Hill & Smith (HILS) Competitors

GBX 2,615 +80.00 (+3.16%)

As of 12:33 PM Eastern

HILS vs. BAB, BBY, MGNS, KLR, and KIE

Should you buy Hill & Smith stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hill & Smith with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hill & Smith include Babcock International Group (BAB), Balfour Beatty (BBY), Morgan Sindall Group (MGNS), Keller Group (KLR), and Kier Group (KIE). These companies are all part of the "engineering & construction" industry.

How does Hill & Smith compare to Babcock International Group?

Babcock International Group (LON:BAB) and Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Babcock International Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,534.80, indicating a potential upside of 57.35%. Hill & Smith has a consensus target price of GBX 2,813.33, indicating a potential upside of 7.58%. Given Babcock International Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Babcock International Group is more favorable than Hill & Smith.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Babcock International Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Babcock International Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hill & Smith. Babcock International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Babcock International Group	£4.96B	0.96	£165.10M	£55.80	17.48
Hill & Smith	£868.80M	2.37	£77.07M	£101.60	25.74

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 9.50% compared to Babcock International Group's net margin of 5.79%. Babcock International Group's return on equity of 43.22% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Babcock International Group	5.79%	43.22%	4.47%
Hill & Smith	9.50%	17.34%	10.01%

Babcock International Group has a beta of 0.892, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.288, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Babcock International Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 50.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Babcock International Group pays out 11.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hill & Smith pays out 49.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

59.2% of Babcock International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Babcock International Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Babcock International Group had 4 more articles in the media than Hill & Smith. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Babcock International Group and 4 mentions for Hill & Smith. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Babcock International Group's score of 0.42 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Babcock International Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hill & Smith	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Babcock International Group and Hill & Smith tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hill & Smith compare to Balfour Beatty?

Balfour Beatty (LON:BBY) and Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Hill & Smith had 3 more articles in the media than Balfour Beatty. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hill & Smith and 1 mentions for Balfour Beatty. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Balfour Beatty's score of 0.00 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Balfour Beatty	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hill & Smith	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Balfour Beatty has a beta of 0.598, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.288, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

60.9% of Balfour Beatty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Balfour Beatty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Balfour Beatty has higher revenue and earnings than Hill & Smith. Balfour Beatty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Balfour Beatty	£9.49B	0.42	£219.98M	£52.00	16.06
Hill & Smith	£868.80M	2.37	£77.07M	£101.60	25.74

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 9.50% compared to Balfour Beatty's net margin of 2.77%. Balfour Beatty's return on equity of 23.73% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Balfour Beatty	2.77%	23.73%	1.63%
Hill & Smith	9.50%	17.34%	10.01%

Balfour Beatty currently has a consensus target price of GBX 792.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.09%. Hill & Smith has a consensus target price of GBX 2,813.33, indicating a potential upside of 7.58%. Given Hill & Smith's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hill & Smith is more favorable than Balfour Beatty.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Balfour Beatty	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Balfour Beatty pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 50.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Balfour Beatty pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hill & Smith pays out 49.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Hill & Smith beats Balfour Beatty on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hill & Smith compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Morgan Sindall Group (LON:MGNS) and Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Hill & Smith had 3 more articles in the media than Morgan Sindall Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hill & Smith and 1 mentions for Morgan Sindall Group. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Morgan Sindall Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Morgan Sindall Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hill & Smith	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Morgan Sindall Group has a beta of 0.849, indicating that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.288, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

48.8% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are held by institutional investors. 14.0% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Morgan Sindall Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hill & Smith. Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Morgan Sindall Group	£5.02B	0.43	£125.92M	£354.80	13.06
Hill & Smith	£868.80M	2.37	£77.07M	£101.60	25.74

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 9.50% compared to Morgan Sindall Group's net margin of 3.49%. Morgan Sindall Group's return on equity of 24.53% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Morgan Sindall Group	3.49%	24.53%	4.46%
Hill & Smith	9.50%	17.34%	10.01%

Morgan Sindall Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 5,200, indicating a potential upside of 12.26%. Hill & Smith has a consensus target price of GBX 2,813.33, indicating a potential upside of 7.58%. Given Morgan Sindall Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Morgan Sindall Group is more favorable than Hill & Smith.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Morgan Sindall Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Morgan Sindall Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 140 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 50.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Morgan Sindall Group pays out 39.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hill & Smith pays out 49.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Morgan Sindall Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Morgan Sindall Group beats Hill & Smith on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hill & Smith compare to Keller Group?

Keller Group (LON:KLR) and Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and risk.

Keller Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hill & Smith. Keller Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Keller Group	£3.09B	0.53	£126.69M	£198.70	11.88
Hill & Smith	£868.80M	2.37	£77.07M	£101.60	25.74

Keller Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 51.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 50.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Keller Group pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hill & Smith pays out 49.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Keller Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 9.50% compared to Keller Group's net margin of 4.62%. Keller Group's return on equity of 23.46% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Keller Group	4.62%	23.46%	7.80%
Hill & Smith	9.50%	17.34%	10.01%

Keller Group has a beta of 1.029, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.288, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Keller Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,155, indicating a potential downside of 8.69%. Hill & Smith has a consensus target price of GBX 2,813.33, indicating a potential upside of 7.58%. Given Hill & Smith's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hill & Smith is more favorable than Keller Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Keller Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

72.6% of Keller Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Keller Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hill & Smith had 2 more articles in the media than Keller Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hill & Smith and 2 mentions for Keller Group. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Keller Group's score of 0.72 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Keller Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hill & Smith	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Hill & Smith beats Keller Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hill & Smith compare to Kier Group?

Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) and Kier Group (LON:KIE) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Hill & Smith has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kier Group. Kier Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hill & Smith	£868.80M	2.37	£77.07M	£101.60	25.74
Kier Group	£4.12B	0.22	£42.84M	£13.10	15.73

Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 50.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Kier Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Hill & Smith pays out 49.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kier Group pays out 55.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 9.50% compared to Kier Group's net margin of 1.47%. Hill & Smith's return on equity of 17.34% beat Kier Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hill & Smith	9.50%	17.34%	10.01%
Kier Group	1.47%	11.69%	2.18%

Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.288, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kier Group has a beta of 0.906, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Hill & Smith presently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,813.33, suggesting a potential upside of 7.58%. Kier Group has a consensus target price of GBX 253.33, suggesting a potential upside of 22.98%. Given Kier Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kier Group is more favorable than Hill & Smith.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Kier Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.8% of Kier Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Kier Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Hill & Smith had 3 more articles in the media than Kier Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hill & Smith and 1 mentions for Kier Group. Kier Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Hill & Smith's score of 0.91 indicating that Kier Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hill & Smith	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kier Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Hill & Smith beats Kier Group on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hill & Smith News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HILS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HILS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Hill & Smith	Engineering & Construction Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£2.05B	£3.43B	£9.34B	£2.79B
Dividend Yield	2.11%	3.12%	3.57%	6.09%
P/E Ratio	25.74	26.66	25.11	366.15
Price / Sales	2.37	80.12	5,347.71	88,429.84
Price / Cash	51.30	14.61	27.92	27.89
Price / Book	4.58	3.29	4.87	7.74
Net Income	£77.07M	£82.90M	£792.39M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.59%	-2.57%	0.40%	0.82%
1 Month Performance	9.87%	0.47%	3.72%	2.78%
1 Year Performance	34.93%	68.88%	38.41%	87.90%

Hill & Smith Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HILS Hill & Smith	2.3932 of 5 stars	GBX 2,615 +3.2%	GBX 2,813.33 +7.6%	+31.9%	£2.05B	£868.80M	25.74	4,336	News Coverage
BAB Babcock International Group	3.6974 of 5 stars	GBX 1,123 +2.5%	GBX 1,574.80 +40.2%	+23.2%	£5.54B	£4.96B	20.13	26,115	News Coverage Analyst Forecast
BBY Balfour Beatty	1.3129 of 5 stars	GBX 862 +4.0%	GBX 792.50 -8.1%	+73.0%	£4.16B	£9.49B	16.58	105,000	News Coverage
MGNS Morgan Sindall Group	1.7488 of 5 stars	GBX 4,788.56 +3.3%	GBX 5,200 +8.6%	+29.4%	£2.25B	£5.02B	13.50	7,700	News Coverage
KLR Keller Group	1.685 of 5 stars	GBX 2,336 +3.5%	GBX 2,155 -7.7%	+54.2%	£1.62B	£3.09B	11.76	9,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HILS) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Hill & Smith (HILS) Competitors

HILS vs. BAB, BBY, MGNS, KLR, and KIE

How does Hill & Smith compare to Babcock International Group?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Balfour Beatty?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Keller Group?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Kier Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HILS vs. The Competition

Hill & Smith Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Hill & Smith (HILS) Competitors

HILS vs. BAB, BBY, MGNS, KLR, and KIE

How does Hill & Smith compare to Babcock International Group?

Do analysts rate BAB or HILS?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, BAB or HILS?

Is BAB or HILS more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, BAB or HILS?

Is BAB or HILS a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BAB or HILS?

Does the media refer more to BAB or HILS?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Balfour Beatty?

Does the media prefer BBY or HILS?

Which has more volatility and risk, BBY or HILS?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in BBY or HILS?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, BBY or HILS?

Is BBY or HILS more profitable?

Do analysts rate BBY or HILS?

Is BBY or HILS a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Does the media favor MGNS or HILS?

Which has more risk & volatility, MGNS or HILS?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MGNS or HILS?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MGNS or HILS?

Is MGNS or HILS more profitable?

Do analysts rate MGNS or HILS?

Is MGNS or HILS a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Keller Group?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, KLR or HILS?

Is KLR or HILS a better dividend stock?

Is KLR or HILS more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, KLR or HILS?

Do analysts rate KLR or HILS?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of KLR or HILS?

Does the media favor KLR or HILS?

Summary

How does Hill & Smith compare to Kier Group?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, HILS or KIE?

Is HILS or KIE a better dividend stock?

Is HILS or KIE more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, HILS or KIE?

Do analysts prefer HILS or KIE?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in HILS or KIE?

Does the media favor HILS or KIE?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HILS vs. The Competition

Hill & Smith Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools