Do analysts prefer IHP or CHRY?

IntegraFin currently has a consensus price target of GBX 440, suggesting a potential upside of 18.12%. Given IntegraFin's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe IntegraFin is more favorable than Chrysalis Investments. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score IntegraFin 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60 Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor IHP or CHRY?

In the previous week, IntegraFin had 3 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for IntegraFin and 2 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. IntegraFin's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of -0.26 indicating that IntegraFin is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment IntegraFin 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Chrysalis Investments 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate GROW or CHRY?

Molten Ventures presently has a consensus price target of GBX 638.67, suggesting a potential downside of 2.86%. Given Molten Ventures' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than Chrysalis Investments. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Molten Ventures 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media refer more to GROW or CHRY?

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Molten Ventures. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 1 mentions for Molten Ventures. Molten Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of -0.26 indicating that Molten Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Molten Ventures 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Chrysalis Investments 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer CHRY or FCSS?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Fidelity China Special 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media prefer CHRY or FCSS?

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelity China Special. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 1 mentions for Fidelity China Special. Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of -0.26 indicating that Fidelity China Special is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Chrysalis Investments 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Fidelity China Special 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer USA or CHRY?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Baillie Gifford US Growth 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor USA or CHRY?

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford US Growth had 1 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Baillie Gifford US Growth and 2 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Baillie Gifford US Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of -0.26 indicating that Baillie Gifford US Growth is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Baillie Gifford US Growth 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Chrysalis Investments 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer CHRY or SDP?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Chrysalis Investments (CHRY) Competitors

GBX 67.40 -1.20 (-1.75%)

As of 10/16/2026 12:33 PM Eastern

Compare

CHRY vs. IHP, GROW, FCSS, USA, and SDP

Should you buy Chrysalis Investments stock or one of its competitors? Chrysalis Investments's main competitors and comparable companies include IntegraFin (IHP), Molten Ventures (GROW), Fidelity China Special (FCSS), Baillie Gifford US Growth (USA), and Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (SDP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to IntegraFin?

IntegraFin (LON:IHP) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, IntegraFin had 3 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for IntegraFin and 2 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. IntegraFin's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of -0.26 indicating that IntegraFin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
IntegraFin	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Chrysalis Investments	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

IntegraFin currently has a consensus price target of GBX 440, suggesting a potential upside of 18.12%. Given IntegraFin's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe IntegraFin is more favorable than Chrysalis Investments.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
IntegraFin	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

43.7% of IntegraFin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 14.5% of IntegraFin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

IntegraFin has a beta of 1.276, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

IntegraFin has a net margin of 28.60% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of -3,829.61%. IntegraFin's return on equity of 27.60% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
IntegraFin	28.60%	27.60%	20.29%
Chrysalis Investments	-3,829.61%	-15.34%	N/A

Chrysalis Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than IntegraFin. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IntegraFin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
IntegraFin	£165.40M	7.44	£52.54M	£19.10	19.50
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-2.75	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A

Summary

IntegraFin beats Chrysalis Investments on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Molten Ventures?

Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Chrysalis Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Molten Ventures. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Molten Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Molten Ventures	£148M	7.63	-£33.58M	£69.00	9.53
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-2.75	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Molten Ventures. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 1 mentions for Molten Ventures. Molten Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of -0.26 indicating that Molten Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Molten Ventures	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Chrysalis Investments	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9564402, suggesting that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Molten Ventures presently has a consensus price target of GBX 638.67, suggesting a potential downside of 2.86%. Given Molten Ventures' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than Chrysalis Investments.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Molten Ventures	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

40.5% of Molten Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 75.09% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of -3,829.61%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 9.21% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Molten Ventures	75.09%	9.21%	-3.46%
Chrysalis Investments	-3,829.61%	-15.34%	N/A

Summary

Molten Ventures beats Chrysalis Investments on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Fidelity China Special?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Fidelity China Special	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.904, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity China Special, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-2.75	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A
Fidelity China Special	£146.54M	7.16	£997.06M	£29.75	7.78

Fidelity China Special has a net margin of 81.41% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of -3,829.61%. Fidelity China Special's return on equity of 9.12% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments	-3,829.61%	-15.34%	N/A
Fidelity China Special	81.41%	9.12%	N/A

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelity China Special. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 1 mentions for Fidelity China Special. Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of -0.26 indicating that Fidelity China Special is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Fidelity China Special	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Fidelity China Special beats Chrysalis Investments on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Baillie Gifford US Growth?

Baillie Gifford US Growth (LON:USA) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Baillie Gifford US Growth has a beta of 0.618, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Baillie Gifford US Growth has a net margin of 96.49% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of -3,829.61%. Baillie Gifford US Growth's return on equity of 25.27% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford US Growth	96.49%	25.27%	N/A
Chrysalis Investments	-3,829.61%	-15.34%	N/A

5.8% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford US Growth had 1 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Baillie Gifford US Growth and 2 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Baillie Gifford US Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of -0.26 indicating that Baillie Gifford US Growth is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford US Growth	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Chrysalis Investments	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Chrysalis Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baillie Gifford US Growth. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford US Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford US Growth	£227.65M	4.52	£84.35M	£81.54	4.56
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-2.75	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Baillie Gifford US Growth	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Baillie Gifford US Growth beats Chrysalis Investments on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (LON:SDP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a beta of 0.958, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a net margin of 95.12% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of -3,829.61%. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's return on equity of 20.01% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments	-3,829.61%	-15.34%	N/A
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund	95.12%	20.01%	-1.73%

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund had 2 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund and 2 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of -0.26 indicating that Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-2.75	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund	£191.10M	5.04	£121.21M	£135.64	5.75

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund beats Chrysalis Investments on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chrysalis Investments News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHRY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CHRY vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Chrysalis Investments	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£310.91M	£5.11B	£13.58B	£2.84B
Dividend Yield	N/A	7.60%	6.07%	6.25%
P/E Ratio	-2.71	28.11	22.87	366.92
Price / Sales	-2.75	1,201.24	487.47	88,606.91
Price / Cash	N/A	47.56	43.64	27.83
Price / Book	0.48	3.44	2.70	6.89
Net Income	£97.18M	£415.07M	£1.32B	£5.88B
7 Day Performance	5.31%	-1.20%	-0.52%	0.19%
1 Month Performance	-0.53%	-2.35%	-2.55%	-0.55%
1 Year Performance	-42.98%	8.32%	10.65%	23.77%

Chrysalis Investments Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CHRY Chrysalis Investments	0.5627 of 5 stars	GBX 67.40 -1.7%	N/A	-43.7%	£310.91M	-£112.98M	N/A	N/A	Analyst Forecast Gap Up
IHP IntegraFin	3.383 of 5 stars	GBX 364.50 +0.7%	GBX 435 +19.3%	+2.9%	£1.20B	£165.40M	19.08	3,520	Analyst Forecast Gap Down
GROW Molten Ventures	1.1562 of 5 stars	GBX 672.50 -0.3%	GBX 638.67 -5.0%	+62.3%	£1.16B	£148M	9.75	20	News Coverage Gap Down
FCSS Fidelity China Special	N/A	GBX 250 +1.0%	N/A	-26.9%	£1.14B	£146.54M	8.40	N/A	News Coverage Positive News
USA Baillie Gifford US Growth	N/A	GBX 388 +1.0%	N/A	+36.1%	£1.07B	£227.65M	4.76	N/A	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CHRY) was last updated on 10/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Chrysalis Investments (CHRY) Competitors

CHRY vs. IHP, GROW, FCSS, USA, and SDP

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to IntegraFin?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Molten Ventures?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Fidelity China Special?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Baillie Gifford US Growth?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CHRY vs. The Competition

Chrysalis Investments Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Chrysalis Investments (CHRY) Competitors

CHRY vs. IHP, GROW, FCSS, USA, and SDP

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to IntegraFin?

Does the media favor IHP or CHRY?

Do analysts prefer IHP or CHRY?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of IHP or CHRY?

Which has more risk and volatility, IHP or CHRY?

Is IHP or CHRY more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, IHP or CHRY?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Molten Ventures?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GROW or CHRY?

Does the media refer more to GROW or CHRY?

Which has more risk & volatility, GROW or CHRY?

Do analysts rate GROW or CHRY?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of GROW or CHRY?

Is GROW or CHRY more profitable?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Fidelity China Special?

Do analysts prefer CHRY or FCSS?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CHRY or FCSS?

Which has more risk and volatility, CHRY or FCSS?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CHRY or FCSS?

Is CHRY or FCSS more profitable?

Does the media prefer CHRY or FCSS?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Baillie Gifford US Growth?

Which has more risk and volatility, USA or CHRY?

Is USA or CHRY more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in USA or CHRY?

Does the media favor USA or CHRY?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, USA or CHRY?

Do analysts prefer USA or CHRY?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund?

Which has more risk and volatility, CHRY or SDP?

Is CHRY or SDP more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CHRY or SDP?

Does the media refer more to CHRY or SDP?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CHRY or SDP?

Do analysts prefer CHRY or SDP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CHRY vs. The Competition

Chrysalis Investments Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools