Does the media prefer HILS or BAB?

In the previous week, Babcock International Group had 4 more articles in the media than Hill & Smith. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Babcock International Group and 3 mentions for Hill & Smith. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Babcock International Group's score of 0.73 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hill & Smith 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Babcock International Group 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, HILS or BBY?

Balfour Beatty has higher revenue and earnings than Hill & Smith. Balfour Beatty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hill & Smith £1.22B 2.10 £77.07M £121.01 27.02 Balfour Beatty £9.95B 0.44 £219.98M £52.20 17.96

Does the media refer more to HILS or BBY?

In the previous week, Hill & Smith had 1 more articles in the media than Balfour Beatty. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Hill & Smith and 2 mentions for Balfour Beatty. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Balfour Beatty's score of 0.25 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hill & Smith 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Balfour Beatty 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation & earnings, KLR or HILS?

Keller Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hill & Smith. Keller Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Keller Group £3.24B 0.70 £126.69M £220.50 15.09 Hill & Smith £1.22B 2.10 £77.07M £121.01 27.02

Is KLR or HILS more profitable?

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 7.96% compared to Keller Group's net margin of 4.81%. Keller Group's return on equity of 24.09% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Keller Group 4.81% 24.09% 7.80% Hill & Smith 7.96% 15.00% 10.01%

Does the media prefer KLR or HILS?

In the previous week, Keller Group had 2 more articles in the media than Hill & Smith. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Keller Group and 3 mentions for Hill & Smith. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Keller Group's score of 0.70 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Keller Group 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hill & Smith 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings & valuation, MGNS or HILS?

Morgan Sindall Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hill & Smith. Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Morgan Sindall Group £5.21B 0.38 £125.92M £382.90 11.03 Hill & Smith £1.22B 2.10 £77.07M £121.01 27.02

Which has better valuation and earnings, KIE or HILS?

Hill & Smith has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kier Group. Kier Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Kier Group £4.35B 0.31 £42.84M £13.10 23.51 Hill & Smith £1.22B 2.10 £77.07M £121.01 27.02

Is KIE or HILS more profitable?

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 7.96% compared to Kier Group's net margin of 1.42%. Hill & Smith's return on equity of 15.00% beat Kier Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Kier Group 1.42% 11.95% 2.18% Hill & Smith 7.96% 15.00% 10.01%

Does the media refer more to KIE or HILS?

In the previous week, Kier Group had 7 more articles in the media than Hill & Smith. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Kier Group and 3 mentions for Hill & Smith. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Kier Group's score of 0.52 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kier Group 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hill & Smith 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Hill & Smith (HILS) Competitors

GBX 3,255 -15.00 (-0.46%)

As of 04:05 AM Eastern

Compare

HILS vs. BAB, BBY, KLR, MGNS, and KIE

Should you buy Hill & Smith stock or one of its competitors? Hill & Smith's main competitors and comparable companies include Babcock International Group (BAB), Balfour Beatty (BBY), Keller Group (KLR), Morgan Sindall Group (MGNS), and Kier Group (KIE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Hill & Smith compare to Babcock International Group?

Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) and Babcock International Group (LON:BAB) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

Hill & Smith presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,241.67, suggesting a potential downside of 0.87%. Babcock International Group has a consensus price target of GBX 4,256, suggesting a potential upside of 361.51%. Given Babcock International Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Babcock International Group is more favorable than Hill & Smith.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Babcock International Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 7.96% compared to Babcock International Group's net margin of 4.08%. Babcock International Group's return on equity of 31.57% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hill & Smith	7.96%	15.00%	10.01%
Babcock International Group	4.08%	31.57%	4.47%

58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of Babcock International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Babcock International Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 70.93 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Babcock International Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Hill & Smith pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Babcock International Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Babcock International Group had 4 more articles in the media than Hill & Smith. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Babcock International Group and 3 mentions for Hill & Smith. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Babcock International Group's score of 0.73 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hill & Smith	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Babcock International Group	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Babcock International Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hill & Smith. Babcock International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hill & Smith	£1.22B	2.10	£77.07M	£121.01	27.02
Babcock International Group	£5.18B	0.87	£165.10M	£41.30	22.33

Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.286, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Babcock International Group has a beta of 0.864, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hill & Smith and Babcock International Group tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hill & Smith compare to Balfour Beatty?

Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) and Balfour Beatty (LON:BBY) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 70.93 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Balfour Beatty pays an annual dividend of GBX 14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Hill & Smith pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Balfour Beatty pays out 26.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hill & Smith currently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,241.67, suggesting a potential downside of 0.87%. Balfour Beatty has a consensus target price of GBX 1,051.67, suggesting a potential upside of 12.18%. Given Balfour Beatty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Balfour Beatty is more favorable than Hill & Smith.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Balfour Beatty	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.286, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Balfour Beatty has a beta of 0.592, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Balfour Beatty has higher revenue and earnings than Hill & Smith. Balfour Beatty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hill & Smith	£1.22B	2.10	£77.07M	£121.01	27.02
Balfour Beatty	£9.95B	0.44	£219.98M	£52.20	17.96

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 7.96% compared to Balfour Beatty's net margin of 2.60%. Balfour Beatty's return on equity of 22.88% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hill & Smith	7.96%	15.00%	10.01%
Balfour Beatty	2.60%	22.88%	1.63%

In the previous week, Hill & Smith had 1 more articles in the media than Balfour Beatty. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Hill & Smith and 2 mentions for Balfour Beatty. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Balfour Beatty's score of 0.25 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hill & Smith	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Balfour Beatty	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Balfour Beatty shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Balfour Beatty shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hill & Smith beats Balfour Beatty on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hill & Smith compare to Keller Group?

Keller Group (LON:KLR) and Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Keller Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,907.50, indicating a potential downside of 12.64%. Hill & Smith has a consensus target price of GBX 3,241.67, indicating a potential downside of 0.87%. Given Hill & Smith's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hill & Smith is more favorable than Keller Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Keller Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 7.96% compared to Keller Group's net margin of 4.81%. Keller Group's return on equity of 24.09% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Keller Group	4.81%	24.09%	7.80%
Hill & Smith	7.96%	15.00%	10.01%

Keller Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 70.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 70.93 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Keller Group pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hill & Smith pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Keller Group had 2 more articles in the media than Hill & Smith. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Keller Group and 3 mentions for Hill & Smith. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Keller Group's score of 0.70 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Keller Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hill & Smith	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Keller Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hill & Smith. Keller Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Keller Group	£3.24B	0.70	£126.69M	£220.50	15.09
Hill & Smith	£1.22B	2.10	£77.07M	£121.01	27.02

72.6% of Keller Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Keller Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Keller Group has a beta of 1.027, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.286, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hill & Smith beats Keller Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hill & Smith compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Morgan Sindall Group (LON:MGNS) and Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Hill & Smith had 3 more articles in the media than Morgan Sindall Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Hill & Smith and 0 mentions for Morgan Sindall Group. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Morgan Sindall Group's score of 0.59 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Morgan Sindall Group	Positive
Hill & Smith	Positive

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 7.96% compared to Morgan Sindall Group's net margin of 3.63%. Morgan Sindall Group's return on equity of 24.83% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Morgan Sindall Group	3.63%	24.83%	4.46%
Hill & Smith	7.96%	15.00%	10.01%

48.8% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.0% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Morgan Sindall Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hill & Smith. Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Morgan Sindall Group	£5.21B	0.38	£125.92M	£382.90	11.03
Hill & Smith	£1.22B	2.10	£77.07M	£121.01	27.02

Morgan Sindall Group has a beta of 0.819, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.286, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Morgan Sindall Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 158 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 70.93 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Morgan Sindall Group pays out 41.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hill & Smith pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Morgan Sindall Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Morgan Sindall Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 5,800, indicating a potential upside of 37.31%. Hill & Smith has a consensus target price of GBX 3,241.67, indicating a potential downside of 0.87%. Given Morgan Sindall Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Morgan Sindall Group is more favorable than Hill & Smith.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Morgan Sindall Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

Morgan Sindall Group and Hill & Smith tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hill & Smith compare to Kier Group?

Kier Group (LON:KIE) and Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

29.8% of Kier Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Kier Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Kier Group had 7 more articles in the media than Hill & Smith. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Kier Group and 3 mentions for Hill & Smith. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Kier Group's score of 0.52 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kier Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hill & Smith	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Kier Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 70.93 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Kier Group pays out 55.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hill & Smith pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kier Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 7.96% compared to Kier Group's net margin of 1.42%. Hill & Smith's return on equity of 15.00% beat Kier Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kier Group	1.42%	11.95%	2.18%
Hill & Smith	7.96%	15.00%	10.01%

Hill & Smith has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kier Group. Kier Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kier Group	£4.35B	0.31	£42.84M	£13.10	23.51
Hill & Smith	£1.22B	2.10	£77.07M	£121.01	27.02

Kier Group has a beta of 0.886, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.286, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Kier Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 300, indicating a potential downside of 2.60%. Hill & Smith has a consensus target price of GBX 3,241.67, indicating a potential downside of 0.87%. Given Hill & Smith's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hill & Smith is more favorable than Kier Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kier Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

Hill & Smith beats Kier Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hill & Smith News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HILS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HILS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Hill & Smith	Construction & Engineering Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£2.54B	£7.94B	£10.29B	£2.80B
Dividend Yield	1.64%	2.65%	96.63%	6.25%
P/E Ratio	26.98	21.47	26.70	366.40
Price / Sales	2.09	62.77	269.06	89,298.07
Price / Cash	51.30	17.18	24.04	27.89
Price / Book	5.72	5.09	4.82	6.91
Net Income	£77.07M	£487.43M	£614.98M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.15%	0.18%	0.06%	-0.69%
1 Month Performance	12.54%	-2.63%	-2.57%	-1.09%
1 Year Performance	56.22%	12.52%	2.71%	22.99%

Hill & Smith Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HILS Hill & Smith	2.3319 of 5 stars	GBX 3,255 -0.5%	GBX 3,241.67 -0.4%	+56.5%	£2.54B	£1.22B	26.90	5,000	Negative News
BAB Babcock International Group	3.8302 of 5 stars	GBX 959.40 -2.8%	GBX 4,256 +343.6%	-29.3%	£4.71B	£5.18B	23.23	26,115
BBY Balfour Beatty	3.104 of 5 stars	GBX 919 -0.3%	GBX 1,051.67 +14.4%	+45.8%	£4.32B	£9.95B	17.61	105,000
KLR Keller Group	2.3676 of 5 stars	GBX 3,322 -0.5%	GBX 2,907.50 -12.5%	+117.2%	£2.25B	£3.24B	15.07	9,500
MGNS Morgan Sindall Group	4.2285 of 5 stars	GBX 4,188 -3.3%	GBX 5,800 +38.5%	-14.7%	£1.98B	£5.21B	10.94	7,700

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HILS) was last updated on 10/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Hill & Smith (HILS) Competitors

HILS vs. BAB, BBY, KLR, MGNS, and KIE

How does Hill & Smith compare to Babcock International Group?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Balfour Beatty?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Keller Group?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Kier Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HILS vs. The Competition

Hill & Smith Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Hill & Smith (HILS) Competitors

HILS vs. BAB, BBY, KLR, MGNS, and KIE

How does Hill & Smith compare to Babcock International Group?

Do analysts rate HILS or BAB?

Is HILS or BAB more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HILS or BAB?

Is HILS or BAB a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer HILS or BAB?

Which has better earnings and valuation, HILS or BAB?

Which has more volatility & risk, HILS or BAB?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Balfour Beatty?

Is HILS or BBY a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend HILS or BBY?

Which has more volatility & risk, HILS or BBY?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, HILS or BBY?

Is HILS or BBY more profitable?

Does the media refer more to HILS or BBY?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of HILS or BBY?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Keller Group?

Do analysts rate KLR or HILS?

Is KLR or HILS more profitable?

Is KLR or HILS a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer KLR or HILS?

Which has better valuation & earnings, KLR or HILS?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of KLR or HILS?

Which has more risk & volatility, KLR or HILS?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Does the media prefer MGNS or HILS?

Is MGNS or HILS more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MGNS or HILS?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, MGNS or HILS?

Which has more risk & volatility, MGNS or HILS?

Is MGNS or HILS a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer MGNS or HILS?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Kier Group?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in KIE or HILS?

Does the media refer more to KIE or HILS?

Is KIE or HILS a better dividend stock?

Is KIE or HILS more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, KIE or HILS?

Which has more volatility & risk, KIE or HILS?

Do analysts recommend KIE or HILS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HILS vs. The Competition

Hill & Smith Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools