Go Pro

Recursion Pharmaceuticals (RXRX) Competitors

Recursion Pharmaceuticals logo
$3.51 -0.05 (-1.40%)
As of 03:16 PM Eastern

RXRX vs. CGON, COGT, SRRK, MIRM, and ERAS

Should you buy Recursion Pharmaceuticals stock or one of its competitors? Recursion Pharmaceuticals's main competitors and comparable companies include CG Oncology (CGON), Cogent Biosciences (COGT), Scholar Rock (SRRK), Mirum Pharmaceuticals (MIRM), and Erasca (ERAS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "biotechnology" industry.

How does Recursion Pharmaceuticals compare to CG Oncology?

CG Oncology (NASDAQ:CGON) and Recursion Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:RXRX) are both healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Recursion Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -945.94% compared to CG Oncology's net margin of -3,602.68%. CG Oncology's return on equity of -25.20% beat Recursion Pharmaceuticals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CG Oncology-3,602.68% -25.20% -23.98%
Recursion Pharmaceuticals -945.94%-50.41%-38.25%

CG Oncology has a beta of 0.23, meaning that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Recursion Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

26.6% of CG Oncology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Recursion Pharmaceuticals shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of CG Oncology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Recursion Pharmaceuticals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CG Oncology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Recursion Pharmaceuticals. CG Oncology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Recursion Pharmaceuticals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CG Oncology$4.04M1,720.80-$160.99M-$2.69N/A
Recursion Pharmaceuticals$74.68M25.16-$644.76M-$1.04N/A

In the previous week, CG Oncology and CG Oncology both had 7 articles in the media. CG Oncology's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Recursion Pharmaceuticals' score of 0.99 indicating that CG Oncology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CG Oncology
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Recursion Pharmaceuticals
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CG Oncology presently has a consensus price target of $83.18, suggesting a potential upside of 6.06%. Recursion Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $8.06, suggesting a potential upside of 129.63%. Given Recursion Pharmaceuticals' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Recursion Pharmaceuticals is more favorable than CG Oncology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CG Oncology
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Recursion Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

Summary

Recursion Pharmaceuticals beats CG Oncology on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Recursion Pharmaceuticals compare to Cogent Biosciences?

Cogent Biosciences (NASDAQ:COGT) and Recursion Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:RXRX) are both healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Cogent Biosciences presently has a consensus price target of $49.40, suggesting a potential upside of 34.39%. Recursion Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $8.06, suggesting a potential upside of 129.63%. Given Recursion Pharmaceuticals' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Recursion Pharmaceuticals is more favorable than Cogent Biosciences.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cogent Biosciences
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Recursion Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

89.1% of Recursion Pharmaceuticals shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of Cogent Biosciences shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Recursion Pharmaceuticals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cogent Biosciences has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Recursion Pharmaceuticals. Cogent Biosciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Recursion Pharmaceuticals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cogent BiosciencesN/AN/A-$328.94M-$2.16N/A
Recursion Pharmaceuticals$74.68M25.16-$644.76M-$1.04N/A

Cogent Biosciences has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Recursion Pharmaceuticals' net margin of -945.94%. Recursion Pharmaceuticals' return on equity of -50.41% beat Cogent Biosciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cogent BiosciencesN/A -84.47% -47.72%
Recursion Pharmaceuticals -945.94%-50.41%-38.25%

In the previous week, Cogent Biosciences had 16 more articles in the media than Recursion Pharmaceuticals. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Cogent Biosciences and 7 mentions for Recursion Pharmaceuticals. Recursion Pharmaceuticals' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Cogent Biosciences' score of 0.95 indicating that Recursion Pharmaceuticals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cogent Biosciences
10 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Recursion Pharmaceuticals
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cogent Biosciences has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Recursion Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Recursion Pharmaceuticals beats Cogent Biosciences on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Recursion Pharmaceuticals compare to Scholar Rock?

Recursion Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:RXRX) and Scholar Rock (NASDAQ:SRRK) are both healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Scholar Rock had 7 more articles in the media than Recursion Pharmaceuticals. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Scholar Rock and 7 mentions for Recursion Pharmaceuticals. Recursion Pharmaceuticals' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Scholar Rock's score of 0.73 indicating that Recursion Pharmaceuticals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Recursion Pharmaceuticals
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Scholar Rock
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Recursion Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scholar Rock has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Scholar Rock has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Recursion Pharmaceuticals. Scholar Rock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Recursion Pharmaceuticals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Recursion Pharmaceuticals$74.68M25.16-$644.76M-$1.04N/A
Scholar RockN/AN/A-$377.94M-$3.45N/A

89.1% of Recursion Pharmaceuticals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Scholar Rock shares are held by institutional investors. 6.7% of Recursion Pharmaceuticals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.3% of Scholar Rock shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Recursion Pharmaceuticals presently has a consensus target price of $8.06, suggesting a potential upside of 129.63%. Scholar Rock has a consensus target price of $58.77, suggesting a potential downside of 3.01%. Given Recursion Pharmaceuticals' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Recursion Pharmaceuticals is more favorable than Scholar Rock.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Recursion Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Scholar Rock
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.13

Scholar Rock has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Recursion Pharmaceuticals' net margin of -945.94%. Recursion Pharmaceuticals' return on equity of -50.41% beat Scholar Rock's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Recursion Pharmaceuticals-945.94% -50.41% -38.25%
Scholar Rock N/A -160.19%-87.18%

Summary

Recursion Pharmaceuticals and Scholar Rock tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Recursion Pharmaceuticals compare to Mirum Pharmaceuticals?

Recursion Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:RXRX) and Mirum Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:MIRM) are both healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Mirum Pharmaceuticals had 7 more articles in the media than Recursion Pharmaceuticals. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Mirum Pharmaceuticals and 7 mentions for Recursion Pharmaceuticals. Mirum Pharmaceuticals' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Recursion Pharmaceuticals' score of 0.99 indicating that Mirum Pharmaceuticals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Recursion Pharmaceuticals
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mirum Pharmaceuticals
11 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Recursion Pharmaceuticals currently has a consensus price target of $8.06, suggesting a potential upside of 129.63%. Mirum Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $137.33, suggesting a potential upside of 39.40%. Given Recursion Pharmaceuticals' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Recursion Pharmaceuticals is more favorable than Mirum Pharmaceuticals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Recursion Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Mirum Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

89.1% of Recursion Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Recursion Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Mirum Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mirum Pharmaceuticals has higher revenue and earnings than Recursion Pharmaceuticals. Mirum Pharmaceuticals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Recursion Pharmaceuticals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Recursion Pharmaceuticals$74.68M25.16-$644.76M-$1.04N/A
Mirum Pharmaceuticals$521.31M12.27-$23.36M-$14.55N/A

Mirum Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -139.18% compared to Recursion Pharmaceuticals' net margin of -945.94%. Mirum Pharmaceuticals' return on equity of -36.28% beat Recursion Pharmaceuticals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Recursion Pharmaceuticals-945.94% -50.41% -38.25%
Mirum Pharmaceuticals -139.18%-36.28%-8.54%

Recursion Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mirum Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Mirum Pharmaceuticals beats Recursion Pharmaceuticals on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Recursion Pharmaceuticals compare to Erasca?

Erasca (NASDAQ:ERAS) and Recursion Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:RXRX) are both healthcare companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Erasca has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Recursion Pharmaceuticals. Erasca is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Recursion Pharmaceuticals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ErascaN/AN/A-$124.55M-$0.95N/A
Recursion Pharmaceuticals$74.68M25.16-$644.76M-$1.04N/A

Erasca has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Recursion Pharmaceuticals' net margin of -945.94%. Erasca's return on equity of -38.43% beat Recursion Pharmaceuticals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ErascaN/A -38.43% -32.05%
Recursion Pharmaceuticals -945.94%-50.41%-38.25%

Erasca has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Recursion Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Erasca had 6 more articles in the media than Recursion Pharmaceuticals. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Erasca and 7 mentions for Recursion Pharmaceuticals. Erasca's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Recursion Pharmaceuticals' score of 0.99 indicating that Erasca is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Erasca
10 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Recursion Pharmaceuticals
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

67.8% of Erasca shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Recursion Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Erasca shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Recursion Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Erasca presently has a consensus price target of $22.09, suggesting a potential upside of 15.54%. Recursion Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of $8.06, suggesting a potential upside of 129.63%. Given Recursion Pharmaceuticals' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Recursion Pharmaceuticals is more favorable than Erasca.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Erasca
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.64
Recursion Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

Summary

Erasca beats Recursion Pharmaceuticals on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Recursion Pharmaceuticals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RXRX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RXRX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RXRX vs. The Competition

MetricRecursion PharmaceuticalsBiotechnology IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.88B$4.03B$7.30B$12.76B
Dividend YieldN/A3.63%2.53%10.79%
P/E Ratio-3.3811.62272.8524.16
Price / Sales25.161,369.34627.6598.32
Price / CashN/A103.6478.5753.12
Price / Book2.0516.8813.166.24
Net Income-$644.76M-$22.76M$3.47B$348.07M
7 Day Performance0.29%1.58%1.31%0.63%
1 Month Performance18.58%11.84%8.67%4.84%
1 Year Performance-27.33%57.30%26.14%16.90%

Recursion Pharmaceuticals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RXRX
Recursion Pharmaceuticals
2.1325 of 5 stars
$3.51
-1.4%
$8.06
+129.6%
-26.3%$1.88B$74.68MN/A400
CGON
CG Oncology
2.8326 of 5 stars
$75.03
+0.4%
$83.18
+10.9%
+210.6%$6.62B$4.04MN/A61
COGT
Cogent Biosciences
2.8209 of 5 stars
$37.93
+1.7%
$49.10
+29.4%
+212.1%$6.47BN/AN/A80
SRRK
Scholar Rock
1.5524 of 5 stars
$52.52
-1.0%
$57.71
+9.9%
+74.8%$6.46BN/AN/A140
MIRM
Mirum Pharmaceuticals
3.6308 of 5 stars
$100.64
+1.9%
$137.33
+36.5%
+36.6%$6.41B$521.31MN/A140

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:RXRX) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners