Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD) Competitors

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to Crescent Capital BDC's net margin of 9.26%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 10.94% beat Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity.

49.5% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Crescent Capital BDC and Crescent Capital BDC both had 1 articles in the media. Goldman Sachs BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Crescent Capital BDC's score of -0.20 indicating that Goldman Sachs BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Crescent Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.9%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.5%. Crescent Capital BDC pays out 409.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Crescent Capital BDC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Crescent Capital BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Capital BDC. Goldman Sachs BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crescent Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Crescent Capital BDC presently has a consensus target price of $13.90, indicating a potential upside of 23.34%. Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus target price of $9.17, indicating a potential downside of 3.00%. Given Crescent Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Crescent Capital BDC is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

24.5% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Carlyle Secured Lending has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Carlyle Secured Lending. Goldman Sachs BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Secured Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Carlyle Secured Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.1%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.5%. Carlyle Secured Lending pays out 197.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Carlyle Secured Lending currently has a consensus target price of $12.50, suggesting a potential upside of 16.60%. Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus target price of $9.17, suggesting a potential downside of 3.00%. Given Carlyle Secured Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Carlyle Secured Lending is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to Carlyle Secured Lending's net margin of 19.52%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 10.94% beat Carlyle Secured Lending's return on equity.

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 1 more articles in the media than Carlyle Secured Lending. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 0 mentions for Carlyle Secured Lending. Carlyle Secured Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Goldman Sachs BDC'saverage media sentiment score.

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus target price of $9.17, indicating a potential downside of 3.00%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus target price of $11.54, indicating a potential upside of 16.76%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.5%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 10.94% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC and Goldman Sachs BDC both had 1 articles in the media. Goldman Sachs BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled MidCap Financial Investment'saverage media sentiment score.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. Goldman Sachs BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.5%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.4%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 210.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Oaktree Specialty Lending. Goldman Sachs BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 1 more articles in the media than Oaktree Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 0 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Goldman Sachs BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Oaktree Specialty Lending'saverage media sentiment score.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 16.66%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 10.94% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Goldman Sachs BDC presently has a consensus price target of $9.17, indicating a potential downside of 3.00%. Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $11.83, indicating a potential upside of 2.45%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.