Go Pro

Chrysalis Investments (CHRY) Competitors

Chrysalis Investments logo
GBX 74.64 -0.16 (-0.22%)
As of 12:34 PM Eastern

CHRY vs. HRI, BNKR, ASHM, BHMG, and WWH

Should you buy Chrysalis Investments stock or one of its competitors? Chrysalis Investments's main competitors and comparable companies include Herald (HRI), The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), Ashmore Group (ASHM), BH Macro GBP (BHMG), and Worldwide Healthcare (WWH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Herald?

Herald (LON:HRI) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Herald
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

6.4% of Herald shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.2% of Herald shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Herald. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 0 mentions for Herald. Herald's average media sentiment score of 1.74 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Herald is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Herald Very Positive
Chrysalis Investments Neutral

Herald has a beta of 0.941, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.296, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Herald has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Herald, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Herald£432.73M1.34£175.20M£895.203.39
Chrysalis Investments-£112.98M-3.18£97.18M-£24.85N/A

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Herald's net margin of 101.77%. Herald's return on equity of 29.18% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Herald101.77% 29.18% 9.22%
Chrysalis Investments 184.47%15.84%N/A

Summary

Herald beats Chrysalis Investments on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments and Chrysalis Investments both had 1 articles in the media. The Bankers Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that The Bankers Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
The Bankers Investment Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
The Bankers Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Bankers Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments-£112.98M-3.18£97.18M-£24.85N/A
The Bankers Investment Trust£322.40M4.34£218.53M£30.135.06

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of 184.47%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments184.47% 15.84% N/A
The Bankers Investment Trust 1,132.30%22.55%6.13%

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.296, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.618, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats Chrysalis Investments on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Ashmore Group?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

Chrysalis Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ashmore Group. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashmore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments-£112.98M-3.18£97.18M-£24.85N/A
Ashmore Group£135.90M10.74£94.67M£16.5413.58

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Ashmore Group's net margin of 78.55%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 15.84% beat Ashmore Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments184.47% 15.84% N/A
Ashmore Group 78.55%14.60%4.52%

Ashmore Group has a consensus target price of GBX 155, suggesting a potential downside of 30.99%. Given Ashmore Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Chrysalis Investments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ashmore Group
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of Ashmore Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.296, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Ashmore Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 0 mentions for Ashmore Group. Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ashmore Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments Neutral
Ashmore Group Neutral

Summary

Ashmore Group beats Chrysalis Investments on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to BH Macro GBP?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 1 more articles in the media than BH Macro GBP. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 0 mentions for BH Macro GBP. Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BH Macro GBP'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments Neutral
BH Macro GBP Neutral

Chrysalis Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BH Macro GBP. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BH Macro GBP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments-£112.98M-3.18£97.18M-£24.85N/A
BH Macro GBP£277.60M4.98£53.77M£45.689.36

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
BH Macro GBP
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.296, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.1291358, indicating that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to BH Macro GBP's net margin of 54.44%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 15.84% beat BH Macro GBP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments184.47% 15.84% N/A
BH Macro GBP 54.44%7.42%-0.31%

Summary

Chrysalis Investments beats BH Macro GBP on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and valuation.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Worldwide Healthcare's net margin of 85.46%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 15.84% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
Chrysalis Investments 184.47%15.84%N/A

Worldwide Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M11.84£227.88M£26.7014.61
Chrysalis Investments-£112.98M-3.18£97.18M-£24.85N/A

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.296, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Worldwide Healthcare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

7.9% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 1 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 1 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chrysalis Investments
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Worldwide Healthcare beats Chrysalis Investments on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chrysalis Investments News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHRY and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHRY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHRY vs. The Competition

MetricChrysalis InvestmentsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£358.98M£5.60B£14.04B£2.88B
Dividend YieldN/A7.40%5.89%6.09%
P/E Ratio-3.0038.1329.21368.35
Price / Sales-3.181,237.99511.6583,691.32
Price / CashN/A48.2838.6827.89
Price / Book0.533.703.687.32
Net Income£97.18M£417.15M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.03%0.47%0.00%1.51%
1 Month Performance-2.73%0.41%0.95%2.50%
1 Year Performance-38.72%8.01%13.24%73.97%

Chrysalis Investments Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHRY
Chrysalis Investments
1.0534 of 5 stars
GBX 74.64
-0.2%
N/A-37.3%£358.98M-£112.98MN/AN/A
HRI
Herald
N/AGBX 2,960
+0.3%
N/A+25.2%£1.42B£101.21M14.876,600
BNKR
The Bankers Investment Trust
N/AGBX 149.40
+1.6%
N/A+24.6%£1.38B£322.40M4.96N/A
ASHM
Ashmore Group
0.9573 of 5 stars
GBX 209.68
+0.6%
GBX 155
-26.1%
+27.5%£1.36B£135.90M12.68283
BHMG
BH Macro GBP
N/AGBX 416.50
-0.1%
N/A+8.2%£1.35B£277.60M9.12N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CHRY) was last updated on 8/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners