NASDAQ:PFLT

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Competitors

$12.67
+0.03 (+0.24 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$12.60
Now: $12.67
$12.73
50-Day Range
$11.82
MA: $12.20
$12.84
52-Week Range
$5.67
Now: $12.67
$12.85
Volume141,755 shs
Average Volume230,266 shs
Market Capitalization$491.22 million
P/E Ratio26.96
Dividend Yield9.13%
Beta1.97

Competitors

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NASDAQ:PFLT) Vs. TSLX, NMFC, TPVG, GAIN, CSWC, and PNNT

Should you be buying PFLT stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investors, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, including Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (TPVG), Gladstone Investment (GAIN), Capital Southwest (CSWC), and PennantPark Investment (PNNT).

Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NASDAQ:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and risk.

Dividends

Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 84.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Sixth Street Specialty Lending and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sixth Street Specialty Lending59.17%13.52%6.95%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital19.28%9.04%3.59%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sixth Street Specialty Lending and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$251.49 million6.04$128.28 million$1.9411.54
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$95.49 million5.14$18.41 million$1.1211.31

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.97, suggesting that its share price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Sixth Street Specialty Lending and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sixth Street Specialty Lending00703.00
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital01202.67

Sixth Street Specialty Lending presently has a consensus target price of $19.1429, suggesting a potential downside of 14.46%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $10.50, suggesting a potential downside of 17.13%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

55.7% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.3% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NASDAQ:PFLT) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Dividends

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and New Mountain Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital19.28%9.04%3.59%
New Mountain Finance4.94%10.30%3.93%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and New Mountain Finance, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital01202.67
New Mountain Finance02202.50

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital presently has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential downside of 17.13%. New Mountain Finance has a consensus price target of $11.1667, indicating a potential downside of 14.04%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and New Mountain Finance's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$95.49 million5.14$18.41 million$1.1211.31
New Mountain Finance$276.51 million4.55$112.56 million$1.2710.23

New Mountain Finance has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

29.3% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.97, suggesting that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NASDAQ:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC02402.67
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital01202.67

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC presently has a consensus price target of $10.9583, indicating a potential downside of 30.25%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential downside of 17.13%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

Risk and Volatility

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.9, meaning that its share price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.97, meaning that its share price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

26.9% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.3% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 93.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC40.65%12.21%6.54%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital19.28%9.04%3.59%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC$73.39 million6.61$31.76 million$1.5410.20
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$95.49 million5.14$18.41 million$1.1211.31

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NASDAQ:PFLT) and Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Dividends

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Gladstone Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and Gladstone Investment's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$95.49 million5.14$18.41 million$1.1211.31
Gladstone Investment$61.92 million7.55$-7,230,000.00$0.9015.63

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Investment. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gladstone Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

29.3% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.97, suggesting that its share price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its share price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and Gladstone Investment, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital01202.67
Gladstone Investment0000N/A

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital currently has a consensus price target of $10.50, suggesting a potential downside of 17.13%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Gladstone Investment.

Profitability

This table compares PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and Gladstone Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital19.28%9.04%3.59%
Gladstone Investment-34.86%5.53%3.52%

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Gladstone Investment on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Capital Southwest (NASDAQ:CSWC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NASDAQ:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Volatility & Risk

Capital Southwest has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.97, indicating that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Capital Southwest and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Capital Southwest-10.38%10.17%4.73%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital19.28%9.04%3.59%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Capital Southwest and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Capital Southwest01402.80
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital01202.67

Capital Southwest currently has a consensus target price of $18.60, indicating a potential downside of 20.48%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $10.50, indicating a potential downside of 17.13%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Capital Southwest.

Dividends

Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. Capital Southwest pays out 107.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Capital Southwest and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Southwest$62.04 million7.49$-22,350,000.00$1.5714.90
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$95.49 million5.14$18.41 million$1.1211.31

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Southwest. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Southwest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

30.9% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.3% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NASDAQ:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares PennantPark Investment and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Investment$100.22 million4.40$-15,970,000.00$0.6110.79
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$95.49 million5.14$18.41 million$1.1211.31

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PennantPark Investment. PennantPark Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for PennantPark Investment and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
PennantPark Investment01302.75
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital01202.67

PennantPark Investment currently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential downside of 24.01%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $10.50, suggesting a potential downside of 17.13%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than PennantPark Investment.

Dividends

PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. PennantPark Investment pays out 78.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares PennantPark Investment and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
PennantPark Investment-15.93%7.56%3.07%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital19.28%9.04%3.59%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

29.9% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.3% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

PennantPark Investment has a beta of 1.98, meaning that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.97, meaning that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats PennantPark Investment on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.


PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Sixth Street Specialty Lending logo
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
1.7$22.38+0.9%$1.52 billion$251.49 million9.29Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
New Mountain Finance logo
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
1.1$12.99+0.5%$1.26 billion$276.51 million-1,297.70Analyst Downgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC logo
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC
1.4$15.71+0.4%$485.16 million$73.39 million12.88Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gladstone Investment logo
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
1.2$14.07+1.9%$467.19 million$61.92 million-26.06Dividend Announcement
News Coverage
Capital Southwest logo
CSWC
Capital Southwest
1.4$23.39+0.0%$464.71 million$62.04 million-58.48Analyst Downgrade
PennantPark Investment logo
PNNT
PennantPark Investment
1.3$6.58+0.9%$441.16 million$100.22 million-27.42News Coverage
Stellus Capital Investment logo
SCM
Stellus Capital Investment
1.2$13.60+0.1%$265.01 million$58.91 million54.40News Coverage
Oaktree Strategic Income logo
OCSI
Oaktree Strategic Income
1.3$8.50+0.0%$250.47 million$39.53 million-212.45News Coverage
PTMN
Portman Ridge Finance
1.2$2.39+1.3%$179.72 million$26.50 million-8.24
Safeguard Scientifics logo
SFE
Safeguard Scientifics
0.9$6.41+3.7%$134.25 millionN/A-4.30Gap Down
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC logo
FCRD
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC
1.2$4.27+0.0%$128.57 million$52.49 million-2.35
OFS Capital logo
OFS
OFS Capital
1.1$9.10+0.4%$122.02 million$52.52 million-16.85
Investcorp Credit Management BDC logo
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC
1.2$5.70+0.4%$79.32 million$34.46 million-3.77Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
TURN
180 Degree Capital
0.8$7.30+0.0%$75.73 millionN/A0.00
Rand Capital logo
RAND
Rand Capital
1.3$18.24+0.7%$47.10 million$2.72 million10.48Gap Down
Live Ventures logo
LIVE
Live Ventures
0.9$29.65+1.9%$46.11 million$191.70 million-25.13
Firsthand Technology Value Fund logo
SVVC
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
0.8$6.28+1.0%$43.29 million$1.79 million-0.81
Capitala Finance logo
CPTA
Capitala Finance
1.1$15.52+0.6%$42.08 million$44.03 million-1.16Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
LYL
Dragon Victory International
0.4$1.22+6.6%$14.20 million$10,000.000.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.