PennantPark Investment (PNNT) Competitors

$3.44 -0.14 (-4.02%)

Closing price 09/18/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$3.44 0.00 (-0.03%)

As of 09/18/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

PNNT vs. ARCC, GBDC, GLAD, MFIC, and NMFC

Should you buy PennantPark Investment stock or one of its competitors? PennantPark Investment's main competitors and comparable companies include Ares Capital (ARCC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), Gladstone Capital (GLAD), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), and New Mountain Finance (NMFC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Ares Capital?

PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 30.91% compared to PennantPark Investment's net margin of 11.33%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PennantPark Investment	11.33%	11.59%	4.23%
Ares Capital	30.91%	9.80%	4.50%

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 21 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Ares Capital and 0 mentions for PennantPark Investment. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat PennantPark Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Investment	Neutral
Ares Capital	Neutral

PennantPark Investment currently has a consensus target price of $5.10, suggesting a potential upside of 48.43%. Ares Capital has a consensus target price of $20.60, suggesting a potential upside of 6.19%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than Ares Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PennantPark Investment	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Ares Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. Ares Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Investment	$21.51M	10.43	$48.85M	$0.16	21.48
Ares Capital	$3.05B	4.56	$1.30B	$1.35	14.37

PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. PennantPark Investment pays out 300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ares Capital pays out 142.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PennantPark Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ares Capital beats PennantPark Investment on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Golub Capital BDC?

Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) and PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. Golub Capital BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Golub Capital BDC	$870.78M	3.74	$376.65M	$0.65	19.29
PennantPark Investment	$21.51M	10.43	$48.85M	$0.16	21.48

Golub Capital BDC currently has a consensus target price of $13.90, indicating a potential upside of 10.85%. PennantPark Investment has a consensus target price of $5.10, indicating a potential upside of 48.43%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than Golub Capital BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Golub Capital BDC	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
PennantPark Investment	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Golub Capital BDC had 2 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Golub Capital BDC and 0 mentions for PennantPark Investment. Golub Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat PennantPark Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Golub Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Golub Capital BDC	Positive
PennantPark Investment	Neutral

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 21.45% compared to PennantPark Investment's net margin of 11.33%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Golub Capital BDC	21.45%	9.91%	4.39%
PennantPark Investment	11.33%	11.59%	4.23%

Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.5%. PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. Golub Capital BDC pays out 203.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment pays out 300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PennantPark Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats PennantPark Investment on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Gladstone Capital?

Gladstone Capital (NASDAQ:GLAD) and PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Gladstone Capital had 3 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Gladstone Capital and 0 mentions for PennantPark Investment. Gladstone Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat PennantPark Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Gladstone Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Capital	Positive
PennantPark Investment	Neutral

10.7% of Gladstone Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Gladstone Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gladstone Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. Gladstone Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Capital	$89.12M	4.89	$58.11M	$2.06	9.37
PennantPark Investment	$21.51M	10.43	$48.85M	$0.16	21.48

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 50.48% compared to PennantPark Investment's net margin of 11.33%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gladstone Capital	50.48%	9.67%	5.00%
PennantPark Investment	11.33%	11.59%	4.23%

Gladstone Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. Gladstone Capital pays out 87.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment pays out 300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Capital has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and PennantPark Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Gladstone Capital has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Gladstone Capital currently has a consensus price target of $21.67, indicating a potential upside of 12.20%. PennantPark Investment has a consensus price target of $5.10, indicating a potential upside of 48.43%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than Gladstone Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gladstone Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
PennantPark Investment	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Gladstone Capital beats PennantPark Investment on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

PennantPark Investment has a net margin of 11.33% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment	-9.85%	11.17%	4.41%
PennantPark Investment	11.33%	11.59%	4.23%

MidCap Financial Investment has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment	$320.88M	2.32	$63.17M	-$0.36	N/A
PennantPark Investment	$21.51M	10.43	$48.85M	$0.16	21.48

MidCap Financial Investment presently has a consensus price target of $11.11, indicating a potential upside of 23.14%. PennantPark Investment has a consensus price target of $5.10, indicating a potential upside of 48.43%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11
PennantPark Investment	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment had 3 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment and 0 mentions for PennantPark Investment. PennantPark Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of -0.24 indicating that PennantPark Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment	Neutral
PennantPark Investment	Neutral

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.7%. PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PennantPark Investment pays out 300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PennantPark Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

PennantPark Investment beats MidCap Financial Investment on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to New Mountain Finance?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

PennantPark Investment has a net margin of 11.33% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -16.78%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat New Mountain Finance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance	-16.78%	10.94%	4.58%
PennantPark Investment	11.33%	11.59%	4.23%

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PennantPark Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	2.02	$16.49M	-$0.47	N/A
PennantPark Investment	$21.51M	10.43	$48.85M	$0.16	21.48

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 4 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 0 mentions for PennantPark Investment. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat PennantPark Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance	Positive
PennantPark Investment	Neutral

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus target price of $8.25, indicating a potential upside of 18.03%. PennantPark Investment has a consensus target price of $5.10, indicating a potential upside of 48.43%. Given PennantPark Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than New Mountain Finance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
New Mountain Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80
PennantPark Investment	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.3%. PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. New Mountain Finance pays out -212.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PennantPark Investment pays out 300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

PennantPark Investment beats New Mountain Finance on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PennantPark Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PNNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PNNT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	PennantPark Investment	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$224.36M	$5.35B	$13.82B	$13.19B
Dividend Yield	13.75%	7.51%	5.95%	12.81%
P/E Ratio	13.22	29.96	25.31	25.40
Price / Sales	10.43	1,246.53	511.07	89.45
Price / Cash	7.47	47.85	43.42	51.42
Price / Book	0.45	3.52	2.73	6.33
Net Income	$48.85M	$417.39M	$1.31B	$358.33M
7 Day Performance	-4.16%	-0.57%	-0.59%	1.12%
1 Month Performance	-6.63%	-1.45%	0.16%	-2.39%
1 Year Performance	-50.33%	1.36%	7.82%	5.35%

PennantPark Investment Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PNNT PennantPark Investment	3.0203 of 5 stars	$3.44 -4.0%	$5.10 +48.4%	-50.3%	$224.36M	$21.51M	13.22	N/A	Ex-Dividend
ARCC Ares Capital	2.8462 of 5 stars	$19.37 -2.2%	$20.60 +6.4%	-10.0%	$13.91B	$1.17B	14.35	4,250	Ex-Dividend Analyst Upgrade
GBDC Golub Capital BDC	3.0665 of 5 stars	$12.43 -0.3%	$13.90 +11.8%	-12.5%	$3.23B	$203.39M	19.12	N/A
GLAD Gladstone Capital	3.3267 of 5 stars	$19.42 -0.3%	$21.67 +11.6%	-18.2%	$438.76M	$53.19M	9.43	65	News Coverage Positive News
MFIC MidCap Financial Investment	2.6072 of 5 stars	$9.05 -0.4%	$11.11 +22.7%	-27.1%	$745.48M	-$11.90M	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:PNNT) was last updated on 9/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

PennantPark Investment (PNNT) Competitors

PNNT vs. ARCC, GBDC, GLAD, MFIC, and NMFC

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Ares Capital?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Golub Capital BDC?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Gladstone Capital?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to New Mountain Finance?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PNNT vs. The Competition

PennantPark Investment Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

PennantPark Investment (PNNT) Competitors

PNNT vs. ARCC, GBDC, GLAD, MFIC, and NMFC

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Ares Capital?

Is PNNT or ARCC more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PNNT or ARCC?

Do analysts recommend PNNT or ARCC?

Which has more volatility & risk, PNNT or ARCC?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PNNT or ARCC?

Is PNNT or ARCC a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PNNT or ARCC?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Golub Capital BDC?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of GBDC or PNNT?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, GBDC or PNNT?

Do analysts rate GBDC or PNNT?

Which has more risk & volatility, GBDC or PNNT?

Does the media favor GBDC or PNNT?

Is GBDC or PNNT more profitable?

Is GBDC or PNNT a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Gladstone Capital?

Does the media refer more to GLAD or PNNT?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in GLAD or PNNT?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GLAD or PNNT?

Is GLAD or PNNT more profitable?

Is GLAD or PNNT a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, GLAD or PNNT?

Do analysts recommend GLAD or PNNT?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MFIC or PNNT?

Is MFIC or PNNT more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MFIC or PNNT?

Do analysts recommend MFIC or PNNT?

Which has more volatility and risk, MFIC or PNNT?

Does the media refer more to MFIC or PNNT?

Is MFIC or PNNT a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to New Mountain Finance?

Is NMFC or PNNT more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, NMFC or PNNT?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in NMFC or PNNT?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, NMFC or PNNT?

Does the media refer more to NMFC or PNNT?

Do analysts rate NMFC or PNNT?

Is NMFC or PNNT a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PNNT vs. The Competition

PennantPark Investment Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools