Go Pro
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free WPM Stock Alerts

Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) Competitors

Wheaton Precious Metals logo
£114.32 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/28/2026 12:12 PM Eastern
Compare

WPM vs. EDV, GGP, HOC, PAF, and CEY

Should you buy Wheaton Precious Metals stock or one of its competitors? Wheaton Precious Metals's main competitors and comparable companies include Endeavour Mining (EDV), Greatland Resources (GGP), Hochschild Mining (HOC), Pan African Resources (PAF), and Centamin (CEY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Wheaton Precious Metals compare to Endeavour Mining?

Endeavour Mining (LON:EDV) and Wheaton Precious Metals (LON:WPM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Wheaton Precious Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endeavour Mining. Endeavour Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour Mining£4.75B2.41-£423.98M£340.0013.95
Wheaton Precious Metals£3.17B16.37£754.42M£395.7028.89

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Wheaton Precious Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Mining Neutral
Wheaton Precious Metals Neutral

Endeavour Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 145 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 69 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Endeavour Mining pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.139, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.187, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Endeavour Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 4,900, indicating a potential upside of 3.33%. Wheaton Precious Metals has a consensus target price of £117, indicating a potential upside of 2.35%. Given Endeavour Mining's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

59.5% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.7% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Endeavour Mining's net margin of 17.62%. Endeavour Mining's return on equity of 26.18% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Endeavour Mining17.62% 26.18% 3.54%
Wheaton Precious Metals 64.66%22.96%5.35%

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Endeavour Mining on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wheaton Precious Metals compare to Greatland Resources?

Wheaton Precious Metals (LON:WPM) and Greatland Resources (LON:GGP) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.187, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greatland Resources has a beta of 1.426, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Greatland Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Wheaton Precious Metals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Greatland Resources and 0 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals. Greatland Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Wheaton Precious Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Greatland Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wheaton Precious Metals Neutral
Greatland Resources Neutral

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Greatland Resources' net margin of 38.25%. Greatland Resources' return on equity of 43.79% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals64.66% 22.96% 5.35%
Greatland Resources 38.25%43.79%-7.97%

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greatland Resources. Greatland Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious Metals£3.17B16.37£754.42M£395.7028.89
Greatland Resources£4.35B1.04-£58.89M£177.293.77

Wheaton Precious Metals presently has a consensus price target of £117, suggesting a potential upside of 2.35%. Greatland Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 733.67, suggesting a potential upside of 9.73%. Given Greatland Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Greatland Resources is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Greatland Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

61.7% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Greatland Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.4% of Greatland Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Greatland Resources beats Wheaton Precious Metals on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wheaton Precious Metals compare to Hochschild Mining?

Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) and Wheaton Precious Metals (LON:WPM) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Hochschild Mining. Hochschild Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hochschild Mining£1.51B2.28£38.41M£39.0017.12
Wheaton Precious Metals£3.17B16.37£754.42M£395.7028.89

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Hochschild Mining's net margin of 19.80%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 35.59% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hochschild Mining19.80% 35.59% 7.11%
Wheaton Precious Metals 64.66%22.96%5.35%

31.1% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.7% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.947, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.187, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hochschild Mining had 9 more articles in the media than Wheaton Precious Metals. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Hochschild Mining and 0 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Wheaton Precious Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hochschild Mining Positive
Wheaton Precious Metals Neutral

Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 69 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Hochschild Mining pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hochschild Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 671, suggesting a potential upside of 0.52%. Wheaton Precious Metals has a consensus target price of £117, suggesting a potential upside of 2.35%. Given Wheaton Precious Metals' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Wheaton Precious Metals is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hochschild Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Hochschild Mining on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wheaton Precious Metals compare to Pan African Resources?

Wheaton Precious Metals (LON:WPM) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Wheaton Precious Metals currently has a consensus price target of £117, suggesting a potential upside of 2.35%. Pan African Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 14.45%. Given Pan African Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pan African Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 69 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Pan African Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pan African Resources pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

61.7% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.0% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pan African Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Pan African Resources' net margin of 29.42%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 49.73% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals64.66% 22.96% 5.35%
Pan African Resources 29.42%49.73%12.99%

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pan African Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wheaton Precious Metals Neutral
Pan African Resources Neutral

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Pan African Resources. Pan African Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious Metals£3.17B16.37£754.42M£395.7028.89
Pan African Resources£837.76M3.30£58.60M£11.9611.40

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.187, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.701, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Pan African Resources on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wheaton Precious Metals compare to Centamin?

Centamin (LON:CEY) and Wheaton Precious Metals (LON:WPM) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Centamin. Centamin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centamin£930.75M0.00£84.67M£0.05N/A
Wheaton Precious Metals£3.17B16.37£754.42M£395.7028.89

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Centamin's net margin of 9.10%. Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity of 22.96% beat Centamin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Centamin9.10% 14.16% 8.45%
Wheaton Precious Metals 64.66%22.96%5.35%

Wheaton Precious Metals has a consensus price target of £117, indicating a potential upside of 2.35%. Given Wheaton Precious Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Wheaton Precious Metals is more favorable than Centamin.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Centamin
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

90.8% of Centamin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.7% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Centamin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Centamin has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.187, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Centamin's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Wheaton Precious Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Centamin Neutral
Wheaton Precious Metals Neutral

Centamin pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 69 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Centamin pays out 6,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Centamin on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Wheaton Precious Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WPM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WPM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WPM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricWheaton Precious MetalsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£51.91B£4.08B£5.11B£2.92B
Dividend Yield0.50%5.16%4.67%6.17%
P/E Ratio28.8925.5726.16367.33
Price / Sales16.377,483.414,448.0483,334.22
Price / CashN/A26.6824.6927.89
Price / Book7.1410.698.996.99
Net Income£754.42M£125.14M£156.32M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.37%8.04%5.97%0.76%
1 Month Performance40.11%24.50%18.93%3.74%
1 Year Performance54.57%59.97%46.70%22.85%

Wheaton Precious Metals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals
0.7215 of 5 stars		£114.32
flat		£117
+2.3%		+54.6%£51.91B£3.17B28.8942
EDV
Endeavour Mining
1.4738 of 5 stars		GBX 4,739
-0.1%		GBX 4,900
+3.4%		+87.0%£11.45B£4.75B13.943,786
GGP
Greatland Resources
1.8216 of 5 stars		GBX 695
-1.6%		GBX 733.67
+5.6%		+156.2%£4.69B£2.97B3.9225
HOC
Hochschild Mining
2.6915 of 5 stars		GBX 670.33
+1.7%		GBX 625
-6.8%		+137.5%£3.45B£1.18B17.193,029
PAF
Pan African Resources
1.8513 of 5 stars		GBX 138.10
+1.3%		GBX 156
+13.0%		+115.7%£2.80B£837.76M11.552,469

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:WPM) was last updated on 8/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel