Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) Competitors

Booz Allen Hamilton has a net margin of 7.35% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 4.93%. Booz Allen Hamilton's return on equity of 76.79% beat Science Applications International's return on equity.

Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Booz Allen Hamilton pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Science Applications International pays out 19.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton pays out 35.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Booz Allen Hamilton has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Booz Allen Hamilton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Booz Allen Hamilton had 4 more articles in the media than Science Applications International. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton and 2 mentions for Science Applications International. Science Applications International's average media sentiment score of 1.71 beat Booz Allen Hamilton's score of 0.79 indicating that Science Applications International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Science Applications International presently has a consensus target price of $110.78, indicating a potential upside of 19.57%. Booz Allen Hamilton has a consensus target price of $93.33, indicating a potential upside of 27.26%. Given Booz Allen Hamilton's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Booz Allen Hamilton is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than Science Applications International. Booz Allen Hamilton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Science Applications International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

76.0% of Science Applications International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Science Applications International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than CACI International. Booz Allen Hamilton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CACI International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Booz Allen Hamilton currently has a consensus target price of $93.33, suggesting a potential upside of 27.26%. CACI International has a consensus target price of $641.50, suggesting a potential upside of 26.87%. Given Booz Allen Hamilton's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Booz Allen Hamilton is more favorable than CACI International.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a net margin of 7.35% compared to CACI International's net margin of 5.86%. Booz Allen Hamilton's return on equity of 76.79% beat CACI International's return on equity.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CACI International has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

91.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of CACI International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of CACI International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CACI International had 14 more articles in the media than Booz Allen Hamilton. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for CACI International and 6 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton. CACI International's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Booz Allen Hamilton's score of 0.79 indicating that CACI International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Booz Allen Hamilton presently has a consensus target price of $93.33, suggesting a potential upside of 27.26%. Leidos has a consensus target price of $193.64, suggesting a potential upside of 54.23%. Given Leidos' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Leidos is more favorable than Booz Allen Hamilton.

Leidos has a net margin of 8.15% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton's net margin of 7.35%. Booz Allen Hamilton's return on equity of 76.79% beat Leidos' return on equity.

In the previous week, Leidos had 20 more articles in the media than Booz Allen Hamilton. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Leidos and 6 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton. Booz Allen Hamilton's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Leidos' score of 0.47 indicating that Booz Allen Hamilton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Leidos has higher revenue and earnings than Booz Allen Hamilton. Booz Allen Hamilton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Leidos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.32, meaning that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Leidos has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Booz Allen Hamilton pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Leidos pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Booz Allen Hamilton pays out 35.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Leidos pays out 15.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Booz Allen Hamilton has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years and Leidos has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Booz Allen Hamilton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

91.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.1% of Leidos shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Leidos shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cognizant Technology Solutions has a net margin of 10.41% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton's net margin of 7.35%. Booz Allen Hamilton's return on equity of 76.79% beat Cognizant Technology Solutions' return on equity.

In the previous week, Cognizant Technology Solutions had 12 more articles in the media than Booz Allen Hamilton. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Cognizant Technology Solutions and 6 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton. Booz Allen Hamilton's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Cognizant Technology Solutions' score of 0.51 indicating that Booz Allen Hamilton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cognizant Technology Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Booz Allen Hamilton. Cognizant Technology Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Booz Allen Hamilton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Booz Allen Hamilton currently has a consensus target price of $93.33, suggesting a potential upside of 27.26%. Cognizant Technology Solutions has a consensus target price of $73.33, suggesting a potential upside of 59.37%. Given Cognizant Technology Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cognizant Technology Solutions is more favorable than Booz Allen Hamilton.

91.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.4% of Cognizant Technology Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Cognizant Technology Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cognizant Technology Solutions has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

Booz Allen Hamilton pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Cognizant Technology Solutions pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Booz Allen Hamilton pays out 35.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Booz Allen Hamilton has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years and Cognizant Technology Solutions has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Booz Allen Hamilton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.