Go Pro
→ Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free WISH Stock Alerts

ContextLogic (WISH) Competitors

ContextLogic logo
$12.84 +0.22 (+1.74%)
As of 08/28/2026
Compare

WISH vs. HEPS, JMIA, GRPN, BZUN, and DIBS

Should you buy ContextLogic stock or one of its competitors? ContextLogic's main competitors and comparable companies include D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading (HEPS), Jumia Technologies (JMIA), Groupon (GRPN), Baozun (BZUN), and 1stdibs.com (DIBS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "broadline retail" industry.

How does ContextLogic compare to D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading?

D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading (NASDAQ:HEPS) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends and earnings.

D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading has a net margin of -7.78% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -131.05%. ContextLogic's return on equity of -115.96% beat D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading-7.78% -776.28% -21.12%
ContextLogic -131.05%-115.96%-62.36%

D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading currently has a consensus price target of $3.07, suggesting a potential upside of 15.85%. Given D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading is more favorable than ContextLogic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
ContextLogic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading had 1 more articles in the media than ContextLogic. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading and 0 mentions for ContextLogic. D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat ContextLogic's score of 0.00 indicating that D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading Very Positive
ContextLogic Neutral

40.5% of D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of ContextLogic shares are held by institutional investors. 36.3% of D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading has a beta of 2.08, suggesting that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ContextLogic has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading has higher revenue and earnings than ContextLogic. D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ContextLogic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading$2.15B0.44-$144.76M-$0.51N/A
ContextLogic$287M1.09-$317M-$11.98N/A

Summary

D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading beats ContextLogic on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ContextLogic compare to Jumia Technologies?

Jumia Technologies (NYSE:JMIA) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, risk, media sentiment and earnings.

Jumia Technologies has a net margin of -27.54% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -131.05%. ContextLogic's return on equity of -115.96% beat Jumia Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jumia Technologies-27.54% -313.73% -46.36%
ContextLogic -131.05%-115.96%-62.36%

16.5% of Jumia Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of ContextLogic shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Jumia Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Jumia Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ContextLogic.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jumia Technologies$188.93M4.55-$61.55MN/AN/A
ContextLogic$287M1.09-$317M-$11.98N/A

In the previous week, Jumia Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than ContextLogic. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Jumia Technologies and 0 mentions for ContextLogic. Jumia Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat ContextLogic's score of 0.00 indicating that Jumia Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jumia Technologies Positive
ContextLogic Neutral

Jumia Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $14.40, suggesting a potential upside of 107.49%. Given Jumia Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Jumia Technologies is more favorable than ContextLogic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jumia Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
ContextLogic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Jumia Technologies has a beta of 2.47, suggesting that its stock price is 147% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ContextLogic has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Jumia Technologies beats ContextLogic on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ContextLogic compare to Groupon?

Groupon (NASDAQ:GRPN) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Groupon has higher revenue and earnings than ContextLogic. Groupon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ContextLogic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Groupon$498.42M1.59-$83.52M-$3.11N/A
ContextLogic$287M1.09-$317M-$11.98N/A

In the previous week, Groupon had 12 more articles in the media than ContextLogic. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Groupon and 0 mentions for ContextLogic. Groupon's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat ContextLogic's score of 0.00 indicating that Groupon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Groupon Positive
ContextLogic Neutral

Groupon has a net margin of -25.26% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -131.05%. Groupon's return on equity of 0.00% beat ContextLogic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Groupon-25.26% N/A -20.28%
ContextLogic -131.05%-115.96%-62.36%

Groupon has a beta of 0.23, indicating that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ContextLogic has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

Groupon currently has a consensus price target of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 33.13%. Given Groupon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Groupon is more favorable than ContextLogic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Groupon
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
ContextLogic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

90.1% of Groupon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of ContextLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.6% of Groupon shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Groupon beats ContextLogic on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ContextLogic compare to Baozun?

Baozun (NASDAQ:BZUN) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation and media sentiment.

Baozun has a net margin of -1.26% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -131.05%. Baozun's return on equity of 2.58% beat ContextLogic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baozun-1.26% 2.58% 1.43%
ContextLogic -131.05%-115.96%-62.36%

Baozun has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ContextLogic has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Baozun had 9 more articles in the media than ContextLogic. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Baozun and 0 mentions for ContextLogic. Baozun's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat ContextLogic's score of 0.00 indicating that Baozun is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baozun Positive
ContextLogic Neutral

Baozun has higher revenue and earnings than ContextLogic. Baozun is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ContextLogic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baozun$1.42B0.12-$34.62M-$0.33N/A
ContextLogic$287M1.09-$317M-$11.98N/A

47.3% of Baozun shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of ContextLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.2% of Baozun shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Baozun presently has a consensus price target of $3.80, suggesting a potential upside of 25.83%. Given Baozun's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Baozun is more favorable than ContextLogic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baozun
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
ContextLogic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Baozun beats ContextLogic on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ContextLogic compare to 1stdibs.com?

1stdibs.com (NASDAQ:DIBS) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

1stdibs.com currently has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 56.95%. Given 1stdibs.com's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 1stdibs.com is more favorable than ContextLogic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
1stdibs.com
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
ContextLogic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

67.0% of 1stdibs.com shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of ContextLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.2% of 1stdibs.com shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

1stdibs.com has a net margin of -8.54% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -131.05%. 1stdibs.com's return on equity of -8.97% beat ContextLogic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
1stdibs.com-8.54% -8.97% -6.20%
ContextLogic -131.05%-115.96%-62.36%

1stdibs.com has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ContextLogic has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, 1stdibs.com had 3 more articles in the media than ContextLogic. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for 1stdibs.com and 0 mentions for ContextLogic. 1stdibs.com's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat ContextLogic's score of 0.00 indicating that 1stdibs.com is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
1stdibs.com Positive
ContextLogic Neutral

1stdibs.com has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ContextLogic. 1stdibs.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ContextLogic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
1stdibs.com$89.62M1.67-$13.67M-$0.22N/A
ContextLogic$287M1.09-$317M-$11.98N/A

Summary

1stdibs.com beats ContextLogic on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ContextLogic News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WISH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WISH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WISH vs. The Competition

Export
MetricContextLogicBroadline Retail IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$313.27M$60.63B$13.18B$12.91B
Dividend YieldN/A2.34%56.99%11.28%
P/E Ratio-1.0716.8046.9725.42
Price / Sales1.095.3688.4192.72
Price / CashN/A24.1929.0153.00
Price / Book1.4334.095.996.14
Net Income-$317M$1.99B$445.85M$348.86M
7 Day Performance13.23%-0.66%-0.92%-0.80%
1 Month Performance35.87%0.06%-0.32%5.56%
1 Year Performance74.69%-2.99%-2.36%15.57%

ContextLogic Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WISH
ContextLogic
N/A$12.84
+1.7%		N/A+68.7%$313.27M$287MN/A452
HEPS
D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading
1.7829 of 5 stars		$2.64
flat		$3.07
+16.3%		-5.7%$943.07M$89.95BN/A3,611
JMIA
Jumia Technologies
4.3112 of 5 stars		$7.03
-0.6%		$14.40
+104.8%		-24.2%$870.67M$188.93MN/A2,016
GRPN
Groupon
3.0304 of 5 stars		$19.49
+0.1%		$26.00
+33.4%		-26.0%$792.56M$497.41MN/A1,734
BZUN
Baozun
4.4445 of 5 stars		$3.11
+3.0%		$3.80
+22.2%		-5.3%$180.72M$1.42BN/A6,762

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WISH) was last updated on 8/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel