Free Trial

Tanfield Group (TAN) Competitors

Tanfield Group logo
GBX 4 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 10/2/2026

TAN vs. CIP, PGIT, DNE, UTLI, and ADAM

Should you buy Tanfield Group stock or one of its competitors? Tanfield Group's main competitors and comparable companies include CIP Merchant Capital (CIP), Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) (PGIT), Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust (DNE), UIL Finance (UTLI), and Jade Road Investments (ADAM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Tanfield Group compare to CIP Merchant Capital?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and CIP Merchant Capital (LON:CIP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Tanfield Group had 3 more articles in the media than CIP Merchant Capital. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tanfield Group and 0 mentions for CIP Merchant Capital. CIP Merchant Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tanfield Group's score of -0.32 indicating that CIP Merchant Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group Neutral
CIP Merchant Capital Neutral

CIP Merchant Capital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -25,628.57%. CIP Merchant Capital's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-25,628.57% -8.84% -1.19%
CIP Merchant Capital N/A N/A N/A

CIP Merchant Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CIP Merchant Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
CIP Merchant Capital£8.87M0.00N/A£13.70N/A

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CIP Merchant Capital beats Tanfield Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) (LON:PGIT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -25,628.57%. Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-25,628.57% -8.84% -1.19%
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) N/A N/A N/A

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)-£2.54M0.00N/A-£40.70N/A

In the previous week, Tanfield Group had 3 more articles in the media than Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L). MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tanfield Group and 0 mentions for Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L). Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tanfield Group's score of -0.32 indicating that Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group Neutral
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) Neutral

Summary

Tanfield Group and Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust?

Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust (LON:DNE) and Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

32.6% of Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 68.6% of Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Tanfield Group had 3 more articles in the media than Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tanfield Group and 0 mentions for Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust. Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tanfield Group's score of -0.32 indicating that Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust Neutral
Tanfield Group Neutral

Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust has a net margin of 74.24% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -25,628.57%. Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust's return on equity of 3.62% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust74.24% 3.62% 2.87%
Tanfield Group -25,628.57%-8.84%-1.19%

Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.227, indicating that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust£1.99M0.00£1.56M£28.41N/A
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A

Summary

Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust beats Tanfield Group on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to UIL Finance?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and UIL Finance (LON:UTLI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

UIL Finance has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -25,628.57%. UIL Finance's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-25,628.57% -8.84% -1.19%
UIL Finance N/A N/A 3.35%

In the previous week, Tanfield Group had 2 more articles in the media than UIL Finance. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tanfield Group and 1 mentions for UIL Finance. UIL Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tanfield Group's score of -0.32 indicating that UIL Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
UIL Finance
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.1% of UIL Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

UIL Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
UIL Finance£3.70M6.98N/AN/AN/A

Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.227, indicating that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UIL Finance has a beta of 0.20071709, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

UIL Finance beats Tanfield Group on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Jade Road Investments?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and Jade Road Investments (LON:ADAM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jade Road Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
Jade Road InvestmentsN/AN/AN/A-£3.40N/A

In the previous week, Tanfield Group had 3 more articles in the media than Jade Road Investments. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tanfield Group and 0 mentions for Jade Road Investments. Jade Road Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tanfield Group's score of -0.32 indicating that Jade Road Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group Neutral
Jade Road Investments Neutral

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Jade Road Investments has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -25,628.57%. Jade Road Investments' return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-25,628.57% -8.84% -1.19%
Jade Road Investments N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Tanfield Group beats Jade Road Investments on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tanfield Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TAN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TAN vs. The Competition

MetricTanfield GroupCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£6.52M£5.16B£13.12B£2.46B
Dividend Yield1.41%7.57%6.04%6.25%
P/E Ratio-3.8829.4524.42366.74
Price / SalesN/A1,200.87500.0889,426.66
Price / Cash4.0947.6745.5127.89
Price / Book0.293.482.706.83
Net Income-£273.80£416.56M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-5.88%-0.74%-1.04%-0.72%
1 Month Performance-11.60%-2.71%-3.20%-1.01%
1 Year Performance-16.67%9.00%10.47%22.82%

Tanfield Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TAN
Tanfield Group
N/AGBX 4
flat
N/A-16.7%£6.52MN/AN/A2
CIP
CIP Merchant Capital
N/AN/AN/AN/A£27.50M£8.87M3.65N/A
PGIT
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£26.23M-£2.54MN/AN/A
DNE
Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£26.15M£1.99M16.72N/A
UTLI
UIL Finance
N/AGBX 134
flat
N/A+9.3%£25.80M£3.70MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TAN) was last updated on 10/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners