PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) Competitors

$6.64 -0.09 (-1.26%)

As of 10:37 AM Eastern

PFLT vs. ARCC, CSWC, GLAD, NMFC, and OCSL

Should you buy PennantPark Floating Rate Capital stock or one of its competitors? PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's main competitors and comparable companies include Ares Capital (ARCC), Capital Southwest (CSWC), Gladstone Capital (GLAD), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), and Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Ares Capital?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and dividends.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital currently has a consensus price target of $9.60, suggesting a potential upside of 44.47%. Ares Capital has a consensus price target of $20.39, suggesting a potential upside of 6.90%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Ares Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Ares Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 10 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Ares Capital and 0 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	Neutral
Ares Capital	Positive

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 28.34% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 18.53%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 10.24% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	18.53%	10.24%	3.88%
Ares Capital	28.34%	9.72%	4.44%

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	$261.43M	2.52	$66.36M	$0.51	13.03
Ares Capital	$3.05B	4.51	$1.30B	$1.22	15.63

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ares Capital pays out 157.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ares Capital beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Capital Southwest?

Capital Southwest (NASDAQ:CSWC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Capital Southwest currently has a consensus target price of $25.17, indicating a potential upside of 8.27%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 44.47%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Capital Southwest.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Capital Southwest	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Capital Southwest had 10 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Capital Southwest and 0 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Capital Southwest's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Capital Southwest is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Capital Southwest	Positive
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	Neutral

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 43.06% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 18.53%. Capital Southwest's return on equity of 13.76% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Capital Southwest	43.06%	13.76%	6.29%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	18.53%	10.24%	3.88%

Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Capital Southwest pays out 136.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Capital Southwest has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Southwest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Capital Southwest	$232.10M	6.66	$113M	$1.70	13.67
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	$261.43M	2.52	$66.36M	$0.51	13.03

Capital Southwest has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

23.4% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Capital Southwest beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Gladstone Capital?

Gladstone Capital (NASDAQ:GLAD) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Gladstone Capital has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gladstone Capital had 2 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Gladstone Capital and 0 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Gladstone Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Gladstone Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Capital	Positive
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	Neutral

10.7% of Gladstone Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Gladstone Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Capital. Gladstone Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Capital	$89.12M	4.90	$58.11M	$2.06	9.39
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	$261.43M	2.52	$66.36M	$0.51	13.03

Gladstone Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Gladstone Capital pays out 87.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Capital has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 50.48% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 18.53%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 10.24% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gladstone Capital	50.48%	9.67%	5.00%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	18.53%	10.24%	3.88%

Gladstone Capital currently has a consensus target price of $21.67, suggesting a potential upside of 11.97%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.60, suggesting a potential upside of 44.47%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Gladstone Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gladstone Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Gladstone Capital beats PennantPark Floating Rate Capital on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to New Mountain Finance?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 2 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 0 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance	Positive
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	Neutral

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.0%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. New Mountain Finance pays out -185.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	1.92	$16.49M	-$0.54	N/A
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	$261.43M	2.52	$66.36M	$0.51	13.03

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -21.29%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 10.71% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance	-21.29%	10.71%	4.55%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	18.53%	10.24%	3.88%

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus target price of $7.50, indicating a potential upside of 12.87%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 44.47%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than New Mountain Finance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
New Mountain Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

New Mountain Finance and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 14.45%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 10.24% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oaktree Specialty Lending	14.45%	9.70%	4.64%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	18.53%	10.24%	3.88%

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 2 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 0 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Oaktree Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Oaktree Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Oaktree Specialty Lending	Very Positive
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	Neutral

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oaktree Specialty Lending. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oaktree Specialty Lending	$316.80M	3.36	$33.92M	$0.48	25.20
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	$261.43M	2.52	$66.36M	$0.51	13.03

Oaktree Specialty Lending currently has a consensus target price of $11.83, suggesting a potential downside of 2.16%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.60, suggesting a potential upside of 44.47%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oaktree Specialty Lending	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Oaktree Specialty Lending on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PennantPark Floating Rate Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PFLT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PFLT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$659.32M	$5.37B	$14.15B	$23.52B
Dividend Yield	14.12%	5.52%	4.88%	3.74%
P/E Ratio	13.03	24.68	20.48	29.89
Price / Sales	2.52	7.67	4.85	3.37
Price / Cash	5.03	29.72	20.32	15.68
Price / Book	0.61	1.81	1.82	3.72
Net Income	$66.36M	$419.50M	$1.33B	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	-3.35%	0.26%	0.17%	0.64%
1 Month Performance	0.20%	-1.80%	-0.56%	-0.27%
1 Year Performance	-27.61%	-1.80%	4.81%	6.79%

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	3.5066 of 5 stars	$6.65 -1.3%	$9.60 +44.5%	-28.0%	$659.32M	$261.43M	13.03	658
ARCC Ares Capital	3.4955 of 5 stars	$19.11 -0.1%	$20.39 +6.7%	-6.2%	$13.80B	$3.05B	15.66	4,250
CSWC Capital Southwest	2.801 of 5 stars	$23.17 -1.0%	$24.10 +4.0%	+12.2%	$1.48B	$232.10M	12.80	36
GLAD Gladstone Capital	3.6625 of 5 stars	$18.97 -0.8%	$21.67 +14.2%	+0.1%	$428.59M	$89.12M	9.21	65	Positive News Upcoming Earnings
NMFC New Mountain Finance	2.8426 of 5 stars	$7.03 -0.1%	$7.67 +9.1%	-30.5%	$664M	$327.08M	N/A	N/A	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PFLT) was last updated on 11/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) Competitors

PFLT vs. ARCC, CSWC, GLAD, NMFC, and OCSL

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Ares Capital?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Capital Southwest?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Gladstone Capital?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to New Mountain Finance?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFLT vs. The Competition

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) Competitors

PFLT vs. ARCC, CSWC, GLAD, NMFC, and OCSL

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Ares Capital?

Do analysts recommend PFLT or ARCC?

Does the media favor PFLT or ARCC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PFLT or ARCC?

Is PFLT or ARCC more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, PFLT or ARCC?

Is PFLT or ARCC a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, PFLT or ARCC?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Capital Southwest?

Do analysts rate CSWC or PFLT?

Does the media favor CSWC or PFLT?

Is CSWC or PFLT more profitable?

Is CSWC or PFLT a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CSWC or PFLT?

Which has more volatility & risk, CSWC or PFLT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CSWC or PFLT?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Gladstone Capital?

Which has more risk & volatility, GLAD or PFLT?

Does the media prefer GLAD or PFLT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GLAD or PFLT?

Which has better valuation and earnings, GLAD or PFLT?

Is GLAD or PFLT a better dividend stock?

Is GLAD or PFLT more profitable?

Do analysts rate GLAD or PFLT?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to New Mountain Finance?

Does the media favor NMFC or PFLT?

Is NMFC or PFLT a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of NMFC or PFLT?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, NMFC or PFLT?

Is NMFC or PFLT more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, NMFC or PFLT?

Do analysts rate NMFC or PFLT?

Summary

How does PennantPark Floating Rate Capital compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Is OCSL or PFLT more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, OCSL or PFLT?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in OCSL or PFLT?

Does the media refer more to OCSL or PFLT?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, OCSL or PFLT?

Do analysts recommend OCSL or PFLT?

Is OCSL or PFLT a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PFLT vs. The Competition

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools