Free Trial

MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC) Competitors

MidCap Financial Investment logo
$10.84 +0.01 (+0.09%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$10.85 +0.01 (+0.09%)
As of 04:36 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MFIC vs. ARCC, GBDC, NMFC, SLRC, and BBDC

Should you buy MidCap Financial Investment stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares MidCap Financial Investment with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with MidCap Financial Investment include Ares Capital (ARCC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), SLR Investment (SLRC), and Barings Bdc (BBDC). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to Ares Capital?

Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and valuation.

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.4%. Ares Capital pays out 117.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 37.30% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 10.86% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ares Capital37.30% 9.85% 4.59%
MidCap Financial Investment 1.90%10.86%4.31%

Ares Capital presently has a consensus price target of $20.75, indicating a potential upside of 10.31%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.54, indicating a potential upside of 6.42%. Given Ares Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 11 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ares Capital and 2 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.63 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ares Capital
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. Ares Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ares Capital$3.05B4.43$1.30B$1.6311.54
MidCap Financial Investment$22.82M39.14$63.17M$0.04271.00

Summary

Ares Capital beats MidCap Financial Investment on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to Golub Capital BDC?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

MidCap Financial Investment presently has a consensus price target of $11.54, suggesting a potential upside of 6.42%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.95%. Given Golub Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Golub Capital BDC is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
Golub Capital BDC
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.4%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golub Capital BDC pays out 171.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Golub Capital BDC had 3 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Golub Capital BDC and 2 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. Golub Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.63 indicating that Golub Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Golub Capital BDC
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 24.64% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 10.86% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment1.90% 10.86% 4.31%
Golub Capital BDC 24.64%10.20%4.47%

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. Golub Capital BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment$22.82M39.14$63.17M$0.04271.00
Golub Capital BDC$236.31M14.43$376.65M$0.7717.00

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats MidCap Financial Investment on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to New Mountain Finance?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and media sentiment.

MidCap Financial Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment$22.82M39.14$63.17M$0.04271.00
New Mountain Finance$327.08M2.31$16.49M-$0.58N/A

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 1 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 2 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.63 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
New Mountain Finance
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 1.90% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 11.14% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment1.90% 10.86% 4.31%
New Mountain Finance -18.65%11.14%4.63%

MidCap Financial Investment presently has a consensus price target of $11.54, suggesting a potential upside of 6.42%. New Mountain Finance has a consensus price target of $9.25, suggesting a potential upside of 15.48%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
New Mountain Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.71

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.4%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.0%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out -220.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats MidCap Financial Investment on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to SLR Investment?

SLR Investment (NASDAQ:SLRC) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, SLR Investment and SLR Investment both had 2 articles in the media. SLR Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.63 indicating that SLR Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
SLR Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

35.3% of SLR Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 8.8% of SLR Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

SLR Investment currently has a consensus price target of $14.40, indicating a potential upside of 9.26%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.54, indicating a potential upside of 6.42%. Given SLR Investment's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SLR Investment
3 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

SLR Investment has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. SLR Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SLR Investment$101.13M7.11$92.54M$1.648.04
MidCap Financial Investment$22.82M39.14$63.17M$0.04271.00

SLR Investment has a net margin of 41.81% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 10.86% beat SLR Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SLR Investment41.81% 8.33% 3.25%
MidCap Financial Investment 1.90%10.86%4.31%

SLR Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.4%. SLR Investment pays out 75.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

SLR Investment has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

SLR Investment beats MidCap Financial Investment on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to Barings Bdc?

Barings Bdc (NYSE:BBDC) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Barings Bdc. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment and 1 mentions for Barings Bdc. Barings Bdc's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.63 indicating that Barings Bdc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Barings Bdc
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Barings Bdc has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. Barings Bdc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Barings Bdc$279.21M3.26$101.92M$0.8510.23
MidCap Financial Investment$22.82M39.14$63.17M$0.04271.00

Barings Bdc has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Barings Bdc has a net margin of 32.45% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 10.86% beat Barings Bdc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Barings Bdc32.45% 10.08% 4.33%
MidCap Financial Investment 1.90%10.86%4.31%

Barings Bdc presently has a consensus target price of $9.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.26%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus target price of $11.54, indicating a potential upside of 6.42%. Given Barings Bdc's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Barings Bdc is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Barings Bdc
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

Barings Bdc pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.4%. Barings Bdc pays out 122.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Barings Bdc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

44.1% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Barings Bdc beats MidCap Financial Investment on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MidCap Financial Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MFIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MFIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MFIC vs. The Competition

MetricMidCap Financial InvestmentFIN IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$892.92M$7.10B$13.51B$12.57B
Dividend Yield11.70%5.80%5.78%5.25%
P/E Ratio271.0791.7824.0526.15
Price / Sales39.1412.45142.23118.48
Price / Cash5.9165.4419.9656.80
Price / Book0.762.742.167.26
Net Income$63.17M$304.02M$1.13B$337.24M
7 Day Performance1.78%1.01%0.46%3.91%
1 Month Performance-6.39%0.32%0.30%5.84%
1 Year Performance-16.68%18.65%12.61%38.37%

MidCap Financial Investment Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
2.8279 of 5 stars
$10.84
+0.1%
$11.54
+6.4%
-16.4%$892.92M$22.82M271.07N/A
ARCC
Ares Capital
3.9767 of 5 stars
$18.80
+1.1%
$20.75
+10.4%
-14.2%$13.50B$3.05B11.532,550
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
3.4872 of 5 stars
$13.06
+1.3%
$14.00
+7.2%
-13.5%$3.40B$870.78M16.96N/A
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
4.308 of 5 stars
$8.02
+1.0%
$9.25
+15.3%
-25.4%$757.49M$327.08MN/AN/A
SLRC
SLR Investment
4.0222 of 5 stars
$13.09
+0.9%
$14.40
+10.0%
-21.3%$714.19M$218.54M7.98N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MFIC) was last updated on 5/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners