NYSE:DIN

Dine Brands Global Competitors

$92.34
-0.19 (-0.21 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$91.93
Now: $92.34
$94.50
50-Day Range
$77.52
MA: $87.43
$95.14
52-Week Range
$28.55
Now: $92.34
$95.32
Volume217,245 shs
Average Volume401,400 shs
Market Capitalization$1.58 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.02

Competitors

Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) Vs. MCD, SBUX, CMG, YUM, DRI, and DPZ

Should you be buying DIN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "restaurants" are considered alternatives and competitors to Dine Brands Global, including McDonald's (MCD), Starbucks (SBUX), Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), Yum! Brands (YUM), Darden Restaurants (DRI), and Domino's Pizza (DPZ).

McDonald's (NYSE:MCD) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares McDonald's and Dine Brands Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McDonald's$21.08 billion8.25$6.03 billion$7.8429.73
Dine Brands Global$910.18 million1.73$104.35 million$6.9513.29

McDonald's has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Dine Brands Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McDonald's, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

McDonald's has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

66.3% of McDonald's shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of McDonald's shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for McDonald's and Dine Brands Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
McDonald's072302.77
Dine Brands Global02602.75

McDonald's currently has a consensus target price of $237.9655, suggesting a potential upside of 2.10%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus target price of $96.2222, suggesting a potential upside of 4.20%. Given Dine Brands Global's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than McDonald's.

Profitability

This table compares McDonald's and Dine Brands Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
McDonald's25.60%-53.62%9.56%
Dine Brands Global-10.52%-17.91%2.58%

Summary

McDonald's beats Dine Brands Global on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Starbucks and Dine Brands Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Starbucks$23.52 billion5.92$928.30 million$1.17101.15
Dine Brands Global$910.18 million1.73$104.35 million$6.9513.29

Starbucks has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Dine Brands Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Starbucks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Starbucks has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

67.3% of Starbucks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Starbucks shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Starbucks and Dine Brands Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Starbucks081802.69
Dine Brands Global02602.75

Starbucks currently has a consensus target price of $111.32, suggesting a potential downside of 5.93%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus target price of $96.2222, suggesting a potential upside of 4.20%. Given Dine Brands Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than Starbucks.

Profitability

This table compares Starbucks and Dine Brands Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Starbucks3.95%-18.07%4.88%
Dine Brands Global-10.52%-17.91%2.58%

Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Chipotle Mexican Grill and Dine Brands Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chipotle Mexican Grill$5.59 billion7.74$350.16 million$14.05109.26
Dine Brands Global$910.18 million1.73$104.35 million$6.9513.29

Chipotle Mexican Grill has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Dine Brands Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipotle Mexican Grill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Chipotle Mexican Grill and Dine Brands Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Chipotle Mexican Grill0121902.61
Dine Brands Global02602.75

Chipotle Mexican Grill currently has a consensus target price of $1,590.8387, suggesting a potential upside of 3.64%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus target price of $96.2222, suggesting a potential upside of 4.20%. Given Dine Brands Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than Chipotle Mexican Grill.

Profitability

This table compares Chipotle Mexican Grill and Dine Brands Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Chipotle Mexican Grill4.08%16.70%5.38%
Dine Brands Global-10.52%-17.91%2.58%

Summary

Chipotle Mexican Grill beats Dine Brands Global on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability and valuation.

Risk and Volatility

Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Yum! Brands and Dine Brands Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Yum! Brands18.78%-12.42%17.73%
Dine Brands Global-10.52%-17.91%2.58%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Yum! Brands and Dine Brands Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Yum! Brands110702.33
Dine Brands Global02602.75

Yum! Brands currently has a consensus target price of $107.7778, suggesting a potential downside of 8.71%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus target price of $96.2222, suggesting a potential upside of 4.20%. Given Dine Brands Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than Yum! Brands.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Yum! Brands and Dine Brands Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yum! Brands$5.60 billion6.30$1.29 billion$3.5533.26
Dine Brands Global$910.18 million1.73$104.35 million$6.9513.29

Yum! Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Dine Brands Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yum! Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.2% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Yum! Brands beats Dine Brands Global on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) and Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 2.02, suggesting that its share price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dine Brands Global and Darden Restaurants' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dine Brands Global-10.52%-17.91%2.58%
Darden Restaurants-1.70%10.47%2.51%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Dine Brands Global and Darden Restaurants, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dine Brands Global02602.75
Darden Restaurants0102002.67

Dine Brands Global currently has a consensus price target of $96.2222, suggesting a potential upside of 4.20%. Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $140.9667, suggesting a potential downside of 3.67%. Given Dine Brands Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than Darden Restaurants.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Dine Brands Global and Darden Restaurants' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dine Brands Global$910.18 million1.73$104.35 million$6.9513.29
Darden Restaurants$7.81 billion2.44$-52,400,000.00$3.1346.75

Dine Brands Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Darden Restaurants. Dine Brands Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darden Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

85.4% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Dine Brands Global beats Darden Restaurants on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) and Domino's Pizza (NYSE:DPZ) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 2.02, suggesting that its share price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Domino's Pizza has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dine Brands Global and Domino's Pizza's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dine Brands Global-10.52%-17.91%2.58%
Domino's Pizza11.98%-14.11%31.41%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Dine Brands Global and Domino's Pizza, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dine Brands Global02602.75
Domino's Pizza092102.70

Dine Brands Global currently has a consensus price target of $96.2222, suggesting a potential upside of 4.20%. Domino's Pizza has a consensus price target of $421.8929, suggesting a potential upside of 6.85%. Given Domino's Pizza's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Domino's Pizza is more favorable than Dine Brands Global.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Dine Brands Global and Domino's Pizza's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dine Brands Global$910.18 million1.73$104.35 million$6.9513.29
Domino's Pizza$3.62 billion4.23$400.71 million$9.5741.26

Domino's Pizza has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Dine Brands Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Domino's Pizza, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

85.4% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Domino's Pizza shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Domino's Pizza shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Domino's Pizza beats Dine Brands Global on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Dine Brands Global Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
McDonald's logo
MCD
McDonald's
2.7$233.08-0.8%$173.90 billion$21.08 billion35.58Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Starbucks logo
SBUX
Starbucks
2.5$118.34-1.4%$139.32 billion$23.52 billion153.69Analyst Report
Chipotle Mexican Grill logo
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill
1.6$1,535.04-0.5%$43.26 billion$5.59 billion183.62Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
Yum! Brands logo
YUM
Yum! Brands
2.3$118.06-0.4%$35.25 billion$5.60 billion35.45Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Darden Restaurants logo
DRI
Darden Restaurants
2.0$146.33-2.2%$19.07 billion$7.81 billion-152.43Decrease in Short Interest
Domino's Pizza logo
DPZ
Domino's Pizza
1.9$394.83-0.5%$15.32 billion$3.62 billion33.83Analyst Revision
Texas Roadhouse logo
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse
1.5$98.93-2.1%$6.89 billion$2.76 billion126.83Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
The Wendy's logo
WEN
The Wendy's
2.4$22.47-0.8%$4.99 billion$1.71 billion46.81Analyst Revision
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store logo
CBRL
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
1.5$171.59-0.5%$4.07 billion$2.52 billion43.22Analyst Downgrade
Brinker International logo
EAT
Brinker International
1.6$68.82-2.3%$3.13 billion$3.08 billion120.74Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Papa John's International logo
PZZA
Papa John's International
1.5$93.60-0.9%$3.08 billion$1.62 billion117.00
Jack in the Box logo
JACK
Jack in the Box
1.6$117.95-1.4%$2.69 billion$1.02 billion30.32Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
The Cheesecake Factory logo
CAKE
The Cheesecake Factory
1.3$57.84-0.3%$2.65 billion$2.48 billion-42.53Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Bloomin' Brands logo
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands
1.4$28.16-0.7%$2.50 billion$4.14 billion-20.55Analyst Report
BJ's Restaurants logo
BJRI
BJ's Restaurants
1.3$58.69-0.2%$1.36 billion$1.16 billion-51.03Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Denny's logo
DENN
Denny's
1.4$17.60-0.1%$1.13 billion$541.39 million110.01Analyst Report
Chuy's logo
CHUY
Chuy's
1.2$46.20-0.4%$910.93 million$426.36 million-105.00Analyst Report
News Coverage
Ruth's Hospitality Group logo
RUTH
Ruth's Hospitality Group
1.2$24.95-0.8%$872.30 million$468.03 million-67.43Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
RCI Hospitality logo
RICK
RCI Hospitality
1.5$66.64-3.0%$599.76 million$132.33 million-98.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers logo
RRGB
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers
1.2$35.45-0.8%$552.35 million$1.32 billion-1.91
Fiesta Restaurant Group logo
FRGI
Fiesta Restaurant Group
0.9$13.73-0.2%$360.85 million$660.94 million-10.90News Coverage
Biglari logo
BH
Biglari
0.9$134.01-0.2%$305.01 million$668.84 million-0.75
Carrols Restaurant Group logo
TAST
Carrols Restaurant Group
2.0$5.68-1.8%$302.95 million$1.46 billion-12.62Gap Down
Nathan's Famous logo
NATH
Nathan's Famous
1.0$65.17-0.8%$268.18 million$103.32 million22.40
Luby's logo
LUB
Luby's
0.7$3.49-0.6%$107.29 million$214.02 million-3.56News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.