Go Pro

Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) Competitors

Wheaton Precious Metals logo
GBX 9,813.73 -156.21 (-1.57%)
As of 12:11 PM Eastern

WPM vs. EDV, GGP, HOC, PAF, and CEY

Should you buy Wheaton Precious Metals stock or one of its competitors? Wheaton Precious Metals's main competitors and comparable companies include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Greatland Resources (GGP), Hochschild Mining (HOC), Pan African Resources (PAF), and Centamin (CEY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Wheaton Precious Metals compare to Endeavour Mining?

Wheaton Precious Metals (LON:WPM) and Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.187, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.139, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. Endeavour Mining's return on equity of 26.18% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals64.66% 22.96% 5.35%
Endeavour Mining 17.62%26.18%3.54%

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Endeavour Mining. Endeavour Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious Metals£3.17B14.05£754.42M£395.7024.80
Endeavour Mining£4.75B2.07-£423.98M£340.0011.98

Wheaton Precious Metals presently has a consensus target price of £117, indicating a potential upside of 19.22%. Endeavour Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 4,900, indicating a potential upside of 20.27%. Given Endeavour Mining's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

61.7% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 69 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Endeavour Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 145 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Endeavour Mining pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Endeavour Mining. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 3 mentions for Endeavour Mining. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Endeavour Mining's score of -0.88 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Wheaton Precious Metals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Endeavour Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Endeavour Mining on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wheaton Precious Metals compare to Greatland Resources?

Wheaton Precious Metals (LON:WPM) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Greatland Resources' net margin of 33.53%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 41.93% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals64.66% 22.96% 5.35%
Greatland Resources 33.53%41.93%-7.97%

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious Metals£3.17B14.05£754.42M£395.7024.80
Greatland Resources£2.97B1.46-£58.89M£177.293.64

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 4 more articles in the media than Greatland Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 0 mentions for Greatland Resources. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Greatland Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wheaton Precious Metals Positive
Greatland Resources Neutral

61.7% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 39.4% of Greatland Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.187, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.543, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Wheaton Precious Metals presently has a consensus target price of £117, suggesting a potential upside of 19.22%. Greatland Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 755.67, suggesting a potential upside of 17.16%. Given Wheaton Precious Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Wheaton Precious Metals is more favorable than Greatland Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Greatland Resources on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wheaton Precious Metals compare to Hochschild Mining?

Wheaton Precious Metals (LON:WPM) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.187, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.947, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

61.7% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.1% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 69 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 17.80%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 29.48% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals64.66% 22.96% 5.35%
Hochschild Mining 17.80%29.48%7.11%

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious Metals£3.17B14.05£754.42M£395.7024.80
Hochschild Mining£1.18B2.21£38.41M£39.0013.02

Wheaton Precious Metals currently has a consensus price target of £117, suggesting a potential upside of 19.22%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 560, suggesting a potential upside of 10.26%. Given Wheaton Precious Metals' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Wheaton Precious Metals is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Hochschild Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 4 more articles in the media than Hochschild Mining. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 0 mentions for Hochschild Mining. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Hochschild Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wheaton Precious Metals Positive
Hochschild Mining Neutral

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Hochschild Mining on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wheaton Precious Metals compare to Pan African Resources?

Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) and Wheaton Precious Metals (LON:WPM) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

Pan African Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 41.95%. Wheaton Precious Metals has a consensus target price of £117, suggesting a potential upside of 19.22%. Given Pan African Resources' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pan African Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.701, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.187, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Pan African Resources' net margin of 29.42%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pan African Resources29.42% 49.73% 12.99%
Wheaton Precious Metals 64.66%22.96%5.35%

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Pan African Resources. Pan African Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pan African Resources£837.76M2.66£58.60M£11.969.19
Wheaton Precious Metals£3.17B14.05£754.42M£395.7024.80

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Pan African Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 2 mentions for Pan African Resources. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Pan African Resources' score of 0.37 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pan African Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Wheaton Precious Metals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 69 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

42.0% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.7% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Pan African Resources on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wheaton Precious Metals compare to Centamin?

Centamin (LON:CEY) and Wheaton Precious Metals (LON:WPM) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Centamin has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.187, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity of 22.96% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Centamin9.10% 14.16% 8.45%
Wheaton Precious Metals 64.66%22.96%5.35%

Centamin pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 69 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Centamin pays out 6,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 4 more articles in the media than Centamin. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 0 mentions for Centamin. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Centamin's score of 0.00 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Centamin Neutral
Wheaton Precious Metals Positive

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Centamin. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centamin£930.75M0.00£84.67M£0.05N/A
Wheaton Precious Metals£3.17B14.05£754.42M£395.7024.80

90.8% of Centamin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.7% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Centamin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a consensus price target of £117, suggesting a potential upside of 19.22%. Given Wheaton Precious Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Wheaton Precious Metals is more favorable than Centamin.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Centamin
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Centamin on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Wheaton Precious Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WPM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WPM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WPM vs. The Competition

MetricWheaton Precious MetalsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£44.57B£3.85B£4.91B£2.89B
Dividend Yield0.58%5.22%4.70%6.09%
P/E Ratio24.8023.3421.40368.30
Price / Sales14.058,664.625,144.3283,647.95
Price / CashN/A26.5224.6327.89
Price / Book6.1310.508.887.22
Net Income£754.42M£122.29M£154.60M£5.89B
7 Day Performance20.33%9.65%7.67%1.53%
1 Month Performance19.05%6.93%5.97%2.33%
1 Year Performance29.39%55.95%44.54%74.71%

Wheaton Precious Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals
2.8776 of 5 stars
GBX 9,813.73
-1.6%
£117
+19.2%
+31.4%£44.57B£3.17B24.8042
EDV
Endeavour Mining
2.9434 of 5 stars
GBX 3,888
+1.2%
GBX 5,366.67
+38.0%
+66.2%£9.37B£4.75B11.173,786
GGP
Greatland Resources
1.5128 of 5 stars
GBX 602.50
+1.5%
GBX 755.67
+25.4%
+157.4%£4.05B£2.97B3.4025
HOC
Hochschild Mining
N/AGBX 480.37
+0.2%
GBX 560
+16.6%
+59.4%£2.47B£1.18B12.323,029
PAF
Pan African Resources
3.3787 of 5 stars
GBX 102.10
-2.0%
GBX 156.50
+53.3%
+75.7%£2.07B£837.76M8.542,469

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:WPM) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners