WISH vs. AKA, LGCB, LVLU, DIBS, HOUR, DDL, SFIX, MYTE, QRTEA, and JMIA
Should you be buying ContextLogic stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of ContextLogic include a.k.a. Brands (AKA), Linkage Global (LGCB), Lulu's Fashion Lounge (LVLU), 1stdibs.Com (DIBS), Hour Loop (HOUR), Dingdong (Cayman) (DDL), Stitch Fix (SFIX), MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. (MYTE), Qurate Retail (QRTEA), and Jumia Technologies (JMIA). These companies are all part of the "catalog & mail - order houses" industry.
ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, community ranking, earnings and profitability.
In the previous week, ContextLogic had 5 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for ContextLogic and 4 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. ContextLogic's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.23 indicating that ContextLogic is being referred to more favorably in the media.
46.1% of ContextLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.3% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
a.k.a. Brands has a net margin of -18.10% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -113.62%. a.k.a. Brands' return on equity of -15.31% beat ContextLogic's return on equity.
ContextLogic has a beta of 2.18, meaning that its share price is 118% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.
ContextLogic currently has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 54.64%. a.k.a. Brands has a consensus target price of $11.75, indicating a potential downside of 5.24%. Given ContextLogic's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe ContextLogic is more favorable than a.k.a. Brands.
ContextLogic received 15 more outperform votes than a.k.a. Brands when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 47.89% of users gave ContextLogic an outperform vote while only 31.67% of users gave a.k.a. Brands an outperform vote.
a.k.a. Brands has higher revenue and earnings than ContextLogic. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ContextLogic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
ContextLogic and a.k.a. Brands tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get ContextLogic News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WISH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WISH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
ContextLogic Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
