Exp World (AGNT) Competitors

Exp World currently has a consensus target price of $5.17, suggesting a potential upside of 47.20%. Marcus & Millichap has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.96%. Given Exp World's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Exp World is more favorable than Marcus & Millichap.

Exp World has a beta of 2.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Exp World and Exp World both had 4 articles in the media. Exp World's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Marcus & Millichap's score of 0.14 indicating that Exp World is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Exp World pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Marcus & Millichap pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Exp World pays out -181.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marcus & Millichap pays out 135.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Exp World has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Exp World is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Marcus & Millichap has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marcus & Millichap, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

27.2% of Exp World shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.8% of Marcus & Millichap shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of Exp World shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.9% of Marcus & Millichap shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Marcus & Millichap has a net margin of 1.77% compared to Exp World's net margin of -0.35%. Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of 2.97% beat Exp World's return on equity.

Exp World has a beta of 2.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The RMR Group has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

27.2% of Exp World shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.3% of The RMR Group shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of Exp World shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.7% of The RMR Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Exp World had 3 more articles in the media than The RMR Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Exp World and 1 mentions for The RMR Group. Exp World's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat The RMR Group's score of 0.77 indicating that Exp World is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Exp World presently has a consensus price target of $5.17, suggesting a potential upside of 47.20%. The RMR Group has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.65%. Given Exp World's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Exp World is more favorable than The RMR Group.

The RMR Group has a net margin of 3.10% compared to Exp World's net margin of -0.35%. The RMR Group's return on equity of 2.96% beat Exp World's return on equity.

Exp World pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. The RMR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. Exp World pays out -181.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The RMR Group pays out 157.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Exp World has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and The RMR Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

The RMR Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The RMR Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Real Brokerage presently has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 211.92%. Exp World has a consensus target price of $5.17, indicating a potential upside of 47.20%. Given Real Brokerage's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Real Brokerage is more favorable than Exp World.

Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Exp World has a beta of 2.05, meaning that its share price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

Exp World has a net margin of -0.35% compared to Real Brokerage's net margin of -0.72%. Exp World's return on equity of -5.43% beat Real Brokerage's return on equity.

Real Brokerage has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Real Brokerage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

53.3% of Real Brokerage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Exp World shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.2% of Real Brokerage shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Exp World shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Real Brokerage had 2 more articles in the media than Exp World. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Real Brokerage and 4 mentions for Exp World. Exp World's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Real Brokerage's score of 0.48 indicating that Exp World is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

53.3% of RE/MAX shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Exp World shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.2% of RE/MAX shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Exp World shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

RE/MAX has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Exp World has a beta of 2.05, indicating that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

RE/MAX presently has a consensus price target of $40.00, indicating a potential upside of 149.53%. Exp World has a consensus price target of $5.17, indicating a potential upside of 47.20%. Given RE/MAX's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe RE/MAX is more favorable than Exp World.

In the previous week, Exp World had 4 more articles in the media than RE/MAX. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Exp World and 0 mentions for RE/MAX. Exp World's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat RE/MAX's score of 0.00 indicating that Exp World is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

RE/MAX has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RE/MAX, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Exp World has a net margin of -0.35% compared to RE/MAX's net margin of -3.04%. Exp World's return on equity of -5.43% beat RE/MAX's return on equity.