Go Pro

Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD) Competitors

Goldman Sachs BDC logo
$8.82 +0.01 (+0.06%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$8.81 -0.01 (-0.16%)
As of 07:33 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GSBD vs. ARCC, CCAP, CGBD, MFIC, and OCSL

Should you buy Goldman Sachs BDC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Goldman Sachs BDC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Goldman Sachs BDC include Ares Capital (ARCC), Crescent Capital BDC (CCAP), Carlyle Secured Lending (CGBD), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), and Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Goldman Sachs BDC compare to Ares Capital?

Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) and Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Goldman Sachs BDC. Ares Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goldman Sachs BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ares Capital$3.05B4.39$1.30B$1.6311.44
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M2.72$119.27M$0.6513.58

Ares Capital presently has a consensus target price of $20.60, suggesting a potential upside of 10.52%. Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus target price of $8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 3.68%. Given Ares Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Goldman Sachs BDC
4 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.43

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 37.30% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC's net margin of 21.32%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 10.94% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ares Capital37.30% 9.85% 4.59%
Goldman Sachs BDC 21.32%10.94%4.66%

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. Ares Capital pays out 117.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 3 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Ares Capital and 7 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.19 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ares Capital
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Goldman Sachs BDC
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Ares Capital beats Goldman Sachs BDC on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Goldman Sachs BDC compare to Crescent Capital BDC?

Crescent Capital BDC (NASDAQ:CCAP) and Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to Crescent Capital BDC's net margin of 9.26%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 10.94% beat Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crescent Capital BDC9.26% 9.34% 4.04%
Goldman Sachs BDC 21.32%10.94%4.66%

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 5 more articles in the media than Crescent Capital BDC. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 2 mentions for Crescent Capital BDC. Goldman Sachs BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Crescent Capital BDC's score of 0.14 indicating that Goldman Sachs BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Crescent Capital BDC
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Goldman Sachs BDC
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Crescent Capital BDC presently has a consensus price target of $13.90, suggesting a potential upside of 26.82%. Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 3.68%. Given Crescent Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Crescent Capital BDC is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crescent Capital BDC
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
Goldman Sachs BDC
4 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.43

Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Capital BDC. Goldman Sachs BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crescent Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Capital BDC$167.29M2.41$34.51M$0.4126.73
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M2.72$119.27M$0.6513.58

Crescent Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.4%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. Crescent Capital BDC pays out 331.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Crescent Capital BDC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Goldman Sachs BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

49.5% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats Crescent Capital BDC on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Goldman Sachs BDC compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and Carlyle Secured Lending (NASDAQ:CGBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. Carlyle Secured Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.4%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Carlyle Secured Lending pays out 197.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 5 more articles in the media than Carlyle Secured Lending. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 2 mentions for Carlyle Secured Lending. Carlyle Secured Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.19 indicating that Carlyle Secured Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Carlyle Secured Lending
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to Carlyle Secured Lending's net margin of 19.52%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 10.94% beat Carlyle Secured Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC21.32% 10.94% 4.66%
Carlyle Secured Lending 19.52%8.99%4.01%

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Carlyle Secured Lending. Goldman Sachs BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Secured Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M2.72$119.27M$0.6513.58
Carlyle Secured Lending$255.57M2.85$69.97M$0.7114.76

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carlyle Secured Lending has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus target price of $8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 3.68%. Carlyle Secured Lending has a consensus target price of $12.50, suggesting a potential upside of 19.27%. Given Carlyle Secured Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Carlyle Secured Lending is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC
4 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.43
Carlyle Secured Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC and Carlyle Secured Lending tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Goldman Sachs BDC compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. Goldman Sachs BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M2.72$119.27M$0.6513.58
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M2.51$63.17M$0.04244.25

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 5 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 2 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.19 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 10.94% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC21.32% 10.94% 4.66%
MidCap Financial Investment 1.90%10.86%4.31%

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus target price of $8.50, indicating a potential downside of 3.68%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus target price of $11.46, indicating a potential upside of 17.34%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC
4 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.43
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.7%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats MidCap Financial Investment on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Goldman Sachs BDC compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) and Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 5 more articles in the media than Oaktree Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 2 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Oaktree Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.19 indicating that Oaktree Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Oaktree Specialty Lending
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Goldman Sachs BDC
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 16.66%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 10.94% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oaktree Specialty Lending16.66% 9.56% 4.60%
Goldman Sachs BDC 21.32%10.94%4.66%

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Oaktree Specialty Lending. Goldman Sachs BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oaktree Specialty Lending$316.80M3.35$33.92M$0.5721.11
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M2.72$119.27M$0.6513.58

Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 210.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Oaktree Specialty Lending currently has a consensus price target of $11.83, suggesting a potential downside of 1.63%. Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 3.68%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Oaktree Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Goldman Sachs BDC
4 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.43

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats Oaktree Specialty Lending on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Goldman Sachs BDC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GSBD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GSBD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GSBD vs. The Competition

MetricGoldman Sachs BDCFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$992.86M$1.30B$14.26B$23.46B
Dividend Yield14.51%13.16%5.70%4.02%
P/E Ratio13.5811.2620.4831.06
Price / Sales2.7213.8544.5419.75
Price / Cash5.556.9019.3418.64
Price / Book0.710.762.254.77
Net Income$119.27M$121.13M$1.13B$1.06B
7 Day Performance-3.87%-0.93%-0.76%-0.56%
1 Month Performance-4.53%-3.05%0.61%-0.11%
1 Year Performance-25.21%-24.48%12.27%16.64%

Goldman Sachs BDC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
2.1709 of 5 stars
$8.83
+0.1%
$8.50
-3.7%
-25.1%$992.86M$365.57M13.58N/A
ARCC
Ares Capital
3.3441 of 5 stars
$18.56
-0.9%
$20.60
+11.0%
-17.8%$13.45B$3.05B11.392,550
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
4.71 of 5 stars
$11.00
-1.1%
$13.90
+26.4%
-24.8%$409.73M$167.29M6.21N/A
CGBD
Carlyle Secured Lending
3.735 of 5 stars
$10.53
-3.3%
$12.50
+18.7%
-25.7%$756.82M$255.57M14.83N/A
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
2.203 of 5 stars
$9.99
+0.1%
$11.46
+14.8%
-25.0%$822.08M$320.88M6.48N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:GSBD) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners