Free Trial

ContextLogic (WISH) Competitors

ContextLogic logo
$9.00 -0.04 (-0.44%)
As of 06/3/2026

WISH vs. BRUN, JFBRW, AIIO, SSU, and NTRP

Should you buy ContextLogic stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares ContextLogic with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with ContextLogic include Boost Run (BRUN), Jeffs' Brands (JFBRW), Robo.ai (AIIO), SIGNA Sports United (SSU), and NextTrip (NTRP).

How does ContextLogic compare to Boost Run?

Boost Run (NASDAQ:BRUN) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both internet retail industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Boost Run had 2 more articles in the media than ContextLogic. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Boost Run and 1 mentions for ContextLogic. Boost Run's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat ContextLogic's score of 0.00 indicating that Boost Run is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Boost Run
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ContextLogic
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Boost Run currently has a consensus price target of $37.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.96%. Given Boost Run's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Boost Run is more favorable than ContextLogic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Boost Run
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
ContextLogic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Boost Run has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ContextLogic.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Boost Run$26.89MN/AN/AN/AN/A
ContextLogic$287M0.77-$317M-$11.98N/A

46.0% of ContextLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Boost Run has a net margin of 0.00% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -131.05%. Boost Run's return on equity of 0.00% beat ContextLogic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Boost RunN/A N/A N/A
ContextLogic -131.05%-115.96%-62.36%

Summary

Boost Run beats ContextLogic on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ContextLogic compare to Jeffs' Brands?

Jeffs' Brands (NASDAQ:JFBRW) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, ContextLogic had 1 more articles in the media than Jeffs' Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ContextLogic and 0 mentions for Jeffs' Brands. Jeffs' Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled ContextLogic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jeffs' Brands Neutral
ContextLogic Neutral

Jeffs' Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ContextLogic.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jeffs' Brands$14.47MN/AN/AN/AN/A
ContextLogic$287M0.77-$317M-$11.98N/A

Jeffs' Brands has a net margin of 0.00% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -131.05%. Jeffs' Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat ContextLogic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jeffs' BrandsN/A N/A N/A
ContextLogic -131.05%-115.96%-62.36%

46.0% of ContextLogic shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ContextLogic beats Jeffs' Brands on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ContextLogic compare to Robo.ai?

Robo.ai (NASDAQ:AIIO) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

Robo.ai has a beta of 2.15, indicating that its share price is 115% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ContextLogic has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

0.2% of Robo.ai shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of ContextLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.1% of Robo.ai shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Robo.ai has a net margin of 0.00% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -131.05%. Robo.ai's return on equity of 0.00% beat ContextLogic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Robo.aiN/A N/A N/A
ContextLogic -131.05%-115.96%-62.36%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Robo.ai
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
ContextLogic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Robo.ai had 7 more articles in the media than ContextLogic. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Robo.ai and 1 mentions for ContextLogic. Robo.ai's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat ContextLogic's score of 0.00 indicating that Robo.ai is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Robo.ai
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ContextLogic
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Robo.ai has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ContextLogic.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Robo.ai$950K58.71-$167.34MN/AN/A
ContextLogic$287M0.77-$317M-$11.98N/A

Summary

Robo.ai beats ContextLogic on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ContextLogic compare to SIGNA Sports United?

ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) and SIGNA Sports United (NYSE:SSU) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and risk.

SIGNA Sports United has a net margin of 0.00% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -131.05%. SIGNA Sports United's return on equity of 0.00% beat ContextLogic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ContextLogic-131.05% -115.96% -62.36%
SIGNA Sports United N/A N/A N/A

46.0% of ContextLogic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.6% of SIGNA Sports United shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of SIGNA Sports United shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ContextLogic had 1 more articles in the media than SIGNA Sports United. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ContextLogic and 0 mentions for SIGNA Sports United. ContextLogic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled SIGNA Sports United'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
ContextLogic Neutral
SIGNA Sports United Neutral

ContextLogic has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SIGNA Sports United.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ContextLogic$287M0.77-$317M-$11.98N/A
SIGNA Sports United$1.06B0.00-$613.33MN/AN/A

ContextLogic has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SIGNA Sports United has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

ContextLogic beats SIGNA Sports United on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ContextLogic compare to NextTrip?

NextTrip (NASDAQ:NTRP) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

NextTrip presently has a consensus target price of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 183.98%. Given NextTrip's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe NextTrip is more favorable than ContextLogic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NextTrip
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
ContextLogic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

3.8% of NextTrip shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of ContextLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.5% of NextTrip shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NextTrip has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ContextLogic has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, NextTrip had 2 more articles in the media than ContextLogic. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for NextTrip and 1 mentions for ContextLogic. ContextLogic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat NextTrip's score of -0.19 indicating that ContextLogic is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NextTrip
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ContextLogic
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

ContextLogic has a net margin of -131.05% compared to NextTrip's net margin of -428.20%. ContextLogic's return on equity of -115.96% beat NextTrip's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NextTrip-428.20% -243.87% -117.42%
ContextLogic -131.05%-115.96%-62.36%

NextTrip has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ContextLogic. NextTrip is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ContextLogic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NextTrip$3.72M9.60-$15.91M-$1.87N/A
ContextLogic$287M0.77-$317M-$11.98N/A

Summary

NextTrip and ContextLogic tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ContextLogic News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WISH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WISH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WISH vs. The Competition

MetricContextLogicInternet Retail IndustryCyclical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$219.58M$1.89B$4.00B$12.42B
Dividend YieldN/A1.51%3.48%5.22%
P/E Ratio-0.7526.5476.6324.35
Price / Sales0.7717.67325.79119.30
Price / CashN/A4.0030.8757.13
Price / Book1.001.863.236.74
Net Income-$317M-$327.35M$247.47M$337.03M
7 Day Performance2.27%0.78%-0.27%0.24%
1 Month PerformanceN/AN/AN/A-1.60%
1 Year Performance27.48%8.31%1.43%34.04%

ContextLogic Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WISH
ContextLogic
N/A$9.00
-0.4%
N/A+30.1%$219.58M$287MN/A452
BRUN
Boost Run
N/A$39.20
+15.1%
$37.50
-4.3%
N/A$0.00$26.89MN/AN/A
JFBRW
Jeffs' Brands
N/A$0.03
+42.6%
N/AN/A$0.00$14.47MN/A10
AIIO
Robo.ai
0.7706 of 5 stars
$2.92
+23.2%
N/A-92.7%$43.93M$950KN/A2
SSU
SIGNA Sports United
N/AN/AN/AN/A$36.31M$1.06BN/A3,623

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:WISH) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners