Go Pro

MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC) Competitors

MidCap Financial Investment logo
$9.62 +0.02 (+0.21%)
As of 09/4/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

MFIC vs. ARCC, GBDC, NMFC, SLRC, and BBDC

Should you buy MidCap Financial Investment stock or one of its competitors? MidCap Financial Investment's main competitors and comparable companies include Ares Capital (ARCC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), SLR Investment (SLRC), and Barings Bdc (BBDC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to Ares Capital?

Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 10 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Ares Capital and 1 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.50 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ares Capital
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. Ares Capital pays out 142.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ares Capital$3.05B4.71$1.30B$1.3514.84
MidCap Financial Investment-$11.90M-66.62$63.17M-$0.36N/A

Ares Capital has a net margin of 30.91% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 11.17% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ares Capital30.91% 9.80% 4.50%
MidCap Financial Investment -9.85%11.17%4.41%

Ares Capital currently has a consensus price target of $20.60, suggesting a potential upside of 2.79%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.11, suggesting a potential upside of 15.46%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than Ares Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11

Summary

Ares Capital beats MidCap Financial Investment on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to Golub Capital BDC?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Golub Capital BDC had 3 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Golub Capital BDC and 1 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. Golub Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.50 indicating that Golub Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Golub Capital BDC
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MidCap Financial Investment presently has a consensus price target of $11.11, suggesting a potential upside of 15.46%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $13.90, suggesting a potential upside of 6.92%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than Golub Capital BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11
Golub Capital BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment-$11.90M-66.62$63.17M-$0.36N/A
Golub Capital BDC$203.39M16.60$376.65M$0.6520.00

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 203.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 21.45% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 11.17% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment-9.85% 11.17% 4.41%
Golub Capital BDC 21.45%9.91%4.39%

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats MidCap Financial Investment on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to New Mountain Finance?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

MidCap Financial Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Mountain Finance. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Mountain Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance$327.08M2.16$16.49M-$0.47N/A
MidCap Financial Investment-$11.90M-66.62$63.17M-$0.36N/A

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 1 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 1 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.69 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.50 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.4%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. New Mountain Finance pays out -212.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus price target of $8.60, indicating a potential upside of 14.97%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.11, indicating a potential upside of 15.46%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than New Mountain Finance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
New Mountain Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of -9.85% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -16.78%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 11.17% beat New Mountain Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance-16.78% 10.94% 4.58%
MidCap Financial Investment -9.85%11.17%4.41%

Summary

New Mountain Finance and MidCap Financial Investment tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to SLR Investment?

SLR Investment (NASDAQ:SLRC) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

SLR Investment has a net margin of 35.20% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 11.17% beat SLR Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SLR Investment35.20% 7.96% 3.09%
MidCap Financial Investment -9.85%11.17%4.41%

35.3% of SLR Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.8% of SLR Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

SLR Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. SLR Investment pays out 91.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

SLR Investment has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, SLR Investment had 3 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for SLR Investment and 1 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. SLR Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.74 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.50 indicating that SLR Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
SLR Investment
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

SLR Investment currently has a consensus price target of $14.10, suggesting a potential upside of 12.17%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.11, suggesting a potential upside of 15.46%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than SLR Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SLR Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11

SLR Investment has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SLR Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SLR Investment$85.42M8.03$92.54M$1.359.31
MidCap Financial Investment-$11.90M-66.62$63.17M-$0.36N/A

Summary

SLR Investment beats MidCap Financial Investment on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to Barings Bdc?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and Barings Bdc (NYSE:BBDC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

MidCap Financial Investment presently has a consensus target price of $11.11, indicating a potential upside of 15.46%. Barings Bdc has a consensus target price of $9.75, indicating a potential upside of 8.21%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than Barings Bdc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11
Barings Bdc
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

Barings Bdc has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Barings Bdc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment-$11.90M-66.62$63.17M-$0.36N/A
Barings Bdc$279.21M3.38$101.92M$0.8310.86

In the previous week, Barings Bdc had 4 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Barings Bdc and 1 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. Barings Bdc's average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.50 indicating that Barings Bdc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Barings Bdc
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. Barings Bdc pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.5%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Barings Bdc pays out 125.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. MidCap Financial Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.1% of Barings Bdc shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Barings Bdc shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barings Bdc has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Barings Bdc has a net margin of 32.73% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 11.17% beat Barings Bdc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment-9.85% 11.17% 4.41%
Barings Bdc 32.73%10.07%4.38%

Summary

Barings Bdc beats MidCap Financial Investment on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MidCap Financial Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MFIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MFIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MFIC vs. The Competition

MetricMidCap Financial InvestmentCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$792.43M$5.72B$14.00B$12.91B
Dividend Yield12.92%7.42%5.89%9.14%
P/E Ratio-26.7231.4426.1825.45
Price / Sales-66.621,211.13508.47125.90
Price / Cash5.3148.1439.9652.44
Price / Book0.721.982.136.17
Net Income$63.17M$419.47M$1.32B$350.08M
7 Day PerformanceN/A7.28%3.84%-0.14%
1 Month Performance-0.93%0.60%1.69%0.94%
1 Year Performance-26.17%5.65%11.19%14.02%

MidCap Financial Investment Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
3.0079 of 5 stars
$9.62
+0.2%
$11.11
+15.5%
-26.2%$792.43M-$11.90MN/AN/A
ARCC
Ares Capital
2.6823 of 5 stars
$19.91
-0.8%
$20.60
+3.5%
-10.7%$14.30B$3.05B14.752,550
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
3.4216 of 5 stars
$12.89
-2.1%
$13.90
+7.8%
-11.9%$3.35B$870.78M19.83N/A
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
2.8864 of 5 stars
$7.48
-2.0%
$8.60
+15.0%
-29.6%$706.49M$327.08MN/AN/A
SLRC
SLR Investment
3.7949 of 5 stars
$12.65
-0.7%
$14.10
+11.5%
-24.7%$690.18M$218.54M9.37N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MFIC) was last updated on 9/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners