Go Pro

Chrysalis Investments (CHRY) Competitors

Chrysalis Investments logo
GBX 77.70 -1.00 (-1.27%)
As of 03:28 AM Eastern

CHRY vs. HRI, WWH, BHMG, FSV, and BNKR

Should you buy Chrysalis Investments stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chrysalis Investments with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chrysalis Investments include Herald (HRI), Worldwide Healthcare (WWH), BH Macro GBP (BHMG), Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (FSV), and The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Herald?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and Herald (LON:HRI) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Herald's net margin of 86.00%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 14.16% beat Herald's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments184.47% 14.16% N/A
Herald 86.00%7.67%9.22%

Herald has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Herald, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments£123.58M3.02£97.18M£22.093.52
Herald£101.21M14.87£175.20M£199.0115.80

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3067211, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Herald has a beta of 0.975936, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Herald had 2 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Herald and 0 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Herald's average media sentiment score of 0.16 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Herald is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments Neutral
Herald Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Herald
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.6% of Herald shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Herald shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Herald beats Chrysalis Investments on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Worldwide Healthcare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Worldwide Healthcare's net margin of 85.46%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 14.16% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
Chrysalis Investments 184.47%14.16%N/A

8.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Worldwide Healthcare has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chrysalis Investments. Worldwide Healthcare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chrysalis Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare-£164.31M-8.56£227.88M-£30.90N/A
Chrysalis Investments£123.58M3.02£97.18M£22.093.52

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 2 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.85 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare Very Positive
Chrysalis Investments Neutral

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.265, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3067211, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chrysalis Investments beats Worldwide Healthcare on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to BH Macro GBP?

BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Chrysalis Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BH Macro GBP. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BH Macro GBP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BH Macro GBP£277.60M5.10£53.77M£45.689.43
Chrysalis Investments£123.58M3.02£97.18M£22.093.52

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to BH Macro GBP's net margin of 54.44%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 14.16% beat BH Macro GBP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BH Macro GBP54.44% 7.42% -0.31%
Chrysalis Investments 184.47%14.16%N/A

BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.14339958, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3067211, indicating that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BH Macro GBP
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, BH Macro GBP's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chrysalis Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
BH Macro GBP Neutral
Chrysalis Investments Neutral

1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Chrysalis Investments beats BH Macro GBP on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (LON:FSV) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

12.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values had 1 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values and 0 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values Very Positive
Chrysalis Investments Neutral

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values£354.63M3.91£223.72M£109.343.91
Chrysalis Investments£123.58M3.02£97.18M£22.093.52

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' net margin of 95.92%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' return on equity of 25.87% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values95.92% 25.87% 0.33%
Chrysalis Investments 184.47%14.16%N/A

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a beta of 1.2719399, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3067211, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values beats Chrysalis Investments on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chrysalis Investments compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) and The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to Chrysalis Investments' net margin of 184.47%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chrysalis Investments184.47% 14.16% N/A
The Bankers Investment Trust 1,132.30%22.55%6.13%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
The Bankers Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled The Bankers Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chrysalis Investments Neutral
The Bankers Investment Trust Neutral

38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3067211, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.617, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis Investments. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Bankers Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chrysalis Investments£123.58M3.02£97.18M£22.093.52
The Bankers Investment Trust£221.50M6.26£218.53M£20.257.38

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats Chrysalis Investments on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chrysalis Investments News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHRY and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHRY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHRY vs. The Competition

MetricChrysalis InvestmentsAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£373.72M£2.38B£6.12B£2.94B
Dividend YieldN/A6.00%5.24%6.15%
P/E Ratio3.5262.0729.90366.77
Price / Sales3.022,034.711,105.7286,365.18
Price / CashN/A60.3394.2727.87
Price / Book0.551.396.617.69
Net Income£97.18M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.02%0.72%0.79%0.42%
1 Month Performance-1.02%-0.49%0.45%-1.43%
1 Year Performance-26.70%8.86%17.30%65.59%

Chrysalis Investments Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHRY
Chrysalis Investments
N/AGBX 77.70
-1.3%
N/A-27.7%£373.72M£123.58M3.52N/A
HRI
Herald
N/AGBX 3,035
+1.5%
N/A+36.2%£1.45B£101.21M15.256,600
WWH
Worldwide Healthcare
N/AGBX 386
+2.6%
N/A+27.9%£1.40B-£164.31MN/AN/A
BHMG
BH Macro GBP
N/AGBX 426.50
-0.1%
N/A+7.6%£1.40B£277.60M9.34N/A
FSV
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
N/AGBX 427
-0.9%
N/A+16.6%£1.38B£354.63M3.9125,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CHRY) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners