ATA Creativity Global Competitors

OneSmart International Education Group (NYSE:ONE) and ATA Creativity Global (NASDAQ:AACG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares OneSmart International Education Group and ATA Creativity Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ATA Creativity Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than OneSmart International Education Group.

Profitability

This table compares OneSmart International Education Group and ATA Creativity Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

29.2% of OneSmart International Education Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of ATA Creativity Global shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of OneSmart International Education Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 52.9% of ATA Creativity Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

OneSmart International Education Group has a beta of 0.17, suggesting that its share price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ATA Creativity Global has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for OneSmart International Education Group and ATA Creativity Global, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

GP Strategies (NYSE:GPX) and ATA Creativity Global (NASDAQ:AACG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares GP Strategies and ATA Creativity Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

GP Strategies has higher revenue and earnings than ATA Creativity Global.

Profitability

This table compares GP Strategies and ATA Creativity Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

66.9% of GP Strategies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of ATA Creativity Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.0% of GP Strategies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 52.9% of ATA Creativity Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

GP Strategies has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ATA Creativity Global has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for GP Strategies and ATA Creativity Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

GP Strategies currently has a consensus price target of $20.0833, indicating a potential upside of 23.82%. Given GP Strategies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe GP Strategies is more favorable than ATA Creativity Global.

Summary

GP Strategies beats ATA Creativity Global on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Puxin (NYSE:NEW) and ATA Creativity Global (NASDAQ:AACG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Puxin and ATA Creativity Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ATA Creativity Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Puxin.

Profitability

This table compares Puxin and ATA Creativity Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

10.2% of Puxin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of ATA Creativity Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Puxin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 52.9% of ATA Creativity Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Puxin has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ATA Creativity Global has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Puxin and ATA Creativity Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Summary

Puxin beats ATA Creativity Global on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tarena International (NASDAQ:TEDU) and ATA Creativity Global (NASDAQ:AACG) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Tarena International and ATA Creativity Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Tarena International has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ATA Creativity Global has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Tarena International and ATA Creativity Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

6.2% of Tarena International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of ATA Creativity Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.9% of ATA Creativity Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Tarena International and ATA Creativity Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ATA Creativity Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tarena International.

Summary

Tarena International beats ATA Creativity Global on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

ATA Creativity Global (NASDAQ:AACG) and Universal Technical Institute (NYSE:UTI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares ATA Creativity Global and Universal Technical Institute's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

ATA Creativity Global has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for ATA Creativity Global and Universal Technical Institute, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Universal Technical Institute has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 61.55%. Given Universal Technical Institute's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Universal Technical Institute is more favorable than ATA Creativity Global.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.1% of ATA Creativity Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.8% of Universal Technical Institute shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.9% of ATA Creativity Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of Universal Technical Institute shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ATA Creativity Global and Universal Technical Institute's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Universal Technical Institute has higher revenue and earnings than ATA Creativity Global.

Summary

Universal Technical Institute beats ATA Creativity Global on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

ATA Creativity Global (NASDAQ:AACG) and Lincoln Educational Services (NASDAQ:LINC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares ATA Creativity Global and Lincoln Educational Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

ATA Creativity Global has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for ATA Creativity Global and Lincoln Educational Services, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Lincoln Educational Services has a consensus target price of $9.50, indicating a potential upside of 29.60%. Given Lincoln Educational Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lincoln Educational Services is more favorable than ATA Creativity Global.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.1% of ATA Creativity Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of Lincoln Educational Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.9% of ATA Creativity Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.0% of Lincoln Educational Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ATA Creativity Global and Lincoln Educational Services' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lincoln Educational Services has higher revenue and earnings than ATA Creativity Global.

Summary

Lincoln Educational Services beats ATA Creativity Global on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.