Go Pro

Dine Brands Global (DIN) Competitors

Dine Brands Global logo
$29.20 -1.66 (-5.38%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$29.86 +0.66 (+2.26%)
As of 04:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

DIN vs. BJRI, BLMN, CAKE, CBRL, and TXRH

Should you buy Dine Brands Global stock or one of its competitors? Dine Brands Global's main competitors and comparable companies include BJ's Restaurants (BJRI), Bloomin' Brands (BLMN), Cheesecake Factory (CAKE), Cracker Barrel Old Country Store (CBRL), and Texas Roadhouse (TXRH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "restaurants" industry.

How does Dine Brands Global compare to BJ's Restaurants?

BJ's Restaurants (NASDAQ:BJRI) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

BJ's Restaurants pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Dine Brands Global pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. BJ's Restaurants pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dine Brands Global pays out 161.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

BJ's Restaurants currently has a consensus target price of $56.88, suggesting a potential downside of 6.42%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus target price of $32.83, suggesting a potential upside of 12.44%. Given Dine Brands Global's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than BJ's Restaurants.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BJ's Restaurants
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36
Dine Brands Global
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89

BJ's Restaurants has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

BJ's Restaurants has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. BJ's Restaurants is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dine Brands Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BJ's Restaurants$1.43B0.90$48.81M$1.8732.50
Dine Brands Global$900M0.41$17.10M$0.4762.13

BJ's Restaurants has a net margin of 2.86% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 0.75%. BJ's Restaurants' return on equity of 12.93% beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BJ's Restaurants2.86% 12.93% 4.79%
Dine Brands Global 0.75%-20.34%3.17%

In the previous week, BJ's Restaurants had 2 more articles in the media than Dine Brands Global. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for BJ's Restaurants and 7 mentions for Dine Brands Global. BJ's Restaurants' average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Dine Brands Global's score of 0.51 indicating that BJ's Restaurants is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BJ's Restaurants
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Dine Brands Global
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

99.9% of BJ's Restaurants shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of BJ's Restaurants shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

BJ's Restaurants beats Dine Brands Global on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Dine Brands Global compare to Bloomin' Brands?

Bloomin' Brands (NASDAQ:BLMN) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

Bloomin' Brands presently has a consensus target price of $9.75, indicating a potential upside of 7.85%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus target price of $32.83, indicating a potential upside of 12.44%. Given Dine Brands Global's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than Bloomin' Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bloomin' Brands
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Dine Brands Global
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89

In the previous week, Dine Brands Global had 4 more articles in the media than Bloomin' Brands. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Dine Brands Global and 3 mentions for Bloomin' Brands. Bloomin' Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Dine Brands Global's score of 0.51 indicating that Bloomin' Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bloomin' Brands
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Dine Brands Global
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Dine Brands Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bloomin' Brands. Bloomin' Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dine Brands Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bloomin' Brands$3.96B0.20$8.24M$0.3129.16
Dine Brands Global$900M0.41$17.10M$0.4762.13

Dine Brands Global has a net margin of 0.75% compared to Bloomin' Brands' net margin of 0.70%. Bloomin' Brands' return on equity of 28.95% beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bloomin' Brands0.70% 28.95% 3.47%
Dine Brands Global 0.75%-20.34%3.17%

92.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Bloomin' Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Bloomin' Brands has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Dine Brands Global beats Bloomin' Brands on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Dine Brands Global compare to Cheesecake Factory?

Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) and Cheesecake Factory (NASDAQ:CAKE) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cheesecake Factory has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cheesecake Factory had 5 more articles in the media than Dine Brands Global. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cheesecake Factory and 7 mentions for Dine Brands Global. Cheesecake Factory's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Dine Brands Global's score of 0.51 indicating that Cheesecake Factory is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Dine Brands Global
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cheesecake Factory
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Dine Brands Global presently has a consensus price target of $32.83, suggesting a potential upside of 12.44%. Cheesecake Factory has a consensus price target of $83.47, suggesting a potential downside of 19.44%. Given Dine Brands Global's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than Cheesecake Factory.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dine Brands Global
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89
Cheesecake Factory
2 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.28

Dine Brands Global pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Cheesecake Factory pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Dine Brands Global pays out 161.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cheesecake Factory pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

92.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of Cheesecake Factory shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Cheesecake Factory shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cheesecake Factory has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Cheesecake Factory is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dine Brands Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dine Brands Global$900M0.41$17.10M$0.4762.13
Cheesecake Factory$3.88B1.33$148.43M$3.6928.08

Cheesecake Factory has a net margin of 4.61% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 0.75%. Cheesecake Factory's return on equity of 43.97% beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dine Brands Global0.75% -20.34% 3.17%
Cheesecake Factory 4.61%43.97%6.18%

Summary

Cheesecake Factory beats Dine Brands Global on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Dine Brands Global compare to Cracker Barrel Old Country Store?

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store (NASDAQ:CBRL) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

96.0% of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dine Brands Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store$3.48B0.33$46.38M$1.1644.09
Dine Brands Global$900M0.41$17.10M$0.4762.13

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a net margin of 0.79% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 0.75%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's return on equity of 2.78% beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store0.79% 2.78% 0.58%
Dine Brands Global 0.75%-20.34%3.17%

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store currently has a consensus price target of $48.14, indicating a potential downside of 5.88%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $32.83, indicating a potential upside of 12.44%. Given Dine Brands Global's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
3 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Dine Brands Global
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89

In the previous week, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store had 5 more articles in the media than Dine Brands Global. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store and 7 mentions for Dine Brands Global. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Dine Brands Global's score of 0.51 indicating that Cracker Barrel Old Country Store is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Dine Brands Global
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Dine Brands Global pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store pays out 86.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Dine Brands Global pays out 161.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store beats Dine Brands Global on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Dine Brands Global compare to Texas Roadhouse?

Texas Roadhouse (NASDAQ:TXRH) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Dine Brands Global had 1 more articles in the media than Texas Roadhouse. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Dine Brands Global and 6 mentions for Texas Roadhouse. Texas Roadhouse's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Dine Brands Global's score of 0.51 indicating that Texas Roadhouse is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Texas Roadhouse
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Dine Brands Global
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Texas Roadhouse currently has a consensus target price of $209.40, indicating a potential upside of 16.81%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus target price of $32.83, indicating a potential upside of 12.44%. Given Texas Roadhouse's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Texas Roadhouse is more favorable than Dine Brands Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Texas Roadhouse
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.52
Dine Brands Global
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 6.63% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 0.75%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 27.20% beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Texas Roadhouse6.63% 27.20% 11.75%
Dine Brands Global 0.75%-20.34%3.17%

Texas Roadhouse pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Dine Brands Global pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Texas Roadhouse pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dine Brands Global pays out 161.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Texas Roadhouse has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Roadhouse has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Texas Roadhouse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dine Brands Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Texas Roadhouse$6.23B1.89$405.55M$6.2528.68
Dine Brands Global$900M0.41$17.10M$0.4762.13

94.8% of Texas Roadhouse shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Texas Roadhouse shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Dine Brands Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Texas Roadhouse beats Dine Brands Global on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Dine Brands Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DIN vs. The Competition

MetricDine Brands GlobalHotels, Restaurants & Leisure IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$369.64M$7.58B$12.59B$23.27B
Dividend Yield2.40%3.85%51.55%3.73%
P/E Ratio62.1321.6045.8228.73
Price / Sales0.41337.8691.5395.65
Price / Cash3.8821.8928.8333.53
Price / Book-1.394.614.094.75
Net Income$17.10M$260.47M$445.09M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-10.89%-1.99%-1.39%-0.96%
1 Month Performance-18.11%-3.99%-4.20%-2.30%
1 Year Performance24.91%-7.72%-5.96%11.69%

Dine Brands Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DIN
Dine Brands Global
2.9844 of 5 stars
$29.20
-5.4%
$32.83
+12.4%
+30.3%$369.64M$900M62.133,520
BJRI
BJ's Restaurants
3.3092 of 5 stars
$63.59
-2.3%
$56.88
-10.6%
+82.1%$1.39B$1.40B34.0122,000
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands
2.6656 of 5 stars
$10.30
-2.6%
$9.75
-5.3%
+38.4%$905.87M$3.96B33.2364,000
CAKE
Cheesecake Factory
3.6078 of 5 stars
$109.49
-2.3%
$83.47
-23.8%
+78.4%$5.58B$3.75B29.6748,400
CBRL
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
2.9339 of 5 stars
$55.24
-0.8%
$48.14
-12.8%
+3.7%$1.24B$3.34B47.6276,730

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:DIN) was last updated on 9/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners