Go Pro

Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX) Competitors

Sixth Street Specialty Lending logo
$17.82 -0.43 (-2.34%)
Closing price 09/15/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$17.78 -0.04 (-0.24%)
As of 04:39 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

TSLX vs. ARCC, GBDC, MFIC, NMFC, and OCSL

Should you buy Sixth Street Specialty Lending stock or one of its competitors? Sixth Street Specialty Lending's main competitors and comparable companies include Ares Capital (ARCC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), and Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Sixth Street Specialty Lending compare to Ares Capital?

Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 30.91% compared to Sixth Street Specialty Lending's net margin of 21.79%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.33% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ares Capital30.91% 9.80% 4.50%
Sixth Street Specialty Lending 21.79%11.33%5.16%

Ares Capital currently has a consensus target price of $20.60, suggesting a potential upside of 6.35%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus target price of $19.83, suggesting a potential upside of 11.28%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than Ares Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Ares Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ares Capital$3.05B4.56$1.30B$1.3514.35
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$449.05M3.77$209.99M$0.9518.76

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Ares Capital pays out 142.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 176.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ares Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 16 more articles in the media than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Ares Capital and 3 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Ares Capital's score of 0.60 indicating that Sixth Street Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ares Capital
9 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Ares Capital beats Sixth Street Specialty Lending on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sixth Street Specialty Lending compare to Golub Capital BDC?

Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) and Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a net margin of 21.79% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 21.45%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.33% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sixth Street Specialty Lending21.79% 11.33% 5.16%
Golub Capital BDC 21.45%9.91%4.39%

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending presently has a consensus target price of $19.83, indicating a potential upside of 11.28%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus target price of $13.90, indicating a potential upside of 11.83%. Given Golub Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Golub Capital BDC is more favorable than Sixth Street Specialty Lending.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Golub Capital BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 176.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golub Capital BDC pays out 203.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Sixth Street Specialty Lending is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$449.05M3.77$209.99M$0.9518.76
Golub Capital BDC$870.78M3.71$376.65M$0.6519.12

In the previous week, Golub Capital BDC had 2 more articles in the media than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Golub Capital BDC and 3 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Golub Capital BDC's score of 0.91 indicating that Sixth Street Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Golub Capital BDC
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats Golub Capital BDC on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sixth Street Specialty Lending compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$449.05M3.77$209.99M$0.9518.76
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M2.32$63.17M-$0.36N/A

Sixth Street Specialty Lending presently has a consensus target price of $19.83, indicating a potential upside of 11.28%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus target price of $11.11, indicating a potential upside of 22.73%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than Sixth Street Specialty Lending.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a net margin of 21.79% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.33% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sixth Street Specialty Lending21.79% 11.33% 5.16%
MidCap Financial Investment -9.85%11.17%4.41%

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.7%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 176.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Sixth Street Specialty Lending and Sixth Street Specialty Lending both had 3 articles in the media. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.37 indicating that Sixth Street Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats MidCap Financial Investment on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sixth Street Specialty Lending compare to New Mountain Finance?

Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$449.05M3.77$209.99M$0.9518.76
New Mountain Finance$327.08M2.08$16.49M-$0.47N/A

70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a net margin of 21.79% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -16.78%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.33% beat New Mountain Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sixth Street Specialty Lending21.79% 11.33% 5.16%
New Mountain Finance -16.78%10.94%4.58%

Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.9%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 176.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out -212.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending currently has a consensus price target of $19.83, indicating a potential upside of 11.28%. New Mountain Finance has a consensus price target of $8.25, indicating a potential upside of 14.27%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Sixth Street Specialty Lending.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
New Mountain Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

In the previous week, Sixth Street Specialty Lending had 2 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending and 1 mentions for New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Sixth Street Specialty Lending's score of 1.00 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sixth Street Specialty Lending Positive
New Mountain Finance Very Positive

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats New Mountain Finance on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sixth Street Specialty Lending compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a net margin of 21.79% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 14.45%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.33% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oaktree Specialty Lending14.45% 9.70% 4.64%
Sixth Street Specialty Lending 21.79%11.33%5.16%

Oaktree Specialty Lending presently has a consensus price target of $11.83, suggesting a potential downside of 4.42%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $19.83, suggesting a potential upside of 11.28%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Oaktree Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Oaktree Specialty Lending. Sixth Street Specialty Lending is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oaktree Specialty Lending$316.80M3.44$33.92M$0.4825.79
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$449.05M3.77$209.99M$0.9518.76

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 2 more articles in the media than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 3 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Oaktree Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Sixth Street Specialty Lending's score of 1.00 indicating that Oaktree Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Oaktree Specialty Lending
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 176.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats Oaktree Specialty Lending on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sixth Street Specialty Lending News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TSLX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TSLX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TSLX vs. The Competition

MetricSixth Street Specialty LendingCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.73B$5.42B$14.03B$23.25B
Dividend Yield9.21%7.50%5.95%3.58%
P/E Ratio18.7630.0325.3428.40
Price / Sales3.771,178.47500.8120.36
Price / Cash8.9847.9140.5734.34
Price / Book1.053.512.744.69
Net Income$209.99M$417.39M$1.31B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.15%-1.23%-0.63%-1.48%
1 Month Performance-5.25%-2.75%-0.90%-4.27%
1 Year Performance-23.31%4.12%10.03%8.97%

Sixth Street Specialty Lending Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
2.9632 of 5 stars
$17.82
-2.3%
$19.83
+11.3%
-23.8%$1.73B$449.05M18.76N/A
ARCC
Ares Capital
2.6632 of 5 stars
$19.80
-1.2%
$20.60
+4.1%
-9.1%$14.21B$3.05B14.662,550
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
3.3434 of 5 stars
$12.86
-1.1%
$13.90
+8.1%
-11.6%$3.34B$870.78M19.78N/A
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
2.6362 of 5 stars
$9.31
-3.3%
$11.11
+19.4%
-26.1%$765.63M$320.88MN/AN/A
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
2.3427 of 5 stars
$7.40
-1.1%
$8.60
+16.3%
-27.2%$699.40M$327.08MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:TSLX) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners