Which has higher valuation & earnings, GLOB or CINT?

Globant has higher revenue and earnings than CI&T. CI&T is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Globant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Globant $2.45B 0.63 $102.92M $2.55 13.89 CI&T $489.65M 0.93 $40.62M $0.29 11.64

Is GLOB or CINT more profitable?

CI&T has a net margin of 6.79% compared to Globant's net margin of 4.63%. CI&T's return on equity of 11.69% beat Globant's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Globant 4.63% 9.28% 6.18% CI&T 6.79% 11.69% 6.51%

Does the media favor GLOB or CINT?

In the previous week, CI&T had 5 more articles in the media than Globant. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for CI&T and 6 mentions for Globant. CI&T's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Globant's score of 0.36 indicating that CI&T is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Globant 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral CI&T 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, EFOR or CINT?

ASGN has higher revenue and earnings than CI&T. CI&T is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASGN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ASGN $3.98B 0.36 $113.50M $1.94 17.81 CI&T $489.65M 0.93 $40.62M $0.29 11.64

Is EFOR or CINT more profitable?

CI&T has a net margin of 6.79% compared to ASGN's net margin of 2.09%. CI&T's return on equity of 11.69% beat ASGN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ASGN 2.09% 9.54% 4.47% CI&T 6.79% 11.69% 6.51%

Does the media prefer EFOR or CINT?

In the previous week, CI&T had 9 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for CI&T and 2 mentions for ASGN. CI&T's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat ASGN's score of -0.95 indicating that CI&T is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ASGN 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative CI&T 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, CINT or BBAI?

CI&T has higher revenue and earnings than BigBear.ai. BigBear.ai is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CI&T, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CI&T $489.65M 0.93 $40.62M $0.29 11.64 BigBear.ai $127.67M 9.78 -$293.91M -$0.21 N/A

Is CINT or BBAI more profitable?

CI&T has a net margin of 6.79% compared to BigBear.ai's net margin of -65.20%. CI&T's return on equity of 11.69% beat BigBear.ai's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CI&T 6.79% 11.69% 6.51% BigBear.ai -65.20% -13.44% -10.63%

Does the media favor CINT or BBAI?

In the previous week, CI&T had 2 more articles in the media than BigBear.ai. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for CI&T and 9 mentions for BigBear.ai. CI&T's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat BigBear.ai's score of 0.53 indicating that CI&T is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment CI&T 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive BigBear.ai 2 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer RXT or CINT?

In the previous week, Rackspace Technology and Rackspace Technology both had 11 articles in the media. CI&T's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Rackspace Technology's score of 0.06 indicating that CI&T is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Rackspace Technology 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral CI&T 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CINT or GDYN?

CI&T has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. CI&T is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CI&T $489.65M 0.93 $40.62M $0.29 11.64 Grid Dynamics $411.83M 1.59 $9.67M $0.02 404.55

Is CINT or GDYN more profitable?

CI&T has a net margin of 6.79% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 0.68%. CI&T's return on equity of 11.69% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CI&T 6.79% 11.69% 6.51% Grid Dynamics 0.68% 1.90% 1.66%

Does the media favor CINT or GDYN?

In the previous week, CI&T had 5 more articles in the media than Grid Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for CI&T and 6 mentions for Grid Dynamics. CI&T's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Grid Dynamics' score of 0.81 indicating that CI&T is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment CI&T 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Grid Dynamics 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

CI&T (CINT) Competitors

$3.21 +0.07 (+2.36%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$3.37 +0.16 (+4.85%)

As of 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

CINT vs. GLOB, EFOR, BBAI, RXT, and GDYN

Should you buy CI&T stock or one of its competitors? CI&T's main competitors and comparable companies include Globant (GLOB), ASGN (EFOR), BigBear.ai (BBAI), Rackspace Technology (RXT), and Grid Dynamics (GDYN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it consulting & other services" industry.

How does CI&T compare to Globant?

Globant (NYSE:GLOB) and CI&T (NYSE:CINT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Globant presently has a consensus price target of $46.38, indicating a potential upside of 30.89%. CI&T has a consensus price target of $6.08, indicating a potential upside of 80.08%. Given CI&T's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CI&T is more favorable than Globant.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Globant	2 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
CI&T	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

Globant has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CI&T has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CI&T had 5 more articles in the media than Globant. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for CI&T and 6 mentions for Globant. CI&T's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Globant's score of 0.36 indicating that CI&T is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Globant	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
CI&T	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

91.6% of Globant shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of CI&T shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Globant shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CI&T has a net margin of 6.79% compared to Globant's net margin of 4.63%. CI&T's return on equity of 11.69% beat Globant's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Globant	4.63%	9.28%	6.18%
CI&T	6.79%	11.69%	6.51%

Globant has higher revenue and earnings than CI&T. CI&T is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Globant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Globant	$2.45B	0.63	$102.92M	$2.55	13.89
CI&T	$489.65M	0.93	$40.62M	$0.29	11.64

Summary

CI&T beats Globant on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CI&T compare to ASGN?

ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) and CI&T (NYSE:CINT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

ASGN has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CI&T has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

CI&T has a net margin of 6.79% compared to ASGN's net margin of 2.09%. CI&T's return on equity of 11.69% beat ASGN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ASGN	2.09%	9.54%	4.47%
CI&T	6.79%	11.69%	6.51%

95.4% of ASGN shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of CI&T shares are held by institutional investors. 14.3% of ASGN shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CI&T had 9 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for CI&T and 2 mentions for ASGN. CI&T's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat ASGN's score of -0.95 indicating that CI&T is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ASGN	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
CI&T	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

ASGN currently has a consensus target price of $28.67, suggesting a potential downside of 17.05%. CI&T has a consensus target price of $6.08, suggesting a potential upside of 80.08%. Given CI&T's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CI&T is more favorable than ASGN.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ASGN	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
CI&T	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

ASGN has higher revenue and earnings than CI&T. CI&T is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASGN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ASGN	$3.98B	0.36	$113.50M	$1.94	17.81
CI&T	$489.65M	0.93	$40.62M	$0.29	11.64

Summary

CI&T beats ASGN on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CI&T compare to BigBear.ai?

CI&T (NYSE:CINT) and BigBear.ai (NYSE:BBAI) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

CI&T has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BigBear.ai has a beta of 3.37, indicating that its share price is 237% more volatile than the broader market.

CI&T has a net margin of 6.79% compared to BigBear.ai's net margin of -65.20%. CI&T's return on equity of 11.69% beat BigBear.ai's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CI&T	6.79%	11.69%	6.51%
BigBear.ai	-65.20%	-13.44%	-10.63%

In the previous week, CI&T had 2 more articles in the media than BigBear.ai. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for CI&T and 9 mentions for BigBear.ai. CI&T's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat BigBear.ai's score of 0.53 indicating that CI&T is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CI&T	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
BigBear.ai	2 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

CI&T has higher revenue and earnings than BigBear.ai. BigBear.ai is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CI&T, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CI&T	$489.65M	0.93	$40.62M	$0.29	11.64
BigBear.ai	$127.67M	9.78	-$293.91M	-$0.21	N/A

92.5% of CI&T shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of BigBear.ai shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of BigBear.ai shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CI&T currently has a consensus price target of $6.08, suggesting a potential upside of 80.08%. BigBear.ai has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 91.94%. Given BigBear.ai's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe BigBear.ai is more favorable than CI&T.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CI&T	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
BigBear.ai	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

CI&T beats BigBear.ai on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CI&T compare to Rackspace Technology?

Rackspace Technology (NASDAQ:RXT) and CI&T (NYSE:CINT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Rackspace Technology has a beta of 3.1, suggesting that its stock price is 210% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CI&T has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Rackspace Technology and Rackspace Technology both had 11 articles in the media. CI&T's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Rackspace Technology's score of 0.06 indicating that CI&T is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Rackspace Technology	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
CI&T	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

CI&T has a net margin of 6.79% compared to Rackspace Technology's net margin of -5.88%. CI&T's return on equity of 11.69% beat Rackspace Technology's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Rackspace Technology	-5.88%	N/A	-1.81%
CI&T	6.79%	11.69%	6.51%

82.5% of Rackspace Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of CI&T shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Rackspace Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CI&T has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Rackspace Technology. Rackspace Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CI&T, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Rackspace Technology	$2.69B	0.39	-$225.80M	-$0.65	N/A
CI&T	$489.65M	0.93	$40.62M	$0.29	11.64

Rackspace Technology presently has a consensus price target of $4.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.79%. CI&T has a consensus price target of $6.08, indicating a potential upside of 80.08%. Given CI&T's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CI&T is more favorable than Rackspace Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Rackspace Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
CI&T	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

Summary

CI&T beats Rackspace Technology on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CI&T compare to Grid Dynamics?

CI&T (NYSE:CINT) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, CI&T had 5 more articles in the media than Grid Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for CI&T and 6 mentions for Grid Dynamics. CI&T's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Grid Dynamics' score of 0.81 indicating that CI&T is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CI&T	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Grid Dynamics	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

CI&T has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. CI&T is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CI&T	$489.65M	0.93	$40.62M	$0.29	11.64
Grid Dynamics	$411.83M	1.59	$9.67M	$0.02	404.55

CI&T has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

92.5% of CI&T shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CI&T has a net margin of 6.79% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 0.68%. CI&T's return on equity of 11.69% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CI&T	6.79%	11.69%	6.51%
Grid Dynamics	0.68%	1.90%	1.66%

CI&T currently has a consensus price target of $6.08, indicating a potential upside of 80.08%. Grid Dynamics has a consensus price target of $9.40, indicating a potential upside of 16.18%. Given CI&T's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe CI&T is more favorable than Grid Dynamics.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CI&T	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Grid Dynamics	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

CI&T beats Grid Dynamics on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CI&T News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CINT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CINT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	CI&T	IT Services Industry	Technology Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$432.54M	$11.17B	$31.66B	$22.70B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.82%	2.75%	3.74%
P/E Ratio	11.08	14.35	81.35	27.75
Price / Sales	0.88	67.36	589.18	20.15
Price / Cash	6.95	42.72	49.13	39.56
Price / Book	1.40	9.14	8.12	4.64
Net Income	$40.62M	$273.41M	$702.36M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	7.85%	-1.93%	114.88%	-1.06%
1 Month Performance	-8.04%	-2.13%	74.29%	-5.03%
1 Year Performance	-34.00%	14.17%	168.48%	5.78%

CI&T Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CINT CI&T	4.9873 of 5 stars	$3.21 +2.4%	$6.08 +89.1%	-35.2%	$432.54M	$489.65M	11.08	7,993	News Coverage Positive News Gap Down
GLOB Globant	3.2855 of 5 stars	$34.53 -0.8%	$46.38 +34.3%	-35.0%	$1.51B	$2.45B	13.54	28,773	News Coverage
EFOR ASGN	2.6452 of 5 stars	$33.16 +2.3%	$28.67 -13.6%	N/A	$1.36B	$3.97B	17.09	2,800
BBAI BigBear.ai	1.7114 of 5 stars	$2.81 +0.2%	$5.00 +78.3%	-60.8%	$1.34B	$127.67M	N/A	579	News Coverage Gap Up
RXT Rackspace Technology	0.5785 of 5 stars	$3.97 -5.5%	$4.00 +0.8%	+177.7%	$1.01B	$2.69B	N/A	5,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CINT) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

CI&T (CINT) Competitors