Golub Capital BDC (GBDC) Competitors

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 203.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment and MidCap Financial Investment both had 3 articles in the media. Golub Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.04 indicating that Golub Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 21.45% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 11.17% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.

MidCap Financial Investment currently has a consensus price target of $11.11, suggesting a potential upside of 25.08%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $13.90, suggesting a potential upside of 12.01%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than Golub Capital BDC.

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

New Mountain Finance presently has a consensus price target of $8.25, indicating a potential upside of 17.69%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $13.90, indicating a potential upside of 12.01%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Golub Capital BDC.

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.3%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. New Mountain Finance pays out -212.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 203.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Golub Capital BDC had 1 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Golub Capital BDC and 2 mentions for New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Golub Capital BDC's score of 0.88 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 21.45% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -16.78%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 10.94% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 21.45% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 14.45%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 9.91% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Oaktree Specialty Lending. Golub Capital BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Golub Capital BDC currently has a consensus price target of $13.90, indicating a potential upside of 12.01%. Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $11.83, indicating a potential downside of 2.04%. Given Golub Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Golub Capital BDC is more favorable than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. Golub Capital BDC pays out 203.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golub Capital BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Golub Capital BDC had 1 more articles in the media than Oaktree Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Golub Capital BDC and 2 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Golub Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's score of 0.15 indicating that Golub Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Bain Capital Specialty Finance shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Golub Capital BDC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bain Capital Specialty Finance. Bain Capital Specialty Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance currently has a consensus target price of $12.60, suggesting a potential upside of 13.46%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus target price of $13.90, suggesting a potential upside of 12.01%. Given Bain Capital Specialty Finance's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bain Capital Specialty Finance is more favorable than Golub Capital BDC.

In the previous week, Golub Capital BDC had 2 more articles in the media than Bain Capital Specialty Finance. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Golub Capital BDC and 1 mentions for Bain Capital Specialty Finance. Golub Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Bain Capital Specialty Finance's score of -0.86 indicating that Golub Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.1%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays out 169.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golub Capital BDC pays out 203.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Bain Capital Specialty Finance has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Bain Capital Specialty Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a net margin of 24.22% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 21.45%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance's return on equity of 10.40% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.