Go Pro

Tanfield Group (TAN) Competitors

Tanfield Group logo
GBX 4.44 -0.07 (-1.49%)
As of 07:29 AM Eastern

TAN vs. RSE, CIP, PGIT, DNE, and ADAM

Should you buy Tanfield Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tanfield Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tanfield Group include Riverstone Energy (RSE), CIP Merchant Capital (CIP), Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) (PGIT), Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust (DNE), and Jade Road Investments (ADAM). These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Riverstone Energy?

Riverstone Energy (LON:RSE) and Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Riverstone Energy has a beta of 0.127, indicating that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.248, indicating that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

8.2% of Riverstone Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 66.9% of Riverstone Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Riverstone Energy has a net margin of -0.58% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Riverstone Energy's return on equity of -0.20% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Riverstone Energy-0.58% -0.20% -0.22%
Tanfield Group -23,900.00%-7.90%-1.19%

In the previous week, Tanfield Group had 1 more articles in the media than Riverstone Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tanfield Group and 0 mentions for Riverstone Energy. Tanfield Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Riverstone Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Tanfield Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Riverstone Energy Neutral
Tanfield Group Positive

Riverstone Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Riverstone Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tanfield Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Riverstone Energy£31.65M0.92£78.63M-£2.17N/A
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A

Summary

Riverstone Energy and Tanfield Group tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to CIP Merchant Capital?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and CIP Merchant Capital (LON:CIP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

CIP Merchant Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CIP Merchant Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
CIP Merchant Capital£8.87M0.00N/A£13.70N/A

In the previous week, Tanfield Group had 1 more articles in the media than CIP Merchant Capital. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tanfield Group and 0 mentions for CIP Merchant Capital. Tanfield Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat CIP Merchant Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Tanfield Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group Positive
CIP Merchant Capital Neutral

CIP Merchant Capital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. CIP Merchant Capital's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-23,900.00% -7.90% -1.19%
CIP Merchant Capital N/A N/A N/A

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CIP Merchant Capital beats Tanfield Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) (LON:PGIT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)-£2.54M0.00N/A-£40.70N/A

In the previous week, Tanfield Group had 1 more articles in the media than Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tanfield Group and 0 mentions for Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L). Tanfield Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Tanfield Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group Positive
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) Neutral

Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-23,900.00% -7.90% -1.19%
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Tanfield Group beats Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust?

Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust (LON:DNE) and Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings and risk.

Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust has a net margin of 74.24% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust's return on equity of 3.62% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust74.24% 3.62% 2.87%
Tanfield Group -23,900.00%-7.90%-1.19%

32.6% of Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are held by institutional investors. 68.6% of Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.248, indicating that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust£1.99M0.00£1.56M£28.41N/A
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A

In the previous week, Tanfield Group had 1 more articles in the media than Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tanfield Group and 0 mentions for Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust. Tanfield Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Tanfield Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust Neutral
Tanfield Group Positive

Summary

Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust beats Tanfield Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Jade Road Investments?

Jade Road Investments (LON:ADAM) and Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Jade Road Investments has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Jade Road Investments' return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jade Road InvestmentsN/A N/A N/A
Tanfield Group -23,900.00%-7.90%-1.19%

Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jade Road Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jade Road InvestmentsN/AN/AN/A-£3.40N/A
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A

In the previous week, Tanfield Group had 1 more articles in the media than Jade Road Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tanfield Group and 0 mentions for Jade Road Investments. Tanfield Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Jade Road Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Tanfield Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jade Road Investments Neutral
Tanfield Group Positive

Summary

Tanfield Group beats Jade Road Investments on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tanfield Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TAN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TAN vs. The Competition

MetricTanfield GroupCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£7.23M£5.52B£13.97B£2.83B
Dividend Yield1.41%7.51%5.96%6.15%
P/E Ratio-4.3136.8928.78368.41
Price / SalesN/A1,120.31465.0383,654.70
Price / Cash4.0948.0429.9527.89
Price / Book0.323.723.717.06
Net Income-£273.80£417.17M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.13%0.65%0.81%0.21%
1 Month Performance-11.20%-0.60%0.80%0.22%
1 Year Performance-5.53%6.37%13.79%64.12%

Tanfield Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TAN
Tanfield Group
N/AGBX 4.44
-1.5%
N/A-4.1%£7.23MN/AN/A2
RSE
Riverstone Energy
N/AGBX 599
+1.7%
N/A-31.9%£28.88M£31.65MN/AN/A
CIP
CIP Merchant Capital
N/AN/AN/AN/A£27.50M£8.87M3.65N/A
PGIT
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£26.23M-£2.54MN/AN/A
DNE
Dunedin Enterprise Investment Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£26.15M£1.99M16.72N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TAN) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners