Go Pro

Tekmar Group (TGP) Competitors

Tekmar Group logo
GBX 13.68 -0.51 (-3.59%)
As of 08:44 AM Eastern

TGP vs. VANL, BILN, SMJ, HERC, and GYG

Should you buy Tekmar Group stock or one of its competitors? Tekmar Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Van Elle (VANL), Billington (BILN), J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (SMJ), Hercules Site Services (HERC), and GYG (GYG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Tekmar Group compare to Van Elle?

Tekmar Group (LON:TGP) and Van Elle (LON:VANL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Tekmar Group had 1 more articles in the media than Van Elle. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tekmar Group and 0 mentions for Van Elle. Van Elle's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tekmar Group's score of -1.14 indicating that Van Elle is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tekmar Group Negative
Van Elle Neutral

17.9% of Tekmar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Van Elle shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.8% of Tekmar Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Van Elle shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tekmar Group has a beta of 1.702, meaning that its share price is 70% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Van Elle has a beta of 0.782, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Van Elle has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Tekmar Group's net margin of -7.38%. Van Elle's return on equity of 0.90% beat Tekmar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tekmar Group-7.38% -10.04% -9.26%
Van Elle 0.35%0.90%3.37%

Van Elle has higher revenue and earnings than Tekmar Group. Tekmar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Van Elle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tekmar Group£32.58M0.59-£4.29M-£1.73N/A
Van Elle£140.48M0.40£4.27M£0.40130.00

Summary

Van Elle beats Tekmar Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tekmar Group compare to Billington?

Tekmar Group (LON:TGP) and Billington (LON:BILN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Billington has higher revenue and earnings than Tekmar Group. Tekmar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Billington, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tekmar Group£32.58M0.59-£4.29M-£1.73N/A
Billington£95.69M0.55£10.46M£10.0040.68

In the previous week, Billington had 1 more articles in the media than Tekmar Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Billington and 1 mentions for Tekmar Group. Billington's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Tekmar Group's score of -1.14 indicating that Billington is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tekmar Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Billington
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

17.9% of Tekmar Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Billington shares are held by institutional investors. 7.8% of Tekmar Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of Billington shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tekmar Group has a beta of 1.702, suggesting that its stock price is 70% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Billington has a beta of 0.551, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Billington has a net margin of 1.39% compared to Tekmar Group's net margin of -7.38%. Billington's return on equity of 2.61% beat Tekmar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tekmar Group-7.38% -10.04% -9.26%
Billington 1.39%2.61%10.37%

Summary

Billington beats Tekmar Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tekmar Group compare to J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC?

Tekmar Group (LON:TGP) and J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC (LON:SMJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tekmar Group. Tekmar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tekmar Group£32.58M0.59-£4.29M-£1.73N/A
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC£29.00M1.54£1.61M£13.068.81

17.9% of Tekmar Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are held by institutional investors. 7.8% of Tekmar Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 71.4% of J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Tekmar Group had 1 more articles in the media than J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tekmar Group and 0 mentions for J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tekmar Group's score of -1.14 indicating that J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tekmar Group Negative
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC Neutral

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a net margin of 17.61% compared to Tekmar Group's net margin of -7.38%. J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC's return on equity of 3.92% beat Tekmar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tekmar Group-7.38% -10.04% -9.26%
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC 17.61%3.92%0.82%

Tekmar Group has a beta of 1.702, meaning that its share price is 70% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC has a beta of 0.214, meaning that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC beats Tekmar Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tekmar Group compare to Hercules Site Services?

Hercules Site Services (LON:HERC) and Tekmar Group (LON:TGP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Tekmar Group had 1 more articles in the media than Hercules Site Services. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tekmar Group and 0 mentions for Hercules Site Services. Hercules Site Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tekmar Group's score of -1.14 indicating that Hercules Site Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hercules Site Services Neutral
Tekmar Group Negative

Hercules Site Services has a beta of 0.963, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tekmar Group has a beta of 1.702, indicating that its stock price is 70% more volatile than the broader market.

Hercules Site Services has higher revenue and earnings than Tekmar Group. Hercules Site Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tekmar Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hercules Site Services£125.85M0.23£798.97K-£2.37N/A
Tekmar Group£32.58M0.59-£4.29M-£1.73N/A

Hercules Site Services has a net margin of -0.53% compared to Tekmar Group's net margin of -7.38%. Hercules Site Services' return on equity of -5.56% beat Tekmar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hercules Site Services-0.53% -5.56% 4.33%
Tekmar Group -7.38%-10.04%-9.26%

7.9% of Hercules Site Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of Tekmar Group shares are held by institutional investors. 37.2% of Hercules Site Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.8% of Tekmar Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hercules Site Services beats Tekmar Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tekmar Group compare to GYG?

GYG (LON:GYG) and Tekmar Group (LON:TGP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

GYG has higher revenue and earnings than Tekmar Group. Tekmar Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GYG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GYG£62.82M0.00N/A-£12.40N/A
Tekmar Group£32.58M0.59-£4.29M-£1.73N/A

GYG has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tekmar Group's net margin of -7.38%. GYG's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tekmar Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GYGN/A N/A N/A
Tekmar Group -7.38%-10.04%-9.26%

In the previous week, Tekmar Group had 1 more articles in the media than GYG. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tekmar Group and 0 mentions for GYG. GYG's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tekmar Group's score of -1.14 indicating that GYG is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GYG Neutral
Tekmar Group Negative

17.9% of Tekmar Group shares are held by institutional investors. 7.8% of Tekmar Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

GYG beats Tekmar Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tekmar Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TGP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TGP vs. The Competition

MetricTekmar GroupConstruction & Engineering IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£19.12M£8.10B£10.31B£2.87B
Dividend YieldN/A2.64%97.17%6.25%
P/E Ratio-7.9121.1625.56367.03
Price / Sales0.5957.85328.4389,972.82
Price / Cash0.4117.3823.8527.89
Price / Book1.134.414.836.30
Net Income-£4.29M£487.40M£612.13M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-8.90%-3.34%0.08%-1.13%
1 Month Performance-4.34%-7.62%-3.58%-0.61%
1 Year Performance148.73%15.18%5.68%19.59%

Tekmar Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TGP
Tekmar Group
N/AGBX 13.68
-3.6%
N/A+158.0%£19.12M£32.58MN/A172
VANL
Van Elle
N/AGBX 52
flat
N/AN/A£56.27M£140.48M130.00670
BILN
Billington
N/AGBX 408.70
+0.9%
N/A+15.5%£52.53M£95.69M40.87463
SMJ
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC
N/AGBX 120
+4.3%
N/A-4.2%£46.45M£29.00M9.19152
HERC
Hercules Site Services
N/AGBX 36
-1.4%
N/A-7.9%£29.01M£125.85MN/A560

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TGP) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners