Semantix (STIX) Competitors

Brand Engagement Network has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Semantix. Brand Engagement Network is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Semantix, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Brand Engagement Network had 5 more articles in the media than Semantix. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Brand Engagement Network and 0 mentions for Semantix. Brand Engagement Network's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Semantix's score of 0.00 indicating that Brand Engagement Network is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Given Semantix's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Semantix is more favorable than Brand Engagement Network.

Brand Engagement Network has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Semantix has a beta of -0.37, meaning that its stock price is 137% less volatile than the broader market.

15.8% of Brand Engagement Network shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.1% of Semantix shares are held by institutional investors. 25.6% of Brand Engagement Network shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 35.5% of Semantix shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Semantix has a net margin of -69.49% compared to Brand Engagement Network's net margin of -2,189.33%. Semantix's return on equity of -45.45% beat Brand Engagement Network's return on equity.

In the previous week, Cango had 3 more articles in the media than Semantix. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Cango and 0 mentions for Semantix. Cango's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Semantix'saverage media sentiment score.

Cango has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Semantix has a beta of -0.37, suggesting that its stock price is 137% less volatile than the broader market.

4.2% of Cango shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.1% of Semantix shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.1% of Cango shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.5% of Semantix shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Semantix has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cango. Cango is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Semantix, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cango presently has a consensus target price of $3.00, suggesting a potential upside of 886.84%. Given Cango's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cango is more favorable than Semantix.

Semantix has a net margin of -69.49% compared to Cango's net margin of -125.53%. Semantix's return on equity of -45.45% beat Cango's return on equity.

40.1% of Semantix shares are held by institutional investors. 35.5% of Semantix shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lucas GC has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Semantix has a beta of -0.37, meaning that its stock price is 137% less volatile than the broader market.

Lucas GC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Semantix.

Lucas GC has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Semantix's net margin of -69.49%. Lucas GC's return on equity of 0.00% beat Semantix's return on equity.

In the previous week, Lucas GC had 5 more articles in the media than Semantix. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Lucas GC and 0 mentions for Semantix. Lucas GC's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Semantix's score of 0.00 indicating that Lucas GC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Given Semantix's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Semantix is more favorable than Lucas GC.

PLAYSTUDIOS currently has a consensus price target of $1.25, suggesting a potential upside of 124.22%. Given PLAYSTUDIOS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe PLAYSTUDIOS is more favorable than Semantix.

PLAYSTUDIOS has a net margin of -15.79% compared to Semantix's net margin of -69.49%. PLAYSTUDIOS's return on equity of -14.38% beat Semantix's return on equity.

PLAYSTUDIOS has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Semantix has a beta of -0.37, meaning that its stock price is 137% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PLAYSTUDIOS had 2 more articles in the media than Semantix. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for PLAYSTUDIOS and 0 mentions for Semantix. PLAYSTUDIOS's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Semantix's score of 0.00 indicating that PLAYSTUDIOS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

37.5% of PLAYSTUDIOS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.1% of Semantix shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of PLAYSTUDIOS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.5% of Semantix shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PLAYSTUDIOS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Semantix. PLAYSTUDIOS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Semantix, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.