Go Pro

Tern (TERN) Competitors

Tern logo
GBX 1.40 +0.10 (+7.54%)
As of 12:44 PM Eastern

TERN vs. OFG, CBA, VLE, JGC, and TENT

Should you buy Tern stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tern with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tern include Octopus Future Generations VCT (OFG), Ceiba Investments (CBA), Volvere (VLE), Jupiter Green (JGC), and Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT). These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Tern compare to Octopus Future Generations VCT?

Octopus Future Generations VCT (LON:OFG) and Tern (LON:TERN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Tern had 1 more articles in the media than Octopus Future Generations VCT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tern and 0 mentions for Octopus Future Generations VCT. Tern's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Octopus Future Generations VCT's score of 0.00 indicating that Tern is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus Future Generations VCT Neutral
Tern Neutral

Octopus Future Generations VCT has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tern's net margin of -9,424.35%. Octopus Future Generations VCT's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tern's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus Future Generations VCTN/A N/A N/A
Tern -9,424.35%-59.29%-5.04%

1.1% of Tern shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Octopus Future Generations VCT shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Tern shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Octopus Future Generations VCT has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tern. Octopus Future Generations VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tern, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus Future Generations VCT-£767K-63.53N/A-£2.30N/A
Tern£54K221.49-£16.02M-£0.81N/A

Summary

Tern beats Octopus Future Generations VCT on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tern compare to Ceiba Investments?

Ceiba Investments (LON:CBA) and Tern (LON:TERN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Tern had 1 more articles in the media than Ceiba Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tern and 0 mentions for Ceiba Investments. Tern's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Ceiba Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Tern is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ceiba Investments Neutral
Tern Neutral

Ceiba Investments has a net margin of -602.11% compared to Tern's net margin of -9,424.35%. Ceiba Investments' return on equity of -14.58% beat Tern's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ceiba Investments-602.11% -14.58% 2.31%
Tern -9,424.35%-59.29%-5.04%

Ceiba Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tern. Ceiba Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tern, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ceiba Investments-£10.05M-4.77£8.64M-£10.00N/A
Tern£54K221.49-£16.02M-£0.81N/A

1.4% of Ceiba Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Tern shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.5% of Ceiba Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Tern shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ceiba Investments has a beta of 0.2, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tern has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tern beats Ceiba Investments on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tern compare to Volvere?

Tern (LON:TERN) and Volvere (LON:VLE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Tern had 1 more articles in the media than Volvere. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tern and 0 mentions for Volvere. Tern's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Volvere's score of 0.00 indicating that Tern is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tern Neutral
Volvere Neutral

Tern has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volvere has a beta of 0.618, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

1.1% of Tern shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Volvere shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.6% of Tern shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.2% of Volvere shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volvere has a net margin of 7.90% compared to Tern's net margin of -9,424.35%. Volvere's return on equity of 9.96% beat Tern's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tern-9,424.35% -59.29% -5.04%
Volvere 7.90%9.96%6.16%

Volvere has higher revenue and earnings than Tern. Tern is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volvere, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tern£54K221.49-£16.02M-£0.81N/A
Volvere£52.70M0.91£2.94M£188.8911.65

Summary

Volvere beats Tern on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tern compare to Jupiter Green?

Tern (LON:TERN) and Jupiter Green (LON:JGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Jupiter Green has higher revenue and earnings than Tern. Tern is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Green, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tern£54K221.49-£16.02M-£0.81N/A
Jupiter Green£7.93M0.00£6.55M£34.51N/A

1.1% of Tern shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Jupiter Green shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.6% of Tern shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Jupiter Green shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Tern had 1 more articles in the media than Jupiter Green. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tern and 0 mentions for Jupiter Green. Tern's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Jupiter Green's score of 0.00 indicating that Tern is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tern Neutral
Jupiter Green Neutral

Tern has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Green has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Jupiter Green has a net margin of -26.72% compared to Tern's net margin of -9,424.35%. Jupiter Green's return on equity of -0.45% beat Tern's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tern-9,424.35% -59.29% -5.04%
Jupiter Green -26.72%-0.45%0.15%

Summary

Jupiter Green beats Tern on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tern compare to Triple Point Energy Transition?

Triple Point Energy Transition (LON:TENT) and Tern (LON:TERN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Triple Point Energy Transition has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tern. Tern is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Point Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Triple Point Energy Transition-£9.97M0.00-£12.35M-£12.35N/A
Tern£54K221.49-£16.02M-£0.81N/A

62.8% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Tern shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Tern shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Tern had 1 more articles in the media than Triple Point Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tern and 0 mentions for Triple Point Energy Transition. Tern's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Triple Point Energy Transition's score of 0.00 indicating that Tern is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Triple Point Energy Transition Neutral
Tern Neutral

Triple Point Energy Transition has a net margin of 152.90% compared to Tern's net margin of -9,424.35%. Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity of -7.81% beat Tern's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Triple Point Energy Transition152.90% -7.81% -4.86%
Tern -9,424.35%-59.29%-5.04%

Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tern has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tern beats Triple Point Energy Transition on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tern News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TERN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TERN vs. The Competition

MetricTernCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£11.96M£5.55B£14.04B£2.87B
Dividend Yield0.73%7.46%5.91%6.13%
P/E Ratio-1.7338.2529.36369.49
Price / Sales221.491,242.94511.8983,955.53
Price / Cash113.7548.2339.3227.89
Price / Book0.543.753.757.07
Net Income-£16.02M£417.17M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-6.80%1.28%1.13%1.18%
1 Month Performance21.57%-0.45%0.48%0.90%
1 Year Performance49.52%6.60%13.18%75.31%

Tern Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TERN
Tern
N/AGBX 1.40
+7.5%
N/A+33.5%£11.96M£54KN/A8
OFG
Octopus Future Generations VCT
N/AGBX 77
flat
N/AN/A£48.73M-£767KN/A2,250
CBA
Ceiba Investments
N/AGBX 29
flat
N/AN/A£47.91M-£10.05MN/AN/A
VLE
Volvere
N/AGBX 2,125
+2.2%
N/A+1.4%£46.54M£52.70M11.25226
JGC
Jupiter Green
N/AN/AN/AN/A£46.49M£7.93M7.10N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TERN) was last updated on 8/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners