Free Trial
The Market Does Not Wait. MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Get the Deal
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Chrysalis Investments (CHRY) Competitors

Chrysalis Investments logo
GBX 79.20 +0.20 (+0.25%)
As of 12:07 PM Eastern

CHRY vs. SNN, HRI, ASHM, BHMG, and FSV

Should you buy Chrysalis Investments stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chrysalis Investments with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chrysalis Investments include Sanne Group (SNN), Herald (HRI), Ashmore Group (ASHM), BH Macro GBP (BHMG), and Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (FSV). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Sanne Group?

Sanne Group (LON:SNN) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Sanne Group's net margin of 0.00%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 14.16% beat Sanne Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanne GroupN/A N/A N/A
Chrysalis Investments 184.47%14.16%N/A

Chrysalis Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sanne Group. Sanne Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chrysalis Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanne Group£194.16M0.00N/A-£4.50N/A
Chrysalis Investments£123.58M3.08£97.18M£22.093.59

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 3 more articles in the media than Sanne Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 0 mentions for Sanne Group. Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 1.86 beat Sanne Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Chrysalis Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanne Group Neutral
Chrysalis Investments Very Positive

Given Sanne Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sanne Group is more favorable than Chrysalis Investments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sanne Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Chrysalis Investments beats Sanne Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Herald?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and Herald (LON:HRI) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Herald shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Herald shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 3 more articles in the media than Herald. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 0 mentions for Herald. Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 1.86 beat Herald's score of 1.57 indicating that Chrysalis Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments Very Positive
Herald Very Positive

Herald has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Herald, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments£123.58M3.08£97.18M£22.093.59
Herald£101.21M14.19£175.20M£199.0115.08

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Herald
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.2766949, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Herald has a beta of 0.661, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Herald's net margin of 86.00%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 14.16% beat Herald's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments184.47% 14.16% N/A
Herald 86.00%7.67%9.22%

Summary

Chrysalis Investments beats Herald on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Ashmore Group?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk and valuation.

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.8% of Ashmore Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Ashmore Group's net margin of 78.55%. Ashmore Group's return on equity of 14.60% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments184.47% 14.16% N/A
Ashmore Group 78.55%14.60%4.52%

Chrysalis Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ashmore Group. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashmore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments£123.58M3.08£97.18M£22.093.59
Ashmore Group£135.90M9.85£94.67M£16.5412.44

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 3 more articles in the media than Ashmore Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 0 mentions for Ashmore Group. Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 1.86 beat Ashmore Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Chrysalis Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments Very Positive
Ashmore Group Neutral

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.2766949, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.958, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Ashmore Group has a consensus price target of GBX 150, indicating a potential downside of 27.11%. Given Ashmore Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Chrysalis Investments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ashmore Group
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Summary

Ashmore Group beats Chrysalis Investments on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to BH Macro GBP?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to BH Macro GBP's net margin of 173.32%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 14.16% beat BH Macro GBP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments184.47% 14.16% N/A
BH Macro GBP 173.32%13.24%-0.31%

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 3 more articles in the media than BH Macro GBP. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 0 mentions for BH Macro GBP. Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 1.86 beat BH Macro GBP's score of 0.00 indicating that Chrysalis Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments Very Positive
BH Macro GBP Neutral

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.2766949, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.08712986, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

Chrysalis Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BH Macro GBP. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BH Macro GBP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments£123.58M3.08£97.18M£22.093.59
BH Macro GBP£277.60M5.12£53.77M£45.689.46

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
BH Macro GBP
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Chrysalis Investments beats BH Macro GBP on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (LON:FSV) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments£123.58M3.08£97.18M£22.093.59
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values£354.63M3.85£223.72M£109.343.85

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.2766949, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a beta of 1.2728288, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' net margin of 95.92%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' return on equity of 25.87% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments184.47% 14.16% N/A
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values 95.92%25.87%0.33%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 3 more articles in the media than Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 0 mentions for Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values. Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 1.86 beat Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' score of 0.00 indicating that Chrysalis Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments Very Positive
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values Neutral

Summary

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values beats Chrysalis Investments on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chrysalis Investments News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHRY and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHRY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHRY vs. The Competition

MetricChrysalis InvestmentsAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£380.93M£2.31B£5.75B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A5.97%5.25%6.15%
P/E Ratio3.5925.1315.93365.17
Price / Sales3.082,019.941,017.8687,687.40
Price / CashN/A60.1748.5927.89
Price / Book0.561.356.667.65
Net Income£97.18M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.89%-0.73%-0.17%0.12%
1 Month Performance-11.51%0.56%0.46%0.31%
1 Year Performance-23.11%11.75%18.50%83.58%

Chrysalis Investments Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHRY
Chrysalis Investments
2.6923 of 5 stars
GBX 79.20
+0.3%
N/A-23.4%£380.93M£123.58M3.59N/A
SNN
Sanne Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.50B£194.16MN/A20,100
HRI
Herald
N/AGBX 3,045
+0.7%
N/A+36.4%£1.46B£101.21M15.306,600
ASHM
Ashmore Group
N/AGBX 220.60
+1.5%
GBX 150
-32.0%
+40.8%£1.43B£135.90M13.34283
BHMG
BH Macro GBP
N/AGBX 427
-0.1%
N/A+9.8%£1.41B£277.60M9.35N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CHRY) was last updated on 5/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners