Real Brokerage (REAX) Competitors

Real Brokerage currently has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 204.69%. The RMR Group has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.16%. Given Real Brokerage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Real Brokerage is more favorable than The RMR Group.

The RMR Group has a net margin of 3.10% compared to Real Brokerage's net margin of -0.72%. The RMR Group's return on equity of 2.96% beat Real Brokerage's return on equity.

53.3% of Real Brokerage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.3% of The RMR Group shares are held by institutional investors. 38.2% of Real Brokerage shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.7% of The RMR Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

The RMR Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Real Brokerage. Real Brokerage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The RMR Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, The RMR Group had 1 more articles in the media than Real Brokerage. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The RMR Group and 1 mentions for Real Brokerage. The RMR Group's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Real Brokerage's score of 0.00 indicating that The RMR Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The RMR Group has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

53.3% of Real Brokerage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Exp World shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.2% of Real Brokerage shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Exp World shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Real Brokerage presently has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 204.69%. Exp World has a consensus price target of $5.17, indicating a potential upside of 41.55%. Given Real Brokerage's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Real Brokerage is more favorable than Exp World.

Real Brokerage has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Exp World. Exp World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Real Brokerage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Exp World had 3 more articles in the media than Real Brokerage. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Exp World and 1 mentions for Real Brokerage. Exp World's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Real Brokerage's score of 0.00 indicating that Exp World is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Exp World has a net margin of -0.35% compared to Real Brokerage's net margin of -0.72%. Exp World's return on equity of -5.43% beat Real Brokerage's return on equity.

Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Exp World has a beta of 2.06, indicating that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Real Brokerage and Real Brokerage both had 1 articles in the media. Comstock Holding Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Real Brokerage's score of 0.00 indicating that Comstock Holding Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Comstock Holding Companies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Real Brokerage. Real Brokerage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Comstock Holding Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Comstock Holding Companies has a beta of -0.48, suggesting that its share price is 148% less volatile than the broader market.

Real Brokerage presently has a consensus target price of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 204.69%. Given Real Brokerage's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Real Brokerage is more favorable than Comstock Holding Companies.

Comstock Holding Companies has a net margin of 32.16% compared to Real Brokerage's net margin of -0.72%. Comstock Holding Companies' return on equity of 35.60% beat Real Brokerage's return on equity.

53.3% of Real Brokerage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.5% of Comstock Holding Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 38.2% of Real Brokerage shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.0% of Comstock Holding Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Douglas Elliman has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Real Brokerage's net margin of -0.72%. Douglas Elliman's return on equity of -19.16% beat Real Brokerage's return on equity.

In the previous week, Douglas Elliman had 3 more articles in the media than Real Brokerage. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Douglas Elliman and 1 mentions for Real Brokerage. Douglas Elliman's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Real Brokerage's score of 0.00 indicating that Douglas Elliman is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Real Brokerage presently has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 204.69%. Given Real Brokerage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Real Brokerage is more favorable than Douglas Elliman.

Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Douglas Elliman has a beta of 1.89, suggesting that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the broader market.

Douglas Elliman has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Real Brokerage. Real Brokerage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Douglas Elliman, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

53.3% of Real Brokerage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.6% of Douglas Elliman shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.2% of Real Brokerage shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Douglas Elliman shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.