Does the media prefer ARCC or NMFC?

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 13 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Ares Capital and 4 mentions for New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Ares Capital's score of 0.49 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ares Capital 3 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral New Mountain Finance 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CGBD or NMFC?

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 2 more articles in the media than Carlyle Secured Lending. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 2 mentions for Carlyle Secured Lending. Carlyle Secured Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat New Mountain Finance's score of 0.90 indicating that Carlyle Secured Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Carlyle Secured Lending 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive New Mountain Finance 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer NMFC or GBDC?

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance and New Mountain Finance both had 4 articles in the media. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Golub Capital BDC's score of 0.72 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment New Mountain Finance 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Golub Capital BDC 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to NMFC or OCSL?

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 1 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 4 mentions for New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's score of 0.14 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment New Mountain Finance 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Oaktree Specialty Lending 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

New Mountain Finance (NMFC) Competitors

$7.95 +0.06 (+0.76%)

Closing price 06/10/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$7.98 +0.03 (+0.43%)

As of 06/10/2026 07:56 PM Eastern

Compare

NMFC vs. ARCC, CGBD, GBDC, MFIC, and OCSL

Should you buy New Mountain Finance stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares New Mountain Finance with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with New Mountain Finance include Ares Capital (ARCC), Carlyle Secured Lending (CGBD), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), and Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Ares Capital?

Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 13 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Ares Capital and 4 mentions for New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Ares Capital's score of 0.49 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ares Capital	3 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
New Mountain Finance	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ares Capital currently has a consensus target price of $20.75, suggesting a potential upside of 8.98%. New Mountain Finance has a consensus target price of $9.25, suggesting a potential upside of 16.35%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Ares Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ares Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
New Mountain Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.1%. Ares Capital pays out 117.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out -220.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ares Capital	$3.05B	4.48	$1.30B	$1.63	11.68
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	2.30	$16.49M	-$0.58	N/A

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 37.30% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 11.14% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ares Capital	37.30%	9.85%	4.59%
New Mountain Finance	-18.65%	11.14%	4.63%

Summary

Ares Capital beats New Mountain Finance on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Carlyle Secured Lending (NASDAQ:CGBD) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Carlyle Secured Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.8%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.1%. Carlyle Secured Lending pays out 197.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out -220.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Carlyle Secured Lending has a net margin of 19.52% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 11.14% beat Carlyle Secured Lending's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Carlyle Secured Lending	19.52%	8.99%	4.01%
New Mountain Finance	-18.65%	11.14%	4.63%

Carlyle Secured Lending has higher earnings, but lower revenue than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Secured Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Carlyle Secured Lending	$63.06M	12.10	$69.97M	$0.71	15.46
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	2.30	$16.49M	-$0.58	N/A

Carlyle Secured Lending has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Carlyle Secured Lending currently has a consensus target price of $12.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.84%. New Mountain Finance has a consensus target price of $9.25, suggesting a potential upside of 16.35%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Carlyle Secured Lending.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Carlyle Secured Lending	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43
New Mountain Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 2 more articles in the media than Carlyle Secured Lending. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 2 mentions for Carlyle Secured Lending. Carlyle Secured Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat New Mountain Finance's score of 0.90 indicating that Carlyle Secured Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Carlyle Secured Lending	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
New Mountain Finance	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

24.5% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Carlyle Secured Lending and New Mountain Finance tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Golub Capital BDC?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance and New Mountain Finance both had 4 articles in the media. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Golub Capital BDC's score of 0.72 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Golub Capital BDC	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.1%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. New Mountain Finance pays out -220.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 171.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	2.30	$16.49M	-$0.58	N/A
Golub Capital BDC	$870.78M	3.95	$376.65M	$0.77	17.16

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus price target of $9.25, indicating a potential upside of 16.35%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.98%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Golub Capital BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
New Mountain Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71
Golub Capital BDC	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 24.64% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 11.14% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance	-18.65%	11.14%	4.63%
Golub Capital BDC	24.64%	10.20%	4.47%

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats New Mountain Finance on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Mountain Finance compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and profitability.

New Mountain Finance presently has a consensus price target of $9.25, indicating a potential upside of 16.35%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.54, indicating a potential upside of 12.76%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
New Mountain Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71
MidCap Financial Investment	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.22

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 3 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 1 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat New Mountain Finance's score of 0.90 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance	Positive
MidCap Financial Investment	Very Positive

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.1%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.1%. New Mountain Finance pays out -220.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 1.90% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 11.14% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance	-18.65%	11.14%	4.63%
MidCap Financial Investment	1.90%	10.86%	4.31%

MidCap Financial Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	2.30	$16.49M	-$0.58	N/A
MidCap Financial Investment	$320.88M	2.63	$63.17M	$0.04	255.75

Summary

New Mountain Finance and MidCap Financial Investment tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus target price of $9.25, indicating a potential upside of 16.35%. Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus target price of $11.83, indicating a potential downside of 1.39%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
New Mountain Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71
Oaktree Specialty Lending	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.1%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.3%. New Mountain Finance pays out -220.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 280.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 16.66% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 11.14% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance	-18.65%	11.14%	4.63%
Oaktree Specialty Lending	16.66%	9.56%	4.60%

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 1 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 4 mentions for New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's score of 0.14 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Oaktree Specialty Lending	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	2.30	$16.49M	-$0.58	N/A
Oaktree Specialty Lending	$316.80M	3.34	$33.92M	$0.57	21.05

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats Oaktree Specialty Lending on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get New Mountain Finance News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NMFC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NMFC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	New Mountain Finance	FIN Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$745.23M	$1.31B	$13.57B	$11.95B
Dividend Yield	16.22%	13.30%	5.78%	5.61%
P/E Ratio	-13.71	11.02	19.97	23.63
Price / Sales	2.30	15.07	133.65	103.14
Price / Cash	2.72	7.01	19.31	54.72
Price / Book	0.69	0.77	2.20	6.70
Net Income	$16.49M	$121.13M	$1.14B	$337.26M
7 Day Performance	-0.75%	-0.79%	0.28%	-2.43%
1 Month Performance	-1.49%	-2.67%	0.46%	0.19%
1 Year Performance	-26.32%	-21.10%	10.25%	23.15%

New Mountain Finance Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NMFC New Mountain Finance	3.4761 of 5 stars	$7.95 +0.8%	$9.25 +16.4%	-26.5%	$745.23M	$327.08M	N/A	N/A
ARCC Ares Capital	3.3211 of 5 stars	$18.91 +1.3%	$20.75 +9.7%	-14.8%	$13.41B	$1.36B	11.60	2,550
CGBD Carlyle Secured Lending	3.8557 of 5 stars	$10.79 +2.0%	$12.50 +15.8%	-22.2%	$735.28M	$63.06M	15.20	N/A	Positive News
GBDC Golub Capital BDC	2.5533 of 5 stars	$13.19 +2.2%	$14.00 +6.1%	-13.5%	$3.36B	$870.78M	17.13	N/A
MFIC MidCap Financial Investment	2.0297 of 5 stars	$10.81 +3.9%	$11.54 +6.7%	-19.4%	$856.67M	$320.88M	270.32	N/A	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:NMFC) was last updated on 6/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

New Mountain Finance (NMFC) Competitors

NMFC vs. ARCC, CGBD, GBDC, MFIC, and OCSL

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Ares Capital?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Golub Capital BDC?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NMFC vs. The Competition

New Mountain Finance Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

New Mountain Finance (NMFC) Competitors

NMFC vs. ARCC, CGBD, GBDC, MFIC, and OCSL

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Ares Capital?

Does the media prefer ARCC or NMFC?

Do analysts rate ARCC or NMFC?

Is ARCC or NMFC a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, ARCC or NMFC?

Which has more risk and volatility, ARCC or NMFC?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ARCC or NMFC?

Is ARCC or NMFC more profitable?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Is CGBD or NMFC a better dividend stock?

Is CGBD or NMFC more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CGBD or NMFC?

Which has more volatility & risk, CGBD or NMFC?

Do analysts prefer CGBD or NMFC?

Does the media refer more to CGBD or NMFC?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CGBD or NMFC?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Golub Capital BDC?

Which has more risk and volatility, NMFC or GBDC?

Does the media prefer NMFC or GBDC?

Is NMFC or GBDC a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, NMFC or GBDC?

Do analysts prefer NMFC or GBDC?

Is NMFC or GBDC more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of NMFC or GBDC?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Do analysts prefer NMFC or MFIC?

Does the media favor NMFC or MFIC?

Is NMFC or MFIC a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in NMFC or MFIC?

Which has more volatility & risk, NMFC or MFIC?

Is NMFC or MFIC more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, NMFC or MFIC?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Do analysts rate NMFC or OCSL?

Is NMFC or OCSL a better dividend stock?

Is NMFC or OCSL more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, NMFC or OCSL?

Does the media refer more to NMFC or OCSL?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of NMFC or OCSL?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, NMFC or OCSL?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NMFC vs. The Competition

New Mountain Finance Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools