Go Pro
→ Do this before December or regret it (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free PFLT Stock Alerts

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) Competitors

$6.84 -0.04 (-0.51%)
Closing price 07/24/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$6.90 +0.06 (+0.86%)
As of 07/24/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

PFLT vs. ARCC, CSWC, MFIC, NMFC, and OCSL

Should you buy PennantPark Floating Rate Capital stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PennantPark Floating Rate Capital with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PennantPark Floating Rate Capital include Ares Capital (ARCC), Capital Southwest (CSWC), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), and Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Ares Capital?

Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ares Capital$3.05B4.42$1.30B$1.6311.52
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.60$66.36M$0.6211.04

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. Ares Capital pays out 117.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 154.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 37.30% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 23.08%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 9.95% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ares Capital37.30% 9.85% 4.59%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 23.08%9.95%3.87%

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ares Capital currently has a consensus price target of $20.60, indicating a potential upside of 9.69%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $9.80, indicating a potential upside of 43.17%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Ares Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 19 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Ares Capital and 2 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Ares Capital's score of 0.78 indicating that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ares Capital
11 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Ares Capital beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Capital Southwest?

Capital Southwest (NASDAQ:CSWC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Capital Southwest has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. Capital Southwest pays out 122.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 154.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Capital Southwest has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Southwest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Southwest$232.10M6.28$113M$1.9012.34
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.60$66.36M$0.6211.04

In the previous week, Capital Southwest had 6 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Capital Southwest and 2 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Capital Southwest's score of 1.01 indicating that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capital Southwest
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

23.4% of Capital Southwest shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Capital Southwest shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 48.68% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 23.08%. Capital Southwest's return on equity of 14.00% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Southwest48.68% 14.00% 6.61%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 23.08%9.95%3.87%

Capital Southwest presently has a consensus target price of $23.20, indicating a potential downside of 1.07%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.80, indicating a potential upside of 43.17%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Capital Southwest.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital Southwest
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Summary

Capital Southwest beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital both had 2 articles in the media. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.79 indicating that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital currently has a consensus price target of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 43.17%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.46, suggesting a potential upside of 20.42%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 154.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MidCap Financial Investment. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.60$66.36M$0.6211.04
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M2.44$63.17M$0.04238.00

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 23.08% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 10.86% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital23.08% 9.95% 3.87%
MidCap Financial Investment 1.90%10.86%4.31%

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats MidCap Financial Investment on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to New Mountain Finance?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus target price of $9.08, suggesting a potential upside of 32.80%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 43.17%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than New Mountain Finance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
New Mountain Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.71
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 3 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 2 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat New Mountain Finance's score of -0.21 indicating that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance$327.08M1.98$16.49M-$0.58N/A
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.60$66.36M$0.6211.04

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.6%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. New Mountain Finance pays out -172.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 154.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 23.08% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 11.14% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance-18.65% 11.14% 4.63%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 23.08%9.95%3.87%

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats New Mountain Finance on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 210.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 154.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending and Oaktree Specialty Lending both had 2 articles in the media. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's score of 0.58 indicating that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Oaktree Specialty Lending
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oaktree Specialty Lending. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oaktree Specialty Lending$316.80M3.25$33.92M$0.5720.49
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.60$66.36M$0.6211.04

Oaktree Specialty Lending presently has a consensus price target of $11.83, suggesting a potential upside of 1.31%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 43.17%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Oaktree Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 23.08% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 16.66%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 9.95% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oaktree Specialty Lending16.66% 9.56% 4.60%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 23.08%9.95%3.87%

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Oaktree Specialty Lending on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PennantPark Floating Rate Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PFLT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PFLT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PFLT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPennantPark Floating Rate CapitalAsset Management IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$680.64M$2.54B$14.47B$23.58B
Dividend Yield13.99%6.05%5.71%4.21%
P/E Ratio11.0461.3420.6630.98
Price / Sales2.601,784.8044.6919.98
Price / Cash5.0860.5019.2732.09
Price / Book0.631.302.254.73
Net Income$66.36M$265.96M$1.14B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-5.52%-0.68%-0.48%-0.45%
1 Month Performance-7.06%-0.58%0.41%-0.41%
1 Year PerformanceN/A6.32%12.27%14.19%

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
4.7575 of 5 stars		$6.85
-0.5%		$9.80
+43.2%		N/A$680.64M$261.43M11.04658
ARCC
Ares Capital
3.3397 of 5 stars		$19.17
-0.2%		$20.60
+7.5%		-18.7%$13.76B$1.36B11.762,550
CSWC
Capital Southwest
1.9148 of 5 stars		$24.30
+0.4%		$23.20
-4.5%		+0.5%$1.51B$232.10M12.7920
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
3.318 of 5 stars		$9.78
-1.9%		$11.46
+17.2%		-26.9%$805.61M$320.88M244.56N/A
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
2.5187 of 5 stars		$7.11
-1.7%		$9.25
+30.1%		-35.4%$671.55M-$64.32MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PFLT) was last updated on 7/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran
For a moment… Forget about Trump’s ties to Israel. Forget about reports of Iran’s nuclear program. Be...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Universal basic income is not impossible. It exist (kind of)
Robert Kiyosaki, author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, is highlighting an income strategy he calls the Patriot Income P...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
Oxford Club Analyst’s Urgent AI Warning
Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist at The Oxford Club, is sharing a private presentation with a warn...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Have you seen Elon’s new “supercurrency”? (It affects you)
Elon Musk just became the world's first trillionaire following the biggest IPO in history, giving him access t...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
This tiny piece of glass could be bigger than GPUs
Jensen Huang says AI can't scale without it. Google Ventures calls it the future of AI compute. Sequoia Capita...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel