Log in
NYSE:EAT

Brinker International Competitors

$49.50
+0.90 (+1.85 %)
(As of 11/23/2020 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$47.67
Now: $49.50
$50.05
50-Day Range
$41.96
MA: $46.25
$51.19
52-Week Range
$7.00
Now: $49.50
$52.95
Volume1.06 million shs
Average Volume2.42 million shs
Market Capitalization$2.24 billion
P/E Ratio86.84
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.74

Competitors

Brinker International (NYSE:EAT) Vs. MCD, SBUX, CMG, YUM, DPZ, and DRI

Should you be buying EAT stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "restaurants" are considered alternatives and competitors to Brinker International, including McDonald's (MCD), Starbucks (SBUX), Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), Yum! Brands (YUM), Domino's Pizza (DPZ), and Darden Restaurants (DRI).

Brinker International (NYSE:EAT) and McDonald's (NYSE:MCD) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Brinker International and McDonald's' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Brinker International0.67%-12.26%2.62%
McDonald's24.78%-52.78%9.69%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Brinker International and McDonald's' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brinker International$3.08 billion0.73$24.40 million$1.7128.95
McDonald's$21.08 billion7.67$6.03 billion$7.8427.68

McDonald's has higher revenue and earnings than Brinker International. McDonald's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brinker International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Brinker International and McDonald's, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Brinker International081302.62
McDonald's062102.78

Brinker International currently has a consensus target price of $45.5789, suggesting a potential downside of 7.92%. McDonald's has a consensus target price of $227.48, suggesting a potential upside of 4.83%. Given McDonald's' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe McDonald's is more favorable than Brinker International.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

92.5% of Brinker International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.1% of McDonald's shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Brinker International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of McDonald's shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Brinker International has a beta of 2.74, indicating that its stock price is 174% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, McDonald's has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

McDonald's beats Brinker International on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX) and Brinker International (NYSE:EAT) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Starbucks and Brinker International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Starbucks5.56%-22.26%6.26%
Brinker International0.67%-12.26%2.62%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

68.4% of Starbucks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of Brinker International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Starbucks shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Brinker International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Starbucks and Brinker International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Starbucks0121502.56
Brinker International081302.62

Starbucks currently has a consensus target price of $88.44, suggesting a potential downside of 8.71%. Brinker International has a consensus target price of $45.5789, suggesting a potential downside of 7.92%. Given Brinker International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brinker International is more favorable than Starbucks.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Starbucks and Brinker International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Starbucks$26.51 billion4.27$3.60 billion$2.8334.23
Brinker International$3.08 billion0.73$24.40 million$1.7128.95

Starbucks has higher revenue and earnings than Brinker International. Brinker International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Starbucks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Starbucks has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brinker International has a beta of 2.74, indicating that its stock price is 174% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Starbucks beats Brinker International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Brinker International (NYSE:EAT) and Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Brinker International and Chipotle Mexican Grill's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Brinker International0.67%-12.26%2.62%
Chipotle Mexican Grill4.08%16.70%5.38%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

92.5% of Brinker International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.8% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Brinker International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Brinker International and Chipotle Mexican Grill, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Brinker International081302.62
Chipotle Mexican Grill0151612.56

Brinker International presently has a consensus price target of $45.5789, suggesting a potential downside of 7.92%. Chipotle Mexican Grill has a consensus price target of $1,335.0345, suggesting a potential upside of 4.22%. Given Chipotle Mexican Grill's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Chipotle Mexican Grill is more favorable than Brinker International.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Brinker International and Chipotle Mexican Grill's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brinker International$3.08 billion0.73$24.40 million$1.7128.95
Chipotle Mexican Grill$5.59 billion6.42$350.16 million$14.0591.17

Chipotle Mexican Grill has higher revenue and earnings than Brinker International. Brinker International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipotle Mexican Grill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Brinker International has a beta of 2.74, suggesting that its stock price is 174% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Chipotle Mexican Grill beats Brinker International on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Brinker International (NYSE:EAT) and Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Volatility & Risk

Brinker International has a beta of 2.74, suggesting that its stock price is 174% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

92.5% of Brinker International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.2% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Brinker International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Brinker International and Yum! Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Brinker International0.67%-12.26%2.62%
Yum! Brands18.78%-12.42%17.73%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Brinker International and Yum! Brands' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brinker International$3.08 billion0.73$24.40 million$1.7128.95
Yum! Brands$5.60 billion5.66$1.29 billion$3.5529.58

Yum! Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Brinker International. Brinker International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yum! Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Brinker International and Yum! Brands, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Brinker International081302.62
Yum! Brands013802.38

Brinker International presently has a consensus price target of $45.5789, suggesting a potential downside of 7.92%. Yum! Brands has a consensus price target of $101.7222, suggesting a potential downside of 3.12%. Given Yum! Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Yum! Brands is more favorable than Brinker International.

Domino's Pizza (NYSE:DPZ) and Brinker International (NYSE:EAT) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Domino's Pizza has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brinker International has a beta of 2.74, meaning that its stock price is 174% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.0% of Domino's Pizza shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of Brinker International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Domino's Pizza shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Brinker International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Domino's Pizza and Brinker International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Domino's Pizza11.98%-14.11%31.41%
Brinker International0.67%-12.26%2.62%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Domino's Pizza and Brinker International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Domino's Pizza$3.62 billion4.22$400.71 million$9.5740.46
Brinker International$3.08 billion0.73$24.40 million$1.7128.95

Domino's Pizza has higher revenue and earnings than Brinker International. Brinker International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Domino's Pizza, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Domino's Pizza and Brinker International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Domino's Pizza082202.73
Brinker International081302.62

Domino's Pizza presently has a consensus target price of $423.5714, suggesting a potential upside of 9.39%. Brinker International has a consensus target price of $45.5789, suggesting a potential downside of 7.92%. Given Domino's Pizza's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Domino's Pizza is more favorable than Brinker International.

Summary

Domino's Pizza beats Brinker International on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) and Brinker International (NYSE:EAT) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brinker International has a beta of 2.74, meaning that its stock price is 174% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

82.9% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of Brinker International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Brinker International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Darden Restaurants and Brinker International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Darden Restaurants-2.60%12.45%2.94%
Brinker International0.67%-12.26%2.62%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Darden Restaurants and Brinker International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Darden Restaurants$7.81 billion1.83$-52,400,000.00$3.1335.01
Brinker International$3.08 billion0.73$24.40 million$1.7128.95

Brinker International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Darden Restaurants. Brinker International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darden Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Darden Restaurants and Brinker International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Darden Restaurants0122002.63
Brinker International081302.62

Darden Restaurants presently has a consensus target price of $103.3125, suggesting a potential downside of 5.72%. Brinker International has a consensus target price of $45.5789, suggesting a potential downside of 7.92%. Given Darden Restaurants' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Darden Restaurants is more favorable than Brinker International.

Summary

Darden Restaurants beats Brinker International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Brinker International Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
McDonald's logo
MCD
McDonald's
2.7$217.00+1.3%$161.69 billion$21.08 billion34.39
Starbucks logo
SBUX
Starbucks
2.5$96.88+0.1%$113.25 billion$26.51 billion87.28
Chipotle Mexican Grill logo
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill
1.6$1,281.00+0.9%$35.84 billion$5.59 billion153.23
Yum! Brands logo
YUM
Yum! Brands
2.3$105.00+0.0%$31.68 billion$5.60 billion31.53Decrease in Short Interest
Domino's Pizza logo
DPZ
Domino's Pizza
1.9$387.21+0.6%$15.26 billion$3.62 billion33.18
Darden Restaurants logo
DRI
Darden Restaurants
2.0$109.58+1.0%$14.27 billion$7.81 billion-73.54Analyst Upgrade
Heavy News Reporting
Dunkin' Brands Group logo
DNKN
Dunkin' Brands Group
1.8$106.22+0.1%$8.75 billion$1.37 billion40.08Decrease in Short Interest
Texas Roadhouse logo
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse
1.5$75.63+2.3%$5.25 billion$2.76 billion85.94Analyst Upgrade
The Wendy's logo
WEN
The Wendy's
2.0$21.97+2.5%$4.92 billion$1.71 billion45.77Decrease in Short Interest
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store logo
CBRL
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
1.9$141.69+1.8%$3.36 billion$2.52 billion-99.78
Papa John's International logo
PZZA
Papa John's International
1.7$81.24+2.5%$2.68 billion$1.62 billion232.12
Jack in the Box logo
JACK
Jack in the Box
2.0$90.65+0.7%$2.06 billion$950.11 million29.15Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
The Cheesecake Factory logo
CAKE
The Cheesecake Factory
1.2$35.05+0.7%$1.60 billion$2.48 billion-25.77
Bloomin' Brands logo
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands
1.8$17.41+1.9%$1.52 billion$4.14 billion-12.71
Dine Brands Global logo
DIN
Dine Brands Global
1.9$62.37+3.5%$1.02 billion$910.18 million-13.74
BJ's Restaurants logo
BJRI
BJ's Restaurants
1.3$36.44+1.5%$813.23 million$1.16 billion-31.69
Denny's logo
DENN
Denny's
1.6$11.41+7.4%$727.59 million$541.39 million71.32
Ruth's Hospitality Group logo
RUTH
Ruth's Hospitality Group
1.0$14.93+3.8%$521.06 million$468.03 million-248.83
Chuy's logo
CHUY
Chuy's
1.4$23.83+2.9%$469.33 million$426.36 million-54.16
Carrols Restaurant Group logo
TAST
Carrols Restaurant Group
1.7$6.02+1.0%$313.59 million$1.46 billion-9.12
Fiesta Restaurant Group logo
FRGI
Fiesta Restaurant Group
0.9$11.98+5.0%$310.53 million$660.94 million-9.51
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers logo
RRGB
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers
1.3$19.17+3.4%$297.94 million$1.32 billion-1.05
Nathan's Famous logo
NATH
Nathan's Famous
1.0$60.15+1.1%$247.52 million$103.32 million20.81
Biglari logo
BH
Biglari
1.1$107.40+0.1%$244.44 million$668.84 million-0.60
RCI Hospitality logo
RICK
RCI Hospitality
1.8$26.30+2.3%$239.99 million$181.06 million-82.19
Luby's logo
LUB
Luby's
0.8$3.10+5.8%$95.09 million$323.47 million-2.03
This page was last updated on 11/24/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.