Go Pro

PennantPark Investment (PNNT) Competitors

PennantPark Investment logo
$3.31 +0.08 (+2.35%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$3.35 +0.04 (+1.30%)
As of 05:22 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PNNT vs. ARCC, CSWC, GBDC, GLAD, and MFIC

Should you buy PennantPark Investment stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PennantPark Investment with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PennantPark Investment include Ares Capital (ARCC), Capital Southwest (CSWC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), Gladstone Capital (GLAD), and MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Ares Capital?

PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

PennantPark Investment currently has a consensus target price of $5.10, indicating a potential upside of 54.26%. Ares Capital has a consensus target price of $20.60, indicating a potential upside of 8.71%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than Ares Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PennantPark Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

Ares Capital has a net margin of 37.30% compared to PennantPark Investment's net margin of 11.33%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PennantPark Investment11.33% 11.59% 4.23%
Ares Capital 37.30%9.85%4.59%

PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 18 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Ares Capital and 1 mentions for PennantPark Investment. PennantPark Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Ares Capital's score of 0.65 indicating that PennantPark Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ares Capital
10 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. PennantPark Investment pays out 228.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ares Capital pays out 117.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PennantPark Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. Ares Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Investment$25.64M8.42$48.85M$0.2115.74
Ares Capital$3.05B4.46$1.30B$1.6311.63

Summary

Ares Capital beats PennantPark Investment on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Capital Southwest?

PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) and Capital Southwest (NASDAQ:CSWC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 48.68% compared to PennantPark Investment's net margin of 11.33%. Capital Southwest's return on equity of 14.00% beat PennantPark Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PennantPark Investment11.33% 11.59% 4.23%
Capital Southwest 48.68%14.00%6.61%

PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Southwest has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital Southwest has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. Capital Southwest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Investment$25.64M8.42$48.85M$0.2115.74
Capital Southwest$232.10M6.44$113M$1.9012.66

PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. PennantPark Investment pays out 228.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest pays out 122.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Capital Southwest has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

PennantPark Investment presently has a consensus target price of $5.10, indicating a potential upside of 54.26%. Capital Southwest has a consensus target price of $23.20, indicating a potential downside of 3.57%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than Capital Southwest.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PennantPark Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Capital Southwest
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

In the previous week, Capital Southwest had 5 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Capital Southwest and 1 mentions for PennantPark Investment. PennantPark Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Capital Southwest's score of 0.59 indicating that PennantPark Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Capital Southwest
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.4% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Capital Southwest beats PennantPark Investment on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Golub Capital BDC?

PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) and Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Golub Capital BDC had 3 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Golub Capital BDC and 1 mentions for PennantPark Investment. PennantPark Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Golub Capital BDC's score of 1.29 indicating that PennantPark Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Golub Capital BDC
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 24.64% compared to PennantPark Investment's net margin of 11.33%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PennantPark Investment11.33% 11.59% 4.23%
Golub Capital BDC 24.64%10.20%4.47%

26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

PennantPark Investment presently has a consensus price target of $5.10, indicating a potential upside of 54.26%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.61%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than Golub Capital BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PennantPark Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Golub Capital BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. PennantPark Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Investment$25.64M8.42$48.85M$0.2115.74
Golub Capital BDC$870.78M3.89$376.65M$0.7716.90

PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. PennantPark Investment pays out 228.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golub Capital BDC pays out 171.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PennantPark Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats PennantPark Investment on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to Gladstone Capital?

PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) and Gladstone Capital (NASDAQ:GLAD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Capital has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

PennantPark Investment currently has a consensus price target of $5.10, indicating a potential upside of 54.26%. Gladstone Capital has a consensus price target of $21.67, indicating a potential upside of 10.94%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than Gladstone Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PennantPark Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Gladstone Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. Gladstone Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. PennantPark Investment pays out 228.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Capital pays out 98.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Gladstone Capital has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Gladstone Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Gladstone Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gladstone Capital has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. Gladstone Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Investment$25.64M8.42$48.85M$0.2115.74
Gladstone Capital$89.12M4.95$58.11M$1.8310.67

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 45.15% compared to PennantPark Investment's net margin of 11.33%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PennantPark Investment11.33% 11.59% 4.23%
Gladstone Capital 45.15%9.79%5.31%

In the previous week, Gladstone Capital had 5 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Gladstone Capital and 1 mentions for PennantPark Investment. PennantPark Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Gladstone Capital's score of 0.69 indicating that PennantPark Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gladstone Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Gladstone Capital beats PennantPark Investment on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PennantPark Investment compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

PennantPark Investment has a net margin of 11.33% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment1.90% 10.86% 4.31%
PennantPark Investment 11.33%11.59%4.23%

MidCap Financial Investment currently has a consensus price target of $11.46, indicating a potential upside of 19.30%. PennantPark Investment has a consensus price target of $5.10, indicating a potential upside of 54.26%. Given PennantPark Investment's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
PennantPark Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment had 1 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment and 1 mentions for PennantPark Investment. PennantPark Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.25 indicating that PennantPark Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
PennantPark Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment pays out 228.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PennantPark Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

MidCap Financial Investment has higher revenue and earnings than PennantPark Investment. PennantPark Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M2.47$63.17M$0.04240.25
PennantPark Investment$25.64M8.42$48.85M$0.2115.74

Summary

PennantPark Investment beats MidCap Financial Investment on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PennantPark Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PNNT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PNNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PNNT vs. The Competition

MetricPennantPark InvestmentInvestors IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$215.87M$74.18M$14.40B$12.41B
Dividend Yield13.95%13.95%5.66%9.39%
P/E Ratio12.726.4120.5724.19
Price / Sales8.428.4244.3594.59
Price / Cash7.473.9419.2447.25
Price / Book0.440.282.266.26
Net Income$48.85M$3.22M$1.14B$331.76M
7 Day Performance-2.62%-1.31%0.44%-1.10%
1 Month Performance-4.67%-11.93%1.60%-1.27%
1 Year Performance-54.43%-49.03%13.41%18.85%

PennantPark Investment Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PNNT
PennantPark Investment
3.4741 of 5 stars
$3.31
+2.4%
$5.10
+54.3%
-55.3%$215.87M$25.64M12.72N/A
ARCC
Ares Capital
3.4246 of 5 stars
$18.81
+0.9%
$20.60
+9.5%
-18.2%$13.50B$3.05B11.542,550
CSWC
Capital Southwest
1.7164 of 5 stars
$23.93
+1.2%
$23.20
-3.1%
+2.6%$1.49B$232.10M12.5920
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
3.5804 of 5 stars
$13.02
+0.8%
$14.00
+7.5%
-16.1%$3.39B$870.78M16.90N/A
GLAD
Gladstone Capital
2.7245 of 5 stars
$19.83
+0.0%
$21.67
+9.3%
-31.9%$447.85M$89.12M10.8370

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PNNT) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners