Which has better valuation & earnings, HILS or GFRD?

Hill & Smith has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hill & Smith £1.22B 2.13 £77.07M £121.01 27.44 Galliford Try £1.89B 0.37 £34.53M £35.10 20.11

Is HILS or GFRD more profitable?

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 7.96% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 2.13%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 32.45% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hill & Smith 7.96% 15.00% 10.01% Galliford Try 2.13% 32.45% 2.22%

Does the media refer more to HILS or GFRD?

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 1 more articles in the media than Hill & Smith. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Galliford Try and 3 mentions for Hill & Smith. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Hill & Smith's score of 0.20 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hill & Smith 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Galliford Try 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GFRD or KLR?

Keller Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Keller Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Galliford Try £1.89B 0.37 £34.53M £35.10 20.11 Keller Group £3.24B 0.70 £126.69M £220.50 15.15

Does the media prefer GFRD or KLR?

In the previous week, Keller Group had 1 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Keller Group and 4 mentions for Galliford Try. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Keller Group's score of 0.58 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Galliford Try 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Keller Group 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, KIE or GFRD?

Kier Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kier Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Kier Group £4.35B 0.31 £42.84M £13.10 23.71 Galliford Try £1.89B 0.37 £34.53M £35.10 20.11

Does the media refer more to KIE or GFRD?

In the previous week, Kier Group had 4 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Kier Group and 4 mentions for Galliford Try. Kier Group's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Galliford Try's score of 0.64 indicating that Kier Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kier Group 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Galliford Try 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend GFRD or KINO?

Galliford Try currently has a consensus target price of GBX 650, indicating a potential downside of 7.93%. Given Galliford Try's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Galliford Try is more favorable than Kinovo. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Galliford Try 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Kinovo 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GFRD or KINO?

Galliford Try has higher revenue and earnings than Kinovo. Kinovo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Galliford Try £1.89B 0.37 £34.53M £35.10 20.11 Kinovo £63.37M 11.95 -£614.82K -£0.00 N/A

Is GFRD or KINO more profitable?

Galliford Try has a net margin of 2.13% compared to Kinovo's net margin of -0.95%. Kinovo's return on equity of 70.28% beat Galliford Try's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Galliford Try 2.13% 32.45% 2.22% Kinovo -0.95% 70.28% 17.21%

Galliford Try (GFRD) Competitors

GBX 705.96 +13.96 (+2.02%)

As of 12:31 PM Eastern

Compare

GFRD vs. HILS, KLR, MGNS, KIE, and KINO

Should you buy Galliford Try stock or one of its competitors? Galliford Try's main competitors and comparable companies include Hill & Smith (HILS), Keller Group (KLR), Morgan Sindall Group (MGNS), Kier Group (KIE), and Kinovo (KINO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Galliford Try compare to Hill & Smith?

Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) and Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 70.93 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 19 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Hill & Smith pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Galliford Try pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Galliford Try is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Hill & Smith has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hill & Smith	£1.22B	2.13	£77.07M	£121.01	27.44
Galliford Try	£1.89B	0.37	£34.53M	£35.10	20.11

Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.286, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galliford Try has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.2% of Galliford Try shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hill & Smith presently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,241.67, indicating a potential downside of 2.36%. Galliford Try has a consensus target price of GBX 650, indicating a potential downside of 7.93%. Given Hill & Smith's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hill & Smith is more favorable than Galliford Try.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 1 more articles in the media than Hill & Smith. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Galliford Try and 3 mentions for Hill & Smith. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Hill & Smith's score of 0.20 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hill & Smith	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Galliford Try	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 7.96% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 2.13%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 32.45% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hill & Smith	7.96%	15.00%	10.01%
Galliford Try	2.13%	32.45%	2.22%

Summary

Hill & Smith beats Galliford Try on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Keller Group?

Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) and Keller Group (LON:KLR) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Keller Group had 1 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Keller Group and 4 mentions for Galliford Try. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Keller Group's score of 0.58 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Galliford Try	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Keller Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Keller Group has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 2.13%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 32.45% beat Keller Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Galliford Try	2.13%	32.45%	2.22%
Keller Group	4.81%	24.09%	7.80%

Galliford Try has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Keller Group has a beta of 1.027, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Keller Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Keller Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Galliford Try	£1.89B	0.37	£34.53M	£35.10	20.11
Keller Group	£3.24B	0.70	£126.69M	£220.50	15.15

50.2% of Galliford Try shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.6% of Keller Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Keller Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 19 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Keller Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 70.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Galliford Try pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Keller Group pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Galliford Try currently has a consensus price target of GBX 650, indicating a potential downside of 7.93%. Keller Group has a consensus price target of GBX 2,907.50, indicating a potential downside of 12.95%. Given Galliford Try's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Galliford Try is more favorable than Keller Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Keller Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Keller Group beats Galliford Try on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) and Morgan Sindall Group (LON:MGNS) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 19 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Morgan Sindall Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 158 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Galliford Try pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Morgan Sindall Group pays out 41.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Morgan Sindall Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Morgan Sindall Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Galliford Try	£1.89B	0.37	£34.53M	£35.10	20.11
Morgan Sindall Group	£5.21B	0.39	£125.92M	£382.90	11.31

50.2% of Galliford Try shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.8% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.0% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Morgan Sindall Group has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 2.13%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 32.45% beat Morgan Sindall Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Galliford Try	2.13%	32.45%	2.22%
Morgan Sindall Group	3.63%	24.83%	4.46%

Galliford Try presently has a consensus target price of GBX 650, suggesting a potential downside of 7.93%. Morgan Sindall Group has a consensus target price of GBX 5,800, suggesting a potential upside of 33.89%. Given Morgan Sindall Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Morgan Sindall Group is more favorable than Galliford Try.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Morgan Sindall Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Galliford Try has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Morgan Sindall Group has a beta of 0.819, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 4 more articles in the media than Morgan Sindall Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Galliford Try and 0 mentions for Morgan Sindall Group. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Morgan Sindall Group's score of 0.30 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Galliford Try	Positive
Morgan Sindall Group	Neutral

Summary

Morgan Sindall Group beats Galliford Try on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Kier Group?

Kier Group (LON:KIE) and Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Kier Group had 4 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Kier Group and 4 mentions for Galliford Try. Kier Group's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Galliford Try's score of 0.64 indicating that Kier Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kier Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Galliford Try	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Kier Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 300, suggesting a potential downside of 3.41%. Galliford Try has a consensus price target of GBX 650, suggesting a potential downside of 7.93%. Given Kier Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Kier Group is more favorable than Galliford Try.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kier Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Galliford Try has a net margin of 2.13% compared to Kier Group's net margin of 1.42%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 32.45% beat Kier Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kier Group	1.42%	11.95%	2.18%
Galliford Try	2.13%	32.45%	2.22%

Kier Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 19 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Kier Group pays out 55.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Galliford Try pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Galliford Try is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Kier Group has a beta of 0.886, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galliford Try has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Kier Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kier Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kier Group	£4.35B	0.31	£42.84M	£13.10	23.71
Galliford Try	£1.89B	0.37	£34.53M	£35.10	20.11

29.8% of Kier Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.2% of Galliford Try shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Kier Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Galliford Try beats Kier Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Kinovo?

Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) and Kinovo (LON:KINO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 4 more articles in the media than Kinovo. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Galliford Try and 0 mentions for Kinovo. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Kinovo's score of 0.00 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Galliford Try	Positive
Kinovo	Neutral

Galliford Try has higher revenue and earnings than Kinovo. Kinovo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Galliford Try	£1.89B	0.37	£34.53M	£35.10	20.11
Kinovo	£63.37M	11.95	-£614.82K	-£0.00	N/A

Galliford Try has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinovo has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Galliford Try has a net margin of 2.13% compared to Kinovo's net margin of -0.95%. Kinovo's return on equity of 70.28% beat Galliford Try's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Galliford Try	2.13%	32.45%	2.22%
Kinovo	-0.95%	70.28%	17.21%

Galliford Try currently has a consensus target price of GBX 650, indicating a potential downside of 7.93%. Given Galliford Try's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Galliford Try is more favorable than Kinovo.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Kinovo	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

50.2% of Galliford Try shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.1% of Kinovo shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of Kinovo shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Galliford Try beats Kinovo on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Galliford Try News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFRD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GFRD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Galliford Try	Construction & Engineering Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£697.61M	£7.84B	£10.17B	£2.87B
Dividend Yield	3.37%	2.65%	96.95%	6.21%
P/E Ratio	20.11	21.38	25.13	366.04
Price / Sales	0.37	58.42	367.52	89,364.46
Price / Cash	0.78	16.66	23.84	27.89
Price / Book	6.00	5.09	4.79	6.31
Net Income	£34.53M	£487.38M	£616.51M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.71%	0.25%	-1.24%	-0.09%
1 Month Performance	16.11%	-2.71%	-3.06%	10.91%
1 Year Performance	39.38%	12.50%	3.13%	17.58%

Galliford Try Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GFRD Galliford Try	2.2638 of 5 stars	GBX 705.96 +2.0%	GBX 650 -7.9%	+35.7%	£697.61M	£1.89B	20.11	3,922	News Coverage
HILS Hill & Smith	2.1757 of 5 stars	GBX 3,265 +4.0%	GBX 3,241.67 -0.7%	+61.1%	£2.54B	£1.22B	26.98	5,000
KLR Keller Group	2.1455 of 5 stars	GBX 3,330 +1.7%	GBX 2,907.50 -12.7%	+128.6%	£2.26B	£3.24B	15.10	9,500	News Coverage
MGNS Morgan Sindall Group	4.1594 of 5 stars	GBX 4,224 +0.2%	GBX 5,800 +37.3%	-1.5%	£2.00B	£5.21B	11.03	7,700
KIE Kier Group	3.1798 of 5 stars	GBX 311.20 +2.0%	GBX 272.50 -12.4%	+44.6%	£1.35B	£4.35B	23.76	10,286	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GFRD) was last updated on 9/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Galliford Try (GFRD) Competitors

GFRD vs. HILS, KLR, MGNS, KIE, and KINO

How does Galliford Try compare to Hill & Smith?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Keller Group?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Kier Group?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Kinovo?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GFRD vs. The Competition

Galliford Try Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Galliford Try (GFRD) Competitors

GFRD vs. HILS, KLR, MGNS, KIE, and KINO

How does Galliford Try compare to Hill & Smith?

Is HILS or GFRD a better dividend stock?

Which has better valuation & earnings, HILS or GFRD?

Which has more volatility & risk, HILS or GFRD?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in HILS or GFRD?

Do analysts rate HILS or GFRD?

Does the media refer more to HILS or GFRD?

Is HILS or GFRD more profitable?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Keller Group?

Does the media prefer GFRD or KLR?

Is GFRD or KLR more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, GFRD or KLR?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GFRD or KLR?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GFRD or KLR?

Is GFRD or KLR a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate GFRD or KLR?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Is GFRD or MGNS a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GFRD or MGNS?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GFRD or MGNS?

Is GFRD or MGNS more profitable?

Do analysts recommend GFRD or MGNS?

Which has more volatility & risk, GFRD or MGNS?

Does the media favor GFRD or MGNS?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Kier Group?

Does the media refer more to KIE or GFRD?

Do analysts recommend KIE or GFRD?

Is KIE or GFRD more profitable?

Is KIE or GFRD a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, KIE or GFRD?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, KIE or GFRD?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in KIE or GFRD?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Kinovo?

Does the media refer more to GFRD or KINO?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GFRD or KINO?

Which has more volatility & risk, GFRD or KINO?

Is GFRD or KINO more profitable?

Do analysts recommend GFRD or KINO?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GFRD or KINO?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GFRD vs. The Competition

Galliford Try Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools