Which has higher valuation and earnings, GFRD or HILS?

Hill & Smith has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Galliford Try £1.93B 0.35 £34.53M £39.90 17.44 Hill & Smith £1.22B 1.84 £77.07M £121.01 23.80

Is GFRD or HILS more profitable?

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 7.96% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 2.13%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 32.45% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Galliford Try 2.13% 32.45% 2.22% Hill & Smith 7.96% 15.00% 10.01%

Does the media refer more to GFRD or HILS?

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 5 more articles in the media than Hill & Smith. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Galliford Try and 1 mentions for Hill & Smith. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Hill & Smith's score of 0.00 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Galliford Try 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hill & Smith 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor MGNS or GFRD?

In the previous week, Morgan Sindall Group had 3 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Morgan Sindall Group and 6 mentions for Galliford Try. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Morgan Sindall Group's score of 0.39 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Morgan Sindall Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Galliford Try 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, KLR or GFRD?

Keller Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Keller Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Keller Group £3.24B 0.63 £126.69M £220.50 13.90 Galliford Try £1.93B 0.35 £34.53M £39.90 17.44

Does the media refer more to KLR or GFRD?

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 2 more articles in the media than Keller Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Galliford Try and 4 mentions for Keller Group. Keller Group's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Galliford Try's score of 0.58 indicating that Keller Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Keller Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Galliford Try 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, GFRD or KIE?

Kier Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kier Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Galliford Try £1.93B 0.35 £34.53M £39.90 17.44 Kier Group £4.35B 0.31 £42.84M £13.50 23.79

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GFRD or RNWH?

Renew has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renew, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Galliford Try £1.93B 0.35 £34.53M £39.90 17.44 Renew £1.11B 0.77 £48.95M £53.38 20.08

Is GFRD or RNWH more profitable?

Renew has a net margin of 3.81% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 2.13%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 32.45% beat Renew's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Galliford Try 2.13% 32.45% 2.22% Renew 3.81% 17.24% 9.20%

Does the media favor GFRD or RNWH?

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 3 more articles in the media than Renew. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Galliford Try and 3 mentions for Renew. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Renew's score of 0.00 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Galliford Try 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Renew 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Galliford Try (GFRD) Competitors

GBX 696 -5.00 (-0.71%)

As of 11/13/2026 11:54 AM Eastern

Compare

GFRD vs. HILS, MGNS, KLR, KIE, and RNWH

Should you buy Galliford Try stock or one of its competitors? Galliford Try's main competitors and comparable companies include Hill & Smith (HILS), Morgan Sindall Group (MGNS), Keller Group (KLR), Kier Group (KIE), and Renew (RNWH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Galliford Try compare to Hill & Smith?

Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) and Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Hill & Smith has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Galliford Try	£1.93B	0.35	£34.53M	£39.90	17.44
Hill & Smith	£1.22B	1.84	£77.07M	£121.01	23.80

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 7.96% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 2.13%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 32.45% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Galliford Try	2.13%	32.45%	2.22%
Hill & Smith	7.96%	15.00%	10.01%

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 5 more articles in the media than Hill & Smith. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Galliford Try and 1 mentions for Hill & Smith. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Hill & Smith's score of 0.00 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Galliford Try	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hill & Smith	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Galliford Try has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.286, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 70.93 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Galliford Try pays out 50.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hill & Smith pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Galliford Try is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Galliford Try presently has a consensus price target of GBX 750, indicating a potential upside of 7.76%. Hill & Smith has a consensus price target of GBX 3,241.67, indicating a potential upside of 12.56%. Given Hill & Smith's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hill & Smith is more favorable than Galliford Try.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

50.2% of Galliford Try shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Galliford Try shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hill & Smith beats Galliford Try on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Morgan Sindall Group (LON:MGNS) and Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Morgan Sindall Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 158 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Morgan Sindall Group pays out 41.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Galliford Try pays out 50.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Morgan Sindall Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Morgan Sindall Group has a beta of 0.856, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galliford Try has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

48.8% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.2% of Galliford Try shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.0% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Galliford Try shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Morgan Sindall Group had 3 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Morgan Sindall Group and 6 mentions for Galliford Try. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Morgan Sindall Group's score of 0.39 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Morgan Sindall Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Galliford Try	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Morgan Sindall Group has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 2.13%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 32.45% beat Morgan Sindall Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Morgan Sindall Group	3.63%	24.83%	4.46%
Galliford Try	2.13%	32.45%	2.22%

Morgan Sindall Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Morgan Sindall Group	£5.21B	0.41	£125.92M	£382.90	11.77
Galliford Try	£1.93B	0.35	£34.53M	£39.90	17.44

Morgan Sindall Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 6,000, suggesting a potential upside of 33.13%. Galliford Try has a consensus price target of GBX 750, suggesting a potential upside of 7.76%. Given Morgan Sindall Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Morgan Sindall Group is more favorable than Galliford Try.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Morgan Sindall Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Morgan Sindall Group beats Galliford Try on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Keller Group?

Keller Group (LON:KLR) and Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 2 more articles in the media than Keller Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Galliford Try and 4 mentions for Keller Group. Keller Group's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Galliford Try's score of 0.58 indicating that Keller Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Keller Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Galliford Try	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Keller Group has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 2.13%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 32.45% beat Keller Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Keller Group	4.81%	24.09%	7.80%
Galliford Try	2.13%	32.45%	2.22%

Keller Group has a beta of 0.976, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galliford Try has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

72.6% of Keller Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.2% of Galliford Try shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Keller Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Galliford Try shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Keller Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Keller Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Keller Group	£3.24B	0.63	£126.69M	£220.50	13.90
Galliford Try	£1.93B	0.35	£34.53M	£39.90	17.44

Keller Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 70.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Keller Group pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Galliford Try pays out 50.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Keller Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,982.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.66%. Galliford Try has a consensus target price of GBX 750, suggesting a potential upside of 7.76%. Given Galliford Try's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Galliford Try is more favorable than Keller Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Keller Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Keller Group beats Galliford Try on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Kier Group?

Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) and Kier Group (LON:KIE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and earnings.

Kier Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kier Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Galliford Try	£1.93B	0.35	£34.53M	£39.90	17.44
Kier Group	£4.35B	0.31	£42.84M	£13.50	23.79

Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Kier Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Galliford Try pays out 50.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kier Group pays out 57.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Galliford Try is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 6 more articles in the media than Kier Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Galliford Try and 0 mentions for Kier Group. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Kier Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Galliford Try	Positive
Kier Group	Neutral

50.2% of Galliford Try shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.8% of Kier Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Galliford Try shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Kier Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Galliford Try has a net margin of 2.13% compared to Kier Group's net margin of 1.42%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 32.45% beat Kier Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Galliford Try	2.13%	32.45%	2.22%
Kier Group	1.42%	11.95%	2.18%

Galliford Try presently has a consensus target price of GBX 750, suggesting a potential upside of 7.76%. Kier Group has a consensus target price of GBX 320, suggesting a potential downside of 0.37%. Given Galliford Try's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Galliford Try is more favorable than Kier Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Kier Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Galliford Try has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kier Group has a beta of 0.842, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Galliford Try beats Kier Group on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Renew?

Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) and Renew (LON:RNWH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Galliford Try has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Renew has a beta of 0.836, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

50.2% of Galliford Try shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of Renew shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Galliford Try shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Renew shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Renew pays an annual dividend of GBX 20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Galliford Try pays out 50.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Renew pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Galliford Try currently has a consensus price target of GBX 750, suggesting a potential upside of 7.76%. Renew has a consensus price target of GBX 1,182.50, suggesting a potential upside of 10.31%. Given Renew's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Renew is more favorable than Galliford Try.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Renew	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 3 more articles in the media than Renew. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Galliford Try and 3 mentions for Renew. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Renew's score of 0.00 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Galliford Try	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Renew	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Renew has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renew, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Galliford Try	£1.93B	0.35	£34.53M	£39.90	17.44
Renew	£1.11B	0.77	£48.95M	£53.38	20.08

Renew has a net margin of 3.81% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 2.13%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 32.45% beat Renew's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Galliford Try	2.13%	32.45%	2.22%
Renew	3.81%	17.24%	9.20%

Summary

Renew beats Galliford Try on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Galliford Try News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFRD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GFRD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Galliford Try	Construction & Engineering Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£684.02M	£7.57B	£10.14B	£2.84B
Dividend Yield	3.30%	2.58%	2.91%	5.10%
P/E Ratio	17.44	31.62	31.12	23.38
Price / Sales	0.35	1.73	3.19	5.04
Price / Cash	0.78	15.58	19.67	20.23
Price / Book	5.91	4.34	3.76	2.45
Net Income	£34.53M	£498.00M	£612.44M	£5.88B
7 Day Performance	-0.57%	2.41%	0.92%	0.81%
1 Month Performance	3.42%	1.31%	-1.23%	-1.80%
1 Year Performance	45.30%	8.06%	2.22%	7.76%

Galliford Try Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GFRD Galliford Try	2.9505 of 5 stars	GBX 696 -0.7%	GBX 750 +7.8%	N/A	£684.02M	£1.93B	17.44	3,922	News Coverage
HILS Hill & Smith	2.1375 of 5 stars	GBX 2,790 -0.9%	GBX 3,241.67 +16.2%	N/A	£2.17B	£1.22B	23.06	5,000	News Coverage Negative News Earnings Report Analyst Upgrade Short Interest Increase
MGNS Morgan Sindall Group	4.3304 of 5 stars	GBX 4,240 -1.6%	GBX 5,800 +36.8%	N/A	£2.01B	£5.21B	11.07	7,700	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Insider Trade Buyback Announcement
KLR Keller Group	1.5167 of 5 stars	GBX 2,970 -0.9%	GBX 2,945 -0.8%	N/A	£2.00B	£3.24B	13.47	9,500	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Gap Up
KIE Kier Group	N/A	GBX 305.60 -2.7%	GBX 300 -1.8%	N/A	£1.32B	£4.35B	22.64	10,286

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GFRD) was last updated on 11/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Galliford Try (GFRD) Competitors

GFRD vs. HILS, MGNS, KLR, KIE, and RNWH

How does Galliford Try compare to Hill & Smith?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Keller Group?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Kier Group?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Renew?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GFRD vs. The Competition

Galliford Try Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Galliford Try (GFRD) Competitors

GFRD vs. HILS, MGNS, KLR, KIE, and RNWH

How does Galliford Try compare to Hill & Smith?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, GFRD or HILS?

Is GFRD or HILS more profitable?

Does the media refer more to GFRD or HILS?

Which has more volatility & risk, GFRD or HILS?

Is GFRD or HILS a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer GFRD or HILS?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GFRD or HILS?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Is MGNS or GFRD a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, MGNS or GFRD?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MGNS or GFRD?

Does the media favor MGNS or GFRD?

Is MGNS or GFRD more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MGNS or GFRD?

Do analysts rate MGNS or GFRD?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Keller Group?

Does the media refer more to KLR or GFRD?

Is KLR or GFRD more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, KLR or GFRD?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in KLR or GFRD?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, KLR or GFRD?

Is KLR or GFRD a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate KLR or GFRD?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Kier Group?

Which has better earnings and valuation, GFRD or KIE?

Is GFRD or KIE a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer GFRD or KIE?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GFRD or KIE?

Is GFRD or KIE more profitable?

Do analysts rate GFRD or KIE?

Which has more risk and volatility, GFRD or KIE?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Renew?

Which has more risk and volatility, GFRD or RNWH?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in GFRD or RNWH?

Is GFRD or RNWH a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend GFRD or RNWH?

Does the media favor GFRD or RNWH?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GFRD or RNWH?

Is GFRD or RNWH more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GFRD vs. The Competition

Galliford Try Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools