New Mountain Finance (NMFC) Competitors

$7.18 +0.01 (+0.07%)

As of 12:54 PM Eastern

NMFC vs. ARCC, CGBD, GBDC, MFIC, and OCSL

Should you buy New Mountain Finance stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares New Mountain Finance with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with New Mountain Finance include Ares Capital (ARCC), Carlyle Secured Lending (CGBD), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), and Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Ares Capital?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus target price of $9.25, suggesting a potential upside of 28.92%. Ares Capital has a consensus target price of $20.65, suggesting a potential upside of 9.89%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Ares Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
New Mountain Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71
Ares Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.9%. Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. New Mountain Finance pays out -172.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ares Capital pays out 117.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 12 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ares Capital and 1 mentions for New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Ares Capital's score of 0.89 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance	Very Positive
Ares Capital	Positive

Ares Capital has a net margin of 37.30% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 11.14% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance	-18.65%	11.14%	4.63%
Ares Capital	37.30%	9.85%	4.59%

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	2.07	$16.49M	-$0.58	N/A
Ares Capital	$3.05B	4.42	$1.30B	$1.63	11.53

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ares Capital beats New Mountain Finance on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and Carlyle Secured Lending (NASDAQ:CGBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.9%. Carlyle Secured Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.7%. New Mountain Finance pays out -172.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carlyle Secured Lending pays out 225.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Carlyle Secured Lending had 1 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Carlyle Secured Lending and 1 mentions for New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Carlyle Secured Lending's score of 1.20 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance	Very Positive
Carlyle Secured Lending	Positive

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carlyle Secured Lending has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus price target of $9.25, suggesting a potential upside of 28.92%. Carlyle Secured Lending has a consensus price target of $12.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.52%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Carlyle Secured Lending.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
New Mountain Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71
Carlyle Secured Lending	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

Carlyle Secured Lending has a net margin of 19.52% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 11.14% beat Carlyle Secured Lending's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance	-18.65%	11.14%	4.63%
Carlyle Secured Lending	19.52%	8.99%	4.01%

Carlyle Secured Lending has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Secured Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	2.07	$16.49M	-$0.58	N/A
Carlyle Secured Lending	$255.57M	2.97	$69.97M	$0.71	15.37

Summary

Carlyle Secured Lending beats New Mountain Finance on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Golub Capital BDC?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.9%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. New Mountain Finance pays out -172.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 171.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	2.07	$16.49M	-$0.58	N/A
Golub Capital BDC	$870.78M	3.86	$376.65M	$0.77	16.77

New Mountain Finance presently has a consensus target price of $9.25, suggesting a potential upside of 28.92%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.40%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Golub Capital BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
New Mountain Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71
Golub Capital BDC	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

In the previous week, Golub Capital BDC had 5 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Golub Capital BDC and 1 mentions for New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Golub Capital BDC's score of 1.21 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance	Very Positive
Golub Capital BDC	Positive

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 24.64% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 11.14% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance	-18.65%	11.14%	4.63%
Golub Capital BDC	24.64%	10.20%	4.47%

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats New Mountain Finance on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Mountain Finance compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 1.90% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 11.14% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment	1.90%	10.86%	4.31%
New Mountain Finance	-18.65%	11.14%	4.63%

MidCap Financial Investment currently has a consensus price target of $11.54, suggesting a potential upside of 13.54%. New Mountain Finance has a consensus price target of $9.25, suggesting a potential upside of 28.92%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.22
New Mountain Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

MidCap Financial Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment	$320.88M	2.61	$63.17M	$0.04	254.00
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	2.07	$16.49M	-$0.58	N/A

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment and MidCap Financial Investment both had 1 articles in the media. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat New Mountain Finance's score of 1.87 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment	Very Positive
New Mountain Finance	Very Positive

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.2%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.9%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out -172.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

MidCap Financial Investment beats New Mountain Finance on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher earnings, but lower revenue than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oaktree Specialty Lending	$316.80M	3.36	$33.92M	$0.57	21.22
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	2.07	$16.49M	-$0.58	N/A

Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.9%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 210.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out -172.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 2 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 1 mentions for New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's score of 0.88 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Oaktree Specialty Lending	Positive
New Mountain Finance	Very Positive

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Oaktree Specialty Lending presently has a consensus target price of $11.83, suggesting a potential downside of 2.17%. New Mountain Finance has a consensus target price of $9.25, suggesting a potential upside of 28.92%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oaktree Specialty Lending	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
New Mountain Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 16.66% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 11.14% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oaktree Specialty Lending	16.66%	9.56%	4.60%
New Mountain Finance	-18.65%	11.14%	4.63%

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats Oaktree Specialty Lending on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get New Mountain Finance News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NMFC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NMFC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	New Mountain Finance	FIN Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$677.68M	$1.31B	$13.98B	$12.58B
Dividend Yield	13.95%	13.26%	5.69%	6.16%
P/E Ratio	-12.37	11.09	20.64	25.45
Price / Sales	2.07	14.39	130.28	103.18
Price / Cash	2.47	6.98	19.75	58.59
Price / Book	0.62	0.78	2.27	6.65
Net Income	$16.49M	$121.13M	$1.14B	$336.83M
7 Day Performance	3.24%	4.00%	1.49%	3.00%
1 Month Performance	-11.42%	-1.94%	2.37%	0.56%
1 Year Performance	-32.18%	-20.60%	13.88%	30.42%

New Mountain Finance Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NMFC New Mountain Finance	3.1355 of 5 stars	$7.18 +0.1%	$9.25 +28.9%	-32.0%	$677.68M	$327.08M	N/A	N/A	Positive News
ARCC Ares Capital	3.7209 of 5 stars	$17.82 -0.1%	$20.65 +15.9%	-15.6%	$12.79B	$3.05B	10.93	2,550
CGBD Carlyle Secured Lending	3.4396 of 5 stars	$10.70 -0.3%	$12.50 +16.9%	-23.0%	$743.34M	$63.06M	15.07	N/A	Positive News
GBDC Golub Capital BDC	3.0109 of 5 stars	$12.32 +0.2%	$14.00 +13.7%	-12.1%	$3.21B	$870.78M	15.99	N/A	Positive News
MFIC MidCap Financial Investment	2.3988 of 5 stars	$9.91 +1.7%	$11.54 +16.5%	-20.1%	$815.88M	$320.88M	247.69	N/A	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:NMFC) was last updated on 7/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

New Mountain Finance (NMFC) Competitors

NMFC vs. ARCC, CGBD, GBDC, MFIC, and OCSL

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Ares Capital?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Golub Capital BDC?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NMFC vs. The Competition

New Mountain Finance Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

New Mountain Finance (NMFC) Competitors

NMFC vs. ARCC, CGBD, GBDC, MFIC, and OCSL

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Ares Capital?

Do analysts recommend NMFC or ARCC?

Is NMFC or ARCC a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in NMFC or ARCC?

Does the media prefer NMFC or ARCC?

Is NMFC or ARCC more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, NMFC or ARCC?

Which has more risk and volatility, NMFC or ARCC?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Is NMFC or CGBD a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to NMFC or CGBD?

Which has more volatility and risk, NMFC or CGBD?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of NMFC or CGBD?

Do analysts rate NMFC or CGBD?

Is NMFC or CGBD more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, NMFC or CGBD?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Golub Capital BDC?

Is NMFC or GBDC a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, NMFC or GBDC?

Do analysts rate NMFC or GBDC?

Does the media refer more to NMFC or GBDC?

Which has more volatility and risk, NMFC or GBDC?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in NMFC or GBDC?

Is NMFC or GBDC more profitable?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Is MFIC or NMFC more profitable?

Do analysts rate MFIC or NMFC?

Which has more risk & volatility, MFIC or NMFC?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MFIC or NMFC?

Does the media prefer MFIC or NMFC?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MFIC or NMFC?

Is MFIC or NMFC a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does New Mountain Finance compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, OCSL or NMFC?

Is OCSL or NMFC a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer OCSL or NMFC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in OCSL or NMFC?

Do analysts rate OCSL or NMFC?

Which has more risk & volatility, OCSL or NMFC?

Is OCSL or NMFC more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NMFC vs. The Competition

New Mountain Finance Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools