Do analysts prefer WWH or CHRY?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Worldwide Healthcare 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts recommend CHRY or FSV?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts recommend CHRY or ASHM?

Ashmore Group has a consensus target price of GBX 155, indicating a potential downside of 25.12%. Given Ashmore Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Chrysalis Investments. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Ashmore Group 2 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67

Do analysts prefer BNKR or CHRY?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score The Bankers Investment Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts prefer BHMG or CHRY?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score BH Macro GBP 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Chrysalis Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Chrysalis Investments (CHRY) Competitors

GBX 75.50 +0.20 (+0.27%)

As of 08:44 AM Eastern

Compare

CHRY vs. WWH, FSV, ASHM, BNKR, and BHMG

Should you buy Chrysalis Investments stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chrysalis Investments with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chrysalis Investments include Worldwide Healthcare (WWH), Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (FSV), Ashmore Group (ASHM), The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), and BH Macro GBP (BHMG). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Worldwide Healthcare's net margin of 85.46%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 15.84% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare	85.46%	8.01%	-2.02%
Chrysalis Investments	184.47%	15.84%	N/A

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 6 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare	Very Positive
Chrysalis Investments	Neutral

Worldwide Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare	£118.16M	11.59	£227.88M	£26.70	14.27
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-3.21	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A

8.0% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.266, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3326553, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Worldwide Healthcare	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Worldwide Healthcare beats Chrysalis Investments on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (LON:FSV) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3326553, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a beta of 1.2700156, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' net margin of 95.92%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' return on equity of 25.87% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments	184.47%	15.84%	N/A
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values	95.92%	25.87%	0.33%

In the previous week, Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' average media sentiment score of 1.69 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments	Neutral
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values	Very Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-3.21	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values	£354.63M	4.16	£223.72M	£109.34	4.15

Summary

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values beats Chrysalis Investments on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Ashmore Group?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3326553, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.962, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ashmore Group had 1 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ashmore Group and 0 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Ashmore Group's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Ashmore Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments	Neutral
Ashmore Group	Positive

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Ashmore Group's net margin of 78.55%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 15.84% beat Ashmore Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments	184.47%	15.84%	N/A
Ashmore Group	78.55%	14.60%	4.52%

Ashmore Group has a consensus target price of GBX 155, indicating a potential downside of 25.12%. Given Ashmore Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Chrysalis Investments.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Ashmore Group	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of Ashmore Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chrysalis Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ashmore Group. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashmore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-3.21	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A
Ashmore Group	£135.90M	9.90	£94.67M	£16.54	12.52

Summary

Ashmore Group beats Chrysalis Investments on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, The Bankers Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for The Bankers Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. The Bankers Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that The Bankers Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
The Bankers Investment Trust	Positive
Chrysalis Investments	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
The Bankers Investment Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of 184.47%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
The Bankers Investment Trust	1,132.30%	22.55%	6.13%
Chrysalis Investments	184.47%	15.84%	N/A

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Bankers Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
The Bankers Investment Trust	£322.40M	4.24	£218.53M	£30.13	4.92
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-3.21	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A

The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.9636718, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3326553, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats Chrysalis Investments on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to BH Macro GBP?

BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.14339958, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3326553, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
BH Macro GBP	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Chrysalis Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, BH Macro GBP's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chrysalis Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
BH Macro GBP	Neutral
Chrysalis Investments	Neutral

Chrysalis Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BH Macro GBP. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BH Macro GBP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
BH Macro GBP	£277.60M	4.87	£53.77M	£45.68	9.14
Chrysalis Investments	-£112.98M	-3.21	£97.18M	-£24.85	N/A

1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to BH Macro GBP's net margin of 54.44%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 15.84% beat BH Macro GBP's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
BH Macro GBP	54.44%	7.42%	-0.31%
Chrysalis Investments	184.47%	15.84%	N/A

Summary

Chrysalis Investments beats BH Macro GBP on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chrysalis Investments News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHRY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CHRY vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Chrysalis Investments	Asset Management Industry	Financial Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£363.14M	£2.53B	£6.17B	£2.82B
Dividend Yield	N/A	6.02%	5.24%	6.16%
P/E Ratio	-3.04	61.74	29.54	368.32
Price / Sales	-3.21	1,785.18	1,729.39	84,394.20
Price / Cash	N/A	60.49	111.17	27.89
Price / Book	0.53	1.31	6.60	7.46
Net Income	£97.18M	£265.96M	£1.13B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-4.90%	-0.56%	-0.32%	0.40%
1 Month Performance	0.67%	-0.40%	-0.06%	-0.62%
1 Year Performance	-32.10%	6.99%	14.02%	62.75%

Chrysalis Investments Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CHRY Chrysalis Investments	N/A	GBX 75.50 +0.3%	N/A	-33.2%	£363.14M	-£112.98M	N/A	N/A
WWH Worldwide Healthcare	N/A	GBX 387.65 -0.7%	N/A	+22.2%	£1.41B	£118.16M	14.52	N/A	Positive News
FSV Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values	N/A	GBX 433.50 -0.2%	N/A	+20.9%	£1.41B	£354.63M	3.96	25,000
ASHM Ashmore Group	1.1401 of 5 stars	GBX 215.44 +0.6%	GBX 155 -28.1%	+17.1%	£1.39B	£135.90M	13.03	283	Positive News
BNKR The Bankers Investment Trust	N/A	GBX 150.20 +0.1%	N/A	+21.4%	£1.38B	£322.40M	4.99	N/A	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CHRY) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Chrysalis Investments (CHRY) Competitors

CHRY vs. WWH, FSV, ASHM, BNKR, and BHMG

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Ashmore Group?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to BH Macro GBP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CHRY vs. The Competition

Chrysalis Investments Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Chrysalis Investments (CHRY) Competitors

CHRY vs. WWH, FSV, ASHM, BNKR, and BHMG

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Is WWH or CHRY more profitable?

Does the media refer more to WWH or CHRY?

Which has better valuation and earnings, WWH or CHRY?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in WWH or CHRY?

Which has more risk and volatility, WWH or CHRY?

Do analysts prefer WWH or CHRY?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Which has more risk & volatility, CHRY or FSV?

Is CHRY or FSV more profitable?

Does the media favor CHRY or FSV?

Do analysts recommend CHRY or FSV?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CHRY or FSV?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CHRY or FSV?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Ashmore Group?

Which has more volatility and risk, CHRY or ASHM?

Does the media favor CHRY or ASHM?

Is CHRY or ASHM more profitable?

Do analysts recommend CHRY or ASHM?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CHRY or ASHM?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CHRY or ASHM?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BNKR or CHRY?

Does the media refer more to BNKR or CHRY?

Do analysts prefer BNKR or CHRY?

Is BNKR or CHRY more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, BNKR or CHRY?

Which has more volatility and risk, BNKR or CHRY?

Summary

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to BH Macro GBP?

Which has more volatility & risk, BHMG or CHRY?

Do analysts prefer BHMG or CHRY?

Does the media refer more to BHMG or CHRY?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, BHMG or CHRY?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of BHMG or CHRY?

Is BHMG or CHRY more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CHRY vs. The Competition

Chrysalis Investments Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools