Free Trial

Tern (TERN) Competitors

Tern logo
GBX 0.82 +0.02 (+2.50%)
As of 05/15/2026 08:05 AM Eastern

TERN vs. KRM, MAFL, TPVE, DVNO, and TEAM

Should you buy Tern stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tern with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tern include KRM22 (KRM), Mineral & Financial Investments (MAFL), Triple Point Income VCT Plc E (TPVE), Develop North (DVNO), and TEAM (TEAM). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Tern compare to KRM22?

KRM22 (LON:KRM) and Tern (LON:TERN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

4.8% of KRM22 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Tern shares are held by institutional investors. 7.3% of KRM22 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Tern shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, KRM22 and KRM22 both had 1 articles in the media. KRM22's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Tern's score of 0.00 indicating that KRM22 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
KRM22 Positive
Tern Neutral

KRM22 has a net margin of -27.23% compared to Tern's net margin of -7,033.60%. Tern's return on equity of -19.70% beat KRM22's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
KRM22-27.23% -140.94% -24.65%
Tern -7,033.60%-19.70%-5.04%

KRM22 has a beta of -0.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tern has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

KRM22 has higher revenue and earnings than Tern. KRM22 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tern, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KRM22£7.12M2.50-£2.54M-£4.60N/A
Tern£29.40K214.78-£16.02M-£0.37N/A

Summary

KRM22 and Tern tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tern compare to Mineral & Financial Investments?

Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) and Tern (LON:TERN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Tern had 1 more articles in the media than Mineral & Financial Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tern and 0 mentions for Mineral & Financial Investments. Mineral & Financial Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tern'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral
Tern Neutral

Mineral & Financial Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Tern. Tern is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mineral & Financial Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M12.61£2.04M£8.405.71
Tern£29.40K214.78-£16.02M-£0.37N/A

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 156.90% compared to Tern's net margin of -7,033.60%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 14.44% beat Tern's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mineral & Financial Investments156.90% 14.44% 11.52%
Tern -7,033.60%-19.70%-5.04%

Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.738, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tern has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Tern shares are held by institutional investors. 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Tern shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Tern on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tern compare to Triple Point Income VCT Plc E?

Tern (LON:TERN) and Triple Point Income VCT Plc E (LON:TPVE) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Triple Point Income VCT Plc E has a net margin of 32.42% compared to Tern's net margin of -7,033.60%. Triple Point Income VCT Plc E's return on equity of 3.97% beat Tern's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tern-7,033.60% -19.70% -5.04%
Triple Point Income VCT Plc E 32.42%3.97%2.47%

In the previous week, Tern had 1 more articles in the media than Triple Point Income VCT Plc E. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tern and 0 mentions for Triple Point Income VCT Plc E. Tern's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Triple Point Income VCT Plc E'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tern Neutral
Triple Point Income VCT Plc E Neutral

1.1% of Tern shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.6% of Tern shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 54.3% of Triple Point Income VCT Plc E shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tern has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triple Point Income VCT Plc E has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

Triple Point Income VCT Plc E has higher revenue and earnings than Tern. Tern is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Point Income VCT Plc E, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tern£29.40K214.78-£16.02M-£0.37N/A
Triple Point Income VCT Plc E£4.35M0.00£1.41M£0.08N/A

Summary

Triple Point Income VCT Plc E beats Tern on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tern compare to Develop North?

Develop North (LON:DVNO) and Tern (LON:TERN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Develop North has higher revenue and earnings than Tern. Tern is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Develop North, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Develop North£1.32M14.45£846.72K£1.6643.98
Tern£29.40K214.78-£16.02M-£0.37N/A

In the previous week, Tern had 1 more articles in the media than Develop North. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tern and 0 mentions for Develop North. Develop North's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tern'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Develop North Neutral
Tern Neutral

Develop North has a net margin of 18.05% compared to Tern's net margin of -7,033.60%. Develop North's return on equity of 2.11% beat Tern's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Develop North18.05% 2.11% 1.11%
Tern -7,033.60%-19.70%-5.04%

Develop North has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tern has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

1.1% of Tern shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Develop North shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Tern shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Develop North beats Tern on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tern compare to TEAM?

TEAM (LON:TEAM) and Tern (LON:TERN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

TEAM has higher revenue and earnings than Tern. TEAM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tern, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TEAM£11.95M1.55-£1.73M-£5.90N/A
Tern£29.40K214.78-£16.02M-£0.37N/A

TEAM has a net margin of -27.02% compared to Tern's net margin of -7,033.60%. Tern's return on equity of -19.70% beat TEAM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TEAM-27.02% -34.47% -12.47%
Tern -7,033.60%-19.70%-5.04%

3.0% of TEAM shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Tern shares are held by institutional investors. 9.7% of TEAM shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Tern shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TEAM has a beta of 0.896, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tern has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tern had 1 more articles in the media than TEAM. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tern and 0 mentions for TEAM. TEAM's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tern'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TEAM Neutral
Tern Neutral

Summary

TEAM and Tern tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tern News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TERN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TERN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TERN vs. The Competition

MetricTernAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£6.16M£2.35B£5.16B£2.60B
Dividend Yield0.73%5.97%5.25%6.15%
P/E Ratio-2.2425.1415.92365.91
Price / Sales214.782,063.60996.1788,030.08
Price / Cash113.7560.1790.2527.89
Price / Book0.321.356.597.74
Net Income-£16.02M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance41.38%-0.71%-0.26%0.21%
1 Month Performance10.66%1.69%1.19%1.56%
1 Year Performance-40.36%12.04%18.11%77.95%

Tern Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TERN
Tern
N/AGBX 0.82
+2.5%
N/A-39.3%£6.16M£29.40KN/A8
KRM
KRM22
N/AGBX 31.50
flat
N/A+0.0%£18.69M£7.12MN/A45
MAFL
Mineral & Financial Investments
N/AGBX 48
flat
N/A+95.9%£18.65M£1.48M5.712
TPVE
Triple Point Income VCT Plc E
N/AN/AN/AN/A£18.09M£4.35M781.25N/A
DVNO
Develop North
N/AGBX 71
flat
N/AN/A£17.73M£1.32M42.77N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TERN) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners