Go Pro

Tanfield Group (TAN) Competitors

Tanfield Group logo
GBX 5.04 +0.25 (+5.10%)
As of 07/3/2026

TAN vs. STM, NBDG, ALAI, JRS, and ALM

Should you buy Tanfield Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tanfield Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tanfield Group include STM Group (STM), NB Distressed Debt New Glb (NBDG), abrdn Latin American Income Fund (ALAI), JPMorgan Russian Securities (JRS), and Allied Minds (ALM). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Tanfield Group compare to STM Group?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and STM Group (LON:STM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.542, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, STM Group has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

STM Group has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than STM Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
STM Group£30.06M0.00£1.47M£0.02N/A

STM Group has a net margin of 4.87% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. STM Group's return on equity of 4.17% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-23,900.00% -7.90% -1.19%
STM Group 4.87%4.17%2.38%

In the previous week, Tanfield Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled STM Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group Neutral
STM Group Neutral

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of STM Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.5% of STM Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

STM Group beats Tanfield Group on 10 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to NB Distressed Debt New Glb?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and NB Distressed Debt New Glb (LON:NBDG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of NB Distressed Debt New Glb shares are held by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of NB Distressed Debt New Glb shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

NB Distressed Debt New Glb has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. NB Distressed Debt New Glb's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-23,900.00% -7.90% -1.19%
NB Distressed Debt New Glb N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Tanfield Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled NB Distressed Debt New Glb'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group Neutral
NB Distressed Debt New Glb Neutral

NB Distressed Debt New Glb has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tanfield Group. NB Distressed Debt New Glb is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tanfield Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
NB Distressed Debt New Glb-£4.00M-8.72N/A-£6.91N/A

Summary

Tanfield Group beats NB Distressed Debt New Glb on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to abrdn Latin American Income Fund?

abrdn Latin American Income Fund (LON:ALAI) and Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

abrdn Latin American Income Fund has a net margin of 79.83% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. abrdn Latin American Income Fund's return on equity of 5.98% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Latin American Income Fund79.83% 5.98% 2.98%
Tanfield Group -23,900.00%-7.90%-1.19%

In the previous week, abrdn Latin American Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tanfield Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn Latin American Income Fund Neutral
Tanfield Group Neutral

40.7% of abrdn Latin American Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of abrdn Latin American Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

abrdn Latin American Income Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Latin American Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Latin American Income Fund£2.70M0.00£2.15M£0.04N/A
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A

abrdn Latin American Income Fund has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tanfield Group has a beta of 0.542, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

abrdn Latin American Income Fund beats Tanfield Group on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to JPMorgan Russian Securities?

JPMorgan Russian Securities (LON:JRS) and Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and dividends.

JPMorgan Russian Securities has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. JPMorgan Russian Securities' return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan Russian SecuritiesN/A N/A N/A
Tanfield Group -23,900.00%-7.90%-1.19%

In the previous week, JPMorgan Russian Securities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tanfield Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan Russian Securities Neutral
Tanfield Group Neutral

JPMorgan Russian Securities has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Russian Securities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan Russian Securities-£259.52M0.00N/A£3.81N/A
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

JPMorgan Russian Securities beats Tanfield Group on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tanfield Group compare to Allied Minds?

Tanfield Group (LON:TAN) and Allied Minds (LON:ALM) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Tanfield Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Allied Minds'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tanfield Group Neutral
Allied Minds Neutral

Allied Minds has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tanfield Group's net margin of -23,900.00%. Allied Minds' return on equity of 0.00% beat Tanfield Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanfield Group-23,900.00% -7.90% -1.19%
Allied Minds N/A N/A N/A

10.1% of Tanfield Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.5% of Tanfield Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Allied Minds has higher revenue and earnings than Tanfield Group. Tanfield Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Allied Minds, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanfield GroupN/AN/A-£273.80-£1.03N/A
Allied Minds£2.86M0.00N/A-£5.20N/A

Summary

Allied Minds beats Tanfield Group on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tanfield Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TAN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

TAN vs. The Competition

MetricTanfield GroupAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£8.22M£2.43B£5.52B£2.52B
Dividend Yield1.41%6.00%5.24%6.15%
P/E Ratio-4.9062.2430.04366.74
Price / SalesN/A2,117.571,133.1986,382.22
Price / Cash4.0960.3389.0327.87
Price / Book0.371.416.687.75
Net Income-£273.80£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-9.10%0.77%0.67%0.59%
1 Month PerformanceN/A0.30%1.11%-0.75%
1 Year Performance1.92%8.73%17.40%63.99%

Tanfield Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TAN
Tanfield Group
N/AGBX 5.05
+5.1%
N/A+4.2%£8.22MN/AN/A2
STM
STM Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£35.53M£30.06M3,075.0048,300
NBDG
NB Distressed Debt New Glb
N/AGBX 45.42
flat
N/AN/A£34.91M-£4.00MN/AN/A
ALAI
abrdn Latin American Income Fund
N/AN/AN/AN/A£34.41M£2.70M1,506.25N/A
JRS
JPMorgan Russian Securities
N/AN/AN/AN/A£33.56M-£259.52M21.78N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TAN) was last updated on 7/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners