Dine Brands Global Competitors

McDonald's (NYSE:MCD) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares McDonald's and Dine Brands Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

McDonald's has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Dine Brands Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McDonald's, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

McDonald's has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

66.3% of McDonald's shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of McDonald's shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for McDonald's and Dine Brands Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

McDonald's currently has a consensus target price of $237.9655, suggesting a potential upside of 2.10%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus target price of $96.2222, suggesting a potential upside of 4.20%. Given Dine Brands Global's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than McDonald's.

Profitability

This table compares McDonald's and Dine Brands Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

McDonald's beats Dine Brands Global on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Starbucks and Dine Brands Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Starbucks has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Dine Brands Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Starbucks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Starbucks has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

67.3% of Starbucks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Starbucks shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Starbucks and Dine Brands Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Starbucks currently has a consensus target price of $111.32, suggesting a potential downside of 5.93%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus target price of $96.2222, suggesting a potential upside of 4.20%. Given Dine Brands Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than Starbucks.

Profitability

This table compares Starbucks and Dine Brands Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Chipotle Mexican Grill and Dine Brands Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Chipotle Mexican Grill has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Dine Brands Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipotle Mexican Grill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Chipotle Mexican Grill and Dine Brands Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Chipotle Mexican Grill currently has a consensus target price of $1,590.8387, suggesting a potential upside of 3.64%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus target price of $96.2222, suggesting a potential upside of 4.20%. Given Dine Brands Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than Chipotle Mexican Grill.

Profitability

This table compares Chipotle Mexican Grill and Dine Brands Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Chipotle Mexican Grill beats Dine Brands Global on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability and valuation.

Risk and Volatility

Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Yum! Brands and Dine Brands Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Yum! Brands and Dine Brands Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Yum! Brands currently has a consensus target price of $107.7778, suggesting a potential downside of 8.71%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus target price of $96.2222, suggesting a potential upside of 4.20%. Given Dine Brands Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than Yum! Brands.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Yum! Brands and Dine Brands Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Yum! Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Dine Brands Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yum! Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.2% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Yum! Brands beats Dine Brands Global on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) and Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 2.02, suggesting that its share price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dine Brands Global and Darden Restaurants' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Dine Brands Global and Darden Restaurants, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Dine Brands Global currently has a consensus price target of $96.2222, suggesting a potential upside of 4.20%. Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $140.9667, suggesting a potential downside of 3.67%. Given Dine Brands Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than Darden Restaurants.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Dine Brands Global and Darden Restaurants' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Dine Brands Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Darden Restaurants. Dine Brands Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darden Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

85.4% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Dine Brands Global beats Darden Restaurants on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) and Domino's Pizza (NYSE:DPZ) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 2.02, suggesting that its share price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Domino's Pizza has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dine Brands Global and Domino's Pizza's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Dine Brands Global and Domino's Pizza, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Dine Brands Global currently has a consensus price target of $96.2222, suggesting a potential upside of 4.20%. Domino's Pizza has a consensus price target of $421.8929, suggesting a potential upside of 6.85%. Given Domino's Pizza's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Domino's Pizza is more favorable than Dine Brands Global.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Dine Brands Global and Domino's Pizza's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Domino's Pizza has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Dine Brands Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Domino's Pizza, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

85.4% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Domino's Pizza shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Domino's Pizza shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Domino's Pizza beats Dine Brands Global on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.