Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX) Competitors

In the previous week, Golub Capital BDC had 6 more articles in the media than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Golub Capital BDC and 2 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Golub Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Sixth Street Specialty Lending's score of 0.93 indicating that Golub Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a net margin of 21.79% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 21.45%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.33% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending presently has a consensus target price of $19.83, suggesting a potential upside of 5.27%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus target price of $13.90, suggesting a potential upside of 6.03%. Given Golub Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Golub Capital BDC is more favorable than Sixth Street Specialty Lending.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Sixth Street Specialty Lending is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 176.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golub Capital BDC pays out 203.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment and 2 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Sixth Street Specialty Lending's score of 0.93 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

MidCap Financial Investment currently has a consensus price target of $11.11, suggesting a potential upside of 15.22%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $19.83, suggesting a potential upside of 5.27%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than Sixth Street Specialty Lending.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a net margin of 21.79% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.33% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 176.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance and New Mountain Finance both had 2 articles in the media. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Sixth Street Specialty Lending's score of 0.93 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

New Mountain Finance presently has a consensus price target of $8.60, suggesting a potential upside of 13.61%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $19.83, suggesting a potential upside of 5.27%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Sixth Street Specialty Lending.

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. New Mountain Finance pays out -212.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 176.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a net margin of 21.79% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -16.78%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.33% beat New Mountain Finance's return on equity.

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 6 more articles in the media than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 2 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's score of 0.82 indicating that Sixth Street Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Oaktree Specialty Lending. Sixth Street Specialty Lending is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 176.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a net margin of 21.79% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 14.45%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.33% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Oaktree Specialty Lending presently has a consensus target price of $11.83, indicating a potential downside of 9.39%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus target price of $19.83, indicating a potential upside of 5.27%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than Oaktree Specialty Lending.