Which has preferable valuation & earnings, MTLS or CXM?

Sprinklr has higher revenue and earnings than Materialise. Materialise is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprinklr, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Materialise $302.73M 1.25 $8.73M $0.20 32.05 Sprinklr $857.20M 1.70 $22.91M $0.12 51.71

Is MTLS or CXM more profitable?

Materialise has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 3.29%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 8.13% beat Materialise's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Materialise 3.77% 4.05% 2.47% Sprinklr 3.29% 8.13% 4.03%

Does the media refer more to MTLS or CXM?

In the previous week, Materialise and Materialise both had 3 articles in the media. Sprinklr's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Materialise's score of 1.00 indicating that Sprinklr is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Materialise 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Sprinklr 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to MTLS or LSPD?

In the previous week, Lightspeed Commerce had 10 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Lightspeed Commerce and 3 mentions for Materialise. Materialise's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Lightspeed Commerce's score of 0.26 indicating that Materialise is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Materialise 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Lightspeed Commerce 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend MTLS or MGRT?

Materialise currently has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 56.01%. Given Materialise's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Materialise is more favorable than Mega Fortune. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Materialise 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Mega Fortune 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has higher earnings & valuation, MTLS or MGRT?

Materialise has higher revenue and earnings than Mega Fortune. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Materialise $302.73M 1.25 $8.73M $0.20 32.05 Mega Fortune $11.09M 118.67 $1.79M N/A N/A

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, MTLS or BBAI?

Materialise has higher revenue and earnings than BigBear.ai. BigBear.ai is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materialise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Materialise $302.73M 1.25 $8.73M $0.20 32.05 BigBear.ai $127.67M 10.65 -$293.91M -$0.87 N/A

Is MTLS or BBAI more profitable?

Materialise has a net margin of 3.77% compared to BigBear.ai's net margin of -226.69%. Materialise's return on equity of 4.05% beat BigBear.ai's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Materialise 3.77% 4.05% 2.47% BigBear.ai -226.69% -16.02% -11.15%

Does the media prefer MTLS or BBAI?

In the previous week, BigBear.ai had 9 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for BigBear.ai and 3 mentions for Materialise. Materialise's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat BigBear.ai's score of 0.30 indicating that Materialise is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Materialise 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive BigBear.ai 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer SBET or MTLS?

In the previous week, Sharplink Gaming had 4 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Sharplink Gaming and 3 mentions for Materialise. Materialise's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Sharplink Gaming's score of 0.93 indicating that Materialise is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Sharplink Gaming 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Materialise 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Materialise (MTLS) Competitors

$6.41 +0.09 (+1.42%)

Closing price 07/30/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$6.40 -0.01 (-0.16%)

As of 07/30/2026 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

MTLS vs. CXM, LSPD, MGRT, BBAI, and SBET

Should you buy Materialise stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Materialise with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Materialise include Sprinklr (CXM), Lightspeed Commerce (LSPD), Mega Fortune (MGRT), BigBear.ai (BBAI), and Sharplink Gaming (SBET). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does Materialise compare to Sprinklr?

Materialise (NASDAQ:MTLS) and Sprinklr (NYSE:CXM) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Sprinklr has higher revenue and earnings than Materialise. Materialise is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprinklr, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Materialise	$302.73M	1.25	$8.73M	$0.20	32.05
Sprinklr	$857.20M	1.70	$22.91M	$0.12	51.71

Materialise has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprinklr has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Materialise currently has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 56.01%. Sprinklr has a consensus target price of $7.79, suggesting a potential upside of 25.47%. Given Materialise's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Materialise is more favorable than Sprinklr.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Materialise	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Sprinklr	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Materialise has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Sprinklr's net margin of 3.29%. Sprinklr's return on equity of 8.13% beat Materialise's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Materialise	3.77%	4.05%	2.47%
Sprinklr	3.29%	8.13%	4.03%

In the previous week, Materialise and Materialise both had 3 articles in the media. Sprinklr's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Materialise's score of 1.00 indicating that Sprinklr is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Materialise	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Sprinklr	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

19.3% of Materialise shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.2% of Sprinklr shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Materialise shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Sprinklr shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sprinklr beats Materialise on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Materialise compare to Lightspeed Commerce?

Materialise (NASDAQ:MTLS) and Lightspeed Commerce (NYSE:LSPD) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Materialise has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Lightspeed Commerce's net margin of -11.77%. Materialise's return on equity of 4.05% beat Lightspeed Commerce's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Materialise	3.77%	4.05%	2.47%
Lightspeed Commerce	-11.77%	0.32%	0.29%

Materialise has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lightspeed Commerce has a beta of 1.88, suggesting that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lightspeed Commerce had 10 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Lightspeed Commerce and 3 mentions for Materialise. Materialise's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Lightspeed Commerce's score of 0.26 indicating that Materialise is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Materialise	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lightspeed Commerce	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

19.3% of Materialise shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.7% of Lightspeed Commerce shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Materialise shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Materialise presently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 56.01%. Lightspeed Commerce has a consensus price target of $11.27, suggesting a potential upside of 16.48%. Given Materialise's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Materialise is more favorable than Lightspeed Commerce.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Materialise	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Lightspeed Commerce	2 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13

Materialise has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lightspeed Commerce. Lightspeed Commerce is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materialise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Materialise	$302.73M	1.25	$8.73M	$0.20	32.05
Lightspeed Commerce	$1.23B	1.09	-$144.41M	-$1.03	N/A

Summary

Materialise beats Lightspeed Commerce on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Materialise compare to Mega Fortune?

Materialise (NASDAQ:MTLS) and Mega Fortune (NASDAQ:MGRT) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

19.3% of Materialise shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Materialise shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Materialise currently has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 56.01%. Given Materialise's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Materialise is more favorable than Mega Fortune.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Materialise	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Mega Fortune	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Materialise has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Mega Fortune's net margin of 0.00%. Materialise's return on equity of 4.05% beat Mega Fortune's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Materialise	3.77%	4.05%	2.47%
Mega Fortune	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Materialise had 2 more articles in the media than Mega Fortune. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Materialise and 1 mentions for Mega Fortune. Mega Fortune's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Materialise's score of 1.00 indicating that Mega Fortune is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Materialise	Positive
Mega Fortune	Very Positive

Materialise has higher revenue and earnings than Mega Fortune.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Materialise	$302.73M	1.25	$8.73M	$0.20	32.05
Mega Fortune	$11.09M	118.67	$1.79M	N/A	N/A

Summary

Materialise beats Mega Fortune on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Materialise compare to BigBear.ai?

Materialise (NASDAQ:MTLS) and BigBear.ai (NYSE:BBAI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

19.3% of Materialise shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of BigBear.ai shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Materialise shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of BigBear.ai shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Materialise has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BigBear.ai has a beta of 3.32, suggesting that its share price is 232% more volatile than the broader market.

Materialise has a net margin of 3.77% compared to BigBear.ai's net margin of -226.69%. Materialise's return on equity of 4.05% beat BigBear.ai's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Materialise	3.77%	4.05%	2.47%
BigBear.ai	-226.69%	-16.02%	-11.15%

In the previous week, BigBear.ai had 9 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for BigBear.ai and 3 mentions for Materialise. Materialise's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat BigBear.ai's score of 0.30 indicating that Materialise is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Materialise	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
BigBear.ai	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Materialise has higher revenue and earnings than BigBear.ai. BigBear.ai is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materialise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Materialise	$302.73M	1.25	$8.73M	$0.20	32.05
BigBear.ai	$127.67M	10.65	-$293.91M	-$0.87	N/A

Materialise currently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 56.01%. BigBear.ai has a consensus price target of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 93.73%. Given BigBear.ai's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe BigBear.ai is more favorable than Materialise.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Materialise	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
BigBear.ai	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Materialise beats BigBear.ai on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Materialise compare to Sharplink Gaming?

Sharplink Gaming (NASDAQ:SBET) and Materialise (NASDAQ:MTLS) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Materialise has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Sharplink Gaming's net margin of -3,604.61%. Materialise's return on equity of 4.05% beat Sharplink Gaming's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sharplink Gaming	-3,604.61%	-38.53%	-38.41%
Materialise	3.77%	4.05%	2.47%

Sharplink Gaming presently has a consensus target price of $20.23, suggesting a potential upside of 215.65%. Materialise has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 56.01%. Given Sharplink Gaming's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sharplink Gaming is more favorable than Materialise.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sharplink Gaming	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Materialise	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, Sharplink Gaming had 4 more articles in the media than Materialise. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Sharplink Gaming and 3 mentions for Materialise. Materialise's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Sharplink Gaming's score of 0.93 indicating that Materialise is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sharplink Gaming	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Materialise	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Sharplink Gaming has a beta of 10.45, meaning that its stock price is 945% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Materialise has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Materialise has higher revenue and earnings than Sharplink Gaming. Sharplink Gaming is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materialise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sharplink Gaming	$28.06M	46.23	-$734.59M	-$0.60	N/A
Materialise	$302.73M	1.25	$8.73M	$0.20	32.05

13.8% of Sharplink Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.3% of Materialise shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Sharplink Gaming shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Materialise shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Materialise beats Sharplink Gaming on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Materialise News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MTLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MTLS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Materialise	INTERNET SOFTWARE Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$373.30M	$17.07B	$36.30B	$12.02B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.64%	3.16%	10.11%
P/E Ratio	32.05	71.79	75.98	23.56
Price / Sales	1.25	37.43	597.80	94.43
Price / Cash	11.22	80.76	41.20	58.30
Price / Book	1.31	6.72	8.43	5.85
Net Income	$8.73M	$385.08M	$1.08B	$336.53M
7 Day Performance	-2.14%	4.07%	0.62%	0.38%
1 Month Performance	-13.73%	14.17%	-2.65%	-4.97%
1 Year Performance	24.22%	-14.06%	135.47%	17.95%

Materialise Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MTLS Materialise	3.7128 of 5 stars	$6.41 +1.4%	$10.00 +56.0%	+22.1%	$373.30M	$302.73M	32.05	2,556
CXM Sprinklr	3.5398 of 5 stars	$6.31 +3.9%	$7.79 +23.5%	-31.5%	$1.48B	$871.18M	52.54	3,258	Gap Down
LSPD Lightspeed Commerce	3.7411 of 5 stars	$10.71 +3.8%	$11.27 +5.3%	-26.5%	$1.47B	$1.23B	N/A	3,400	Trending News Earnings Report
MGRT Mega Fortune	N/A	$101.75 +3.8%	N/A	+3,539.2%	$1.40B	$11.09M	N/A	11	Positive News
BBAI BigBear.ai	1.819 of 5 stars	$2.79 -1.6%	$5.50 +97.5%	-55.6%	$1.33B	$127.35M	N/A	660	Trending News Earnings Report

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MTLS) was last updated on 7/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Materialise (MTLS) Competitors

MTLS vs. CXM, LSPD, MGRT, BBAI, and SBET

How does Materialise compare to Sprinklr?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Lightspeed Commerce?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Mega Fortune?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to BigBear.ai?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Sharplink Gaming?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTLS vs. The Competition

Materialise Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Materialise (MTLS) Competitors

MTLS vs. CXM, LSPD, MGRT, BBAI, and SBET

How does Materialise compare to Sprinklr?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, MTLS or CXM?

Which has more volatility and risk, MTLS or CXM?

Do analysts recommend MTLS or CXM?

Is MTLS or CXM more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MTLS or CXM?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MTLS or CXM?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Lightspeed Commerce?

Is MTLS or LSPD more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, MTLS or LSPD?

Does the media refer more to MTLS or LSPD?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MTLS or LSPD?

Do analysts recommend MTLS or LSPD?

Which has better valuation and earnings, MTLS or LSPD?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Mega Fortune?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MTLS or MGRT?

Do analysts recommend MTLS or MGRT?

Is MTLS or MGRT more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MTLS or MGRT?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, MTLS or MGRT?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to BigBear.ai?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of MTLS or BBAI?

Which has more volatility and risk, MTLS or BBAI?

Is MTLS or BBAI more profitable?

Does the media prefer MTLS or BBAI?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, MTLS or BBAI?

Do analysts prefer MTLS or BBAI?

Summary

How does Materialise compare to Sharplink Gaming?

Is SBET or MTLS more profitable?

Do analysts prefer SBET or MTLS?

Does the media prefer SBET or MTLS?

Which has more risk & volatility, SBET or MTLS?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, SBET or MTLS?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of SBET or MTLS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MTLS vs. The Competition

Materialise Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools