NASDAQ:PTMN

Portman Ridge Finance Competitors

$2.39
-0.03 (-1.24 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$2.36
Now: $2.39
$2.42
50-Day Range
$2.02
MA: $2.16
$2.42
52-Week Range
$0.91
Now: $2.39
$2.45
Volume256,475 shs
Average Volume445,235 shs
Market Capitalization$179.72 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield9.92%
Beta1.34

Competitors

Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:PTMN) Vs. PFLT, TPVG, GAIN, CSWC, PNNT, and SCM

Should you be buying PTMN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investors, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Portman Ridge Finance, including PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (TPVG), Gladstone Investment (GAIN), Capital Southwest (CSWC), PennantPark Investment (PNNT), and Stellus Capital Investment (SCM).

Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:PTMN) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NASDAQ:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

12.8% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.3% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Portman Ridge Finance and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Portman Ridge Finance01002.00
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital01202.67

Portman Ridge Finance currently has a consensus price target of $2.00, indicating a potential downside of 16.32%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential downside of 17.13%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Portman Ridge Finance and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portman Ridge Finance$26.50 million6.78$-12,500,000.00$0.0829.88
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$95.49 million5.14$18.41 million$1.1211.31

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Portman Ridge Finance. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Portman Ridge Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.97, indicating that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Portman Ridge Finance and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Portman Ridge Finance-47.13%7.87%3.40%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital19.28%9.04%3.59%

Dividends

Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out 300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Portman Ridge Finance has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Portman Ridge Finance on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:PTMN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

26.9% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and Portman Ridge Finance, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC02402.67
Portman Ridge Finance01002.00

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC currently has a consensus target price of $10.9583, indicating a potential downside of 30.25%. Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential downside of 16.32%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and Portman Ridge Finance's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC$73.39 million6.61$31.76 million$1.5410.20
Portman Ridge Finance$26.50 million6.78$-12,500,000.00$0.0829.88

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Portman Ridge Finance. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Portman Ridge Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.9, meaning that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC and Portman Ridge Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC40.65%12.21%6.54%
Portman Ridge Finance-47.13%7.87%3.40%

Dividends

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 93.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Portman Ridge Finance pays out 300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Portman Ridge Finance has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC beats Portman Ridge Finance on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:PTMN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Portman Ridge Finance pays out 300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Portman Ridge Finance has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Gladstone Investment and Portman Ridge Finance's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Investment$61.92 million7.55$-7,230,000.00$0.9015.63
Portman Ridge Finance$26.50 million6.78$-12,500,000.00$0.0829.88

Gladstone Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Portman Ridge Finance. Gladstone Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Portman Ridge Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

12.1% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Gladstone Investment and Portman Ridge Finance, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Gladstone Investment0000N/A
Portman Ridge Finance01002.00

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential downside of 16.32%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Gladstone Investment.

Profitability

This table compares Gladstone Investment and Portman Ridge Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Gladstone Investment-34.86%5.53%3.52%
Portman Ridge Finance-47.13%7.87%3.40%

Summary

Gladstone Investment beats Portman Ridge Finance on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Capital Southwest (NASDAQ:CSWC) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:PTMN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Capital Southwest has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Capital Southwest pays out 107.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Portman Ridge Finance pays out 300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Portman Ridge Finance has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Capital Southwest and Portman Ridge Finance's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Southwest$62.04 million7.49$-22,350,000.00$1.5714.90
Portman Ridge Finance$26.50 million6.78$-12,500,000.00$0.0829.88

Portman Ridge Finance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Capital Southwest. Capital Southwest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Portman Ridge Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

30.9% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Capital Southwest shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Capital Southwest and Portman Ridge Finance, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Capital Southwest01402.80
Portman Ridge Finance01002.00

Capital Southwest presently has a consensus target price of $18.60, indicating a potential downside of 20.48%. Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential downside of 16.32%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Capital Southwest.

Profitability

This table compares Capital Southwest and Portman Ridge Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Capital Southwest-10.38%10.17%4.73%
Portman Ridge Finance-47.13%7.87%3.40%

Summary

Capital Southwest beats Portman Ridge Finance on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:PTMN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

29.9% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for PennantPark Investment and Portman Ridge Finance, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
PennantPark Investment01302.75
Portman Ridge Finance01002.00

PennantPark Investment presently has a consensus target price of $5.00, indicating a potential downside of 24.01%. Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential downside of 16.32%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than PennantPark Investment.

Dividends

PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. PennantPark Investment pays out 78.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Portman Ridge Finance pays out 300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Portman Ridge Finance has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares PennantPark Investment and Portman Ridge Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
PennantPark Investment-15.93%7.56%3.07%
Portman Ridge Finance-47.13%7.87%3.40%

Risk and Volatility

PennantPark Investment has a beta of 1.98, suggesting that its share price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares PennantPark Investment and Portman Ridge Finance's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Investment$100.22 million4.40$-15,970,000.00$0.6110.79
Portman Ridge Finance$26.50 million6.78$-12,500,000.00$0.0829.88

Portman Ridge Finance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PennantPark Investment. PennantPark Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Portman Ridge Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:PTMN) and Stellus Capital Investment (NYSE:SCM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

12.8% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of Stellus Capital Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 4.7% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.4% of Stellus Capital Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Portman Ridge Finance and Stellus Capital Investment, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Portman Ridge Finance01002.00
Stellus Capital Investment01202.67

Portman Ridge Finance presently has a consensus price target of $2.00, indicating a potential downside of 16.32%. Stellus Capital Investment has a consensus price target of $11.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.12%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Stellus Capital Investment.

Dividends

Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Stellus Capital Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out 300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Stellus Capital Investment pays out 81.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Portman Ridge Finance has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Stellus Capital Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Portman Ridge Finance and Stellus Capital Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Portman Ridge Finance-47.13%7.87%3.40%
Stellus Capital Investment8.91%9.70%3.74%

Volatility and Risk

Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stellus Capital Investment has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its share price is 41% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Portman Ridge Finance and Stellus Capital Investment's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portman Ridge Finance$26.50 million6.78$-12,500,000.00$0.0829.88
Stellus Capital Investment$58.91 million4.50$26.44 million$1.2311.06

Stellus Capital Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Portman Ridge Finance. Stellus Capital Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Portman Ridge Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Stellus Capital Investment beats Portman Ridge Finance on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.


Portman Ridge Finance Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital logo
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1.0$12.67-0.2%$491.22 million$95.49 million26.96Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC logo
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC
1.4$15.71-0.4%$485.16 million$73.39 million12.88Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gladstone Investment logo
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
1.2$14.07-1.9%$467.19 million$61.92 million-26.06Dividend Announcement
News Coverage
Capital Southwest logo
CSWC
Capital Southwest
1.4$23.39-0.0%$464.71 million$62.04 million-58.48Analyst Downgrade
PennantPark Investment logo
PNNT
PennantPark Investment
1.3$6.58-0.9%$441.16 million$100.22 million-27.42News Coverage
Stellus Capital Investment logo
SCM
Stellus Capital Investment
1.2$13.60-0.1%$265.01 million$58.91 million54.40News Coverage
Oaktree Strategic Income logo
OCSI
Oaktree Strategic Income
1.3$8.50-0.0%$250.47 million$39.53 million-212.45News Coverage
Safeguard Scientifics logo
SFE
Safeguard Scientifics
0.9$6.41-3.7%$134.25 millionN/A-4.30Gap Down
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC logo
FCRD
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC
1.2$4.27-0.0%$128.57 million$52.49 million-2.35
OFS Capital logo
OFS
OFS Capital
1.1$9.10-0.4%$122.02 million$52.52 million-16.85
Investcorp Credit Management BDC logo
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC
1.2$5.70-0.4%$79.32 million$34.46 million-3.77Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
TURN
180 Degree Capital
0.8$7.30-0.0%$75.73 millionN/A0.00
Rand Capital logo
RAND
Rand Capital
1.3$18.24-0.7%$47.10 million$2.72 million10.48Gap Down
Live Ventures logo
LIVE
Live Ventures
0.9$29.65-1.9%$46.11 million$191.70 million-25.13
Firsthand Technology Value Fund logo
SVVC
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
0.8$6.28-1.0%$43.29 million$1.79 million-0.81
Capitala Finance logo
CPTA
Capitala Finance
1.1$15.52-0.6%$42.08 million$44.03 million-1.16Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
LYL
Dragon Victory International
0.4$1.22-6.6%$14.20 million$10,000.000.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.