Which has stronger valuation and earnings, SANG or CINT?

CI&T has higher revenue and earnings than Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CI&T, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Sangoma Technologies $236.69M 0.58 -$5.01M -$0.19 N/A CI&T $489.65M 0.90 $40.62M $0.31 10.55

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, OWLS or SANG?

OBOOK has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sangoma Technologies. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio OBOOK $7.86M 64.06 N/A N/A N/A Sangoma Technologies $236.69M 0.58 -$5.01M -$0.19 N/A

Sangoma Technologies (SANG) Competitors

$4.10 +0.05 (+1.23%)

Closing price 07/10/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$3.99 -0.11 (-2.68%)

As of 07/10/2026 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

SANG vs. WEAV, CINT, OWLS, SPT, and DCBO

Should you buy Sangoma Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sangoma Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sangoma Technologies include Weave Communications (WEAV), CI&T (CINT), OBOOK (OWLS), Sprout Social (SPT), and Docebo (DCBO). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Weave Communications?

Weave Communications (NYSE:WEAV) and Sangoma Technologies (NASDAQ:SANG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

86.8% of Weave Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of Sangoma Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Weave Communications shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.0% of Sangoma Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sangoma Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Weave Communications. Weave Communications is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sangoma Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Weave Communications	$239.02M	2.31	-$28.05M	-$0.31	N/A
Sangoma Technologies	$236.69M	0.58	-$5.01M	-$0.19	N/A

In the previous week, Weave Communications and Weave Communications both had 1 articles in the media. Sangoma Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Weave Communications' score of 1.76 indicating that Sangoma Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Weave Communications	Very Positive
Sangoma Technologies	Very Positive

Sangoma Technologies has a net margin of -3.04% compared to Weave Communications' net margin of -10.05%. Sangoma Technologies' return on equity of -2.26% beat Weave Communications' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Weave Communications	-10.05%	-26.46%	-10.39%
Sangoma Technologies	-3.04%	-2.26%	-1.71%

Weave Communications presently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 44.26%. Sangoma Technologies has a consensus price target of $4.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.44%. Given Weave Communications' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Weave Communications is more favorable than Sangoma Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Weave Communications	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Sangoma Technologies	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75

Weave Communications has a beta of 1.68, meaning that its stock price is 68% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sangoma Technologies has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Weave Communications beats Sangoma Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to CI&T?

Sangoma Technologies (NASDAQ:SANG) and CI&T (NYSE:CINT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

CI&T has higher revenue and earnings than Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CI&T, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sangoma Technologies	$236.69M	0.58	-$5.01M	-$0.19	N/A
CI&T	$489.65M	0.90	$40.62M	$0.31	10.55

In the previous week, CI&T had 2 more articles in the media than Sangoma Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CI&T and 1 mentions for Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat CI&T's score of -0.62 indicating that Sangoma Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Sangoma Technologies	Very Positive
CI&T	Negative

Sangoma Technologies has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CI&T has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

CI&T has a net margin of 7.90% compared to Sangoma Technologies' net margin of -3.04%. CI&T's return on equity of 13.19% beat Sangoma Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sangoma Technologies	-3.04%	-2.26%	-1.71%
CI&T	7.90%	13.19%	7.32%

39.7% of Sangoma Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of CI&T shares are held by institutional investors. 14.0% of Sangoma Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sangoma Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $4.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.44%. CI&T has a consensus target price of $6.74, indicating a potential upside of 106.19%. Given CI&T's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CI&T is more favorable than Sangoma Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sangoma Technologies	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75
CI&T	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64

Summary

CI&T beats Sangoma Technologies on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to OBOOK?

OBOOK (NASDAQ:OWLS) and Sangoma Technologies (NASDAQ:SANG) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

39.7% of Sangoma Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 14.0% of Sangoma Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, OBOOK and OBOOK both had 1 articles in the media. OBOOK's average media sentiment score of 1.87 equaled Sangoma Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
OBOOK	Very Positive
Sangoma Technologies	Very Positive

OBOOK presently has a consensus target price of $11.00, suggesting a potential upside of 92.98%. Sangoma Technologies has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.44%. Given OBOOK's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe OBOOK is more favorable than Sangoma Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
OBOOK	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Sangoma Technologies	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75

OBOOK has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sangoma Technologies' net margin of -3.04%. OBOOK's return on equity of 0.00% beat Sangoma Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
OBOOK	N/A	N/A	N/A
Sangoma Technologies	-3.04%	-2.26%	-1.71%

OBOOK has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sangoma Technologies.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
OBOOK	$7.86M	64.06	N/A	N/A	N/A
Sangoma Technologies	$236.69M	0.58	-$5.01M	-$0.19	N/A

Summary

OBOOK beats Sangoma Technologies on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Sprout Social?

Sangoma Technologies (NASDAQ:SANG) and Sprout Social (NASDAQ:SPT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Sangoma Technologies has a net margin of -3.04% compared to Sprout Social's net margin of -8.18%. Sangoma Technologies' return on equity of -2.26% beat Sprout Social's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sangoma Technologies	-3.04%	-2.26%	-1.71%
Sprout Social	-8.18%	-13.90%	-5.72%

Sangoma Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $4.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.44%. Sprout Social has a consensus price target of $11.88, suggesting a potential upside of 43.42%. Given Sprout Social's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sprout Social is more favorable than Sangoma Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sangoma Technologies	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75
Sprout Social	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20

Sangoma Technologies has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprout Social has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sprout Social had 2 more articles in the media than Sangoma Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Sprout Social and 1 mentions for Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Sprout Social's score of 0.62 indicating that Sangoma Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Sangoma Technologies	Very Positive
Sprout Social	Positive

Sangoma Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sprout Social. Sangoma Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprout Social, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sangoma Technologies	$236.69M	0.58	-$5.01M	-$0.19	N/A
Sprout Social	$457.55M	1.09	-$43.33M	-$0.66	N/A

39.7% of Sangoma Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.0% of Sangoma Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Sprout Social shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sangoma Technologies beats Sprout Social on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Docebo?

Sangoma Technologies (NASDAQ:SANG) and Docebo (NASDAQ:DCBO) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Docebo has a net margin of 13.71% compared to Sangoma Technologies' net margin of -3.04%. Docebo's return on equity of 93.49% beat Sangoma Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sangoma Technologies	-3.04%	-2.26%	-1.71%
Docebo	13.71%	93.49%	17.82%

39.7% of Sangoma Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.2% of Docebo shares are held by institutional investors. 14.0% of Sangoma Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Docebo has higher revenue and earnings than Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Docebo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sangoma Technologies	$236.69M	0.58	-$5.01M	-$0.19	N/A
Docebo	$242.69M	1.95	$37.51M	$1.16	16.22

Sangoma Technologies has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Docebo has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Docebo had 4 more articles in the media than Sangoma Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Docebo and 1 mentions for Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Docebo's score of 0.70 indicating that Sangoma Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Sangoma Technologies	Very Positive
Docebo	Positive

Sangoma Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.44%. Docebo has a consensus target price of $30.67, suggesting a potential upside of 63.03%. Given Docebo's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Docebo is more favorable than Sangoma Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sangoma Technologies	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75
Docebo	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Summary

Docebo beats Sangoma Technologies on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sangoma Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SANG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SANG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Sangoma Technologies	INTERNET SOFTWARE Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$134.78M	$18.31B	$39.11B	$12.66B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.41%	3.19%	8.00%
P/E Ratio	-21.58	68.31	170.86	24.53
Price / Sales	0.58	25.71	597.26	95.37
Price / Cash	4.13	83.21	46.86	60.03
Price / Book	0.54	6.81	9.59	6.38
Net Income	-$5.01M	$385.08M	$1.07B	$331.87M
7 Day Performance	7.30%	0.98%	-0.29%	0.35%
1 Month Performance	13.29%	5.85%	-0.51%	0.57%
1 Year Performance	-31.85%	-7.64%	142.71%	22.26%

Sangoma Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SANG Sangoma Technologies	1.2414 of 5 stars	$4.10 +1.2%	$4.00 -2.4%	-31.8%	$134.78M	$236.69M	N/A	730
WEAV Weave Communications	2.695 of 5 stars	$6.40 +6.8%	$10.00 +56.3%	-10.4%	$509.01M	$239.02M	N/A	890	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Forecast Gap Up
CINT CI&T	4.2819 of 5 stars	$3.77 +12.8%	$6.80 +80.6%	-43.1%	$506.83M	$489.65M	12.15	7,993	News Coverage Analyst Forecast High Trading Volume
OWLS OBOOK	4.0723 of 5 stars	$5.69 +0.7%	$11.00 +93.3%	N/A	$502.60M	$7.86M	N/A	200	Positive News
SPT Sprout Social	2.2841 of 5 stars	$7.99 +5.8%	$11.88 +48.6%	-56.1%	$480.28M	$457.55M	N/A	1,362

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:SANG) was last updated on 7/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Sangoma Technologies (SANG) Competitors

SANG vs. WEAV, CINT, OWLS, SPT, and DCBO

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Weave Communications?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to CI&T?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to OBOOK?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Sprout Social?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Docebo?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SANG vs. The Competition

Sangoma Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Sangoma Technologies (SANG) Competitors

SANG vs. WEAV, CINT, OWLS, SPT, and DCBO

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Weave Communications?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of WEAV or SANG?

Which has better earnings and valuation, WEAV or SANG?

Does the media favor WEAV or SANG?

Is WEAV or SANG more profitable?

Do analysts rate WEAV or SANG?

Which has more risk and volatility, WEAV or SANG?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to CI&T?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, SANG or CINT?

Does the media favor SANG or CINT?

Which has more risk and volatility, SANG or CINT?

Is SANG or CINT more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in SANG or CINT?

Do analysts recommend SANG or CINT?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to OBOOK?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of OWLS or SANG?

Does the media prefer OWLS or SANG?

Do analysts recommend OWLS or SANG?

Is OWLS or SANG more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, OWLS or SANG?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Sprout Social?

Is SANG or SPT more profitable?

Do analysts rate SANG or SPT?

Which has more volatility and risk, SANG or SPT?

Does the media favor SANG or SPT?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, SANG or SPT?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of SANG or SPT?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Docebo?

Is SANG or DCBO more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of SANG or DCBO?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, SANG or DCBO?

Which has more risk and volatility, SANG or DCBO?

Does the media refer more to SANG or DCBO?

Do analysts recommend SANG or DCBO?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SANG vs. The Competition

Sangoma Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools