Exp World (AGNT) Competitors

The RMR Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The RMR Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

The RMR Group has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Exp World has a beta of 2.05, meaning that its share price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

The RMR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Exp World pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. The RMR Group pays out 157.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Exp World pays out -181.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The RMR Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Exp World has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

42.3% of The RMR Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Exp World shares are held by institutional investors. 54.7% of The RMR Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Exp World shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, The RMR Group had 2 more articles in the media than Exp World. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for The RMR Group and 1 mentions for Exp World. Exp World's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat The RMR Group's score of 0.37 indicating that Exp World is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

The RMR Group currently has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.36%. Exp World has a consensus target price of $5.17, indicating a potential upside of 29.82%. Given Exp World's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Exp World is more favorable than The RMR Group.

The RMR Group has a net margin of 3.10% compared to Exp World's net margin of -0.35%. The RMR Group's return on equity of 2.96% beat Exp World's return on equity.

In the previous week, Real Brokerage had 2 more articles in the media than Exp World. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Real Brokerage and 1 mentions for Exp World. Real Brokerage's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Exp World's score of 0.53 indicating that Real Brokerage is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Real Brokerage has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Real Brokerage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Exp World has a net margin of -0.35% compared to Real Brokerage's net margin of -0.72%. Exp World's return on equity of -5.43% beat Real Brokerage's return on equity.

53.3% of Real Brokerage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Exp World shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.2% of Real Brokerage shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Exp World shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Exp World has a beta of 2.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

Real Brokerage presently has a consensus target price of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 141.66%. Exp World has a consensus target price of $5.17, suggesting a potential upside of 29.82%. Given Real Brokerage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Real Brokerage is more favorable than Exp World.

Exp World has a net margin of -0.35% compared to RE/MAX's net margin of -3.04%. Exp World's return on equity of -5.43% beat RE/MAX's return on equity.

In the previous week, Exp World had 1 more articles in the media than RE/MAX. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Exp World and 0 mentions for RE/MAX. Exp World's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat RE/MAX's score of 0.00 indicating that Exp World is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Exp World currently has a consensus price target of $5.17, indicating a potential upside of 29.82%. RE/MAX has a consensus price target of $13.80, indicating a potential upside of 11.65%. Given Exp World's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Exp World is more favorable than RE/MAX.

RE/MAX has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RE/MAX, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Exp World has a beta of 2.05, indicating that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RE/MAX has a beta of 1.82, indicating that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

27.2% of Exp World shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of RE/MAX shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of Exp World shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of RE/MAX shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Comstock Holding Companies has a net margin of 32.16% compared to Exp World's net margin of -0.35%. Comstock Holding Companies' return on equity of 35.60% beat Exp World's return on equity.

Comstock Holding Companies has a beta of -0.36, suggesting that its stock price is 136% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Exp World has a beta of 2.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

6.5% of Comstock Holding Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Exp World shares are held by institutional investors. 35.0% of Comstock Holding Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Exp World shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Comstock Holding Companies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Comstock Holding Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Comstock Holding Companies and Comstock Holding Companies both had 1 articles in the media. Comstock Holding Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Exp World's score of 0.53 indicating that Comstock Holding Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Exp World has a consensus price target of $5.17, indicating a potential upside of 29.82%. Given Exp World's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Exp World is more favorable than Comstock Holding Companies.