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that IntegraFin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
IntegraFin	Positive
Chrysalis Investments	Neutral

Summary

IntegraFin beats Chrysalis Investments on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to JPMorgan Japanese?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and JPMorgan Japanese (LON:JFJ) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
JPMorgan Japanese	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

JPMorgan Japanese has a net margin of 96.52% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of -3,829.61%. JPMorgan Japanese's return on equity of 20.00% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments	-3,829.61%	-15.34%	N/A
JPMorgan Japanese	96.52%	20.00%	8.06%

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.269, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Japanese has a beta of 1.026, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Japanese'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments	Neutral
JPMorgan Japanese	Neutral

39.6% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan Japanese has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Japanese, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-2.93	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A
JPMorgan Japanese	£245.55M	5.00	£194.81M	£149.06	5.49

Summary

JPMorgan Japanese beats Chrysalis Investments on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Molten Ventures?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

Molten Ventures has a consensus target price of GBX 638.67, indicating a potential downside of 4.75%. Given Molten Ventures' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than Chrysalis Investments.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Molten Ventures	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 75.09% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of -3,829.61%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 9.21% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments	-3,829.61%	-15.34%	N/A
Molten Ventures	75.09%	9.21%	-3.46%

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Molten Ventures'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments	Neutral
Molten Ventures	Neutral

Chrysalis Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Molten Ventures. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Molten Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-2.93	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A
Molten Ventures	£148M	7.82	-£33.58M	£69.00	9.72

39.6% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.5% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.269, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9564402, meaning that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Molten Ventures beats Chrysalis Investments on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chrysalis Investments News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CHRY vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Chrysalis Investments	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£331.39M	£5.25B	£13.61B	£2.90B
Dividend Yield	N/A	7.52%	6.00%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	-2.77	27.39	23.36	366.46
Price / Sales	-2.93	1,253.23	511.45	90,072.28
Price / Cash	N/A	47.81	50.32	27.89
Price / Book	0.49	3.50	2.71	6.35
Net Income	£97.18M	£417.39M	£1.32B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.58%	-0.11%	-0.50%	0.33%
1 Month Performance	-8.13%	-2.32%	-1.90%	5.88%
1 Year Performance	-42.39%	5.05%	9.34%	19.38%

Chrysalis Investments Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CHRY Chrysalis Investments	N/A	GBX 68.90 +1.6%	N/A	-43.3%	£331.39M	-£112.98M	N/A	N/A
WWH Worldwide Healthcare	N/A	GBX 374.77 +0.6%	N/A	+16.2%	£1.31B	£118.16M	14.04	N/A	Positive News
TMPL Temple Bar	N/A	GBX 414.65 +0.4%	N/A	+17.3%	£1.27B	£222.42M	5.51	N/A	News Coverage
IHP IntegraFin	4.0476 of 5 stars	GBX 367.17 -1.0%	GBX 435 +18.5%	+8.0%	£1.21B	£165.40M	19.22	3,520	News Coverage Gap Down
JFJ JPMorgan Japanese	N/A	GBX 798.41 -0.6%	N/A	+17.7%	£1.20B	£245.55M	5.36	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CHRY) was last updated on 9/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Chrysalis Investments (CHRY) Competitors

CHRY vs. WWH, TMPL, IHP, JFJ, and GROW

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Temple Bar?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to IntegraFin?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to JPMorgan Japanese?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Molten Ventures?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

CHRY vs. The Competition

Chrysalis Investments Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Chrysalis Investments (CHRY) Competitors

CHRY vs. WWH, TMPL, IHP, JFJ, and GROW

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Is WWH or CHRY more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, WWH or CHRY?

Does the media favor WWH or CHRY?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in WWH or CHRY?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, WWH or CHRY?

Do analysts recommend WWH or CHRY?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Temple Bar?

Do analysts prefer TMPL or CHRY?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, TMPL or CHRY?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of TMPL or CHRY?

Is TMPL or CHRY more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, TMPL or CHRY?

Does the media favor TMPL or CHRY?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to IntegraFin?

Do analysts recommend IHP or CHRY?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, IHP or CHRY?

Which has more risk and volatility, IHP or CHRY?

Is IHP or CHRY more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in IHP or CHRY?

Does the media prefer IHP or CHRY?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to JPMorgan Japanese?

Do analysts recommend CHRY or JFJ?

Is CHRY or JFJ more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, CHRY or JFJ?

Does the media refer more to CHRY or JFJ?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CHRY or JFJ?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CHRY or JFJ?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Molten Ventures?

Do analysts rate CHRY or GROW?

Is CHRY or GROW more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CHRY or GROW?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CHRY or GROW?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CHRY or GROW?

Which has more volatility and risk, CHRY or GROW?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

CHRY vs. The Competition

Chrysalis Investments Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools