Brinker International Competitors

Brinker International (NYSE:EAT) and McDonald's (NYSE:MCD) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Brinker International and McDonald's' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Brinker International and McDonald's' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

McDonald's has higher revenue and earnings than Brinker International. McDonald's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brinker International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Brinker International and McDonald's, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Brinker International currently has a consensus target price of $45.5789, suggesting a potential downside of 7.92%. McDonald's has a consensus target price of $227.48, suggesting a potential upside of 4.83%. Given McDonald's' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe McDonald's is more favorable than Brinker International.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

92.5% of Brinker International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.1% of McDonald's shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Brinker International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of McDonald's shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Brinker International has a beta of 2.74, indicating that its stock price is 174% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, McDonald's has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

McDonald's beats Brinker International on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX) and Brinker International (NYSE:EAT) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Starbucks and Brinker International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

68.4% of Starbucks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of Brinker International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Starbucks shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Brinker International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Starbucks and Brinker International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Starbucks currently has a consensus target price of $88.44, suggesting a potential downside of 8.71%. Brinker International has a consensus target price of $45.5789, suggesting a potential downside of 7.92%. Given Brinker International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brinker International is more favorable than Starbucks.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Starbucks and Brinker International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Starbucks has higher revenue and earnings than Brinker International. Brinker International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Starbucks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Starbucks has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brinker International has a beta of 2.74, indicating that its stock price is 174% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Starbucks beats Brinker International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Brinker International (NYSE:EAT) and Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Brinker International and Chipotle Mexican Grill's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

92.5% of Brinker International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.8% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Brinker International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Brinker International and Chipotle Mexican Grill, as provided by MarketBeat.

Brinker International presently has a consensus price target of $45.5789, suggesting a potential downside of 7.92%. Chipotle Mexican Grill has a consensus price target of $1,335.0345, suggesting a potential upside of 4.22%. Given Chipotle Mexican Grill's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Chipotle Mexican Grill is more favorable than Brinker International.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Brinker International and Chipotle Mexican Grill's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Chipotle Mexican Grill has higher revenue and earnings than Brinker International. Brinker International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipotle Mexican Grill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Brinker International has a beta of 2.74, suggesting that its stock price is 174% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Chipotle Mexican Grill beats Brinker International on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Brinker International (NYSE:EAT) and Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Volatility & Risk

Brinker International has a beta of 2.74, suggesting that its stock price is 174% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

92.5% of Brinker International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.2% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Brinker International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Brinker International and Yum! Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Brinker International and Yum! Brands' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Yum! Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Brinker International. Brinker International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yum! Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Brinker International and Yum! Brands, as provided by MarketBeat.

Brinker International presently has a consensus price target of $45.5789, suggesting a potential downside of 7.92%. Yum! Brands has a consensus price target of $101.7222, suggesting a potential downside of 3.12%. Given Yum! Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Yum! Brands is more favorable than Brinker International.

Domino's Pizza (NYSE:DPZ) and Brinker International (NYSE:EAT) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Domino's Pizza has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brinker International has a beta of 2.74, meaning that its stock price is 174% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.0% of Domino's Pizza shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of Brinker International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Domino's Pizza shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Brinker International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Domino's Pizza and Brinker International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Domino's Pizza and Brinker International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Domino's Pizza has higher revenue and earnings than Brinker International. Brinker International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Domino's Pizza, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Domino's Pizza and Brinker International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Domino's Pizza presently has a consensus target price of $423.5714, suggesting a potential upside of 9.39%. Brinker International has a consensus target price of $45.5789, suggesting a potential downside of 7.92%. Given Domino's Pizza's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Domino's Pizza is more favorable than Brinker International.

Summary

Domino's Pizza beats Brinker International on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) and Brinker International (NYSE:EAT) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brinker International has a beta of 2.74, meaning that its stock price is 174% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

82.9% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of Brinker International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Brinker International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Darden Restaurants and Brinker International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Darden Restaurants and Brinker International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Brinker International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Darden Restaurants. Brinker International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darden Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Darden Restaurants and Brinker International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Darden Restaurants presently has a consensus target price of $103.3125, suggesting a potential downside of 5.72%. Brinker International has a consensus target price of $45.5789, suggesting a potential downside of 7.92%. Given Darden Restaurants' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Darden Restaurants is more favorable than Brinker International.

Summary

Darden Restaurants beats Brinker International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.