Go Pro

Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD) Competitors

Goldman Sachs BDC logo
$9.64 +0.06 (+0.57%)
Closing price 09/11/2026 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$9.69 +0.05 (+0.57%)
As of 09/11/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GSBD vs. ARCC, CCAP, CGBD, MFIC, and OCSL

Should you buy Goldman Sachs BDC stock or one of its competitors? Goldman Sachs BDC's main competitors and comparable companies include Ares Capital (ARCC), Crescent Capital BDC (CCAP), Carlyle Secured Lending (CGBD), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), and Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Goldman Sachs BDC compare to Ares Capital?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.3%. Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 246.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ares Capital pays out 142.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 21 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Ares Capital and 0 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.70 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC Positive
Ares Capital Positive

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus target price of $8.75, suggesting a potential downside of 9.19%. Ares Capital has a consensus target price of $20.60, suggesting a potential upside of 4.36%. Given Ares Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC
3 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.57
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Goldman Sachs BDC. Ares Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goldman Sachs BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC$71.05M15.27$119.27M$0.5218.53
Ares Capital$1.17B12.07$1.30B$1.3514.62

Ares Capital has a net margin of 30.91% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC's net margin of 17.19%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 11.04% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC17.19% 11.04% 4.62%
Ares Capital 30.91%9.80%4.50%

Summary

Ares Capital beats Goldman Sachs BDC on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Goldman Sachs BDC compare to Crescent Capital BDC?

Crescent Capital BDC (NASDAQ:CCAP) and Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Crescent Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.7%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.3%. Crescent Capital BDC pays out -1,511.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 246.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Crescent Capital BDC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Crescent Capital BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Crescent Capital BDC presently has a consensus target price of $12.63, indicating a potential upside of 27.27%. Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus target price of $8.75, indicating a potential downside of 9.19%. Given Crescent Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Capital BDC is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crescent Capital BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Goldman Sachs BDC
3 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.57

Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

49.5% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Crescent Capital BDC had 19 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Crescent Capital BDC and 0 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. Goldman Sachs BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Crescent Capital BDC's score of 0.58 indicating that Goldman Sachs BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crescent Capital BDC Positive
Goldman Sachs BDC Positive

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 17.19% compared to Crescent Capital BDC's net margin of -2.02%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 11.04% beat Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crescent Capital BDC-2.02% 9.02% 3.82%
Goldman Sachs BDC 17.19%11.04%4.62%

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Capital BDC. Crescent Capital BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goldman Sachs BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Capital BDC$7.13M51.26$34.51M-$0.09N/A
Goldman Sachs BDC$71.05M15.27$119.27M$0.5218.53

Summary

Crescent Capital BDC beats Goldman Sachs BDC on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Goldman Sachs BDC compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and Carlyle Secured Lending (NASDAQ:CGBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Carlyle Secured Lending. Goldman Sachs BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Secured Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC$71.05M15.27$119.27M$0.5218.53
Carlyle Secured Lending$255.57M3.06$69.97M$0.5122.29

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carlyle Secured Lending has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Carlyle Secured Lending had 2 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Carlyle Secured Lending and 0 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. Carlyle Secured Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.70 indicating that Carlyle Secured Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC Positive
Carlyle Secured Lending Very Positive

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.3%. Carlyle Secured Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.3%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 246.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Carlyle Secured Lending pays out 274.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 17.19% compared to Carlyle Secured Lending's net margin of 14.26%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 11.04% beat Carlyle Secured Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC17.19% 11.04% 4.62%
Carlyle Secured Lending 14.26%8.85%3.90%

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus price target of $8.75, indicating a potential downside of 9.19%. Carlyle Secured Lending has a consensus price target of $12.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.94%. Given Carlyle Secured Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Carlyle Secured Lending is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC
3 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.57
Carlyle Secured Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC and Carlyle Secured Lending tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Goldman Sachs BDC compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

MidCap Financial Investment presently has a consensus target price of $11.11, suggesting a potential upside of 22.87%. Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus target price of $8.75, suggesting a potential downside of 9.19%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11
Goldman Sachs BDC
3 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.57

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment had 3 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment and 0 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.70 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment Positive
Goldman Sachs BDC Positive

Goldman Sachs BDC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goldman Sachs BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M2.32$63.17M-$0.36N/A
Goldman Sachs BDC$71.05M15.27$119.27M$0.5218.53

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.7%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.3%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 246.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 17.19% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 11.17% beat Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment-9.85% 11.17% 4.41%
Goldman Sachs BDC 17.19%11.04%4.62%

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

MidCap Financial Investment beats Goldman Sachs BDC on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Goldman Sachs BDC compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) and Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and earnings.

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Oaktree Specialty Lending. Goldman Sachs BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oaktree Specialty Lending$53.53M20.85$33.92M$0.4826.40
Goldman Sachs BDC$71.05M15.27$119.27M$0.5218.53

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 5 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 0 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. Oaktree Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.70 indicating that Oaktree Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Oaktree Specialty Lending Positive
Goldman Sachs BDC Positive

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 17.19% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 14.45%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 11.04% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oaktree Specialty Lending14.45% 9.70% 4.64%
Goldman Sachs BDC 17.19%11.04%4.62%

Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.5%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.3%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 246.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Oaktree Specialty Lending currently has a consensus price target of $11.83, indicating a potential downside of 6.60%. Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $8.75, indicating a potential downside of 9.19%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Oaktree Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Goldman Sachs BDC
3 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.57

Summary

Oaktree Specialty Lending beats Goldman Sachs BDC on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Goldman Sachs BDC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GSBD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GSBD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GSBD vs. The Competition

MetricGoldman Sachs BDCCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.08B$5.50B$14.01B$23.19B
Dividend Yield13.28%7.47%5.94%3.56%
P/E Ratio18.5330.5425.6728.69
Price / Sales15.271,230.74510.2199.79
Price / Cash6.0247.8940.1633.82
Price / Book0.773.532.754.74
Net Income$119.27M$418.04M$1.32B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.46%-1.39%-1.17%-1.99%
1 Month Performance0.36%-1.45%0.26%-2.68%
1 Year Performance-15.30%4.82%9.27%10.45%

Goldman Sachs BDC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
1.6164 of 5 stars
$9.64
+0.6%
$8.75
-9.2%
-15.6%$1.08B$71.05M18.53N/A
ARCC
Ares Capital
2.5671 of 5 stars
$20.07
+0.6%
$20.40
+1.6%
-11.9%$14.32B$3.05B14.872,550
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
4.6338 of 5 stars
$10.62
+0.8%
$13.10
+23.4%
-37.3%$388.36M$167.29MN/AN/A
CGBD
Carlyle Secured Lending
3.3232 of 5 stars
$11.98
+1.7%
$12.50
+4.3%
-17.2%$810.52M$255.57M23.49N/A
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
2.9174 of 5 stars
$9.81
+2.0%
$11.11
+13.2%
-28.1%$792.42M$320.88MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:GSBD) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners