Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MTLS or BBAI?

Materialise has higher revenue and earnings than BigBear.ai. BigBear.ai is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materialise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Materialise $302.73M 1.37 $8.73M $0.20 35.20 BigBear.ai $127.67M 12.85 -$293.91M -$0.87 N/A

Is MTLS or BBAI more profitable?

Materialise has a net margin of 3.77% compared to BigBear.ai's net margin of -226.69%. Materialise's return on equity of 4.05% beat BigBear.ai's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Materialise 3.77% 4.05% 2.47% BigBear.ai -226.69% -16.02% -11.15%

Does the media favor MTLS or BBAI?

In the previous week, BigBear.ai had 4 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for BigBear.ai and 1 mentions for Materialise. BigBear.ai's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Materialise's score of 0.00 indicating that BigBear.ai is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Materialise 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral BigBear.ai 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to MTLS or VIA?

In the previous week, Via Transportation had 17 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Via Transportation and 1 mentions for Materialise. Materialise's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Via Transportation's score of -0.01 indicating that Materialise is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Materialise 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Via Transportation 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 18 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer LSPD or MTLS?

In the previous week, Lightspeed Commerce and Lightspeed Commerce both had 1 articles in the media. Lightspeed Commerce's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Materialise'saverage media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lightspeed Commerce 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Materialise 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TBLA or MTLS?

Taboola.com has higher revenue and earnings than Materialise. Taboola.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materialise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Taboola.com $1.91B 0.69 $42.28M $0.38 14.29 Materialise $302.73M 1.37 $8.73M $0.20 35.20

Does the media refer more to TBLA or MTLS?

In the previous week, Taboola.com had 1 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Taboola.com and 1 mentions for Materialise. Taboola.com's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Materialise's score of 0.00 indicating that Taboola.com is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Taboola.com 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Materialise 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation & earnings, MTLS or CXM?

Sprinklr has higher revenue and earnings than Materialise. Materialise is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprinklr, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Materialise $302.73M 1.37 $8.73M $0.20 35.20 Sprinklr $857.20M 1.50 $22.91M $0.12 45.63

Is MTLS or CXM more profitable?

Materialise has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 3.29%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 8.13% beat Materialise's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Materialise 3.77% 4.05% 2.47% Sprinklr 3.29% 8.13% 4.03%

Does the media prefer MTLS or CXM?

In the previous week, Sprinklr had 1 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Sprinklr and 1 mentions for Materialise. Sprinklr's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Materialise's score of 0.00 indicating that Sprinklr is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Materialise 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Sprinklr 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Materialise (MTLS) Competitors

$7.04 -0.28 (-3.83%)

Closing price 07/7/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$6.96 -0.08 (-1.08%)

As of 07/7/2026 05:57 PM Eastern

Compare

MTLS vs. BBAI, VIA, LSPD, TBLA, and CXM

Should you buy Materialise stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Materialise with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Materialise include BigBear.ai (BBAI), Via Transportation (VIA), Lightspeed Commerce (LSPD), Taboola.com (TBLA), and Sprinklr (CXM). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does Materialise compare to BigBear.ai?

Materialise (NASDAQ:MTLS) and BigBear.ai (NYSE:BBAI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

Materialise currently has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 42.05%. BigBear.ai has a consensus price target of $5.50, indicating a potential upside of 60.58%. Given BigBear.ai's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe BigBear.ai is more favorable than Materialise.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Materialise	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
BigBear.ai	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Materialise has higher revenue and earnings than BigBear.ai. BigBear.ai is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materialise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Materialise	$302.73M	1.37	$8.73M	$0.20	35.20
BigBear.ai	$127.67M	12.85	-$293.91M	-$0.87	N/A

Materialise has a net margin of 3.77% compared to BigBear.ai's net margin of -226.69%. Materialise's return on equity of 4.05% beat BigBear.ai's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Materialise	3.77%	4.05%	2.47%
BigBear.ai	-226.69%	-16.02%	-11.15%

Materialise has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BigBear.ai has a beta of 3.32, indicating that its share price is 232% more volatile than the broader market.

19.3% of Materialise shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of BigBear.ai shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of BigBear.ai shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, BigBear.ai had 4 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for BigBear.ai and 1 mentions for Materialise. BigBear.ai's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Materialise's score of 0.00 indicating that BigBear.ai is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Materialise	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
BigBear.ai	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Materialise beats BigBear.ai on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Materialise compare to Via Transportation?

Materialise (NASDAQ:MTLS) and Via Transportation (NYSE:VIA) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

Materialise presently has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 42.05%. Via Transportation has a consensus price target of $37.10, indicating a potential upside of 103.12%. Given Via Transportation's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Via Transportation is more favorable than Materialise.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Materialise	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Via Transportation	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.79

Materialise has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Via Transportation's net margin of 0.00%. Materialise's return on equity of 4.05% beat Via Transportation's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Materialise	3.77%	4.05%	2.47%
Via Transportation	N/A	N/A	N/A

Materialise has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Via Transportation. Via Transportation is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materialise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Materialise	$302.73M	1.37	$8.73M	$0.20	35.20
Via Transportation	$463.13M	3.21	-$96.36M	-$0.93	N/A

19.3% of Materialise shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.4% of Via Transportation shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.3% of Via Transportation shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Via Transportation had 17 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Via Transportation and 1 mentions for Materialise. Materialise's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Via Transportation's score of -0.01 indicating that Materialise is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Materialise	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Via Transportation	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	18 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Via Transportation beats Materialise on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Materialise compare to Lightspeed Commerce?

Lightspeed Commerce (NYSE:LSPD) and Materialise (NASDAQ:MTLS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.

Materialise has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lightspeed Commerce. Lightspeed Commerce is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materialise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lightspeed Commerce	$1.23B	1.19	-$144.41M	-$1.03	N/A
Materialise	$302.73M	1.37	$8.73M	$0.20	35.20

Materialise has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Lightspeed Commerce's net margin of -11.77%. Materialise's return on equity of 4.05% beat Lightspeed Commerce's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lightspeed Commerce	-11.77%	0.32%	0.29%
Materialise	3.77%	4.05%	2.47%

Lightspeed Commerce has a beta of 1.88, meaning that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Materialise has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lightspeed Commerce and Lightspeed Commerce both had 1 articles in the media. Lightspeed Commerce's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Materialise'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lightspeed Commerce	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Materialise	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Lightspeed Commerce currently has a consensus target price of $11.27, suggesting a potential upside of 6.36%. Materialise has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.05%. Given Materialise's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Materialise is more favorable than Lightspeed Commerce.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lightspeed Commerce	2 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13
Materialise	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

68.7% of Lightspeed Commerce shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.3% of Materialise shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Materialise beats Lightspeed Commerce on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Materialise compare to Taboola.com?

Taboola.com (NASDAQ:TBLA) and Materialise (NASDAQ:MTLS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Taboola.com has a net margin of 5.64% compared to Materialise's net margin of 3.77%. Taboola.com's return on equity of 10.72% beat Materialise's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Taboola.com	5.64%	10.72%	6.37%
Materialise	3.77%	4.05%	2.47%

Taboola.com has higher revenue and earnings than Materialise. Taboola.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materialise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Taboola.com	$1.91B	0.69	$42.28M	$0.38	14.29
Materialise	$302.73M	1.37	$8.73M	$0.20	35.20

Taboola.com has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Materialise has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Taboola.com currently has a consensus target price of $5.90, suggesting a potential upside of 8.66%. Materialise has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.05%. Given Materialise's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Materialise is more favorable than Taboola.com.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Taboola.com	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Materialise	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, Taboola.com had 1 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Taboola.com and 1 mentions for Materialise. Taboola.com's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Materialise's score of 0.00 indicating that Taboola.com is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Taboola.com	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Materialise	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

42.9% of Taboola.com shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.3% of Materialise shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.6% of Taboola.com shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Taboola.com beats Materialise on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Materialise compare to Sprinklr?

Materialise (NASDAQ:MTLS) and Sprinklr (NYSE:CXM) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Sprinklr had 1 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Sprinklr and 1 mentions for Materialise. Sprinklr's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Materialise's score of 0.00 indicating that Sprinklr is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Materialise	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Sprinklr	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Materialise currently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.05%. Sprinklr has a consensus price target of $7.79, suggesting a potential upside of 42.20%. Given Sprinklr's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sprinklr is more favorable than Materialise.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Materialise	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Sprinklr	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Sprinklr has higher revenue and earnings than Materialise. Materialise is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprinklr, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Materialise	$302.73M	1.37	$8.73M	$0.20	35.20
Sprinklr	$857.20M	1.50	$22.91M	$0.12	45.63

Materialise has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprinklr has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

19.3% of Materialise shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.2% of Sprinklr shares are held by institutional investors. 25.2% of Sprinklr shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Materialise has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 3.29%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 8.13% beat Materialise's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Materialise	3.77%	4.05%	2.47%
Sprinklr	3.29%	8.13%	4.03%

Summary

Sprinklr beats Materialise on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Materialise News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MTLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MTLS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Materialise	INTERNET SOFTWARE Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$432.37M	$17.41B	$39.02B	$12.57B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.42%	3.18%	6.89%
P/E Ratio	35.20	67.44	168.88	24.41
Price / Sales	1.37	37.41	600.60	116.34
Price / Cash	12.99	77.49	46.23	57.41
Price / Book	1.44	6.81	9.55	6.40
Net Income	$8.73M	$385.08M	$1.07B	$331.37M
7 Day Performance	-0.98%	0.40%	-1.87%	-0.91%
1 Month Performance	6.51%	3.08%	-1.09%	1.88%
1 Year Performance	23.73%	-10.68%	139.02%	22.83%

Materialise Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MTLS Materialise	2.3022 of 5 stars	$7.04 -3.8%	$10.00 +42.0%	+27.1%	$432.37M	$302.73M	35.20	2,556
BBAI BigBear.ai	1.9857 of 5 stars	$3.43 -4.3%	$5.50 +60.6%	-56.0%	$1.64B	$127.67M	N/A	660
VIA Via Transportation	3.8563 of 5 stars	$18.27 -5.6%	$37.10 +103.1%	N/A	$1.48B	$434.34M	N/A	973	Trending News
LSPD Lightspeed Commerce	2.2795 of 5 stars	$10.60 -0.3%	$11.27 +6.4%	-9.0%	$1.46B	$1.23B	N/A	3,400
TBLA Taboola.com	4.5441 of 5 stars	$5.43 -1.8%	$5.90 +8.7%	+47.6%	$1.32B	$1.91B	14.29	2,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MTLS) was last updated on 7/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Materialise (MTLS) Competitors

MTLS vs. BBAI, VIA, LSPD, TBLA, and CXM

How does Materialise compare to BigBear.ai?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Via Transportation?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Lightspeed Commerce?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Taboola.com?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Sprinklr?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTLS vs. The Competition

Materialise Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Materialise (MTLS) Competitors

MTLS vs. BBAI, VIA, LSPD, TBLA, and CXM

How does Materialise compare to BigBear.ai?

Do analysts rate MTLS or BBAI?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MTLS or BBAI?

Is MTLS or BBAI more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, MTLS or BBAI?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MTLS or BBAI?

Does the media favor MTLS or BBAI?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Via Transportation?

Do analysts recommend MTLS or VIA?

Is MTLS or VIA more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, MTLS or VIA?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in MTLS or VIA?

Does the media refer more to MTLS or VIA?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Lightspeed Commerce?

Which has better earnings & valuation, LSPD or MTLS?

Is LSPD or MTLS more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, LSPD or MTLS?

Does the media prefer LSPD or MTLS?

Do analysts rate LSPD or MTLS?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of LSPD or MTLS?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Taboola.com?

Is TBLA or MTLS more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TBLA or MTLS?

Which has more risk & volatility, TBLA or MTLS?

Do analysts prefer TBLA or MTLS?

Does the media refer more to TBLA or MTLS?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of TBLA or MTLS?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Sprinklr?

Does the media prefer MTLS or CXM?

Do analysts prefer MTLS or CXM?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MTLS or CXM?

Which has more volatility and risk, MTLS or CXM?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in MTLS or CXM?

Is MTLS or CXM more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTLS vs. The Competition

Materialise Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools