Exp World (AGNT) Competitors

Zillow Group has a net margin of 2.27% compared to Exp World's net margin of -0.48%. Zillow Group's return on equity of 1.37% beat Exp World's return on equity.

Zillow Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zillow Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Zillow Group has a beta of 2.04, indicating that its share price is 104% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Exp World has a beta of 2.2, indicating that its share price is 120% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Zillow Group currently has a consensus target price of $71.71, indicating a potential upside of 70.99%. Exp World has a consensus target price of $7.92, indicating a potential upside of 19.95%. Given Zillow Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Zillow Group is more favorable than Exp World.

In the previous week, Zillow Group had 19 more articles in the media than Exp World. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Zillow Group and 6 mentions for Exp World. Exp World's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Zillow Group's score of 0.03 indicating that Exp World is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

20.3% of Zillow Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Exp World shares are held by institutional investors. 29.9% of Zillow Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Exp World shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Exp World has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Compass. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Compass, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Compass has a net margin of 0.17% compared to Exp World's net margin of -0.48%. Compass' return on equity of 1.86% beat Exp World's return on equity.

67.1% of Compass shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Exp World shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Compass shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Exp World shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Compass has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its stock price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Exp World has a beta of 2.2, suggesting that its stock price is 120% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Compass had 9 more articles in the media than Exp World. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Compass and 6 mentions for Exp World. Compass' average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Exp World's score of 0.19 indicating that Compass is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Compass currently has a consensus target price of $12.63, indicating a potential upside of 45.05%. Exp World has a consensus target price of $7.92, indicating a potential upside of 19.95%. Given Compass' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Compass is more favorable than Exp World.

Cushman & Wakefield presently has a consensus target price of $18.06, indicating a potential upside of 27.61%. Exp World has a consensus target price of $7.92, indicating a potential upside of 19.95%. Given Cushman & Wakefield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Cushman & Wakefield is more favorable than Exp World.

Cushman & Wakefield has higher revenue and earnings than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cushman & Wakefield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cushman & Wakefield has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Exp World has a beta of 2.2, indicating that its stock price is 120% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Cushman & Wakefield has a net margin of 0.70% compared to Exp World's net margin of -0.48%. Cushman & Wakefield's return on equity of 15.41% beat Exp World's return on equity.

In the previous week, Cushman & Wakefield had 7 more articles in the media than Exp World. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Cushman & Wakefield and 6 mentions for Exp World. Cushman & Wakefield's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Exp World's score of 0.19 indicating that Cushman & Wakefield is being referred to more favorably in the media.

95.6% of Cushman & Wakefield shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Exp World shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Cushman & Wakefield shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Exp World shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hercules Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. Exp World pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Hercules Capital pays out 90.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Exp World pays out -142.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hercules Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Exp World has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Hercules Capital presently has a consensus price target of $18.13, suggesting a potential upside of 12.06%. Exp World has a consensus price target of $7.92, suggesting a potential upside of 19.95%. Given Exp World's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Exp World is more favorable than Hercules Capital.

19.7% of Hercules Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Exp World shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Hercules Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Exp World shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hercules Capital has a net margin of 59.85% compared to Exp World's net margin of -0.48%. Hercules Capital's return on equity of 16.05% beat Exp World's return on equity.

Hercules Capital has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Exp World has a beta of 2.2, meaning that its share price is 120% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Hercules Capital had 37 more articles in the media than Exp World. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Hercules Capital and 6 mentions for Exp World. Hercules Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Exp World's score of 0.19 indicating that Hercules Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Hercules Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hercules Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.