NASDAQ:CCAP

Crescent Capital BDC Competitors

$18.53
-0.49 (-2.58 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$18.12
Now: $18.53
$19.14
50-Day Range
$16.24
MA: $17.56
$19.95
52-Week Range
$8.79
Now: $18.53
$19.95
Volume37,183 shs
Average Volume27,939 shs
Market Capitalization$521.93 million
P/E Ratio18.91
Dividend Yield8.56%
BetaN/A

Competitors

Crescent Capital BDC (NASDAQ:CCAP) Vs. IPOE, IPOF, PAYA, WPF, PRCH, and STPK

Should you be buying CCAP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "holding & other investment offices" are considered alternatives and competitors to Crescent Capital BDC, including Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V (IPOE), Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI (IPOF), Paya (PAYA), Foley Trasimene Acquisition (WPF), Porch Group (PRCH), and Star Peak Energy Transition (STPK).

Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V (NYSE:IPOE) and Crescent Capital BDC (NASDAQ:CCAP) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V and Crescent Capital BDC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V0000N/A
Crescent Capital BDC01102.50

Crescent Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.05%. Given Crescent Capital BDC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Capital BDC is more favorable than Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V and Crescent Capital BDC's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Crescent Capital BDC$53.48 million9.76$29.28 million$1.8210.18

Crescent Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V.

Profitability

This table compares Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V and Crescent Capital BDC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VN/AN/AN/A
Crescent Capital BDC41.11%8.60%4.72%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

36.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Crescent Capital BDC beats Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Crescent Capital BDC (NASDAQ:CCAP) and Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI (NYSE:IPOF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Crescent Capital BDC and Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Crescent Capital BDC01102.50
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI0000N/A

Crescent Capital BDC currently has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.05%. Given Crescent Capital BDC's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Capital BDC is more favorable than Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Crescent Capital BDC and Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Capital BDC$53.48 million9.76$29.28 million$1.8210.18
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VIN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Crescent Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI.

Profitability

This table compares Crescent Capital BDC and Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Crescent Capital BDC41.11%8.60%4.72%
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VIN/AN/AN/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

36.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Crescent Capital BDC beats Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Crescent Capital BDC (NASDAQ:CCAP) and Paya (NASDAQ:PAYA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Crescent Capital BDC and Paya, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Crescent Capital BDC01102.50
Paya00503.00

Crescent Capital BDC currently has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.05%. Paya has a consensus target price of $15.75, indicating a potential upside of 38.52%. Given Paya's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Paya is more favorable than Crescent Capital BDC.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Crescent Capital BDC and Paya's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Capital BDC$53.48 million9.76$29.28 million$1.8210.18
PayaN/AN/A$4.28 million$0.1863.17

Crescent Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Paya. Crescent Capital BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Paya, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Crescent Capital BDC and Paya's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Crescent Capital BDC41.11%8.60%4.72%
PayaN/A-1.98%-0.03%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

36.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.2% of Paya shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Paya shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Crescent Capital BDC (NASDAQ:CCAP) and Foley Trasimene Acquisition (NYSE:WPF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Crescent Capital BDC and Foley Trasimene Acquisition, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Crescent Capital BDC01102.50
Foley Trasimene Acquisition0000N/A

Crescent Capital BDC currently has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.05%. Given Crescent Capital BDC's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Capital BDC is more favorable than Foley Trasimene Acquisition.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Crescent Capital BDC and Foley Trasimene Acquisition's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Capital BDC$53.48 million9.76$29.28 million$1.8210.18
Foley Trasimene AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Crescent Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Foley Trasimene Acquisition.

Profitability

This table compares Crescent Capital BDC and Foley Trasimene Acquisition's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Crescent Capital BDC41.11%8.60%4.72%
Foley Trasimene AcquisitionN/AN/AN/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

36.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Foley Trasimene Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Crescent Capital BDC beats Foley Trasimene Acquisition on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Crescent Capital BDC (NASDAQ:CCAP) and Porch Group (NASDAQ:PRCH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Crescent Capital BDC and Porch Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Crescent Capital BDC01102.50
Porch Group00303.00

Crescent Capital BDC currently has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.05%. Porch Group has a consensus target price of $25.3333, indicating a potential upside of 76.42%. Given Porch Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Porch Group is more favorable than Crescent Capital BDC.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Crescent Capital BDC and Porch Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Capital BDC$53.48 million9.76$29.28 million$1.8210.18
Porch GroupN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Crescent Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Porch Group.

Profitability

This table compares Crescent Capital BDC and Porch Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Crescent Capital BDC41.11%8.60%4.72%
Porch GroupN/AN/AN/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

36.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Porch Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Crescent Capital BDC beats Porch Group on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Crescent Capital BDC (NASDAQ:CCAP) and Star Peak Energy Transition (NYSE:STPK) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Crescent Capital BDC and Star Peak Energy Transition, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Crescent Capital BDC01102.50
Star Peak Energy Transition0000N/A

Crescent Capital BDC currently has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.05%. Given Crescent Capital BDC's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Capital BDC is more favorable than Star Peak Energy Transition.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Crescent Capital BDC and Star Peak Energy Transition's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Capital BDC$53.48 million9.76$29.28 million$1.8210.18
Star Peak Energy TransitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Crescent Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Star Peak Energy Transition.

Profitability

This table compares Crescent Capital BDC and Star Peak Energy Transition's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Crescent Capital BDC41.11%8.60%4.72%
Star Peak Energy TransitionN/AN/AN/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

36.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Crescent Capital BDC beats Star Peak Energy Transition on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.


Crescent Capital BDC Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
IPOE
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V
0.5$16.32-0.2%$1.64 billionN/A0.00
IPOF
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI
0.0$10.39-1.0%$1.49 billionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Paya logo
PAYA
Paya
2.1$11.37-0.3%$1.44 billionN/A142.14
WPF
Foley Trasimene Acquisition
0.0$10.00-0.0%$1.29 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Porch Group logo
PRCH
Porch Group
1.9$14.36-12.0%$1.28 billionN/A0.00
STPK
Star Peak Energy Transition
0.2$26.23-0.5%$1.26 billionN/A0.00News Coverage
Arko logo
ARKO
Arko
1.9$9.95-0.4%$1.24 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
JWS
Jaws Acquisition
0.2$13.33-0.5%$1.15 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Brooge Energy logo
BROG
Brooge Energy
0.8$10.03-0.2%$1.10 billion$44.08 million31.34
CRHC
Cohn Robbins
0.0$10.06-0.3%$1.04 billionN/A0.00
APSG
Apollo Strategic Growth Capital
0.0$9.92-0.1%$1.01 billionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Bain Capital Specialty Finance logo
BCSF
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
1.2$15.68-0.4%$1.01 billion$197.95 million-38.24Increase in Short Interest
GSAH
GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II
0.4$10.38-0.2%$973.13 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
CONX
CONX
0.0$10.00-0.5%$937.70 millionN/A0.00News Coverage
Artius Acquisition logo
AACQ
Artius Acquisition
0.2$10.01-0.3%$906.54 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
RTP
Reinvent Technology Partners
0.0$10.07-0.3%$868.54 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
PRPB
CC Neuberger Principal Holdings II
0.0$10.03-0.0%$830.48 millionN/A0.00
AGC
Altimeter Growth
0.0$12.52-7.9%$779.37 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
AVAN
Avanti Acquisition
0.0$9.98-0.1%$748.50 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
RBAC
RedBall Acquisition
0.0$10.04-0.8%$721.63 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
HighPeak Energy logo
HPK
HighPeak Energy
0.0$7.69-7.0%$712.68 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
DGNR
Dragoneer Growth Opportunities
0.0$10.14-0.3%$699.66 millionN/A0.00
CIIC
CIIG Merger
1.9$21.60-10.2%$698.61 millionN/A0.00
Churchill Capital Corp II logo
CCX
Churchill Capital Corp II
2.0$10.00-0.2%$690 millionN/A0.00Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
dMY Technology Group, Inc. II logo
DMYD
dMY Technology Group, Inc. II
1.7$19.81-2.2%$683.45 millionN/A0.00
Horizon Acquisition logo
HZAC
Horizon Acquisition
0.0$9.84-0.7%$669.10 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
GRSV
Gores Holdings V
0.0$10.03-0.0%$658.22 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
TREB
Trebia Acquisition
0.2$10.06-0.0%$650.76 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
VGAC
VG Acquisition
0.0$10.00-0.1%$635.69 millionN/A0.00Unusual Options Activity
IPOD
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. IV
0.0$10.82-0.9%$622.15 millionN/A0.00
NGA
Northern Genesis Acquisition
0.0$15.17-1.8%$605.77 millionN/A0.00
ETAC
E.Merge Technology Acquisition
0.0$9.82-0.3%$600.98 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
JIH
Juniper Industrial
0.2$13.60-0.4%$586.50 millionN/A0.00
Global Cord Blood logo
CO
Global Cord Blood
0.8$4.81-1.2%$584.66 million$172.50 million8.15
SSPK
Silver Spike Acquisition
0.2$18.37-1.9%$574.04 millionN/A0.00
GOAC
GO Acquisition
0.0$9.98-0.1%$573.85 millionN/A0.00
SEAH
Sports Entertainment Acquisition
0.0$9.94-0.1%$559.13 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
ACTC
ArcLight Clean Transition
1.0$15.58-2.1%$540.44 millionN/A0.00
FMAC
FirstMark Horizon Acquisition
0.0$10.09-0.2%$522.16 millionN/A0.00
EQD
Equity Distribution Acquisition
0.0$9.99-0.4%$516.98 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
ACND
Ascendant Digital Acquisition
0.0$9.92-0.1%$513.36 millionN/A0.00
IMPX
AEA-Bridges Impact
0.0$9.94-0.2%$497 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
APXT
Apex Technology Acquisition
1.0$11.09-3.3%$494.17 millionN/A0.00
LSEA
Landsea Homes
1.9$9.58-0.8%$442.89 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
BTAQ
Burgundy Technology Acquisition
0.0$9.92-0.3%$438.35 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Fusion Acquisition logo
FUSE
Fusion Acquisition
0.2$9.97-0.1%$436.19 millionN/A0.00News Coverage
VACQ
Vector Acquisition
0.0$10.90-3.4%$436 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Thunder Bridge Acquisition II logo
THBR
Thunder Bridge Acquisition II
1.9$10.07-0.2%$434.22 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
SNPR
Tortoise Acquisition Corp. II
0.0$10.01-1.0%$431.68 millionN/A0.00
DEH
D8
0.2$9.99-0.8%$430.82 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/16/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.