Does the media prefer HILS or BAB?

In the previous week, Hill & Smith and Hill & Smith both had 3 articles in the media. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Babcock International Group's score of 0.36 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hill & Smith 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Babcock International Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor BAB or KLR?

In the previous week, Keller Group had 8 more articles in the media than Babcock International Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Keller Group and 3 mentions for Babcock International Group. Keller Group's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Babcock International Group's score of 0.36 indicating that Keller Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Babcock International Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Keller Group 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer MGNS or BAB?

In the previous week, Babcock International Group had 2 more articles in the media than Morgan Sindall Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Babcock International Group and 1 mentions for Morgan Sindall Group. Morgan Sindall Group's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Babcock International Group's score of 0.36 indicating that Morgan Sindall Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Morgan Sindall Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Babcock International Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to BAB or KIE?

In the previous week, Babcock International Group had 1 more articles in the media than Kier Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Babcock International Group and 2 mentions for Kier Group. Kier Group's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Babcock International Group's score of 0.36 indicating that Kier Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Babcock International Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Kier Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Babcock International Group (BAB) Competitors

GBX 1,203 +12.00 (+1.01%)

As of 03:35 AM Eastern

Compare

BAB vs. BBY, HILS, KLR, MGNS, and KIE

Should you buy Babcock International Group stock or one of its competitors? Babcock International Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Balfour Beatty (BBY), Hill & Smith (HILS), Keller Group (KLR), Morgan Sindall Group (MGNS), and Kier Group (KIE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Babcock International Group compare to Balfour Beatty?

Babcock International Group (LON:BAB) and Balfour Beatty (LON:BBY) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Babcock International Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 4,256, suggesting a potential upside of 253.78%. Balfour Beatty has a consensus target price of GBX 856.67, suggesting a potential downside of 10.53%. Given Babcock International Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Babcock International Group is more favorable than Balfour Beatty.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Babcock International Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Balfour Beatty	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Babcock International Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Balfour Beatty pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Babcock International Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Balfour Beatty pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Babcock International Group has a beta of 0.874, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Balfour Beatty has a beta of 0.592, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Balfour Beatty has higher revenue and earnings than Babcock International Group. Balfour Beatty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Babcock International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Babcock International Group	£5.18B	1.14	£165.10M	£41.30	29.13
Balfour Beatty	£9.49B	0.48	£219.98M	£52.00	18.41

In the previous week, Babcock International Group had 3 more articles in the media than Balfour Beatty. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Babcock International Group and 0 mentions for Balfour Beatty. Babcock International Group's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Balfour Beatty's score of 0.00 indicating that Babcock International Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Babcock International Group	Neutral
Balfour Beatty	Neutral

Babcock International Group has a net margin of 4.08% compared to Balfour Beatty's net margin of 2.77%. Babcock International Group's return on equity of 31.57% beat Balfour Beatty's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Babcock International Group	4.08%	31.57%	4.47%
Balfour Beatty	2.77%	23.73%	1.63%

65.8% of Babcock International Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Balfour Beatty shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Babcock International Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Balfour Beatty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Babcock International Group beats Balfour Beatty on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Babcock International Group compare to Hill & Smith?

Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) and Babcock International Group (LON:BAB) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and dividends.

Hill & Smith presently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,075, suggesting a potential downside of 0.49%. Babcock International Group has a consensus target price of GBX 4,256, suggesting a potential upside of 253.78%. Given Babcock International Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Babcock International Group is more favorable than Hill & Smith.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Babcock International Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of Babcock International Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Babcock International Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Babcock International Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hill & Smith. Babcock International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hill & Smith	£868.80M	2.78	£77.07M	£101.60	30.41
Babcock International Group	£5.18B	1.14	£165.10M	£41.30	29.13

Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.284, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Babcock International Group has a beta of 0.874, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hill & Smith and Hill & Smith both had 3 articles in the media. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Babcock International Group's score of 0.36 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hill & Smith	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Babcock International Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 50.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Babcock International Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Hill & Smith pays out 49.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Babcock International Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 9.50% compared to Babcock International Group's net margin of 4.08%. Babcock International Group's return on equity of 31.57% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hill & Smith	9.50%	17.34%	10.01%
Babcock International Group	4.08%	31.57%	4.47%

Summary

Hill & Smith beats Babcock International Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Babcock International Group compare to Keller Group?

Babcock International Group (LON:BAB) and Keller Group (LON:KLR) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Babcock International Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Keller Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 51.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Babcock International Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Keller Group pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Keller Group had 8 more articles in the media than Babcock International Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Keller Group and 3 mentions for Babcock International Group. Keller Group's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Babcock International Group's score of 0.36 indicating that Keller Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Babcock International Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Keller Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Keller Group has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Babcock International Group's net margin of 4.08%. Babcock International Group's return on equity of 31.57% beat Keller Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Babcock International Group	4.08%	31.57%	4.47%
Keller Group	4.81%	24.09%	7.80%

Babcock International Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 4,256, suggesting a potential upside of 253.78%. Keller Group has a consensus price target of GBX 2,907.50, suggesting a potential downside of 6.69%. Given Babcock International Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Babcock International Group is more favorable than Keller Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Babcock International Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Keller Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Babcock International Group has a beta of 0.874, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Keller Group has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

65.8% of Babcock International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.6% of Keller Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Babcock International Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Keller Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Babcock International Group has higher revenue and earnings than Keller Group. Keller Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Babcock International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Babcock International Group	£5.18B	1.14	£165.10M	£41.30	29.13
Keller Group	£3.24B	0.66	£126.69M	£198.70	15.68

Summary

Babcock International Group and Keller Group tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Babcock International Group compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Morgan Sindall Group (LON:MGNS) and Babcock International Group (LON:BAB) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Babcock International Group has a net margin of 4.08% compared to Morgan Sindall Group's net margin of 3.63%. Babcock International Group's return on equity of 31.57% beat Morgan Sindall Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Morgan Sindall Group	3.63%	24.83%	4.46%
Babcock International Group	4.08%	31.57%	4.47%

Morgan Sindall Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 158 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Babcock International Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Morgan Sindall Group pays out 41.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Babcock International Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Babcock International Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Morgan Sindall Group. Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Babcock International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Morgan Sindall Group	£5.21B	0.40	£125.92M	£382.90	11.75
Babcock International Group	£5.18B	1.14	£165.10M	£41.30	29.13

Morgan Sindall Group has a beta of 0.842, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Babcock International Group has a beta of 0.874, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Babcock International Group had 2 more articles in the media than Morgan Sindall Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Babcock International Group and 1 mentions for Morgan Sindall Group. Morgan Sindall Group's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Babcock International Group's score of 0.36 indicating that Morgan Sindall Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Morgan Sindall Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Babcock International Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

48.8% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of Babcock International Group shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Babcock International Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Morgan Sindall Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 5,800, indicating a potential upside of 28.89%. Babcock International Group has a consensus target price of GBX 4,256, indicating a potential upside of 253.78%. Given Babcock International Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Babcock International Group is more favorable than Morgan Sindall Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Morgan Sindall Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Babcock International Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Babcock International Group beats Morgan Sindall Group on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Babcock International Group compare to Kier Group?

Babcock International Group (LON:BAB) and Kier Group (LON:KIE) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Babcock International Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Kier Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Babcock International Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kier Group pays out 55.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Babcock International Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 4,256, indicating a potential upside of 253.78%. Kier Group has a consensus target price of GBX 253.33, indicating a potential downside of 0.73%. Given Babcock International Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Babcock International Group is more favorable than Kier Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Babcock International Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Kier Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

65.8% of Babcock International Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.8% of Kier Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Babcock International Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Kier Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Babcock International Group has a beta of 0.874, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kier Group has a beta of 0.872, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Babcock International Group has a net margin of 4.08% compared to Kier Group's net margin of 1.47%. Babcock International Group's return on equity of 31.57% beat Kier Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Babcock International Group	4.08%	31.57%	4.47%
Kier Group	1.47%	11.69%	2.18%

Babcock International Group has higher revenue and earnings than Kier Group. Kier Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Babcock International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Babcock International Group	£5.18B	1.14	£165.10M	£41.30	29.13
Kier Group	£4.12B	0.27	£42.84M	£13.10	19.48

In the previous week, Babcock International Group had 1 more articles in the media than Kier Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Babcock International Group and 2 mentions for Kier Group. Kier Group's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Babcock International Group's score of 0.36 indicating that Kier Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Babcock International Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Kier Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Babcock International Group beats Kier Group on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Babcock International Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BAB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BAB vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Babcock International Group	Construction & Engineering Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£5.92B	£8.58B	£10.83B	£2.88B
Dividend Yield	0.63%	2.61%	97.10%	6.09%
P/E Ratio	29.13	23.97	28.11	368.33
Price / Sales	1.14	61.18	358.96	83,691.32
Price / Cash	1.29	19.28	24.70	27.89
Price / Book	14.91	4.78	4.53	7.32
Net Income	£165.10M	£487.35M	£607.12M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.55%	-0.67%	1.36%	1.04%
1 Month Performance	19.17%	-2.21%	2.39%	2.49%
1 Year Performance	23.51%	22.72%	13.63%	69.40%

Babcock International Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BAB Babcock International Group	3.7474 of 5 stars	GBX 1,203 +1.0%	GBX 4,256 +253.8%	+24.2%	£5.92B	£5.18B	29.13	26,115
BBY Balfour Beatty	1.1415 of 5 stars	GBX 875.50 -0.5%	GBX 856.67 -2.2%	+55.0%	£4.15B	£9.49B	16.84	105,000
HILS Hill & Smith	1.8941 of 5 stars	GBX 3,060 +1.7%	GBX 2,976.67 -2.7%	+55.6%	£2.39B	£868.80M	30.12	4,336	News Coverage
KLR Keller Group	2.4853 of 5 stars	GBX 3,062 -0.6%	GBX 2,907.50 -5.0%	+128.8%	£2.09B	£3.09B	15.41	9,500
MGNS Morgan Sindall Group	4.5447 of 5 stars	GBX 4,428 -0.8%	GBX 5,800 +31.0%	-1.8%	£2.07B	£5.02B	12.48	7,700	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BAB) was last updated on 8/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Babcock International Group (BAB) Competitors

BAB vs. BBY, HILS, KLR, MGNS, and KIE

How does Babcock International Group compare to Balfour Beatty?

Summary

How does Babcock International Group compare to Hill & Smith?

Summary

How does Babcock International Group compare to Keller Group?

Summary

How does Babcock International Group compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Summary

How does Babcock International Group compare to Kier Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BAB vs. The Competition

Babcock International Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Babcock International Group (BAB) Competitors

BAB vs. BBY, HILS, KLR, MGNS, and KIE

How does Babcock International Group compare to Balfour Beatty?

Do analysts recommend BAB or BBY?

Is BAB or BBY a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, BAB or BBY?

Which has better valuation & earnings, BAB or BBY?

Does the media favor BAB or BBY?

Is BAB or BBY more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in BAB or BBY?

Summary

How does Babcock International Group compare to Hill & Smith?

Do analysts prefer HILS or BAB?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HILS or BAB?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, HILS or BAB?

Which has more risk and volatility, HILS or BAB?

Does the media prefer HILS or BAB?

Is HILS or BAB a better dividend stock?

Is HILS or BAB more profitable?

Summary

How does Babcock International Group compare to Keller Group?

Is BAB or KLR a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor BAB or KLR?

Is BAB or KLR more profitable?

Do analysts rate BAB or KLR?

Which has more volatility and risk, BAB or KLR?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BAB or KLR?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, BAB or KLR?

Summary

How does Babcock International Group compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Is MGNS or BAB more profitable?

Is MGNS or BAB a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MGNS or BAB?

Which has more volatility & risk, MGNS or BAB?

Does the media prefer MGNS or BAB?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MGNS or BAB?

Do analysts rate MGNS or BAB?

Summary

How does Babcock International Group compare to Kier Group?

Is BAB or KIE a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer BAB or KIE?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BAB or KIE?

Which has more risk and volatility, BAB or KIE?

Is BAB or KIE more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, BAB or KIE?

Does the media refer more to BAB or KIE?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BAB vs. The Competition

Babcock International Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools