Do analysts prefer AMBR or MFIC?

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $10.71, indicating a potential upside of 25.98%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than Amber International. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Amber International 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 MidCap Financial Investment 1 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media favor AMBR or MFIC?

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment had 2 more articles in the media than Amber International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment and 2 mentions for Amber International. Amber International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.51 indicating that Amber International is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Amber International 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MidCap Financial Investment 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate AMBR or PFLT?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 44.47%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Amber International. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Amber International 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media prefer AMBR or PFLT?

In the previous week, Amber International had 1 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Amber International and 1 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Amber International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.78 indicating that Amber International is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Amber International 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend PAX or AMBR?

Patria Investments currently has a consensus price target of $12.75, suggesting a potential upside of 7.96%. Given Patria Investments' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Patria Investments is more favorable than Amber International. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Patria Investments 3 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.60 Amber International 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to PAX or AMBR?

In the previous week, Amber International had 1 more articles in the media than Patria Investments. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Amber International and 1 mentions for Patria Investments. Amber International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Patria Investments' score of 0.59 indicating that Amber International is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Patria Investments 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Amber International 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend AMBR or FAC?

Factorial Energy has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 169.71%. Given Factorial Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Factorial Energy is more favorable than Amber International. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Amber International 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Factorial Energy 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Does the media refer more to AMBR or FAC?

In the previous week, Factorial Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Amber International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Factorial Energy and 2 mentions for Amber International. Factorial Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Amber International's score of 0.89 indicating that Factorial Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Amber International 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Factorial Energy 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate AMBR or NMFC?

New Mountain Finance has a consensus price target of $7.67, indicating a potential upside of 11.27%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Amber International. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Amber International 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 New Mountain Finance 1 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.80

Does the media favor AMBR or NMFC?

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 4 more articles in the media than Amber International. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 2 mentions for Amber International. Amber International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat New Mountain Finance's score of 0.05 indicating that Amber International is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Amber International 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive New Mountain Finance 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Amber International (AMBR) Competitors

$1.70 -0.11 (-6.08%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$1.71 +0.01 (+0.76%)

As of 07:50 PM Eastern

Compare

AMBR vs. MFIC, PFLT, PAX, FAC, and NMFC

Should you buy Amber International stock or one of its competitors? Amber International's main competitors and comparable companies include MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT), Patria Investments (PAX), Factorial Energy (FAC), and New Mountain Finance (NMFC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Amber International compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Amber International (NASDAQ:AMBR) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment had 2 more articles in the media than Amber International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment and 2 mentions for Amber International. Amber International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.51 indicating that Amber International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Amber International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MidCap Financial Investment	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $10.71, indicating a potential upside of 25.98%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than Amber International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Amber International	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
MidCap Financial Investment	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

MidCap Financial Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Amber International. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amber International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Amber International	$66.09M	2.58	$3.75M	$0.01	181.00
MidCap Financial Investment	-$11.90M	-58.86	$63.17M	-$0.36	N/A

Amber International has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 15.1% of Amber International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Amber International has a net margin of -0.27% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 11.17% beat Amber International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Amber International	-0.27%	1.07%	0.42%
MidCap Financial Investment	-9.85%	11.17%	4.41%

Summary

Amber International beats MidCap Financial Investment on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Amber International compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Amber International (NASDAQ:AMBR) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.1% of Amber International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Amber International has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus target price of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 44.47%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Amber International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Amber International	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to Amber International's net margin of -0.27%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 10.24% beat Amber International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Amber International	-0.27%	1.07%	0.42%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	18.53%	10.24%	3.88%

In the previous week, Amber International had 1 more articles in the media than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Amber International and 1 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Amber International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.78 indicating that Amber International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Amber International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Amber International. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amber International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Amber International	$66.09M	2.58	$3.75M	$0.01	181.00
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	$261.43M	2.52	$66.36M	$0.51	13.03

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Amber International on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Amber International compare to Patria Investments?

Patria Investments (NYSE:PAX) and Amber International (NASDAQ:AMBR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Patria Investments has a net margin of 19.91% compared to Amber International's net margin of -0.27%. Patria Investments' return on equity of 38.68% beat Amber International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Patria Investments	19.91%	38.68%	15.84%
Amber International	-0.27%	1.07%	0.42%

In the previous week, Amber International had 1 more articles in the media than Patria Investments. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Amber International and 1 mentions for Patria Investments. Amber International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Patria Investments' score of 0.59 indicating that Amber International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Patria Investments	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Amber International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amber International has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

96.3% of Patria Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 58.1% of Patria Investments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.1% of Amber International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Patria Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Amber International. Patria Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amber International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Patria Investments	$428M	1.84	$73.40M	$0.44	26.84
Amber International	$66.09M	2.58	$3.75M	$0.01	181.00

Patria Investments currently has a consensus price target of $12.75, suggesting a potential upside of 7.96%. Given Patria Investments' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Patria Investments is more favorable than Amber International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Patria Investments	3 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.60
Amber International	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Patria Investments beats Amber International on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Amber International compare to Factorial Energy?

Amber International (NASDAQ:AMBR) and Factorial Energy (NASDAQ:FAC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Amber International has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Factorial Energy has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Factorial Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Amber International. Factorial Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amber International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Amber International	$66.09M	2.58	$3.75M	$0.01	181.00
Factorial Energy	N/A	N/A	$6.22M	-$0.66	N/A

In the previous week, Factorial Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Amber International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Factorial Energy and 2 mentions for Amber International. Factorial Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Amber International's score of 0.89 indicating that Factorial Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Amber International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Factorial Energy	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Factorial Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Amber International's net margin of -0.27%. Amber International's return on equity of 1.07% beat Factorial Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Amber International	-0.27%	1.07%	0.42%
Factorial Energy	N/A	-41.99%	-1.91%

Factorial Energy has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 169.71%. Given Factorial Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Factorial Energy is more favorable than Amber International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Amber International	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Factorial Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Summary

Factorial Energy beats Amber International on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Amber International compare to New Mountain Finance?

Amber International (NASDAQ:AMBR) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Amber International has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.1% of Amber International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

New Mountain Finance has a consensus price target of $7.67, indicating a potential upside of 11.27%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Amber International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Amber International	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
New Mountain Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 4 more articles in the media than Amber International. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 2 mentions for Amber International. Amber International's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat New Mountain Finance's score of 0.05 indicating that Amber International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Amber International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
New Mountain Finance	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Amber International has a net margin of -0.27% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -16.78%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 10.94% beat Amber International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Amber International	-0.27%	1.07%	0.42%
New Mountain Finance	-16.78%	10.94%	4.58%

New Mountain Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Amber International. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amber International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Amber International	$66.09M	2.58	$3.75M	$0.01	181.00
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	1.99	$16.49M	-$0.47	N/A

Summary

Amber International beats New Mountain Finance on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Amber International News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AMBR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AMBR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Amber International	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$170.64M	$5.11B	$13.59B	$12.94B
Dividend Yield	N/A	7.60%	6.07%	27.63%
P/E Ratio	90.50	27.45	22.18	17.70
Price / Sales	2.43	1,207.38	489.59	76.22
Price / Cash	34.05	47.56	43.64	51.88
Price / Book	1.45	3.44	2.70	5.85
Net Income	$3.75M	$415.07M	$1.32B	$380.67M
7 Day Performance	-9.57%	-1.11%	-0.48%	-4.97%
1 Month Performance	28.79%	-1.72%	-2.13%	-6.95%
1 Year Performance	-24.11%	7.93%	10.40%	-5.99%

Amber International Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AMBR Amber International	0.7107 of 5 stars	$1.70 -6.1%	N/A	-31.7%	$170.64M	$66.09M	90.50	295
MFIC MidCap Financial Investment	3.1401 of 5 stars	$8.62 -1.4%	$11.11 +28.9%	-28.0%	$710.06M	-$11.90M	N/A	N/A
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	4.5513 of 5 stars	$6.84 -1.9%	$9.80 +43.4%	-23.7%	$678.65M	$61.93M	13.40	658	Positive News
PAX Patria Investments	2.5994 of 5 stars	$10.21 +0.7%	$12.75 +24.9%	-19.3%	$674.54M	$399.23M	20.42	548
FAC Factorial Energy	2.5367 of 5 stars	$6.00 -4.8%	$13.00 +116.7%	N/A	$673.71M	N/A	N/A	2	News Coverage Short Interest Increase

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:AMBR) was last updated on 10/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Amber International (AMBR) Competitors

AMBR vs. MFIC, PFLT, PAX, FAC, and NMFC

How does Amber International compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Summary

How does Amber International compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Summary

How does Amber International compare to Patria Investments?

Summary

How does Amber International compare to Factorial Energy?

Summary

How does Amber International compare to New Mountain Finance?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMBR vs. The Competition

Amber International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Amber International (AMBR) Competitors

AMBR vs. MFIC, PFLT, PAX, FAC, and NMFC

How does Amber International compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

Does the media favor AMBR or MFIC?

Do analysts prefer AMBR or MFIC?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AMBR or MFIC?

Which has more risk and volatility, AMBR or MFIC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in AMBR or MFIC?

Is AMBR or MFIC more profitable?

Summary

How does Amber International compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in AMBR or PFLT?

Which has more volatility & risk, AMBR or PFLT?

Do analysts rate AMBR or PFLT?

Is AMBR or PFLT more profitable?

Does the media prefer AMBR or PFLT?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AMBR or PFLT?

Summary

How does Amber International compare to Patria Investments?

Is PAX or AMBR more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PAX or AMBR?

Which has more volatility and risk, PAX or AMBR?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PAX or AMBR?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, PAX or AMBR?

Do analysts recommend PAX or AMBR?

Summary

How does Amber International compare to Factorial Energy?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMBR or FAC?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, AMBR or FAC?

Does the media refer more to AMBR or FAC?

Is AMBR or FAC more profitable?

Do analysts recommend AMBR or FAC?

Summary

How does Amber International compare to New Mountain Finance?

Which has more risk and volatility, AMBR or NMFC?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in AMBR or NMFC?

Do analysts rate AMBR or NMFC?

Does the media favor AMBR or NMFC?

Is AMBR or NMFC more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AMBR or NMFC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMBR vs. The Competition

Amber International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools