Free Trial
→ Musk is burning $2.5 billion a quarter on AI. One company holds the key. (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free TAN Stock Alerts

Tanfield Group (TAN) Competitors

Tanfield Group logo
GBX 4.53 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/3/2026
Compare

TAN vs. SDV, RSE, CIP, DGI9, and PGIT

Should you buy Tanfield Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tanfield Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tanfield Group include Chelverton UK Dividend Trust (SDV), Riverstone Energy (RSE), CIP Merchant Capital (CIP), Digital 9 Infrastructure (DGI9), and Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) (PGIT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Chelverton UK Dividend Trust?

Chelverton UK Dividend Trust (LON:SDV) and Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Chelverton UK Dividend Trust has a net margin of 8.39% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Chelverton UK Dividend Trust's return on equity of 0.50% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chelverton UK Dividend Trust8.39% 0.50% 0.90%
Tanfield Group -23,900.00%-7.90%-1.19%

Chelverton UK Dividend Trust has a beta of 0.7132659, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.542, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

1.9% of Chelverton UK Dividend Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Chelverton UK Dividend Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chelverton UK Dividend Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chelverton UK Dividend Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chelverton UK Dividend Trust£1.44M21.36£8.87M£0.21654.17
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A

In the previous week, Chelverton UK Dividend Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tanfield Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chelverton UK Dividend Trust Neutral
Tanfield Group Neutral

Summary

Chelverton UK Dividend Trust beats Tanfield Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Riverstone Energy?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and Riverstone Energy (LON:RSE) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.0% of Riverstone Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 66.9% of Riverstone Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Riverstone Energy has a net margin of -0.58% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Riverstone Energy's return on equity of -0.20% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-23,900.00% -7.90% -1.19%
Riverstone Energy -0.58%-0.20%-0.22%

Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.542, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Riverstone Energy has a beta of 0.124, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Riverstone Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Riverstone Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tanfield Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
Riverstone Energy£31.65M0.83£78.63M-£2.17N/A

In the previous week, Tanfield Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Riverstone Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group Neutral
Riverstone Energy Neutral

Summary

Riverstone Energy beats Tanfield Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to CIP Merchant Capital?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and CIP Merchant Capital (LON:CIP) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

CIP Merchant Capital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. CIP Merchant Capital's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-23,900.00% -7.90% -1.19%
CIP Merchant Capital N/A N/A N/A

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Tanfield Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CIP Merchant Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group Neutral
CIP Merchant Capital Neutral

CIP Merchant Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CIP Merchant Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
CIP Merchant Capital£8.87M0.00N/A£13.70N/A

Summary

CIP Merchant Capital beats Tanfield Group on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Digital 9 Infrastructure?

Digital 9 Infrastructure (LON:DGI9) and Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

Tanfield Group has higher revenue and earnings than Digital 9 Infrastructure. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Digital 9 Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Digital 9 Infrastructure-£211.22M-0.12-£456.44M-£25.10N/A
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A

Digital 9 Infrastructure has a net margin of -4,631.60% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Tanfield Group's return on equity of -7.90% beat Digital 9 Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Digital 9 Infrastructure-4,631.60% -74.80% N/A
Tanfield Group -23,900.00%-7.90%-1.19%

23.3% of Digital 9 Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Digital 9 Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Digital 9 Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tanfield Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Digital 9 Infrastructure Neutral
Tanfield Group Neutral

Summary

Tanfield Group beats Digital 9 Infrastructure on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) (LON:PGIT) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Tanfield Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group Neutral
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) Neutral

Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-23,900.00% -7.90% -1.19%
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) N/A N/A N/A

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L)-£2.54M0.00N/A-£40.70N/A

Summary

Tanfield Group and Premier Global Infrastructure Trust PLC (PGIT.L) tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tanfield Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TAN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TAN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TAN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTanfield GroupAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£7.38M£2.45B£5.75B£2.78B
Dividend Yield1.41%6.02%5.28%6.12%
P/E Ratio-4.4025.8216.34364.34
Price / SalesN/A2,112.761,113.6187,480.01
Price / Cash4.0960.1591.3227.85
Price / Book0.331.386.507.74
Net Income-£273.80£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-9.04%-0.12%0.31%0.21%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-30.82%-7.23%N/A
1 Year Performance-9.40%11.37%19.72%74.70%

Tanfield Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TAN
Tanfield Group
N/AGBX 4.53
flat		N/A-9.6%£7.38MN/AN/A2
SDV
Chelverton UK Dividend Trust
N/AGBX 137.45
+0.1%		N/A-2.8%£30.86M£1.44M654.52N/A
RSE
Riverstone Energy
N/AGBX 593.80
+3.7%		N/A-27.8%£28.63M£31.65MN/AN/A
CIP
CIP Merchant Capital
N/AN/AN/AN/A£27.50M£8.87M3.65N/A
DGI9
Digital 9 Infrastructure
N/AGBX 4.90
+6.5%		N/A-45.5%£26.55M-£211.22MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TAN) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
How to claim a stake in SpaceX before the June 12 IPO
SpaceX is expected to go public on June 12 - and for the first time, everyday investors may have a way in befo...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s secret China deal
Trump just returned from Beijing with the most powerful business delegation in American history - Elon Musk, J...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
June 4: The day smart money moves (not June 12)
Everyone is watching June 12 - the SpaceX listing date. The real deadline is June 4, when Goldman Sachs, Morga...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Oil is settling in yuan now - here's what that means for gold
Saudi Arabia has terminated its 1974 petrodollar agreement with the United States - the deal that forced every...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
AI breakthrough hidden inside SpaceX exposed on June 11
On June 11, SpaceX is hosting a major investor event - and growth investor Louis Navellier believes Elon Musk ...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Important SpaceX PREDICTION from Trading Legend Jon Najarian
Trading legend Jon Najarian says the real story behind the projected June 12 SpaceX IPO isn't the IPO itself -...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Research Firm that Warned of Dot-Com Crash Says: “These 7 Stocks Could Fall 50% or More”
Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist at The Oxford Club, issued a warning before the Dot-Com Crash of ...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel