NASDAQ:NMFC

New Mountain Finance Competitors

$13.06
+0.10 (+0.77 %)
(As of 04/21/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$12.92
Now: $13.06
$13.10
50-Day Range
$12.38
MA: $12.77
$13.39
52-Week Range
$6.34
Now: $13.06
$13.44
Volume191,791 shs
Average Volume438,128 shs
Market Capitalization$1.26 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield9.26%
Beta1.39

Competitors

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) Vs. PSEC, GBDC, TSLX, PFLT, TPVG, and GAIN

Should you be buying NMFC stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investors, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to New Mountain Finance, including Prospect Capital (PSEC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX), PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (TPVG), and Gladstone Investment (GAIN).

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and Prospect Capital (NASDAQ:PSEC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Volatility & Risk

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Prospect Capital has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares New Mountain Finance and Prospect Capital's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance$276.51 million4.57$112.56 million$1.2710.28
Prospect Capital$623.53 million5.01$-16,220,000.00$0.7211.21

New Mountain Finance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Prospect Capital. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Prospect Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares New Mountain Finance and Prospect Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Mountain Finance4.94%10.30%3.93%
Prospect Capital22.08%8.16%4.72%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.3% of Prospect Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.8% of Prospect Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Prospect Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. New Mountain Finance pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Prospect Capital pays out 100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Prospect Capital has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for New Mountain Finance and Prospect Capital, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Mountain Finance02202.50
Prospect Capital10001.00

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus price target of $11.1667, indicating a potential downside of 14.50%. Prospect Capital has a consensus price target of $4.50, indicating a potential downside of 44.24%. Given New Mountain Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Prospect Capital.

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats Prospect Capital on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Dividends

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. New Mountain Finance pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golub Capital BDC pays out 95.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golub Capital BDC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk & Volatility

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for New Mountain Finance and Golub Capital BDC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Mountain Finance02202.50
Golub Capital BDC02002.00

New Mountain Finance presently has a consensus target price of $11.1667, indicating a potential downside of 14.50%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential downside of 25.90%. Given New Mountain Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Golub Capital BDC.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares New Mountain Finance and Golub Capital BDC's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance$276.51 million4.57$112.56 million$1.2710.28
Golub Capital BDC$298.95 million8.68$54.87 million$1.2212.72

New Mountain Finance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Golub Capital BDC. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares New Mountain Finance and Golub Capital BDC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Mountain Finance4.94%10.30%3.93%
Golub Capital BDC18.35%7.95%3.99%

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats Golub Capital BDC on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for New Mountain Finance and Sixth Street Specialty Lending, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Mountain Finance02202.50
Sixth Street Specialty Lending00703.00

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus price target of $11.1667, indicating a potential downside of 14.50%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $19.1429, indicating a potential downside of 14.27%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than New Mountain Finance.

Profitability

This table compares New Mountain Finance and Sixth Street Specialty Lending's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Mountain Finance4.94%10.30%3.93%
Sixth Street Specialty Lending59.17%13.52%6.95%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.7% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. New Mountain Finance pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 84.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares New Mountain Finance and Sixth Street Specialty Lending's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance$276.51 million4.57$112.56 million$1.2710.28
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$251.49 million6.42$128.28 million$1.9411.52

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats New Mountain Finance on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NASDAQ:PFLT) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Profitability

This table compares PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and New Mountain Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital19.28%9.04%3.59%
New Mountain Finance4.94%10.30%3.93%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and New Mountain Finance's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$95.49 million5.16$18.41 million$1.1211.35
New Mountain Finance$276.51 million4.57$112.56 million$1.2710.28

New Mountain Finance has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.97, indicating that its share price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and New Mountain Finance, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital01202.67
New Mountain Finance02202.50

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital presently has a consensus target price of $10.50, indicating a potential downside of 17.39%. New Mountain Finance has a consensus target price of $11.1667, indicating a potential downside of 14.50%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital.

Dividends

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

29.3% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares New Mountain Finance and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance$276.51 million4.57$112.56 million$1.2710.28
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC$73.39 million6.43$31.76 million$1.549.93

New Mountain Finance has higher revenue and earnings than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Mountain Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.9, suggesting that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. New Mountain Finance pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 93.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for New Mountain Finance and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Mountain Finance02202.50
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC02402.67

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus target price of $11.1667, suggesting a potential downside of 14.50%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a consensus target price of $10.9583, suggesting a potential downside of 28.33%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

Profitability

This table compares New Mountain Finance and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Mountain Finance4.94%10.30%3.93%
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC40.65%12.21%6.54%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.9% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC beats New Mountain Finance on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

Risk & Volatility

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for New Mountain Finance and Gladstone Investment, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Mountain Finance02202.50
Gladstone Investment01002.00

New Mountain Finance presently has a consensus target price of $11.1667, indicating a potential downside of 14.50%. Given New Mountain Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Gladstone Investment.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares New Mountain Finance and Gladstone Investment's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance$276.51 million4.57$112.56 million$1.2710.28
Gladstone Investment$61.92 million7.60$-7,230,000.00$0.9015.76

New Mountain Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Investment. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gladstone Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. New Mountain Finance pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares New Mountain Finance and Gladstone Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Mountain Finance4.94%10.30%3.93%
Gladstone Investment-34.86%5.53%3.52%

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats Gladstone Investment on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


New Mountain Finance Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Prospect Capital logo
PSEC
Prospect Capital
1.3$8.07+1.9%$3.12 billion$623.53 million23.06News Coverage
Golub Capital BDC logo
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
1.4$15.52+1.0%$2.60 billion$298.95 million110.87
Sixth Street Specialty Lending logo
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
1.7$22.34+0.5%$1.61 billion$251.49 million9.27Analyst Report
News Coverage
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital logo
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1.0$12.71+0.6%$492.77 million$95.49 million27.04Decrease in Short Interest
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC logo
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC
1.4$15.29+0.8%$472.19 million$73.39 million12.53
Gladstone Investment logo
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
1.2$14.18+0.2%$470.85 million$61.92 million-26.26Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Capital Southwest logo
CSWC
Capital Southwest
1.4$23.67+1.3%$470.28 million$62.04 million-59.18Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
PennantPark Investment logo
PNNT
PennantPark Investment
1.3$6.47+0.5%$433.78 million$100.22 million-26.96
Stellus Capital Investment logo
SCM
Stellus Capital Investment
1.2$13.61+0.2%$265.20 million$58.91 million54.44News Coverage
PTMN
Portman Ridge Finance
1.2$2.37+0.8%$178.21 million$26.50 million-8.17
Safeguard Scientifics logo
SFE
Safeguard Scientifics
0.9$6.21+0.2%$130.06 millionN/A-4.17
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC logo
FCRD
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC
1.2$4.26+0.7%$128.26 million$52.49 million-2.34
OFS Capital logo
OFS
OFS Capital
1.1$8.81+0.6%$118.13 million$52.52 million-16.31
Investcorp Credit Management BDC logo
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC
1.2$5.72+0.5%$79.59 million$34.46 million-3.79
TURN
180 Degree Capital
0.8$7.27+0.3%$75.63 millionN/A0.00
Rand Capital logo
RAND
Rand Capital
1.3$18.66+1.8%$48.18 million$2.72 million10.72High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Capitala Finance logo
CPTA
Capitala Finance
1.1$17.12+10.0%$46.41 million$44.03 million-1.28High Trading Volume
Live Ventures logo
LIVE
Live Ventures
0.9$28.84+0.2%$44.85 million$191.70 million-24.44
Firsthand Technology Value Fund logo
SVVC
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
0.8$6.14+1.6%$41.63 million$1.79 million-0.79
LYL
Dragon Victory International
0.4$1.32+9.8%$15.36 million$10,000.000.00
This page was last updated on 4/21/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.