Which has preferable valuation & earnings, HILS or GFRD?

Hill & Smith has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hill & Smith £868.80M 2.64 £77.07M £101.60 28.83 Galliford Try £1.89B 0.32 £34.53M £35.10 17.23

Is HILS or GFRD more profitable?

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 9.50% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 1.93%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 30.23% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hill & Smith 9.50% 17.34% 10.01% Galliford Try 1.93% 30.23% 2.22%

Does the media prefer HILS or GFRD?

In the previous week, Hill & Smith had 1 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hill & Smith and 1 mentions for Galliford Try. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Galliford Try's score of 0.00 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hill & Smith 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Galliford Try 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GFRD or KLR?

Keller Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Keller Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Galliford Try £1.89B 0.32 £34.53M £35.10 17.23 Keller Group £3.09B 0.68 £126.69M £198.70 15.53

Does the media prefer GFRD or KLR?

In the previous week, Keller Group had 1 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Keller Group and 1 mentions for Galliford Try. Keller Group's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Galliford Try's score of 0.00 indicating that Keller Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Galliford Try 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Keller Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer MGNS or GFRD?

In the previous week, Morgan Sindall Group had 2 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Morgan Sindall Group and 1 mentions for Galliford Try. Morgan Sindall Group's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Galliford Try's score of 0.00 indicating that Morgan Sindall Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Morgan Sindall Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Galliford Try 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GFRD or KIE?

Kier Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kier Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Galliford Try £1.89B 0.32 £34.53M £35.10 17.23 Kier Group £4.12B 0.26 £42.84M £13.10 18.72

Does the media refer more to GFRD or KIE?

In the previous week, Kier Group had 2 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Kier Group and 1 mentions for Galliford Try. Kier Group's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Galliford Try's score of 0.00 indicating that Kier Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Galliford Try 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Kier Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer GFRD or KINO?

Galliford Try currently has a consensus price target of GBX 615, suggesting a potential upside of 1.72%. Given Galliford Try's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Galliford Try is more favorable than Kinovo. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Galliford Try 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Kinovo 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher valuation & earnings, GFRD or KINO?

Galliford Try has higher revenue and earnings than Kinovo. Kinovo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Galliford Try £1.89B 0.32 £34.53M £35.10 17.23 Kinovo £63.37M 11.95 -£614.82K -£0.00 N/A

Is GFRD or KINO more profitable?

Galliford Try has a net margin of 1.93% compared to Kinovo's net margin of -0.95%. Kinovo's return on equity of 70.28% beat Galliford Try's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Galliford Try 1.93% 30.23% 2.22% Kinovo -0.95% 70.28% 17.21%

Galliford Try (GFRD) Competitors

GBX 604.60 +4.60 (+0.77%)

As of 03:47 AM Eastern

Compare

GFRD vs. HILS, KLR, MGNS, KIE, and KINO

Should you buy Galliford Try stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Galliford Try with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Galliford Try include Hill & Smith (HILS), Keller Group (KLR), Morgan Sindall Group (MGNS), Kier Group (KIE), and Kinovo (KINO). These companies are all part of the "engineering & construction" industry.

How does Galliford Try compare to Hill & Smith?

Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) and Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.2% of Galliford Try shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hill & Smith currently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,976.67, suggesting a potential upside of 1.61%. Galliford Try has a consensus price target of GBX 615, suggesting a potential upside of 1.72%. Given Galliford Try's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Galliford Try is more favorable than Hill & Smith.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Hill & Smith has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hill & Smith	£868.80M	2.64	£77.07M	£101.60	28.83
Galliford Try	£1.89B	0.32	£34.53M	£35.10	17.23

Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.293, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galliford Try has a beta of 0.464, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 50.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Hill & Smith pays out 49.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Galliford Try pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 9.50% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 1.93%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 30.23% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hill & Smith	9.50%	17.34%	10.01%
Galliford Try	1.93%	30.23%	2.22%

In the previous week, Hill & Smith had 1 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hill & Smith and 1 mentions for Galliford Try. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Galliford Try's score of 0.00 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hill & Smith	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Galliford Try	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Hill & Smith beats Galliford Try on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Keller Group?

Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) and Keller Group (LON:KLR) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Keller Group has a net margin of 4.62% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 1.93%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 30.23% beat Keller Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Galliford Try	1.93%	30.23%	2.22%
Keller Group	4.62%	23.46%	7.80%

Galliford Try has a beta of 0.464, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Keller Group has a beta of 1.028, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

50.2% of Galliford Try shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.6% of Keller Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Keller Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Keller Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Keller Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Galliford Try	£1.89B	0.32	£34.53M	£35.10	17.23
Keller Group	£3.09B	0.68	£126.69M	£198.70	15.53

In the previous week, Keller Group had 1 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Keller Group and 1 mentions for Galliford Try. Keller Group's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Galliford Try's score of 0.00 indicating that Keller Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Galliford Try	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Keller Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Galliford Try presently has a consensus price target of GBX 615, suggesting a potential upside of 1.72%. Keller Group has a consensus price target of GBX 2,467.50, suggesting a potential downside of 20.04%. Given Galliford Try's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Galliford Try is more favorable than Keller Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Keller Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Keller Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 51.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Galliford Try pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Keller Group pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Keller Group beats Galliford Try on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Morgan Sindall Group (LON:MGNS) and Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Morgan Sindall Group had 2 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Morgan Sindall Group and 1 mentions for Galliford Try. Morgan Sindall Group's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Galliford Try's score of 0.00 indicating that Morgan Sindall Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Morgan Sindall Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Galliford Try	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

48.8% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.2% of Galliford Try shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Morgan Sindall Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 140 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Morgan Sindall Group pays out 39.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Galliford Try pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Morgan Sindall Group has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 1.93%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 30.23% beat Morgan Sindall Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Morgan Sindall Group	3.63%	24.83%	4.46%
Galliford Try	1.93%	30.23%	2.22%

Morgan Sindall Group has a beta of 0.842, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galliford Try has a beta of 0.464, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Morgan Sindall Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 5,800, suggesting a potential upside of 28.77%. Galliford Try has a consensus price target of GBX 615, suggesting a potential upside of 1.72%. Given Morgan Sindall Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Morgan Sindall Group is more favorable than Galliford Try.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Morgan Sindall Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Morgan Sindall Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Morgan Sindall Group	£5.02B	0.42	£125.92M	£354.80	12.69
Galliford Try	£1.89B	0.32	£34.53M	£35.10	17.23

Summary

Morgan Sindall Group beats Galliford Try on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Kier Group?

Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) and Kier Group (LON:KIE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

50.2% of Galliford Try shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.8% of Kier Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Kier Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Galliford Try has a net margin of 1.93% compared to Kier Group's net margin of 1.47%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 30.23% beat Kier Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Galliford Try	1.93%	30.23%	2.22%
Kier Group	1.47%	11.69%	2.18%

Kier Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kier Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Galliford Try	£1.89B	0.32	£34.53M	£35.10	17.23
Kier Group	£4.12B	0.26	£42.84M	£13.10	18.72

Galliford Try has a beta of 0.464, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kier Group has a beta of 0.872, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kier Group had 2 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Kier Group and 1 mentions for Galliford Try. Kier Group's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Galliford Try's score of 0.00 indicating that Kier Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Galliford Try	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Kier Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Kier Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Galliford Try pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kier Group pays out 55.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Galliford Try is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Galliford Try currently has a consensus target price of GBX 615, suggesting a potential upside of 1.72%. Kier Group has a consensus target price of GBX 253.33, suggesting a potential upside of 3.28%. Given Kier Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kier Group is more favorable than Galliford Try.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Kier Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Galliford Try beats Kier Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Kinovo?

Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) and Kinovo (LON:KINO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Galliford Try currently has a consensus price target of GBX 615, suggesting a potential upside of 1.72%. Given Galliford Try's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Galliford Try is more favorable than Kinovo.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Kinovo	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 1 more articles in the media than Kinovo. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Galliford Try and 0 mentions for Kinovo. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kinovo'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Galliford Try	Neutral
Kinovo	Neutral

50.2% of Galliford Try shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.1% of Kinovo shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of Kinovo shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Galliford Try has a beta of 0.464, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinovo has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Galliford Try has higher revenue and earnings than Kinovo. Kinovo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Galliford Try	£1.89B	0.32	£34.53M	£35.10	17.23
Kinovo	£63.37M	11.95	-£614.82K	-£0.00	N/A

Galliford Try has a net margin of 1.93% compared to Kinovo's net margin of -0.95%. Kinovo's return on equity of 70.28% beat Galliford Try's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Galliford Try	1.93%	30.23%	2.22%
Kinovo	-0.95%	70.28%	17.21%

Summary

Galliford Try beats Kinovo on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Galliford Try News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFRD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GFRD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Galliford Try	Engineering & Construction Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£597.02M	£3.26B	£9.26B	£2.85B
Dividend Yield	3.21%	3.10%	3.49%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	17.23	27.02	26.76	367.96
Price / Sales	0.32	81.56	1,867.37	84,359.52
Price / Cash	0.78	14.57	27.04	27.89
Price / Book	5.14	3.51	4.35	7.03
Net Income	£34.53M	£105.39M	£792.89M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-3.18%	-0.54%	0.49%	0.60%
1 Month Performance	14.20%	1.74%	-0.16%	0.95%
1 Year Performance	38.51%	32.11%	13.40%	68.91%

Galliford Try Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GFRD Galliford Try	1.6502 of 5 stars	GBX 604.60 +0.8%	GBX 615 +1.7%	+39.4%	£597.02M	£1.89B	17.23	3,922
HILS Hill & Smith	1.8507 of 5 stars	GBX 3,077.43 +1.7%	GBX 2,976.67 -3.3%	+41.0%	£2.41B	£868.80M	30.29	4,336	News Coverage High Trading Volume
KLR Keller Group	1.1704 of 5 stars	GBX 3,280 -2.7%	GBX 2,467.50 -24.8%	+131.6%	£2.24B	£3.09B	16.51	9,500
MGNS Morgan Sindall Group	4.3925 of 5 stars	GBX 4,760 -4.5%	GBX 5,200 +9.2%	-4.2%	£2.22B	£5.02B	13.42	7,700	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Gap Down High Trading Volume
KIE Kier Group	3.3368 of 5 stars	GBX 240.20 flat	GBX 253.33 +5.5%	+22.8%	£1.05B	£4.12B	18.34	10,286	News Coverage High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GFRD) was last updated on 7/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Galliford Try (GFRD) Competitors

GFRD vs. HILS, KLR, MGNS, KIE, and KINO

How does Galliford Try compare to Hill & Smith?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Keller Group?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Kier Group?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Kinovo?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GFRD vs. The Competition

Galliford Try Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Galliford Try (GFRD) Competitors

GFRD vs. HILS, KLR, MGNS, KIE, and KINO

How does Galliford Try compare to Hill & Smith?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of HILS or GFRD?

Do analysts prefer HILS or GFRD?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, HILS or GFRD?

Which has more risk and volatility, HILS or GFRD?

Is HILS or GFRD a better dividend stock?

Is HILS or GFRD more profitable?

Does the media prefer HILS or GFRD?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Keller Group?

Is GFRD or KLR more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, GFRD or KLR?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of GFRD or KLR?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GFRD or KLR?

Does the media prefer GFRD or KLR?

Do analysts recommend GFRD or KLR?

Is GFRD or KLR a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Morgan Sindall Group?

Does the media prefer MGNS or GFRD?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MGNS or GFRD?

Is MGNS or GFRD a better dividend stock?

Is MGNS or GFRD more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, MGNS or GFRD?

Do analysts rate MGNS or GFRD?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MGNS or GFRD?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Kier Group?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in GFRD or KIE?

Is GFRD or KIE more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GFRD or KIE?

Which has more volatility and risk, GFRD or KIE?

Does the media refer more to GFRD or KIE?

Is GFRD or KIE a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer GFRD or KIE?

Summary

How does Galliford Try compare to Kinovo?

Do analysts prefer GFRD or KINO?

Does the media refer more to GFRD or KINO?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of GFRD or KINO?

Which has more risk and volatility, GFRD or KINO?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, GFRD or KINO?

Is GFRD or KINO more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GFRD vs. The Competition

Galliford Try Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools