Real Brokerage (REAX) Competitors

Sixth Street Specialty Lending currently has a consensus price target of $19.67, suggesting a potential upside of 11.00%. Real Brokerage has a consensus price target of $5.69, suggesting a potential upside of 160.89%. Given Real Brokerage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Real Brokerage is more favorable than Sixth Street Specialty Lending.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a net margin of 25.25% compared to Real Brokerage's net margin of -0.32%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.92% beat Real Brokerage's return on equity.

70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.3% of Real Brokerage shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 38.2% of Real Brokerage shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Real Brokerage had 3 more articles in the media than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Real Brokerage and 0 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Real Brokerage's score of 1.18 indicating that Sixth Street Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Real Brokerage. Real Brokerage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Office Properties Income Trust presently has a consensus target price of $27.00, suggesting a potential upside of 43.54%. Real Brokerage has a consensus target price of $5.69, suggesting a potential upside of 160.89%. Given Real Brokerage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Real Brokerage is more favorable than Office Properties Income Trust.

Office Properties Income Trust has a beta of 1.71, indicating that its share price is 71% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Office Properties Income Trust had 3 more articles in the media than Real Brokerage. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Office Properties Income Trust and 3 mentions for Real Brokerage. Office Properties Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Real Brokerage's score of 1.18 indicating that Office Properties Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Real Brokerage has higher revenue and earnings than Office Properties Income Trust.

64.4% of Office Properties Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.3% of Real Brokerage shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Office Properties Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.2% of Real Brokerage shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Real Brokerage has a net margin of -0.32% compared to Office Properties Income Trust's net margin of -62.99%. Real Brokerage's return on equity of -11.37% beat Office Properties Income Trust's return on equity.

Marcus & Millichap has a net margin of -0.08% compared to Real Brokerage's net margin of -0.32%. Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of 0.43% beat Real Brokerage's return on equity.

In the previous week, Real Brokerage had 1 more articles in the media than Marcus & Millichap. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Real Brokerage and 2 mentions for Marcus & Millichap. Real Brokerage's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Marcus & Millichap's score of 0.05 indicating that Real Brokerage is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Marcus & Millichap has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Real Brokerage. Marcus & Millichap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Real Brokerage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Real Brokerage currently has a consensus price target of $5.69, suggesting a potential upside of 160.89%. Marcus & Millichap has a consensus price target of $28.00, suggesting a potential downside of 11.04%. Given Real Brokerage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Real Brokerage is more favorable than Marcus & Millichap.

Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

53.3% of Real Brokerage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.8% of Marcus & Millichap shares are held by institutional investors. 38.2% of Real Brokerage shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.2% of Marcus & Millichap shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Five Point has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Real Brokerage. Real Brokerage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five Point, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

53.3% of Real Brokerage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Five Point shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.2% of Real Brokerage shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.9% of Five Point shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Five Point has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Real Brokerage's net margin of -0.32%. Five Point's return on equity of 1.99% beat Real Brokerage's return on equity.

In the previous week, Real Brokerage had 2 more articles in the media than Five Point. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Real Brokerage and 1 mentions for Five Point. Real Brokerage's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Five Point's score of 0.00 indicating that Real Brokerage is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Real Brokerage presently has a consensus target price of $5.69, suggesting a potential upside of 160.89%. Given Real Brokerage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Real Brokerage is more favorable than Five Point.

Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Five Point has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.