Gogo Competitors

Gogo (NASDAQ:GOGO) and OLO (NYSE:OLO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

43.3% of Gogo shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of Gogo shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Gogo and OLO's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

OLO has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gogo.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Gogo and OLO, as reported by MarketBeat.

Gogo presently has a consensus price target of $10.20, suggesting a potential downside of 6.42%. OLO has a consensus price target of $32.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.36%. Given OLO's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe OLO is more favorable than Gogo.

Profitability

This table compares Gogo and OLO's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

OLO beats Gogo on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gogo (NASDAQ:GOGO) and HUYA (NYSE:HUYA) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Gogo has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, HUYA has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

43.3% of Gogo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.6% of HUYA shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of Gogo shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Gogo and HUYA's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

HUYA has higher revenue and earnings than Gogo. Gogo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HUYA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Gogo and HUYA, as reported by MarketBeat.

Gogo presently has a consensus price target of $10.20, suggesting a potential downside of 6.42%. HUYA has a consensus price target of $23.40, suggesting a potential upside of 31.68%. Given HUYA's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe HUYA is more favorable than Gogo.

Profitability

This table compares Gogo and HUYA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

HUYA beats Gogo on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gogo (NASDAQ:GOGO) and 21Vianet Group (NASDAQ:VNET) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Gogo has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, 21Vianet Group has a beta of 0.44, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

43.3% of Gogo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.8% of 21Vianet Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of Gogo shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.1% of 21Vianet Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Gogo and 21Vianet Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

21Vianet Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gogo. 21Vianet Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gogo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Gogo and 21Vianet Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Gogo presently has a consensus price target of $10.20, suggesting a potential downside of 6.42%. 21Vianet Group has a consensus price target of $31.20, suggesting a potential upside of 10.95%. Given 21Vianet Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe 21Vianet Group is more favorable than Gogo.

Profitability

This table compares Gogo and 21Vianet Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

21Vianet Group beats Gogo on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gogo (NASDAQ:GOGO) and FormFactor (NASDAQ:FORM) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Gogo has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FormFactor has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

43.3% of Gogo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.9% of FormFactor shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of Gogo shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of FormFactor shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Gogo and FormFactor's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

FormFactor has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gogo. Gogo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FormFactor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Gogo and FormFactor, as reported by MarketBeat.

Gogo presently has a consensus price target of $10.20, suggesting a potential downside of 6.42%. FormFactor has a consensus price target of $48.25, suggesting a potential downside of 2.35%. Given FormFactor's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FormFactor is more favorable than Gogo.

Profitability

This table compares Gogo and FormFactor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

FormFactor beats Gogo on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gogo (NASDAQ:GOGO) and Viavi Solutions (NASDAQ:VIAV) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Gogo has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Viavi Solutions has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Gogo and Viavi Solutions, as reported by MarketBeat.

Gogo presently has a consensus price target of $10.20, suggesting a potential downside of 6.42%. Viavi Solutions has a consensus price target of $17.6429, suggesting a potential upside of 6.47%. Given Viavi Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Viavi Solutions is more favorable than Gogo.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

43.3% of Gogo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Viavi Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of Gogo shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Viavi Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Gogo and Viavi Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Gogo and Viavi Solutions' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Viavi Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Gogo. Gogo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Viavi Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Viavi Solutions beats Gogo on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Gogo (NASDAQ:GOGO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Ambarella has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gogo has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Ambarella and Gogo, as provided by MarketBeat.

Ambarella presently has a consensus price target of $102.2308, suggesting a potential downside of 1.83%. Gogo has a consensus price target of $10.20, suggesting a potential downside of 6.42%. Given Ambarella's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Ambarella is more favorable than Gogo.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

72.3% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.3% of Gogo shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ambarella shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of Gogo shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Ambarella and Gogo's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ambarella and Gogo's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ambarella has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gogo. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gogo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Ambarella beats Gogo on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.