Free Trial

Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX) Competitors

Sixth Street Specialty Lending logo
$17.40 -0.27 (-1.50%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$17.47 +0.06 (+0.37%)
As of 07:47 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

TSLX vs. ARCC, CSWC, GBDC, MFIC, and NMFC

Should you buy Sixth Street Specialty Lending stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sixth Street Specialty Lending with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sixth Street Specialty Lending include Ares Capital (ARCC), Capital Southwest (CSWC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), and New Mountain Finance (NMFC). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Sixth Street Specialty Lending compare to Ares Capital?

Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 37.30% compared to Sixth Street Specialty Lending's net margin of 25.25%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.92% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ares Capital37.30% 9.85% 4.59%
Sixth Street Specialty Lending 25.25%11.92%5.54%

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Ares Capital pays out 117.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 160.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 15 more articles in the media than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Ares Capital and 3 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Ares Capital's score of 0.60 indicating that Sixth Street Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ares Capital
8 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ares Capital currently has a consensus target price of $20.75, indicating a potential upside of 10.43%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus target price of $19.83, indicating a potential upside of 13.95%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than Ares Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Ares Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ares Capital$3.05B4.42$1.30B$1.6311.53
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$449.05M3.68$209.99M$1.1515.13

Summary

Ares Capital and Sixth Street Specialty Lending tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sixth Street Specialty Lending compare to Capital Southwest?

Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) and Capital Southwest (NASDAQ:CSWC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Southwest. Capital Southwest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$449.05M3.68$209.99M$1.1515.13
Capital Southwest$232.10M6.21$113M$1.9012.22

Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 160.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest pays out 122.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending presently has a consensus price target of $19.83, suggesting a potential upside of 13.95%. Capital Southwest has a consensus price target of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.25%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than Capital Southwest.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Capital Southwest
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Southwest has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 48.68% compared to Sixth Street Specialty Lending's net margin of 25.25%. Capital Southwest's return on equity of 14.00% beat Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sixth Street Specialty Lending25.25% 11.92% 5.54%
Capital Southwest 48.68%14.00%6.61%

70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.4% of Capital Southwest shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Capital Southwest shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sixth Street Specialty Lending had 2 more articles in the media than Capital Southwest. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending and 1 mentions for Capital Southwest. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Capital Southwest's score of 0.83 indicating that Sixth Street Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Capital Southwest
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Capital Southwest beats Sixth Street Specialty Lending on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sixth Street Specialty Lending compare to Golub Capital BDC?

Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) and Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Sixth Street Specialty Lending is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$449.05M3.68$209.99M$1.1515.13
Golub Capital BDC$870.78M3.90$376.65M$0.7716.94

70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a net margin of 25.25% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 24.64%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.92% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sixth Street Specialty Lending25.25% 11.92% 5.54%
Golub Capital BDC 24.64%10.20%4.47%

Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 160.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golub Capital BDC pays out 171.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sixth Street Specialty Lending is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending currently has a consensus price target of $19.83, indicating a potential upside of 13.95%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.36%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than Golub Capital BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Golub Capital BDC
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, Golub Capital BDC had 3 more articles in the media than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Golub Capital BDC and 3 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Golub Capital BDC's score of 0.70 indicating that Sixth Street Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Golub Capital BDC
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats Golub Capital BDC on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sixth Street Specialty Lending compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. Sixth Street Specialty Lending is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M2.69$63.17M$0.04262.00
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$449.05M3.68$209.99M$1.1515.13

In the previous week, Sixth Street Specialty Lending had 3 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending and 0 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Sixth Street Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment Neutral
Sixth Street Specialty Lending Positive

MidCap Financial Investment presently has a consensus price target of $11.54, suggesting a potential upside of 10.07%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $19.83, suggesting a potential upside of 13.95%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.8%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 160.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a net margin of 25.25% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.92% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment1.90% 10.86% 4.31%
Sixth Street Specialty Lending 25.25%11.92%5.54%

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats MidCap Financial Investment on 16 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sixth Street Specialty Lending compare to New Mountain Finance?

Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Sixth Street Specialty Lending had 1 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending and 2 mentions for New Mountain Finance. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat New Mountain Finance's score of 0.58 indicating that Sixth Street Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
New Mountain Finance
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Sixth Street Specialty Lending currently has a consensus target price of $19.83, suggesting a potential upside of 13.95%. New Mountain Finance has a consensus target price of $9.25, suggesting a potential upside of 18.14%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Sixth Street Specialty Lending.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
New Mountain Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.71

Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.3%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 160.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out -220.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$449.05M3.68$209.99M$1.1515.13
New Mountain Finance$327.08M2.26$16.49M-$0.58N/A

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a net margin of 25.25% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.92% beat New Mountain Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sixth Street Specialty Lending25.25% 11.92% 5.54%
New Mountain Finance -18.65%11.14%4.63%

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats New Mountain Finance on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sixth Street Specialty Lending News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TSLX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TSLX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TSLX vs. The Competition

MetricSixth Street Specialty LendingFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.68B$1.31B$13.63B$23.37B
Dividend Yield10.41%13.06%5.77%4.07%
P/E Ratio15.1310.9119.9130.27
Price / Sales3.6814.18137.9322.09
Price / Cash8.707.1019.5424.41
Price / Book1.020.772.184.63
Net Income$209.99M$121.13M$1.13B$1.07B
7 Day Performance0.79%-1.83%-0.17%-1.64%
1 Month Performance-11.59%-8.50%0.04%-0.77%
1 Year Performance-25.23%-21.11%11.71%22.61%

Sixth Street Specialty Lending Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
4.5396 of 5 stars
$17.41
-1.5%
$19.83
+14.0%
-24.1%$1.68B$449.05M15.13N/A
ARCC
Ares Capital
3.9044 of 5 stars
$18.59
flat
$20.75
+11.6%
-13.8%$13.35B$3.05B11.402,550
CSWC
Capital Southwest
1.9097 of 5 stars
$22.77
flat
$23.50
+3.2%
+13.3%$1.41B$232.10M11.9820
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
3.2664 of 5 stars
$12.89
flat
$14.00
+8.6%
-12.1%$3.36B$870.78M16.74N/A
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
2.1742 of 5 stars
$10.60
flat
$11.54
+8.8%
-16.8%$873.15M$320.88M265.07N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:TSLX) was last updated on 6/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners