Free Trial

Tanfield Group (TAN) Competitors

Tanfield Group logo
GBX 5 -0.50 (-9.09%)
As of 06/12/2026 12:43 PM Eastern

TAN vs. SDV, CIP, EGT, RSE, and PGIT

Should you buy Tanfield Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tanfield Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tanfield Group include Chelverton UK Dividend Trust (SDV), CIP Merchant Capital (CIP), European Green Transition Plc O (EGT), Riverstone Energy (RSE), and Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) (PGIT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Chelverton UK Dividend Trust?

Chelverton UK Dividend Trust (LON:SDV) and Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

Chelverton UK Dividend Trust has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Chelverton UK Dividend Trust's return on equity of 0.50% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chelverton UK Dividend Trust8.39% 0.50% 0.90%
Tanfield Group -23,900.00%-7.90%-1.19%

Chelverton UK Dividend Trust has a beta of 0.7132659, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.542, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chelverton UK Dividend Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tanfield Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chelverton UK Dividend Trust Neutral
Tanfield Group Neutral

1.9% of Chelverton UK Dividend Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Chelverton UK Dividend Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chelverton UK Dividend Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chelverton UK Dividend Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chelverton UK Dividend Trust£1.44M21.30£8.87M£0.21652.50
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A

Summary

Chelverton UK Dividend Trust beats Tanfield Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to CIP Merchant Capital?

CIP Merchant Capital (LON:CIP) and Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

CIP Merchant Capital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. CIP Merchant Capital's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CIP Merchant CapitalN/A N/A N/A
Tanfield Group -23,900.00%-7.90%-1.19%

In the previous week, CIP Merchant Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tanfield Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CIP Merchant Capital Neutral
Tanfield Group Neutral

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CIP Merchant Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CIP Merchant Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CIP Merchant Capital£8.87M0.00N/A£13.70N/A
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A

Summary

CIP Merchant Capital beats Tanfield Group on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to European Green Transition Plc O?

European Green Transition Plc O (LON:EGT) and Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

European Green Transition Plc O has a beta of 0.9488613, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.542, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

4.5% of European Green Transition Plc O shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.4% of European Green Transition Plc O shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

European Green Transition Plc O has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Tanfield Group's return on equity of -7.90% beat European Green Transition Plc O's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
European Green Transition Plc ON/A -27.93% N/A
Tanfield Group -23,900.00%-7.90%-1.19%

In the previous week, European Green Transition Plc O's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Tanfield Group's score of 0.00 indicating that European Green Transition Plc O is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
European Green Transition Plc O Very Positive
Tanfield Group Neutral

European Green Transition Plc O is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tanfield Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
European Green Transition Plc ON/AN/A-£709.49K-£0.64N/A
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A

Summary

European Green Transition Plc O beats Tanfield Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Riverstone Energy?

Riverstone Energy (LON:RSE) and Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Riverstone Energy has a beta of 0.115, indicating that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.542, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Riverstone Energy has a net margin of -0.58% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Riverstone Energy's return on equity of -0.20% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Riverstone Energy-0.58% -0.20% -0.22%
Tanfield Group -23,900.00%-7.90%-1.19%

Riverstone Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Riverstone Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tanfield Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Riverstone Energy£31.65M0.86£78.63M-£2.17N/A
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A

26.3% of Riverstone Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are held by institutional investors. 66.9% of Riverstone Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Riverstone Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tanfield Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Riverstone Energy Neutral
Tanfield Group Neutral

Summary

Riverstone Energy beats Tanfield Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)?

Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) (LON:PGIT) and Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and valuation.

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)N/A N/A N/A
Tanfield Group -23,900.00%-7.90%-1.19%

Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)-£2.54M0.00N/A-£40.70N/A
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A

In the previous week, Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tanfield Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) Neutral
Tanfield Group Neutral

Summary

Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) and Tanfield Group tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tanfield Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TAN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TAN vs. The Competition

MetricTanfield GroupAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£8.15M£2.45B£5.90B£2.79B
Dividend Yield1.41%6.03%5.28%6.13%
P/E Ratio-4.8525.7816.34366.77
Price / SalesN/A2,075.011,103.1586,680.90
Price / Cash4.0960.3388.9827.87
Price / Book0.361.376.577.84
Net Income-£273.80£265.36M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.17%0.31%1.14%-0.07%
1 Month Performance-3.85%0.51%1.56%1.44%
1 Year Performance24.38%11.05%20.16%75.30%

Tanfield Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TAN
Tanfield Group
N/AGBX 5
-9.1%
N/A+24.4%£8.15MN/AN/A2
SDV
Chelverton UK Dividend Trust
N/AGBX 137.18
-1.0%
N/A-1.7%£30.80M£1.44M653.24N/A
CIP
CIP Merchant Capital
N/AN/AN/AN/A£27.50M£8.87M3.65N/A
EGT
European Green Transition Plc O
N/AGBX 10
+2.6%
N/A+47.0%£26.96MN/AN/AN/A
RSE
Riverstone Energy
N/AGBX 557.50
-0.9%
N/A-30.3%£26.88M£31.65MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TAN) was last updated on 6/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners