Go Pro

SLR Investment (SLRC) Competitors

SLR Investment logo
$11.57 -0.10 (-0.86%)
As of 11:03 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SLRC vs. ARCC, CGBD, CSWC, GBDC, and GLAD

Should you buy SLR Investment stock or one of its competitors? SLR Investment's main competitors and comparable companies include Ares Capital (ARCC), Carlyle Secured Lending (CGBD), Capital Southwest (CSWC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), and Gladstone Capital (GLAD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does SLR Investment compare to Ares Capital?

SLR Investment (NASDAQ:SLRC) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

SLR Investment has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

SLR Investment has a net margin of 35.20% compared to Ares Capital's net margin of 30.91%. Ares Capital's return on equity of 9.80% beat SLR Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SLR Investment35.20% 7.96% 3.09%
Ares Capital 30.91%9.80%4.50%

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 2 more articles in the media than SLR Investment. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Ares Capital and 8 mentions for SLR Investment. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat SLR Investment's score of 0.10 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
SLR Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ares Capital
3 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

35.3% of SLR Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.8% of SLR Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

SLR Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. SLR Investment pays out 91.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ares Capital pays out 142.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SLR Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than SLR Investment. SLR Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SLR Investment$218.54M2.89$92.54M$1.358.57
Ares Capital$3.05B4.46$1.30B$1.3514.03

SLR Investment currently has a consensus target price of $14.10, suggesting a potential upside of 21.87%. Ares Capital has a consensus target price of $20.60, suggesting a potential upside of 8.74%. Given SLR Investment's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than Ares Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SLR Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

Summary

Ares Capital beats SLR Investment on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SLR Investment compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Carlyle Secured Lending (NASDAQ:CGBD) and SLR Investment (NASDAQ:SLRC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Carlyle Secured Lending had 2 more articles in the media than SLR Investment. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Carlyle Secured Lending and 8 mentions for SLR Investment. Carlyle Secured Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat SLR Investment's score of 0.10 indicating that Carlyle Secured Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carlyle Secured Lending
4 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
SLR Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

SLR Investment has a net margin of 35.20% compared to Carlyle Secured Lending's net margin of 14.26%. Carlyle Secured Lending's return on equity of 8.85% beat SLR Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carlyle Secured Lending14.26% 8.85% 3.90%
SLR Investment 35.20%7.96%3.09%

SLR Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Carlyle Secured Lending. SLR Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Secured Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carlyle Secured Lending$255.57M2.90$69.97M$0.5121.15
SLR Investment$218.54M2.89$92.54M$1.358.57

Carlyle Secured Lending presently has a consensus target price of $12.25, suggesting a potential upside of 13.57%. SLR Investment has a consensus target price of $14.10, suggesting a potential upside of 21.87%. Given SLR Investment's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than Carlyle Secured Lending.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carlyle Secured Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
SLR Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

24.5% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of SLR Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.8% of SLR Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Carlyle Secured Lending has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SLR Investment has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Carlyle Secured Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. SLR Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Carlyle Secured Lending pays out 274.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SLR Investment pays out 91.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Carlyle Secured Lending beats SLR Investment on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SLR Investment compare to Capital Southwest?

Capital Southwest (NASDAQ:CSWC) and SLR Investment (NASDAQ:SLRC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

23.4% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of SLR Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.8% of SLR Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Capital Southwest had 1 more articles in the media than SLR Investment. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Capital Southwest and 8 mentions for SLR Investment. Capital Southwest's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat SLR Investment's score of 0.10 indicating that Capital Southwest is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capital Southwest
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
SLR Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. SLR Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Capital Southwest pays out 128.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SLR Investment pays out 91.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. SLR Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 46.68% compared to SLR Investment's net margin of 35.20%. Capital Southwest's return on equity of 13.88% beat SLR Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Southwest46.68% 13.88% 6.45%
SLR Investment 35.20%7.96%3.09%

Capital Southwest has higher revenue and earnings than SLR Investment. SLR Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Southwest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Southwest$232.10M6.45$113M$1.8112.97
SLR Investment$218.54M2.89$92.54M$1.358.57

Capital Southwest has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SLR Investment has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital Southwest presently has a consensus target price of $23.60, suggesting a potential upside of 0.51%. SLR Investment has a consensus target price of $14.10, suggesting a potential upside of 21.87%. Given SLR Investment's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than Capital Southwest.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital Southwest
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
SLR Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Capital Southwest beats SLR Investment on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SLR Investment compare to Golub Capital BDC?

SLR Investment (NASDAQ:SLRC) and Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

35.3% of SLR Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 8.8% of SLR Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than SLR Investment. SLR Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SLR Investment$218.54M2.89$92.54M$1.358.57
Golub Capital BDC$870.78M3.75$376.65M$0.6519.33

SLR Investment currently has a consensus target price of $14.10, suggesting a potential upside of 21.87%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus target price of $13.90, suggesting a potential upside of 10.62%. Given SLR Investment's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than Golub Capital BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SLR Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Golub Capital BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

SLR Investment has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, SLR Investment had 8 more articles in the media than Golub Capital BDC. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for SLR Investment and 0 mentions for Golub Capital BDC. Golub Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat SLR Investment's score of 0.10 indicating that Golub Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
SLR Investment Neutral
Golub Capital BDC Neutral

SLR Investment has a net margin of 35.20% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 21.45%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 9.91% beat SLR Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SLR Investment35.20% 7.96% 3.09%
Golub Capital BDC 21.45%9.91%4.39%

SLR Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.5%. SLR Investment pays out 91.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golub Capital BDC pays out 203.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SLR Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats SLR Investment on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SLR Investment compare to Gladstone Capital?

SLR Investment (NASDAQ:SLRC) and Gladstone Capital (NASDAQ:GLAD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

35.3% of SLR Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Gladstone Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 8.8% of SLR Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Gladstone Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

SLR Investment currently has a consensus target price of $14.10, indicating a potential upside of 21.87%. Gladstone Capital has a consensus target price of $21.67, indicating a potential upside of 12.47%. Given SLR Investment's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than Gladstone Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SLR Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Gladstone Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

SLR Investment has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Capital has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

SLR Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Gladstone Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. SLR Investment pays out 91.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Capital pays out 87.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Capital has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

SLR Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Capital. SLR Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gladstone Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SLR Investment$218.54M2.89$92.54M$1.358.57
Gladstone Capital$89.12M4.88$58.11M$2.069.35

In the previous week, SLR Investment had 5 more articles in the media than Gladstone Capital. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for SLR Investment and 3 mentions for Gladstone Capital. Gladstone Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat SLR Investment's score of 0.10 indicating that Gladstone Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
SLR Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gladstone Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 50.48% compared to SLR Investment's net margin of 35.20%. Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 9.67% beat SLR Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SLR Investment35.20% 7.96% 3.09%
Gladstone Capital 50.48%9.67%5.00%

Summary

Gladstone Capital beats SLR Investment on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get SLR Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SLRC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SLRC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SLRC vs. The Competition

MetricSLR InvestmentCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$632.73M$5.18B$13.32B$13.27B
Dividend Yield10.70%7.55%6.03%15.88%
P/E Ratio8.5929.3724.5126.15
Price / Sales2.891,271.28510.2693.06
Price / Cash6.5747.7747.4551.25
Price / Book0.643.502.706.34
Net Income$92.54M$417.69M$1.32B$361.18M
7 Day Performance-1.45%-0.52%-0.80%-1.17%
1 Month Performance-8.90%5.46%1.25%-3.40%
1 Year Performance-23.73%3.53%8.36%3.28%

SLR Investment Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SLRC
SLR Investment
4.492 of 5 stars
$11.57
-0.9%
$14.10
+21.9%
-22.8%$632.73M$218.54M8.59N/A
ARCC
Ares Capital
2.9879 of 5 stars
$19.38
-0.3%
$20.60
+6.3%
-4.8%$13.91B$3.05B14.354,250
CGBD
Carlyle Secured Lending
3.4805 of 5 stars
$11.46
-0.5%
$12.50
+9.1%
-13.2%$788.22M$255.57M22.462,500
CSWC
Capital Southwest
3.2844 of 5 stars
$23.46
+0.1%
$23.60
+0.6%
+7.4%$1.49B$232.10M12.9636
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
2.6824 of 5 stars
$12.57
+0.1%
$13.90
+10.6%
-6.4%$3.26B$870.78M19.32N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SLRC) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners