PennantPark Investment (PNNT) Competitors

$3.54 +0.07 (+1.87%)

As of 12:54 PM Eastern

PNNT vs. ARCC, FDUS, GBDC, GLAD, and MFIC

Should you buy PennantPark Investment stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PennantPark Investment with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PennantPark Investment include Ares Capital (ARCC), Fidus Investment (FDUS), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), Gladstone Capital (GLAD), and MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Ares Capital?

Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) and PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 37.30% compared to PennantPark Investment's net margin of 11.33%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ares Capital	37.30%	9.85%	4.59%
PennantPark Investment	11.33%	11.59%	4.23%

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. Ares Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ares Capital	$3.05B	4.42	$1.30B	$1.63	11.53
PennantPark Investment	$25.64M	9.00	$48.85M	$0.21	16.83

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. Ares Capital pays out 117.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment pays out 228.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PennantPark Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ares Capital presently has a consensus target price of $20.65, indicating a potential upside of 9.89%. PennantPark Investment has a consensus target price of $5.10, indicating a potential upside of 44.27%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than Ares Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ares Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
PennantPark Investment	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 13 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ares Capital and 0 mentions for PennantPark Investment. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat PennantPark Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ares Capital	Positive
PennantPark Investment	Neutral

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ares Capital beats PennantPark Investment on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Fidus Investment?

PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) and Fidus Investment (NASDAQ:FDUS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.1% of Fidus Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Fidus Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidus Investment has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. Fidus Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Investment	$25.64M	9.00	$48.85M	$0.21	16.83
Fidus Investment	$155.87M	4.72	$82.40M	$2.28	8.50

PennantPark Investment currently has a consensus target price of $5.10, indicating a potential upside of 44.27%. Fidus Investment has a consensus target price of $21.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.36%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than Fidus Investment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PennantPark Investment	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Fidus Investment	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Fidus Investment has a net margin of 49.51% compared to PennantPark Investment's net margin of 11.33%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat Fidus Investment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PennantPark Investment	11.33%	11.59%	4.23%
Fidus Investment	49.51%	11.19%	5.97%

PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidus Investment has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. Fidus Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. PennantPark Investment pays out 228.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fidus Investment pays out 75.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PennantPark Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Fidus Investment had 3 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Fidus Investment and 0 mentions for PennantPark Investment. Fidus Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat PennantPark Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidus Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Investment	Neutral
Fidus Investment	Positive

Summary

Fidus Investment beats PennantPark Investment on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Golub Capital BDC?

PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) and Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 24.64% compared to PennantPark Investment's net margin of 11.33%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PennantPark Investment	11.33%	11.59%	4.23%
Golub Capital BDC	24.64%	10.20%	4.47%

PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

PennantPark Investment currently has a consensus price target of $5.10, suggesting a potential upside of 44.27%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.40%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than Golub Capital BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PennantPark Investment	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Golub Capital BDC	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. PennantPark Investment pays out 228.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golub Capital BDC pays out 171.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PennantPark Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. Golub Capital BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Investment	$25.64M	9.00	$48.85M	$0.21	16.83
Golub Capital BDC	$870.78M	3.86	$376.65M	$0.77	16.77

In the previous week, Golub Capital BDC had 6 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Golub Capital BDC and 0 mentions for PennantPark Investment. Golub Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat PennantPark Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Golub Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Investment	Neutral
Golub Capital BDC	Positive

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats PennantPark Investment on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Gladstone Capital?

PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) and Gladstone Capital (NASDAQ:GLAD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Gladstone Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. Gladstone Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Investment	$25.64M	9.00	$48.85M	$0.21	16.83
Gladstone Capital	$89.12M	5.01	$58.11M	$1.83	10.80

26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Gladstone Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Gladstone Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gladstone Capital had 4 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gladstone Capital and 0 mentions for PennantPark Investment. Gladstone Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat PennantPark Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Gladstone Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Investment	Neutral
Gladstone Capital	Neutral

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 45.15% compared to PennantPark Investment's net margin of 11.33%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PennantPark Investment	11.33%	11.59%	4.23%
Gladstone Capital	45.15%	9.79%	5.31%

PennantPark Investment currently has a consensus price target of $5.10, indicating a potential upside of 44.27%. Gladstone Capital has a consensus price target of $21.67, indicating a potential upside of 9.59%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than Gladstone Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PennantPark Investment	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Gladstone Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Capital has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. Gladstone Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. PennantPark Investment pays out 228.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Capital pays out 98.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Gladstone Capital has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Summary

Gladstone Capital beats PennantPark Investment on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment had 1 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment and 0 mentions for PennantPark Investment. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat PennantPark Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment	Very Positive
PennantPark Investment	Neutral

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.2%. PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment pays out 228.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PennantPark Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

MidCap Financial Investment currently has a consensus target price of $11.54, indicating a potential upside of 13.54%. PennantPark Investment has a consensus target price of $5.10, indicating a potential upside of 44.27%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.22
PennantPark Investment	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PennantPark Investment has a net margin of 11.33% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment	1.90%	10.86%	4.31%
PennantPark Investment	11.33%	11.59%	4.23%

MidCap Financial Investment has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. PennantPark Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment	$320.88M	2.61	$63.17M	$0.04	254.00
PennantPark Investment	$25.64M	9.00	$48.85M	$0.21	16.83

Summary

MidCap Financial Investment beats PennantPark Investment on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PennantPark Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PNNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PNNT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	PennantPark Investment	Investors Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$230.82M	$79.55M	$13.98B	$12.58B
Dividend Yield	14.33%	14.33%	5.69%	6.16%
P/E Ratio	13.60	6.88	20.64	25.45
Price / Sales	9.00	9.03	130.28	103.18
Price / Cash	7.47	3.94	19.75	58.59
Price / Book	0.47	0.30	2.27	6.65
Net Income	$48.85M	$3.22M	$1.14B	$336.83M
7 Day Performance	4.74%	4.48%	1.49%	3.00%
1 Month Performance	-9.94%	-7.45%	2.37%	0.56%
1 Year Performance	-48.41%	-47.77%	13.88%	30.42%

PennantPark Investment Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PNNT PennantPark Investment	3.8003 of 5 stars	$3.54 +1.9%	$5.10 +44.3%	-49.3%	$230.82M	$25.64M	13.60	N/A
ARCC Ares Capital	3.7209 of 5 stars	$17.82 -0.1%	$20.65 +15.9%	-15.6%	$12.79B	$3.05B	10.93	2,550
FDUS Fidus Investment	3.3981 of 5 stars	$18.23 +1.6%	$21.00 +15.2%	-5.6%	$691.83M	$155.87M	8.00	N/A	Positive News
GBDC Golub Capital BDC	3.0109 of 5 stars	$12.32 +0.2%	$14.00 +13.7%	-12.1%	$3.21B	$870.78M	15.99	N/A	Positive News
GLAD Gladstone Capital	2.5297 of 5 stars	$18.68 +1.2%	$21.67 +16.0%	-28.0%	$422.00M	$89.12M	10.21	70

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:PNNT) was last updated on 7/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

PennantPark Investment (PNNT) Competitors

PNNT vs. ARCC, FDUS, GBDC, GLAD, and MFIC

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Ares Capital?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Fidus Investment?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Golub Capital BDC?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Gladstone Capital?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PNNT vs. The Competition

PennantPark Investment Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

PennantPark Investment (PNNT) Competitors

PNNT vs. ARCC, FDUS, GBDC, GLAD, and MFIC

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Ares Capital?

Is ARCC or PNNT more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, ARCC or PNNT?

Which has better earnings & valuation, ARCC or PNNT?

Is ARCC or PNNT a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate ARCC or PNNT?

Does the media refer more to ARCC or PNNT?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ARCC or PNNT?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Fidus Investment?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PNNT or FDUS?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PNNT or FDUS?

Do analysts recommend PNNT or FDUS?

Is PNNT or FDUS more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, PNNT or FDUS?

Is PNNT or FDUS a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer PNNT or FDUS?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Golub Capital BDC?

Is PNNT or GBDC more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, PNNT or GBDC?

Do analysts prefer PNNT or GBDC?

Is PNNT or GBDC a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PNNT or GBDC?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, PNNT or GBDC?

Does the media favor PNNT or GBDC?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Gladstone Capital?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PNNT or GLAD?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PNNT or GLAD?

Does the media prefer PNNT or GLAD?

Is PNNT or GLAD more profitable?

Do analysts prefer PNNT or GLAD?

Which has more risk & volatility, PNNT or GLAD?

Is PNNT or GLAD a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does PennantPark Investment compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Does the media prefer MFIC or PNNT?

Is MFIC or PNNT a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer MFIC or PNNT?

Which has more volatility and risk, MFIC or PNNT?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MFIC or PNNT?

Is MFIC or PNNT more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MFIC or PNNT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PNNT vs. The Competition

PennantPark Investment Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools