ContextLogic (WISH) Competitors

ContextLogic logo
$9.15 +0.13 (+1.44%)
As of 06/23/2026

WISH vs. BRUN, JFBRW, AIIO, SSU, and NTRP

Should you buy ContextLogic stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares ContextLogic with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with ContextLogic include Boost Run (BRUN), Jeffs' Brands (JFBRW), Robo.ai (AIIO), SIGNA Sports United (SSU), and NextTrip (NTRP).

How does ContextLogic compare to Boost Run?

Boost Run (NASDAQ:BRUN) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both internet retail industry companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends and media sentiment.

46.0% of ContextLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Boost Run has a net margin of 0.00% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -131.05%. Boost Run's return on equity of 0.00% beat ContextLogic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Boost RunN/A N/A N/A
ContextLogic -131.05%-115.96%-62.36%

Boost Run currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.81%. Given Boost Run's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Boost Run is more favorable than ContextLogic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Boost Run
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
ContextLogic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Boost Run had 1 more articles in the media than ContextLogic. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Boost Run and 0 mentions for ContextLogic. Boost Run's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat ContextLogic's score of 0.00 indicating that Boost Run is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Boost Run Positive
ContextLogic Neutral

Boost Run has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ContextLogic.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Boost Run$33.70MN/AN/AN/AN/A
ContextLogic$287M0.78-$317M-$11.98N/A

Summary

Boost Run beats ContextLogic on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ContextLogic compare to Jeffs' Brands?

ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) and Jeffs' Brands (NASDAQ:JFBRW) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

46.0% of ContextLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ContextLogic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jeffs' Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
ContextLogic Neutral
Jeffs' Brands Neutral

Jeffs' Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ContextLogic.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ContextLogic$287M0.78-$317M-$11.98N/A
Jeffs' Brands$14.47MN/AN/AN/AN/A

Jeffs' Brands has a net margin of 0.00% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -131.05%. Jeffs' Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat ContextLogic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ContextLogic-131.05% -115.96% -62.36%
Jeffs' Brands N/A N/A N/A

Summary

ContextLogic and Jeffs' Brands tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ContextLogic compare to Robo.ai?

Robo.ai (NASDAQ:AIIO) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Robo.ai has a beta of 2.15, suggesting that its share price is 115% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ContextLogic has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Robo.ai had 6 more articles in the media than ContextLogic. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Robo.ai and 0 mentions for ContextLogic. Robo.ai's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat ContextLogic's score of 0.00 indicating that Robo.ai is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Robo.ai Neutral
ContextLogic Neutral

Robo.ai has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ContextLogic.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Robo.ai$950K59.30-$167.34MN/AN/A
ContextLogic$287M0.78-$317M-$11.98N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Robo.ai
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
ContextLogic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Robo.ai has a net margin of 0.00% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -131.05%. Robo.ai's return on equity of 0.00% beat ContextLogic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Robo.aiN/A N/A N/A
ContextLogic -131.05%-115.96%-62.36%

0.2% of Robo.ai shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of ContextLogic shares are held by institutional investors. 46.1% of Robo.ai shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Robo.ai beats ContextLogic on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ContextLogic compare to SIGNA Sports United?

ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) and SIGNA Sports United (NYSE:SSU) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, ContextLogic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled SIGNA Sports United'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
ContextLogic Neutral
SIGNA Sports United Neutral

46.0% of ContextLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.6% of SIGNA Sports United shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of SIGNA Sports United shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ContextLogic has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SIGNA Sports United has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

SIGNA Sports United has a net margin of 0.00% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -131.05%. SIGNA Sports United's return on equity of 0.00% beat ContextLogic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ContextLogic-131.05% -115.96% -62.36%
SIGNA Sports United N/A N/A N/A

ContextLogic has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SIGNA Sports United.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ContextLogic$287M0.78-$317M-$11.98N/A
SIGNA Sports United$1.06B0.00-$613.33MN/AN/A

Summary

ContextLogic and SIGNA Sports United tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ContextLogic compare to NextTrip?

NextTrip (NASDAQ:NTRP) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

ContextLogic has a net margin of -131.05% compared to NextTrip's net margin of -428.20%. ContextLogic's return on equity of -115.96% beat NextTrip's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NextTrip-428.20% -249.26% -117.47%
ContextLogic -131.05%-115.96%-62.36%

3.8% of NextTrip shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of ContextLogic shares are held by institutional investors. 44.5% of NextTrip shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, NextTrip had 4 more articles in the media than ContextLogic. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for NextTrip and 0 mentions for ContextLogic. NextTrip's average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat ContextLogic's score of 0.00 indicating that NextTrip is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
NextTrip Very Positive
ContextLogic Neutral

NextTrip presently has a consensus target price of $7.50, suggesting a potential upside of 278.79%. Given NextTrip's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe NextTrip is more favorable than ContextLogic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NextTrip
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
ContextLogic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

NextTrip has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ContextLogic. NextTrip is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ContextLogic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NextTrip$3.72M7.71-$15.91M-$1.87N/A
ContextLogic$287M0.78-$317M-$11.98N/A

NextTrip has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ContextLogic has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

NextTrip beats ContextLogic on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ContextLogic News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WISH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WISH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WISH vs. The Competition

MetricContextLogicInternet Retail IndustryCyclical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$223.24M$1.84B$3.91B$12.32B
Dividend YieldN/A1.51%3.50%5.88%
P/E Ratio-0.7626.7378.4023.96
Price / Sales0.7817.76307.94107.90
Price / CashN/A4.0030.8053.76
Price / Book1.021.833.346.41
Net Income-$317M-$327.35M$249.12M$337.14M
7 Day Performance-1.82%-0.43%-0.60%-1.06%
1 Month Performance7.02%5.30%0.06%0.49%
1 Year Performance30.71%5.82%-0.38%28.43%

ContextLogic Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WISH
ContextLogic
N/A$9.15
+1.4%
N/A+34.4%$223.24M$287MN/A452
BRUN
Boost Run
N/A$37.46
+21.2%
$45.00
+20.1%
N/A$0.00$33.70MN/AN/A
JFBRW
Jeffs' Brands
N/A$0.03
flat
N/AN/A$0.00$14.47MN/A10
AIIO
Robo.ai
1.1045 of 5 stars
$2.76
+1.5%
N/A-92.1%$50.41M$950KN/A2
SSU
SIGNA Sports United
N/AN/AN/AN/A$36.31M$1.06BN/A3,623

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:WISH) was last updated on 6/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners