Go Pro
→ A letter from Shannon Stansberry (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free MGNS Stock Alerts

Morgan Sindall Group (MGNS) Competitors

Morgan Sindall Group logo
GBX 4,040 -134.00 (-3.21%)
As of 11:56 AM Eastern
Compare

MGNS vs. BAB, BBY, HILS, KLR, and KIE

Should you buy Morgan Sindall Group stock or one of its competitors? Morgan Sindall Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Babcock International Group (BAB), Balfour Beatty (BBY), Hill & Smith (HILS), Keller Group (KLR), and Kier Group (KIE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Morgan Sindall Group compare to Babcock International Group?

Morgan Sindall Group (LON:MGNS) and Babcock International Group (LON:BAB) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

In the previous week, Babcock International Group's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Morgan Sindall Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Babcock International Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Morgan Sindall Group Neutral
Babcock International Group Positive

Babcock International Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Morgan Sindall Group. Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Babcock International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Morgan Sindall Group£5.21B0.37£125.92M£382.9010.55
Babcock International Group£5.18B0.91£165.10M£41.3023.26

Morgan Sindall Group has a beta of 0.819, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Babcock International Group has a beta of 0.874, suggesting that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Morgan Sindall Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 158 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Babcock International Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Morgan Sindall Group pays out 41.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Babcock International Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

48.8% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.8% of Babcock International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.0% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Babcock International Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Babcock International Group has a net margin of 4.08% compared to Morgan Sindall Group's net margin of 3.63%. Babcock International Group's return on equity of 31.57% beat Morgan Sindall Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Morgan Sindall Group3.63% 24.83% 4.46%
Babcock International Group 4.08%31.57%4.47%

Morgan Sindall Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 5,800, suggesting a potential upside of 43.56%. Babcock International Group has a consensus price target of GBX 4,256, suggesting a potential upside of 343.06%. Given Babcock International Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Babcock International Group is more favorable than Morgan Sindall Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Morgan Sindall Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Babcock International Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Babcock International Group beats Morgan Sindall Group on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Morgan Sindall Group compare to Balfour Beatty?

Morgan Sindall Group (LON:MGNS) and Balfour Beatty (LON:BBY) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Morgan Sindall Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 158 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Balfour Beatty pays an annual dividend of GBX 14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Morgan Sindall Group pays out 41.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Balfour Beatty pays out 26.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Balfour Beatty has higher revenue and earnings than Morgan Sindall Group. Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Balfour Beatty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Morgan Sindall Group£5.21B0.37£125.92M£382.9010.55
Balfour Beatty£9.95B0.41£219.98M£52.2016.43

Morgan Sindall Group has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Balfour Beatty's net margin of 2.60%. Morgan Sindall Group's return on equity of 24.83% beat Balfour Beatty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Morgan Sindall Group3.63% 24.83% 4.46%
Balfour Beatty 2.60%22.88%1.63%

Morgan Sindall Group has a beta of 0.819, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Balfour Beatty has a beta of 0.592, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Balfour Beatty had 1 more articles in the media than Morgan Sindall Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Balfour Beatty and 0 mentions for Morgan Sindall Group. Morgan Sindall Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Balfour Beatty'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Morgan Sindall Group Neutral
Balfour Beatty Neutral

48.8% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Balfour Beatty shares are held by institutional investors. 14.0% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Balfour Beatty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Morgan Sindall Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 5,800, suggesting a potential upside of 43.56%. Balfour Beatty has a consensus price target of GBX 1,051.67, suggesting a potential upside of 22.64%. Given Morgan Sindall Group's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Morgan Sindall Group is more favorable than Balfour Beatty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Morgan Sindall Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Balfour Beatty
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Morgan Sindall Group and Balfour Beatty tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Morgan Sindall Group compare to Hill & Smith?

Morgan Sindall Group (LON:MGNS) and Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Morgan Sindall Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 5,800, suggesting a potential upside of 43.56%. Hill & Smith has a consensus price target of GBX 3,241.67, suggesting a potential upside of 12.91%. Given Morgan Sindall Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Morgan Sindall Group is more favorable than Hill & Smith.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Morgan Sindall Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Hill & Smith
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

48.8% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are held by institutional investors. 14.0% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Morgan Sindall Group has a beta of 0.819, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.286, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Morgan Sindall Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 158 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 70.93 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Morgan Sindall Group pays out 41.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hill & Smith pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Morgan Sindall Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Morgan Sindall Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hill & Smith. Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Morgan Sindall Group£5.21B0.37£125.92M£382.9010.55
Hill & Smith£1.22B1.84£77.07M£121.0123.72

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 7.96% compared to Morgan Sindall Group's net margin of 3.63%. Morgan Sindall Group's return on equity of 24.83% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Morgan Sindall Group3.63% 24.83% 4.46%
Hill & Smith 7.96%15.00%10.01%

In the previous week, Hill & Smith had 2 more articles in the media than Morgan Sindall Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hill & Smith and 0 mentions for Morgan Sindall Group. Hill & Smith's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Morgan Sindall Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Hill & Smith is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Morgan Sindall Group Neutral
Hill & Smith Positive

Summary

Morgan Sindall Group and Hill & Smith tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Morgan Sindall Group compare to Keller Group?

Morgan Sindall Group (LON:MGNS) and Keller Group (LON:KLR) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Morgan Sindall Group has a beta of 0.819, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Keller Group has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

48.8% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.6% of Keller Group shares are held by institutional investors. 14.0% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Keller Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Keller Group has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Morgan Sindall Group's net margin of 3.63%. Morgan Sindall Group's return on equity of 24.83% beat Keller Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Morgan Sindall Group3.63% 24.83% 4.46%
Keller Group 4.81%24.09%7.80%

Morgan Sindall Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 158 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Keller Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 70.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Morgan Sindall Group pays out 41.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Keller Group pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Morgan Sindall Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 5,800, suggesting a potential upside of 43.56%. Keller Group has a consensus price target of GBX 2,907.50, suggesting a potential downside of 1.77%. Given Morgan Sindall Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Morgan Sindall Group is more favorable than Keller Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Morgan Sindall Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Keller Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Keller Group had 1 more articles in the media than Morgan Sindall Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Keller Group and 0 mentions for Morgan Sindall Group. Keller Group's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Morgan Sindall Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Keller Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Morgan Sindall Group Neutral
Keller Group Positive

Keller Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Morgan Sindall Group. Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keller Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Morgan Sindall Group£5.21B0.37£125.92M£382.9010.55
Keller Group£3.24B0.62£126.69M£220.5013.42

Summary

Keller Group beats Morgan Sindall Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Morgan Sindall Group compare to Kier Group?

Morgan Sindall Group (LON:MGNS) and Kier Group (LON:KIE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Kier Group had 2 more articles in the media than Morgan Sindall Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Kier Group and 0 mentions for Morgan Sindall Group. Kier Group's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Morgan Sindall Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Kier Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Morgan Sindall Group Neutral
Kier Group Positive

Morgan Sindall Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 158 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Kier Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Morgan Sindall Group pays out 41.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kier Group pays out 55.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Morgan Sindall Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Morgan Sindall Group has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Kier Group's net margin of 1.47%. Morgan Sindall Group's return on equity of 24.83% beat Kier Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Morgan Sindall Group3.63% 24.83% 4.46%
Kier Group 1.47%11.69%2.18%

Morgan Sindall Group has higher revenue and earnings than Kier Group. Morgan Sindall Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kier Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Morgan Sindall Group£5.21B0.37£125.92M£382.9010.55
Kier Group£4.12B0.26£42.84M£13.1018.72

Morgan Sindall Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 5,800, suggesting a potential upside of 43.56%. Kier Group has a consensus target price of GBX 253.33, suggesting a potential upside of 3.31%. Given Morgan Sindall Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Morgan Sindall Group is more favorable than Kier Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Morgan Sindall Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Kier Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

48.8% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.8% of Kier Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.0% of Morgan Sindall Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Kier Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Morgan Sindall Group has a beta of 0.819, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kier Group has a beta of 0.886, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Morgan Sindall Group beats Kier Group on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Morgan Sindall Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MGNS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MGNS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MGNS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMorgan Sindall GroupConstruction & Engineering IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.91B£8.11B£10.30B£2.89B
Dividend Yield3.86%2.61%97.04%6.22%
P/E Ratio10.5521.8625.63366.61
Price / Sales0.3757.46484.8383,688.54
Price / Cash2.0317.0124.2527.89
Price / Book3.244.464.866.55
Net Income£125.92M£487.40M£612.20M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.12%-0.68%0.04%17.81%
1 Month Performance-10.10%-6.13%-2.89%0.60%
1 Year Performance-0.37%29.58%8.83%20.07%

Morgan Sindall Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MGNS
Morgan Sindall Group
4.3199 of 5 stars		GBX 4,040
-3.2%		GBX 5,800
+43.6%		-0.2%£1.91B£5.21B10.557,700
BAB
Babcock International Group
3.1638 of 5 stars		GBX 1,004
-2.0%		GBX 4,256
+323.9%		-11.6%£4.94B£5.18B24.3126,115
BBY
Balfour Beatty
2.8194 of 5 stars		GBX 860.50
-1.3%		GBX 1,051.67
+22.2%		+40.7%£4.12B£9.95B16.55105,000
HILS
Hill & Smith
3.8104 of 5 stars		GBX 2,880
-0.7%		GBX 3,241.67
+12.6%		+34.6%£2.25B£1.22B28.354,336
KLR
Keller Group
1.9487 of 5 stars		GBX 3,012
-0.6%		GBX 2,907.50
-3.5%		+124.2%£2.05B£3.24B15.169,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MGNS) was last updated on 9/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel