Question 1

Do analysts prefer PFLT or ARCC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital presently has a consensus target price of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 34.52%. Ares Capital has a consensus target price of $20.60, suggesting a potential upside of 4.44%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Ares Capital. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Ares Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 8 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.73

Question 2

Is PFLT or ARCC a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ares Capital pays out 142.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Question 3

Which has better valuation and earnings, PFLT or ARCC?

Accepted Answer

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PennantPark Floating Rate Capital $261.43M 2.76 $66.36M $0.51 14.28 Ares Capital $3.05B 4.64 $1.30B $1.35 14.61

Question 4

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PFLT or ARCC?

Accepted Answer

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 5

Is PFLT or ARCC more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Ares Capital has a net margin of 30.91% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 18.53%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 10.24% beat Ares Capital's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 18.53% 10.24% 3.88% Ares Capital 30.91% 9.80% 4.50%

Question 6

Which has more volatility and risk, PFLT or ARCC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 7

Does the media prefer PFLT or ARCC?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 3 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Ares Capital and 6 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.83 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ares Capital 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 8

Do analysts rate PFLT or CSWC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital currently has a consensus price target of $9.80, indicating a potential upside of 34.52%. Capital Southwest has a consensus price target of $23.60, indicating a potential downside of 3.24%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Capital Southwest. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Capital Southwest 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 6 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Question 9

Is PFLT or CSWC a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.5%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest pays out 128.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Question 10

Which has better valuation & earnings, PFLT or CSWC?

Accepted Answer

Capital Southwest has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Capital Southwest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PennantPark Floating Rate Capital $261.43M 2.76 $66.36M $0.51 14.28 Capital Southwest $232.10M 6.70 $113M $1.81 13.47

Question 11

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PFLT or CSWC?

Accepted Answer

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.4% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 12

Is PFLT or CSWC more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 46.68% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 18.53%. Capital Southwest's return on equity of 13.88% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 18.53% 10.24% 3.88% Capital Southwest 46.68% 13.88% 6.45%

Question 13

Which has more volatility and risk, PFLT or CSWC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Southwest has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 14

Does the media refer more to PFLT or CSWC?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Capital Southwest had 4 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Capital Southwest and 6 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Capital Southwest's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.83 indicating that Capital Southwest is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Capital Southwest 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 15

Do analysts rate PFLT or MFIC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital currently has a consensus price target of $9.80, indicating a potential upside of 34.52%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.11, indicating a potential upside of 19.88%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 MidCap Financial Investment 1 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.11

Question 16

Is PFLT or MFIC a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.4%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Question 17

Which has better earnings & valuation, PFLT or MFIC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PennantPark Floating Rate Capital $261.43M 2.76 $66.36M $0.51 14.28 MidCap Financial Investment $320.88M 2.38 $63.17M -$0.36 N/A

Question 18

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PFLT or MFIC?

Accepted Answer

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Question 19

Is PFLT or MFIC more profitable?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 11.17% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 18.53% 10.24% 3.88% MidCap Financial Investment -9.85% 11.17% 4.41%

Question 20

Which has more volatility and risk, PFLT or MFIC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 21

Does the media favor PFLT or MFIC?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital had 4 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and 2 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.83 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MidCap Financial Investment 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 22

Do analysts prefer PFLT or NMFC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital currently has a consensus price target of $9.80, indicating a potential upside of 34.52%. New Mountain Finance has a consensus price target of $8.60, indicating a potential upside of 16.77%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than New Mountain Finance. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 New Mountain Finance 2 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67

Question 23

Is PFLT or NMFC a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out -212.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Question 24

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PFLT or NMFC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PennantPark Floating Rate Capital $261.43M 2.76 $66.36M $0.51 14.28 New Mountain Finance $327.08M 2.13 $16.49M -$0.47 N/A

Question 25

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PFLT or NMFC?

Accepted Answer

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 26

Is PFLT or NMFC more profitable?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -16.78%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 10.94% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 18.53% 10.24% 3.88% New Mountain Finance -16.78% 10.94% 4.58%

Question 27

Which has more volatility & risk, PFLT or NMFC?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 28

Does the media prefer PFLT or NMFC?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital had 6 more articles in the media than New Mountain Finance. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and 0 mentions for New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.69 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.83 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Overall Sentiment PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Positive New Mountain Finance Very Positive

Question 29

Do analysts rate OCSL or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

Oaktree Specialty Lending presently has a consensus target price of $11.83, suggesting a potential downside of 7.95%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 34.52%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Oaktree Specialty Lending. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Oaktree Specialty Lending 0 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Question 30

Is OCSL or PFLT a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Question 31

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, OCSL or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oaktree Specialty Lending. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Oaktree Specialty Lending $316.80M 3.57 $33.92M $0.48 26.78 PennantPark Floating Rate Capital $261.43M 2.76 $66.36M $0.51 14.28

Question 32

Do institutionals and insiders believe in OCSL or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Question 33

Is OCSL or PFLT more profitable?

Accepted Answer

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 14.45%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 10.24% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Oaktree Specialty Lending 14.45% 9.70% 4.64% PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 18.53% 10.24% 3.88%

Question 34

Which has more risk and volatility, OCSL or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 35

Does the media refer more to OCSL or PFLT?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital had 4 more articles in the media than Oaktree Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and 2 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Oaktree Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.83 indicating that Oaktree Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Oaktree Specialty Lending 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Metric	PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$723.81M	$5.66B	$14.10B	$23.52B
Dividend Yield	12.99%	7.42%	5.89%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	14.30	31.58	26.19	29.17
Price / Sales	2.76	1,232.57	513.82	21.45
Price / Cash	5.47	48.07	30.84	19.95
Price / Book	0.67	3.58	2.78	4.82
Net Income	$66.36M	$419.48M	$1.32B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-1.69%	7.85%	4.34%	1.04%
1 Month Performance	-3.18%	-0.05%	1.18%	-1.15%
1 Year Performance	N/A	6.78%	11.40%	12.65%

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	4.4281 of 5 stars	$7.29 -1.4%	$9.80 +34.5%	N/A	$723.81M	$261.43M	14.30	658	Dividend Announcement
ARCC Ares Capital	2.5058 of 5 stars	$19.95 +0.4%	$20.40 +2.3%	-10.7%	$14.32B	$3.05B	14.78	2,550	Positive News
CSWC Capital Southwest	2.6438 of 5 stars	$25.47 +0.3%	$23.60 -7.3%	+7.1%	$1.62B	$232.10M	14.07	20	Positive News
MFIC MidCap Financial Investment	3.3773 of 5 stars	$9.62 -0.8%	$11.11 +15.5%	-26.2%	$792.43M	$320.88M	N/A	N/A	Positive News
NMFC New Mountain Finance	2.8872 of 5 stars	$7.54 -1.0%	$8.60 +14.1%	-29.6%	$712.17M	-$53.58M	N/A	N/A	Positive News

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) Competitors

PFLT vs. ARCC, CSWC, MFIC, NMFC, and OCSL

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Ares Capital?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Capital Southwest?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to New Mountain Finance?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFLT vs. The Competition

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) Competitors

PFLT vs. ARCC, CSWC, MFIC, NMFC, and OCSL

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Ares Capital?

Is PFLT or ARCC more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, PFLT or ARCC?

Which has better valuation and earnings, PFLT or ARCC?

Is PFLT or ARCC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer PFLT or ARCC?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PFLT or ARCC?

Does the media prefer PFLT or ARCC?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Capital Southwest?

Which has more volatility and risk, PFLT or CSWC?

Does the media refer more to PFLT or CSWC?

Is PFLT or CSWC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate PFLT or CSWC?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PFLT or CSWC?

Is PFLT or CSWC more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PFLT or CSWC?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PFLT or MFIC?

Does the media favor PFLT or MFIC?

Which has more volatility and risk, PFLT or MFIC?

Do analysts rate PFLT or MFIC?

Is PFLT or MFIC more profitable?

Is PFLT or MFIC a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PFLT or MFIC?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to New Mountain Finance?

Is PFLT or NMFC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer PFLT or NMFC?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PFLT or NMFC?

Is PFLT or NMFC more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, PFLT or NMFC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PFLT or NMFC?

Does the media prefer PFLT or NMFC?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Does the media refer more to OCSL or PFLT?

Is OCSL or PFLT more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, OCSL or PFLT?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in OCSL or PFLT?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, OCSL or PFLT?

Do analysts rate OCSL or PFLT?

Is OCSL or PFLT a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFLT vs. The Competition

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools