Go Pro

Dine Brands Global (DIN) Competitors

Dine Brands Global logo
$33.10 -0.69 (-2.04%)
As of 11:02 AM Eastern

DIN vs. BJRI, CAKE, CBRL, TXRH, and ARCO

Should you buy Dine Brands Global stock or one of its competitors? Dine Brands Global's main competitors and comparable companies include BJ's Restaurants (BJRI), Cheesecake Factory (CAKE), Cracker Barrel Old Country Store (CBRL), Texas Roadhouse (TXRH), and Arcos Dorados (ARCO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "restaurants" industry.

How does Dine Brands Global compare to BJ's Restaurants?

Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) and BJ's Restaurants (NASDAQ:BJRI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BJ's Restaurants has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Dine Brands Global presently has a consensus target price of $32.83, suggesting a potential downside of 0.81%. BJ's Restaurants has a consensus target price of $56.88, suggesting a potential downside of 10.99%. Given Dine Brands Global's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than BJ's Restaurants.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dine Brands Global
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.88
BJ's Restaurants
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.27

BJ's Restaurants has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. BJ's Restaurants is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dine Brands Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dine Brands Global$879.30M0.48$17.10M$0.4770.43
BJ's Restaurants$1.40B0.97$48.81M$1.8734.17

92.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 100.0% of BJ's Restaurants shares are held by institutional investors. 6.7% of Dine Brands Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of BJ's Restaurants shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

BJ's Restaurants has a net margin of 2.86% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 0.75%. BJ's Restaurants' return on equity of 12.93% beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dine Brands Global0.75% -20.34% 3.17%
BJ's Restaurants 2.86%12.93%4.79%

In the previous week, BJ's Restaurants had 13 more articles in the media than Dine Brands Global. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for BJ's Restaurants and 4 mentions for Dine Brands Global. Dine Brands Global's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat BJ's Restaurants' score of 0.62 indicating that Dine Brands Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Dine Brands Global
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BJ's Restaurants
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

BJ's Restaurants beats Dine Brands Global on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Dine Brands Global compare to Cheesecake Factory?

Cheesecake Factory (NASDAQ:CAKE) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Cheesecake Factory has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Cheesecake Factory is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dine Brands Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cheesecake Factory$3.75B1.39$148.43M$3.6928.39
Dine Brands Global$879.30M0.48$17.10M$0.4770.43

Cheesecake Factory has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

94.5% of Cheesecake Factory shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are held by institutional investors. 8.0% of Cheesecake Factory shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Dine Brands Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cheesecake Factory has a net margin of 4.61% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 0.75%. Cheesecake Factory's return on equity of 43.97% beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cheesecake Factory4.61% 43.97% 6.18%
Dine Brands Global 0.75%-20.34%3.17%

Cheesecake Factory pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Dine Brands Global pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Cheesecake Factory pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dine Brands Global pays out 161.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Cheesecake Factory presently has a consensus price target of $81.00, suggesting a potential downside of 22.67%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $32.83, suggesting a potential downside of 0.81%. Given Dine Brands Global's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than Cheesecake Factory.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cheesecake Factory
2 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.28
Dine Brands Global
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.88

In the previous week, Cheesecake Factory had 14 more articles in the media than Dine Brands Global. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Cheesecake Factory and 4 mentions for Dine Brands Global. Cheesecake Factory's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Dine Brands Global's score of 0.77 indicating that Cheesecake Factory is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cheesecake Factory
8 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Dine Brands Global
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Cheesecake Factory beats Dine Brands Global on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Dine Brands Global compare to Cracker Barrel Old Country Store?

Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) and Cracker Barrel Old Country Store (NASDAQ:CBRL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Dine Brands Global presently has a consensus target price of $32.83, suggesting a potential downside of 0.81%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a consensus target price of $48.14, suggesting a potential downside of 12.66%. Given Dine Brands Global's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Dine Brands Global is more favorable than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dine Brands Global
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.88
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
3 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a net margin of 0.79% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 0.75%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's return on equity of 2.78% beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dine Brands Global0.75% -20.34% 3.17%
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store 0.79%2.78%0.58%

In the previous week, Dine Brands Global had 1 more articles in the media than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Dine Brands Global and 3 mentions for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Dine Brands Global's score of 0.77 indicating that Cracker Barrel Old Country Store is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Dine Brands Global
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

92.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dine Brands Global pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Dine Brands Global pays out 161.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store pays out 86.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dine Brands Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dine Brands Global$879.30M0.48$17.10M$0.4770.43
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store$3.34B0.37$46.38M$1.1647.52

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store beats Dine Brands Global on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Dine Brands Global compare to Texas Roadhouse?

Texas Roadhouse (NASDAQ:TXRH) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Texas Roadhouse had 12 more articles in the media than Dine Brands Global. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Texas Roadhouse and 4 mentions for Dine Brands Global. Texas Roadhouse's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Dine Brands Global's score of 0.77 indicating that Texas Roadhouse is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Texas Roadhouse
13 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Dine Brands Global
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

94.8% of Texas Roadhouse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Texas Roadhouse shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Dine Brands Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Texas Roadhouse has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Texas Roadhouse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dine Brands Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Texas Roadhouse$5.88B2.25$405.55M$6.2532.20
Dine Brands Global$879.30M0.48$17.10M$0.4770.43

Texas Roadhouse presently has a consensus price target of $208.48, suggesting a potential upside of 3.58%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $32.83, suggesting a potential downside of 0.81%. Given Texas Roadhouse's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Texas Roadhouse is more favorable than Dine Brands Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Texas Roadhouse
0 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Dine Brands Global
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.88

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 6.63% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 0.75%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 27.20% beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Texas Roadhouse6.63% 27.20% 11.75%
Dine Brands Global 0.75%-20.34%3.17%

Texas Roadhouse pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Dine Brands Global pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Texas Roadhouse pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dine Brands Global pays out 161.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Texas Roadhouse has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Summary

Texas Roadhouse beats Dine Brands Global on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Dine Brands Global compare to Arcos Dorados?

Arcos Dorados (NYSE:ARCO) and Dine Brands Global (NYSE:DIN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Arcos Dorados pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Dine Brands Global pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Arcos Dorados pays out 9.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dine Brands Global pays out 161.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Arcos Dorados has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Arcos Dorados presently has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 35.14%. Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $32.83, indicating a potential downside of 0.81%. Given Arcos Dorados' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Arcos Dorados is more favorable than Dine Brands Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Arcos Dorados
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Dine Brands Global
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.88

Arcos Dorados has a net margin of 5.15% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 0.75%. Arcos Dorados' return on equity of 12.50% beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Arcos Dorados5.15% 12.50% 2.58%
Dine Brands Global 0.75%-20.34%3.17%

In the previous week, Arcos Dorados had 5 more articles in the media than Dine Brands Global. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Arcos Dorados and 4 mentions for Dine Brands Global. Arcos Dorados' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Dine Brands Global's score of 0.77 indicating that Arcos Dorados is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Arcos Dorados
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Dine Brands Global
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Arcos Dorados has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dine Brands Global has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Arcos Dorados has higher revenue and earnings than Dine Brands Global. Arcos Dorados is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dine Brands Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arcos Dorados$4.68B0.35$212.12M$1.226.37
Dine Brands Global$879.30M0.48$17.10M$0.4770.43

55.9% of Arcos Dorados shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Dine Brands Global shares are held by institutional investors. 6.7% of Dine Brands Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Arcos Dorados beats Dine Brands Global on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Dine Brands Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DIN vs. The Competition

MetricDine Brands GlobalHotels, Restaurants & Leisure IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$419.05M$8.20B$13.01B$24.19B
Dividend Yield2.17%3.74%54.44%3.72%
P/E Ratio70.4322.9546.8830.11
Price / Sales0.48351.9195.8819.97
Price / Cash4.2922.1526.1831.97
Price / Book-1.434.903.976.84
Net Income$17.10M$260.60M$446.21M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-4.48%1.64%-0.67%-0.98%
1 Month Performance-2.98%1.01%0.66%2.54%
1 Year Performance54.64%-2.96%-0.36%17.82%

Dine Brands Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DIN
Dine Brands Global
2.6269 of 5 stars
$33.10
-2.0%
$32.83
-0.8%
+56.5%$419.05M$879.30M70.433,520
BJRI
BJ's Restaurants
3.5357 of 5 stars
$68.65
-1.3%
$56.88
-17.2%
+82.9%$1.48B$1.40B36.7122,000
CAKE
Cheesecake Factory
3.4355 of 5 stars
$111.19
+3.9%
$81.00
-27.2%
+70.5%$5.33B$3.75B30.1348,400
CBRL
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
2.5946 of 5 stars
$56.10
-2.9%
$48.14
-14.2%
-5.7%$1.29B$3.34B48.3676,730
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse
4.7578 of 5 stars
$207.46
-0.3%
$208.48
+0.5%
+15.4%$13.67B$5.88B33.19101,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:DIN) was last updated on 8/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners